• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.283-294
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 LDA 토픽모델링을 활용하여 최근 5년간의 과학영재교육 관련 연구의 동향을 살펴보는 것이다. 보편적으로 이용되는 국내 학술 데이터 RISS, KISS, DBpia를 선정하여 국내 학술논문 292편을 수집해 2,404개의 키워드를 분석하였다. 주요 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 최근 과학영재교육 연구물 수는 2019년에 이르기까지 그 수가 줄어들고 있으며, 과학 영재교육 관련 연구에서 상위 10개의 주제어는 '학생', '프로그램', '초등', '수업', '창의성', '영재교육', '인식', '교사', '교육', '활동'으로 나타났다. 둘째, 토픽모델링 분석 결과로는 총 10개의 토픽이 도출되었다. 최근 5년간 과학 영재교육에서 주로 이루어진 연구주제는 '과학 영재학생의 정의적 특성', '중등 과학 영재학생의 특성', '과학영재교육 프로그램의 개발 및 적용', '과학고와 과학영재고의 교육활동', '과학 영재학생의 인지적 특성', '과학영재교육 정책', '과학영재학생과 창의성', '과학영재학생들의 연구수행교육', '과학영재학생의 학업과 진로선택', '과학 영재학생의 과학 개념'으로 나타났다. 과거에는 특정 토픽의 비중이 상대적으로 높게 나타났으나, 2019년으로 올수록 토픽 간 비중이 크게 차이가 나지 않는다. 따라서 최근으로 올수록 연구가 한 주제에 치우치지 않고 고루 진행되고 있다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.506-521
• /
• 2020

This study aims to develop a scientific creativity task which science-gifted elementary students can conduct on a field trip to a botanical garden, and to analyze the results from conducting the task. For this, 38 science-gifted fifth-graders from the Science-Gifted Education Center, located at the Office of Education, participated in a field trip to a botanical garden, as a part of their program. Prior to the program, researchers developed a scientific creativity task for outdoor education program, along with science education specialists and teachers. The tasks were to observe plants, and to create something new and useful, or, in other words, scientifically creative, based on the plants' characteristics. The students could submit at most three ideas. Also, they assessed their own ideas, and selected an idea that they thought was the most creative. The results were analyzed by using the scientific creativity formula. The main findings from this study are as follows. First, it was found that the scientific creativity formula had an upward bias in assessing originality. Second, the students tended to assess the usefulness of their own ideas more generously. Third, the correlation between self-assessment results and scores from the scientific creativity formula for originality was r=.43. Fourth, in formula-based assessments, the correlation between originality scores and usefulness scores was relatively high, at r=.56. Fifth, the correlation between a student's scientific creativity score and the number of his or her ideas was very low, at r=.23. Sixth, when the ideas chosen as the most creative by students were compared with the ideas that had the highest scores in formula-based assessments, it was shown that 8 out of 19 students (42.1%) did not choose the idea that appeared to be the most creative when graded by the formula. This study is concluded by discussing the lessons from the scientific creativity task analysis for primary science education and gifted education.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.196-204
• /
• 2014

영재성에는 인지적 특성과 함께 비인지적 특성이 포함되어있다. 그동안 영재교육에서 영재의 정의적 영역은 인지적 교육에 비해 소홀히 다루어왔다. 본 연구의 목적은 인성교육 프로그램이 초등과학영재 학생들의 도덕 판단력에 미치는 영향을 분석하는 것으로, 인간관계 중심의 6대 덕목인 '정직, 약속, 용서, 책임, 배려, 소유'의 인성교육 프로그램을 4주 동안 실행하였다. 그리고 도덕적 판단력 검사 KDIT를 통해 수업 적용 전과 후를 비교하고, 인성교육 프로그램의 효과와 성별에 따른 차이가 있는지를 알아보았다. 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 인성교육 프로그램은 영재학생들의 도덕적 판단력을 향상시키는데 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 초등 과학영재 남학생과 여학생 집단 간의 차이는 유의미하지 않았다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.709-719
• /
• 2011

본 연구의 목적은 초등과학영재 학생과 일반아동사이의 분류 활동 능력의 차이를 확인하는데 있다. 연구를 수행하기 위해 강원도 지역의 P교육청 부설 영재교육원의 초등과학영재 학생 6명과 B와 M초등학교의 일반아동 6명이 연구 대상으로 선정되었다. 학생들에게 부여되는 분류 활동 과제는 선행 연구를 바탕으로 실물자료 과제 3가지와 사진자료 과제 3가지로 총 6가지였으며, 초등과학영재 학생과 일반아동 사이의 분류 활동 능력 차이를 확인하기 위해 분류 활동 과제 수행에 걸리는 시간 측정, 분류 활동 결과 분석 및 분류 기준 수 비교, 분류 능력 지수 산출을 실시하였다. 연구 결과 분류 과제 종류에 관계없이 초등과학영재가 일반아동에 비해 분류 활동 과제 수행에 걸리는 시간이 더 짧게 걸렸다. 분류 활동 결과 분석에 있어서는 초등과학영재와 일반아동 모두 비교 관찰을 실시하였으나 생성된 분류 기준 수에 있어서는 초등과학영재가 더 많은 기준 수를 산출하였고, 분류 능력 지수 또한 초등과학영재의 경우가 더 높았으나 학년의 발달과 유의미한 관계는 없었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.267-284
• /
• 2018

