• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2023

This study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey study that confirms the effect on subjects that prefer clinical practice in order to prepare basic data for efficient clinical practice guidance for nursing college students. The study participants were 201 students attending C University, and the data collection period was from October 1 to October 15, 2022. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 as descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, Chi square test, ANOVA test, and Multiple regression test. As a result of the analysis, it was found that clinical decision-making and critical thinking were correlated under the statistical significance level (r=.730, p<0.01). The most favorite clinical practice department was community nursing, and male students preferred community nursing the most (Male=45.6%, χ²=.000), female students were found to prefer similar levels of practical subjects with child nursing , adult nursing, and maternal nursing(χ²=000).Clinical decision-making was found to be higher in students who preferred community nursing at a statistical significance level than those who preferred child nursing (F=4.91, p<0.01). Critical thinking was higher among students who preferred adult nursing than those who preferred other subjects (F=4.65, p<0.01). Through the analysis results, it was found that general characteristics vary, but clinical decision-making ability and critical thinking affect the preference of clinical practice subjects. Therefore, based on the results of this study, the professor of clinical practice suggests the development of a program to foster clinical decision-making and critical thinking to make students interested in clinical practice subjects.

• 창의정보문화연구
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.237-243
• /
• 2019

컴퓨팅 기술을 활용하여 문제를 해결하는 능력, 의사소통하는 능력, 협업하는 능력 등이 미래사회에 필요한 핵심역량으로 자리잡고 있다. 이러한 역량을 향상시키기 위해 우리나라 정보 교과에서는 알고리즘과 프로그래밍 능력을 중요한 목표로 설정하고 있다. 알고리즘적 사고는 컴퓨팅 사고력의 핵심적인 요소로 알고리즘을 설계하거나 프로그래밍 하는데 매우 중요한 역할을 하는 것으로 알려져 있고, 정보 교과의 목표를 설정하거나 학생의 성취를 측정할 때 활용되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 초,중,고등학생의 알고리즘적 사고를 측정하는 문항을 개발하고 수준을 측정하였다. 측정 결과, 학교급이 높아질 수록 알고리즘적 사고를 향상되는 것으로 분석되었고, 성별간 차이는 없는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구를 통해 알고리즘적 사고의 수준을 위한 문항을 구성하거나 난이도를 설정하는데 가이드를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.104-112
• /
• 2013

We examined the strategies to stimulate the reflective thinking using science notebook for the improvement of problem solving ability which is one of the core skills for the future. The strategies we derived have four steps which are input, output, solving mission and reflection as my own mirror. We applied the strategies to the 6th grade class for autumn semester in order to examine the students learning process and the result. We could observe that students looked into their own learning and had a time to look back their activities in the class. We could also confirmed that science notebook would be effective to improve the problem solving as stimulating the reflective thinking. In addition, we could specify the strategy of using science notebook in the class. At a 'input' stage, students should be able to choose their own learning style as their preference and teacher need to give them proper feedback. Interaction with peers should be emphasized during the activities as 'question attack' and 'question defense' in 'output' stage and 'solving mission' stage. You should suggest the students various method to record their thought from looking back their classroom activities instead of mere writing. We also examine the students achievement from the students' notebook and Meta Cognitive Awareness test. As a result, students who had studied using science notebook showed statistically meaningful higher achievement than controlled students.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제48권2호
• /
• pp.149-167
• /
• 2009

This study was aimed to examine problem-solving ability of fifth graders on two types of mathematical essay problems, and to analyze the process of mathematical justification in solving the essay problems. For this purpose, a total of 14 mathematical essay problems were developed, in which half of the items were single tasks and the other half were data-provided tasks. Sixteen students with higher academic achievements in mathematics and the Korean language were chosen, and were given to solve the mathematical essay problems individually. They then were asked to justify their solution methods in groups of 4 and to reach a consensus through negotiation among group members. Students were good at understanding the given single tasks but they often revealed lack of logical thinking and representation. They also tended to use everyday language rather than mathematical language in explaining their solution processes. Some students experienced difficulty in understanding the meaning of data in the essay problems. With regard to mathematical justification, students employed more internal justification by experience or mathematical logic than external justification by authority. Given this, this paper includes implications for teachers on how they need to teach mathematics in order to foster students' logical thinking and communication.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.1038-1043
• /
• 2009

최근 교육현장에서는 창의력과 문제해결력과 같은 고등사고능력을 신장시키기 위한 교육이 초 중등교육뿐만 아니라 대학교육에서도 요구되어지고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 대학생을 대상으로 컴퓨터 프로그래밍 교육을 실시함에 있어 학생들의 고등사고능력을 신장시키기 위한 컴퓨터 프로그래밍 교육에 대하여 논하고자 한다. 이를 위해 선행된 사례들과 문헌연구를 기반으로 프로젝트학습 기반의 컴퓨터 프로그래밍 교육을 제시하고자 한다. 본 연구가 컴퓨터 및 공학교육 전반에 걸쳐 컴퓨터 프로그래밍 교육을 실시하는데 있어 작은 밑거름이 되기를 기대한다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.309-318
• /
• 2003

