• 도시과학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.21-27
• /
• 2018

With the increase of the skyscraper center, the development of large-diameter and high-strength reinforcing bars is being carried out to solve the dense reinforcement. In case of the steel reinforced concrete with a small cross section such as beam-column joints, the development length becomes short when straight bars are used. Therefore, it is possible to solve the problem that the development length becomes short by using the bearing strength of the hooked bar and headed bar. In this study, the exterior beam-column joint test of SD700 hooked bar and headed bar with anchorage length of 20db was conducted to extend the development length limitation of hooked bar and headed bar. As a result of the evaluation of the anchorage strength using the design equation by KCI, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.31 for the hooked reinforcing bars. In the case of headed bars, the average of the [measured value]/[predicted value] ratio was 1.12. In addition, in order to compare the anchorage performance of the hooked bar and the headed bar, the measured values were divided by the square root of the compressive strength of the concrete to compare the anchorage strength. Under the same conditions, the anchorage strength of headed bars was 8.5% higher than the hooked bars.

• 콘크리트학회논문집
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.365-373
• /
• 2016

강섬유 보강 초고성능콘크리트(SUPER Concrete)는 일반 콘크리트에 비해 높은 압축강도와 인장강도를 지닌다. 이러한 특성으로 SUPER Concrete로 제작된 부재는 단면을 크게 줄일 수 있고, 확대머리철근의 정착강도가 향상될 것으로 기대된다. 이 연구에서는 120 MPa, 180 MPa SUPER Concrete로 제작된 외부 보-기둥 접합부에 $4d_b$, $6d_b$의 정착길이를 갖는 확대머리철근의 정착 성능을 평가하였다. 모든 실험체에서 600 MPa 이상의 실제 항복강도가 발현된 후 일부 실험체에서 측면파열파괴가 발생되었다. 확대머리철근의 정착강도가 매우 높아 철근이 파단되는 경우도 있었다. 설계기준강도 120 MPa 이상 SUPER Concrete에 정착된 확대머리철근은 $4d_b$의 짧은 정착길이로 콘크리트구조기준에서 허용하는 철근의 최대 설계기준강도 600 MPa를 발현할 수 있는 것으로 평가되었다. 기존에 개발된 일반 콘크리트에 정착된 확대머리철근의 측면파열파괴강도 평가식과 현행 콘크리트구조 기준의 확대머리철근 정착길이 설계식은 실험값을 과소평가하였다. 일반콘크리트에서 개발된 평가식은 SUPER Concrete의 높은 인장강도 특성을 반영하지 못하기 때문으로 분석된다. 확대머리철근 정착강도를 $(f_{ck})^{\alpha}$에 비례한다고 가정하고 실험결과를 회귀분석하여, SUPER Concrete 압축강도의 0.14승에 비례하는 정착강도 평가식이 개발되었다. 40개 실험 자료에 대한 [실험값]/[예측 값]의 평균은 1.01, 변동계수는 5%였다.

• International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.77-85
• /
• 2011

The use of headed bars as opposed to standard 90- or 180-degree hooked bars in beam ends, beam-column joints or other steel congested areas for anchorage and bond has become more favorable due to the fact that steel congestion is often created by large bend diameters or crossties. This research mainly focuses on evaluating the code provisions regarding the use of headed bars. Nine simply supported rectangular concrete beams with headed longitudinal reinforcement were tested under a four-point monotonic loading system. The design clear spacing, which varies from 1.5 to 4.25 times the bar diameter, was the only parameter for the experimental investigation. The test results showed that the closely-spaced headed bars were capable of developing to full yield strength without any severe brittle concrete breakout cone or pullout failure. Bond along the bar was not sufficient due to the early loss of concrete integrity. However, the headed bars were effective for anchorage with no excessive moment capacity reduction. This implies that the clear spacing of about 2 times the bar diameter for headed bars may be reasonable to ensure the development of specified yield strength of headed bars and corresponding member design strength.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2006년도 춘계학술발표회 논문집(I)
• /
• pp.42-45
• /
• 2006

This study investigated headed bar anchorage of exterior beam column joints in nuclear power plants. In nuclear power plant structures, anchorage of headed bar is recommended to satisfy ACI 349-01 App. B that are based on the Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) method. However, CCD method may lead to very conservative results for beam column joints where head is anchored within the diagonal strut and concrete is confined by transverse rebar. Compared with results of 5 joint specimens, the anchorage capacities calculated by ACI 349-01 are underestimated by 70-90%. Therefore, it is necessary to amend ACI 349-01 for the mechanical anchorage in beam column joints.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 2020

In this study, side-face blowout failure strength of high strength headed reinforcing bar, which is vertically anchoring between RC or SFRC members, is evaluated throughout pullout test. The major test parameters are content ratio of high strength steel fibers, strength of rebar, length of anchorage, presence of shear reinforcement, and the side concrete cover thickness planned to be 1.3 times of the rebar. In pullout test, tensile force was applied to the headed reinforcing bar with the hinged supports positioned 1.5 and 0.7 times the anchorage length on both sides of the headed reinforcing bar. As a result, the cone-shaped crack occurred where the headed reinforcing bar embedded and finally side-face blowout failure caused by bearing pressure of the headed reinforcing bar. The tensile strength of specimens increased by 13.0 ~26.2% with shear reinforcement. The pullout strength of the specimens increased by 3.6 ~15.4% according to steel fiber reinforcement. Increasing the anchoring length and shear reinforcement were evaluated to reduce the stress bearing ration of the total stress.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.407-420
• /
• 2012

This study investigated possible ways to replace conventional stirrups used on high-strength concrete members with improved reinforcing materials. Headed bar and high-strength steel were chosen to substitute for conventional stirrups, and an experimental comparison between the shear behavior of high-strength concrete large beams reinforced with conventional stirrups and the chosen stirrup substitutes was made. Test results indicated that the headed bar and the high-strength steel led to a significant reserve of shear strength and a good redistribution of shear between stirrups after shear cracking. This is due to the headed bar providing excellent end anchorage and the high-strength steel successfully resisting higher and sudden shear transmission from the concrete to the shear reinforcement. Experimental results presented in this paper were also compared with various prediction models for shear strength of concrete members.

