Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (한국임상약학회지)

Korean College Of Clinical Pharmacy (한국임상약학회)
권호 표지

Readability of Patient Information Leaflets in Clinical Trials

임상시험 시험대상자설명서의 가독성 평가

  • Received : 2015.12.28
  • Accepted : 2016.03.12
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Elements of informed consent including capacity, disclosure, understanding, voluntariness, and permission of the participant, are all crucial for clinical trials to be legally and ethically valid. During the informed consent process, the patient information leaflet is an important information source which prospective research subjects can utilize in their decision-making. In the adequate provision of information, KGCP guideline necessitate 20 specific items, as well as the use language that individuals can understand. This study measures the vocabulary level of patient information leaflets in an effort to provide an objective evaluation on the readability of such material. Methods: The word difficulty of 13 leaflets was quantitatively evaluated using Kim kwang Hae's vocabulary grading framework, which was compared to the difficulty level of words found in the $6^{th}$ grade Korean textbook. The quantitative outcomes were statistically analyzed using chi-squared tests and linear by linear association for ordinal data. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the vocabulary level and frequency of words in leaflets and the 6th Korean textbook. The leaflets were on average 260 sentences and about roughly 15 pages long, including lay language (easier or equal to language used in primary school) of around 12% less; technical language of around 4.5% more. As the vocabulary grades increase, there was a distinct difference in vocabulary level between Korean textbook and each information leaflet (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patient information leaflets may fail to provide appropriate information for self-determination by clinical trial subject through the difficulty level of its wording. Improvements in the degree of patients' understanding and appropriate use of information leaflets are collaboratively equipped to strengthen patient's autonomy and therefore guaranteeing participant's rights.

Keywords

References

  1. Gamble VN. Under the shadow of tuskegee: African americans and health care. Am J Public Health 1997;87(11):1773-1778. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.11.1773
  2. KFDA. Understanding the clinical research ethics. 2005; The publication of administrative 11-147012-000152-01.
  3. The Korean Supreme Court's decision on 2009 DA.17417(2009.5.21)
  4. Ministry of health and Welfare. News letter 2014.12.2; Complementary measures on a five-year plan of pharmaceutical industry promotion.
  5. Hee Young S. The suggestions for improving informed consent in clinical trials. Kor J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;16(1):13-20.
  6. Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Informed consent: What did the doctor say? Lancet 1999;353(9165):1713.
  7. Resnik DB. Do informed consent documents matter? Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(2):114-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2008.10.004
  8. Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L et al. Adult literacy in America : A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S Dept of Education;1993.
  9. Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 2003;348(8):721-726. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021212
  10. Jeong IS, Sohn JH, Shin TG. Evaluating the quality of informed consent in clinical research. Korean J Med Ethics 2010;13(1):43-58.
  11. Kim EJ, Development and evaluation of simplified informed consent for clinical trial. M.S. in Nursing. Thesis for Nursing Kyungpook National University. 2014.
  12. Shin HY. The suggestion for improving informed consent in clinical trials. Korean J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008;16(1):13-20.
  13. Moon HL, Kim HK, Lee KS, et al. A survey of the cognition on clinical trial and informed consent of cancer patients and their families. Korean J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995;3(2):141-153.
  14. Kim KH, Korean vocabulary for education. Seoul:Pagijong press, 2003.
  15. Lee I-H, Lee HW, Je NK, et al. Assessment of readability and appropriate usability based on the product labeling of over-the-counter drugs in Korea. Yakhak hoeji. 2012;56(5):333-45.
  16. Kim LY, Lee I-H. Readability of the product labeling information of over-the-counter pharmaceuticals in convenience store. Korean J Clin Pharm 2015;25(1):27-33.
  17. Health Literacy Innovations. National survey of Medicaid guidelines for health literacy. Health literacy Innovations. 2007.
  18. Lee SY. A Comparative study on readabilities of elementary school textbooks. Korean Lange Edu Res 2011;41:169-193.
  19. Kang SJ, Koh HJ. An Analysis on the readability of the texts in elementary school science textbooks in terms of word and sentence units. J Korean Elemen Sci Edu 2014;33(3):549-557. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.3.549
  20. Lee SH, Choe BI, Kim CM, et al. A survey on perception of clinical trial of pharmaceuticals and informed consent in Korea. Kor J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;17(1):72-92.
  21. Jefford M, Mileshkin L, Matthews J, et al. Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials is high, but understanding is a problem. Supp Care Cancer 2011;19(3):371-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0829-6
  22. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, et al. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2001;358(9295): 1772-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06805-2
  23. Morrow GR. How readable are subject consent forms? JAMA 1980; 244(1):56-58. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1980.03310010042026
  24. Ogloff JR, Otto RK. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research. Ethics Behav 1991; 1(4):239-252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0104_2
  25. Sharp S. Consent documents for oncology trials:Dose anybody read these things? Am J Clin Oncol 2004;27(6):570-575. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3
  26. Resnik DB, Peddada S, Altilio J et al. Oncology consent forms:failure to disclose off-site treatment availability. IRB 2008;30(6):7-11.
  27. Cheung WY, Pond GR, Hesleqrave RJ, et al. The contents and readability of informed consent forms for oncology clinical trials. Am J Clin Oncol 2010;33(4):387-392. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e3181b20641
  28. Berger O, Gronberq BH, Sand K et al. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Ann Oncol 2009;20(2):379-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn623
  29. The National Institute of Korean language. National adult basic literacy survey. In ; 2008-1-57:1-125.
  30. Schillinger D, Bindman A, Stewart A, et al. Health literacy and the quality of physician-patient interpersonal communication. Patient Educ Couns 2004;3:315-323.
  31. Kripalani S, Jacobson TA, Mugalla IC, et al. Health literacy and the quality of physician patient communication during hospitalization. J Hosp Med 2010;5(5):269-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.667
  32. Lee YT, Yoon TY, Kim SH. Functional health literacy and understanding of explanation according to characteristics of patients. Health Soc Sci 2012;32:145-171.
  33. Hong IH, Eun Y. Health literacy of inpatients at general hospital. Korean J Adult Nurs 2012;24(5):477-488. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2012.24.5.477
  34. Kim S-S, Kim S-H, Lee S-Y. Health literacy:development of a Korean health literacy assessment tool. Korean J Health Edu Promotion 2005;22(4):215-227.
  35. Jubelirer SJ, Linton JC, Magnetti SM. Reading versus comprehension: Implications for patient education and consent in an outpatient oncology clinic. J Cancer Edu 1994;9(1):26-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08858199409528261
  36. Oh SY, Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL quarterly 2001;35(1): 69-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587860
  37. Darian S. Adapting authentic materials for language teaching. English Teach Forum 2001;39:2-7.