Scientific reasoning is one of the main concerns in current science education. This study have tried to answer on the question whether Korean science education has the potential to help improve of students' ability to think scientifically. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between reasoning patterns evident in science textbook and science examination items, and students' scientific reasoning skills across grades in Korea. 1975 subjects (1022 females and 953 males) were administered in the Lawson's Test of Scientific Reasoning skills. Forty seven science textbooks and 240 assessment instrument were analyzed by several scientific reasoning keys. Scientific reasoning patterns were adopted from Lawson's classification which characterized the patterns as the empirical-inductive and the hypothetical-deductive. This study found that reasoning patterns evident in textbook analyses and assessment instrumental items do not evidentce the potential to stimulate the development of students' reasoning skill. In order to improve the students' abilities to think and achieve, higher levels of reasoning must be included in the science textbook and examination. Further, some of scientific reasoning processes, such as generating hypotheses, designing experiments, and logical prediction, were not found in science textbooks and test items in Korean secondary schools. This study also discussed the educational implication of these results and further studies about to develop student's reasoning ability.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.75-84
• /
• 2002

After entering an elementary school, in fact, a number of children regard mathematics as one of very difficult subjects because of its abstractiveness. This is caused by the fact that their basic thinking power is not yet formed or they can not understand the special quality of mathematics. So this article emphasizes the need to build up the higher logical thought and a basic mathematical concept at the lower grade elementary school stage in which the loaming activity on mathematics begins in earnest, that is, at the stage before having an experience on the calculating activity using numbers. But at present the lower grade elementary school students in our country do not understand the special quality of mathematics composed of a various symbolic system and lay stress upon mathematics learning attached to the calculative activity. In order to make the right mathematical concept of the lower grade elementary school, the basic knowledge and ability as follows is sure to be formed. 1) the foundational logical manipulation activity and knowledge 2) the using ability of the sign and symbolic system At the stage on which mathematics learning activity begins, it is a very important task to make the right concept of the abstractive math and nurse the capability for finding mathematical relations covered under the sign system through the continuos loaming activity on . Through the basic logical manipulation activity and the game activity of sign for lower grade elementary school students mentioned in this article, they can not only foster the higher level logical thinking power and the foundational calculative ability but also bring up the interest on the activity of establishing a new problem solving strategy.

• 융합신호처리학회논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.110-115
• /
• 2021

4차 산업혁명 시대가 도래하면서 인공지능에 대한 교육이 활발하게 진행되고 있다. 그러나 기존의 강의식 교육은 지식의 전달을 목적으로 두고 있어 인공지능 분야에서 요구하는 능동적인 문제해결 능력과 인공지능 활용능력을 기르는 데 어려움을 겪는다. 본 논문에서는 이를 해결하기 위해 학습자가 제시된 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 학습이 이루어지는 문제 중심학습 기반 교육 방안을 제안한다. 학습자들에게 제공되는 문제는 완성된 하나의 프로젝트이다. 이 프로젝트는 3가지 종류로 구성된다. 분류 모델, 분류 모델의 학습 데이터, 분류된 결과에 따라 실행될 블록 코드. 해당 프로젝트는 동작은 하지만 각각의 구성요소들이 낮은 동작 수준을 보이도록 설계되어 있다. 이를 해결하기 위해 학습자들은 테스팅을 통해 프로젝트의 문제점을 찾고 토론을 통해 해결책을 찾아 좀 더 높은 동작 수준으로 개선하는 과정을 거치며 컴퓨팅 사고력 향상을 기대할 수 있다.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.479-487
• /
• 2009

현재 우리나라 컴퓨터 교육과정의 성격과 목표 중 가장 강조하는 부분은 정보소양 능력과 문제해결 능력을 배양하여 미래사회를 선도할 수 있는 능력을 키우는 것이다. 그러나 현행의 컴퓨터교육은 응용 프로그램 활용 교육에만 초점이 맞추어져 있어 이 목표를 달성하지 못하고 있으며 문제해결 능력과 논리적 사고력을 높이기 위해 컴퓨터과학 교육에 대한 중요성이 커지고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 언플러그드 학습 방법을 컴퓨터과학 영역 중의 정보표현 영역에 적용하였다. 그 결과 언플러그드 학습 방법이 강의식 학습 방법에 비해 학업성취도가 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이며 높게 나타났다. 또한 정의적 영역에서도 강의식 학습 방법에 비해 긍정적으로 나타났다.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.318-330
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to verify the validity of a measurement tool for Vietnamese high school students' systems thinking abilities. Two quantitative assessment tools, the Systems Thinking Measuring Instrument (Lee et al., 2013) and the Systems Thinking Scale (Dolansky et al., 2020), were used to measure students' systems thinking after translation into Vietnamese. As a result, it was revealed that Cronbach-α for each tool (i.e., STMI and STS) was .917 and .950, respectively, indicating high reliability for both. To validate the construct validity of the translated questionnaire, exploratory factor analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed using AMOS 21.0. For concurrent validity, correlation analysis using structural equation modeling was performed to validate the translated questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that 10 items from the STMI and 12 items from the STS loaded on the intended factors and appropriate factor loading values were obtained. For confirmatory factor analysis, a structural equation model organized with 10 items from the STMI and 12 items from the STS was used. The result of this showed that the convergent validity values of the model were all appropriate, and the model fit indices were analyzed to be χ²/df of 1.892, CFI of .928, TLI of .919, SRMR of .047, and RMSEA of .063, indicating that the model consisting of the 22 items of the two questionnaires was appropriate. Analysis of the concurrent validity of the two tools indicated a high correlation coefficient (.903) and high correlation (.571-.846) among the subfactors. In conclusion, both the STMI and STS are valid quantitative measures of systems thinking, and it can be inferred that the systems thinking of Vietnamese high-school students can be quantitatively measured using the 22 items identified in our analysis. Using the tool validated in this study with other tools (e.g., qualitative assessment) can help accurately measure Vietnamese high school students' systems thinking abilities. Furthermore, these tools can be used to collect evidence and support effective education in ODA projects and volunteer programs.