• KCI Concrete Journal
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.86-91
• /
• 2002

This paper presents an experimental study to investigate the behavior of mechanical anchorage of reinforcing bars in concrete members. Three kinds of mechanical anchorage which are a kind of headed reinforcements are considered in this study. Total seven specimens were prepared to consider the effects of anchoring methods (Type A, Type B and Type C) and anchorage lengths of the reinforcing bars (14 $d_{b}$, 12 $d_{b}$, 9 $d_{b}$). Pullout tests conforming to ASTM were carried out to assess the effects of several variables on anchoring strength of bars. Based on the test results, it was concluded that the behavior of the specimen anchored by the mechanical anchorage with the anchor-age length of 12 $d_{b}$, is as good as, or better than that of the specimen anchored by 90-degree standard hook.rd hook.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2003년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.512-517
• /
• 2003

The repeated loading responses of four shear-critical reinforced concrete beams, with two different shear span-to-depth ratios, were studied. One series of beams was reinforced using pairs of bundled stirrups with $90^{\circ}C$ standard hooks, having free end extensions of $6d_b$. The companion beams contained shear reinforcement made with larger diameter headed bars anchored with 50mm diameter circular heads. A single headed bar had the same area as a pair of bundled stirrups and hence the two series were comparable. The test results indicate that beams containing headed bar stirrups have a superior performance to companion beams containing bundled standard stirrups, with improved ductility, larger energy adsorption and enhanced post-peak load carrying capability. Due to splitting of the concrete cover and local crushing, the hooks of the standard stirrups opened, resulting in loss of anchorage. In contrast, the headed bar stirrups did not lose their anchorage and hence were able to develop strain hardening and also served to delay buckling of the flexural compression steel. Excellent load-deflection predictions were obtained by reducing the tension stiffening to account for repeated load effects.

• 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.148-156
• /
• 2020

본 논문은 강섬유 보강 콘크리트 부재에 수직으로 기계적 정착된 고강도 확대머리철근의 정착성능을 평가하기 위하여 실시한 기초 인발실험결과를 정리한 것이다. 주요 실험변수는 강섬유의 혼입률, 콘크리트 강도, 정착길이, 확대머리철근 항복강도, 전단보강유무 등이다. 실험체의 좌우 순피복두께는 확대머리철근 직경의 두 배로 계획하였다. 확대머리철근을 중심으로 1.5𝑙_dt, 0.7𝑙_dt가 되는 위치에 힌지 지점을 두고, 확대머리 철근을 직접 인발하였다. 인발실험결과, 실험변수에 따라 콘크리트 파괴 및 철근 인장파단이 나타났다. 강섬유를 보강한 실험체가 동일한 변수의 강섬유를 보강하지 않은 실험체에 비히여 콘크리트 압축강도는 2.7~5.4% 크게 나타난 반면 인발강도는 20.9~63.1% 크게 나타나 정착성능 향상에 큰 기여를 하는 것으로 평가되었다. 강섬유 보강 콘크리트에 대해 확대머리철근과 평행한 전단보강근의 배근은 1.7~7.7% 인발강도를 증가시켰으나, 콘크리트 강도 증가를 고려할 때 정착성능 향상에 미치는 영향이 크지 않았다. 본 실험체 상세와 같이 강섬유보강 콘크리트 부재에 수직정착된 SD600의 확대머리철근 정착설계는 KCI2017, KCI2012의 정착길이 설계식을 그대로 사용할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• 콘크리트학회논문집
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.201-208
• /
• 2017

외부 보-기둥 접합부에서는 철근정착을 위해 갈고리철근 사용하고 있으며, 철근과밀배근 해소와 시공작업의 어려움으로 확대머리철근의 사용이 증가하고 있다. SD600 51 mm 확대머리철근을 사용할 경우 ACI318-14 및 KCI2012기준에서 사용을 제한하고 있다. 이번 연구에서는 외부 보-기둥 접합부 내에 고강도 대구경 철근의 확대머리 철근의 사용이 가능하도록 실험 60 MPa, 80 MPa 콘크리트강도로 제작된 실험체의 정착상세별 구조성능을 평가하였다. 모든 실험체에서는 보의 휨항복파괴가 발생하였으며, 실험체의 모멘트-변위 곡선에서 비슷한 양상을 보였다. 다른 실험체보다 갈고리가 한쪽방향으로 배근한 실험체에서는 갈고리철근 배근방향에 의해 전단저항능력이 달라지므로 3.5%변위비 이후에 부착응력 감소가 더 크게 나타났으며, 전단변형능력도 더 크게 나타났다. 실험체의 내진성능을 확인하기 위하여 ACI374.1-05기준과 비교하였으며, 실험결과 충분한 내진성능을 확보하였다. 이를 통하여 외부 보-기둥 접합부에서 SD600, 51 mm 확대머리철근의 사용이 가능한 것으로 판단된다.