This study analyzed the types of scientific humors made by scientifically-gifted elementary school students and their perceptions of making scientific humor. For this, 77 students from $4^{th}$ to $6^{th}$ graders of gifted science education center in Seoul National University of Education were selected. Scientific humors made by the students were analyzed according to the number and types. Their perceptions of making scientific humor were also analyzed through a questionnaire and group interviews. The analysis of the results revealed that most of scientifically-gifted students made more than 2 scientific humors, and the number of scientific humor for each students varied from 0 to 11. The most types they made were the descriptive type and the pun using pronunciation type, but they made various types without any special type to be biased. And They made more the dialogue type than the narrative type, especially the riddle type. They used scientific knowledge that preceded the knowledge of science curriculum in their grade level over two or more years. The scientific knowledge of chemistry was used more than physics, biology, earth science and combination field. The name utilization type was more than the characteristic utilization type and the principle utilization type. Scientific humors in the everyday situation were more than humors in artificial situation. The students had various positive perceptions in making scientific humor such as increase of scientific knowledge, increase of various thinking abilities, deep understanding of science concept and principle, increase of interest and motivation about science and science learning, and increase on sense of humor. They had also some negative perceptions related to difficulties in the process of making scientific humor, lack of fun, and lack of time in the class.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.115-128
• /
• 2014

Students' argumentation during science inquiry should be regarded important as it could help students to make meaningful connections between theories and experiments and to make scientific claims based on evidences. In this study, elementary science-gifted students' argumentation during small group inquiry was analyzed according to inquiry process. There were three stages of argumentation during students' inquiry. The first argumentation was to predict what would happen(Prediction stage). In this stage, the scientific problem was presented by concept cartoon as a way to start and to facilitate students' argumentation. The second argumentation was to design an experiment to solve the problem(Planning stage) and the third was to interpret the result of experiment(Interpretation stage). The discourse move, level of grounds and their relationship were analyzed to find the characteristics of argumentation during science inquiry. In terms of discourse move, 'Asking for opinion' was the most frequent whereas 'Claim' or 'Rebuttal' were rare. Students tended to listen to or ask others' opinion rather than provide their own claims or critics on others' opinion. 'Rebuttal' was shown a few times only during prediction and planning stage. There was no single 'Rebuttal' during interpretation stage. Students tended to easily accept or agree other student's interpretation of data instead of arguing their own ideas. In terms of level of grounds, students mostly provided their ideas without any attempt to justify their position. Especially during planning stage, students tended to suggest or decide ways of measuring or controlling variables without any grounds. They used evidences only a few times during prediction stage. In terms of relation between discourse move and level of grounds, students provided grounds most frequently when they dispute others' claims. The level of grounds were higher when they advocate or clarify their own or others' ideas than when they claim their ideas. The result of this study showed that the quality of elementary science-gifted students' argumentation during science inquiry was undesirable in many ways. Implications for scaffolding and facilitating argumentation during science inquiry were discussed.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.292-303
• /
• 2009

In this study, we investigated the characteristics of the analogies, the mapping understanding, and the mapping errors on saturated solution of scientifically-gifted and general elementary students. Fifth graders (n=60) at four scientifically-gifted education institutes in Seoul and/or Gyeonggi province and fifth graders (n=91) at three elementary schools in Seoul were selected and assigned to the scientifically-gifted group and the general group respectively. After the students of each group performed the experiment and were taught about the target concept in the first class, they administered the test on the self-generating analogies on the target concept in the second class. The results revealed that the students in the scientifically-gifted group made more analogies, especially verbal/pictorial, structural/functional, enriched, and higher systematic ones, and had deeper understanding of the analogy than those in the general group. The numbers of the shared attributes included in the student-generated analogies and the scores of the mapping understanding of the students in the scientifically-gifted group were significantly higher than those in the general group. The students in the scientifically-gifted group had fewer mapping errors than those in the general group. However, not a few students in the scientifically-gifted group had at least one mapping error. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.55-61
• /
• 2009

This study was designed to explore problem solving process to earth science area by elementary science gifted children, which compared and analyzed the questionnaires and problem solving to earth science area by gifted Science education center, Seoul National University Of Education, The analyzed results showed difference by gender that in the science study level at the time of entrance to the gifted Science education center, male students was the highest in the middle school as 37.5%, and female students in the elementary 6th grade as 61.5%. And male students were investigated to do more precedent study than female students. Secondly, in the problem solving process of earth science related problems, males made most use of problem solving process area(30.3%), and females symbolizing (27.5%) area. Thirdly, comparison of reasoning technology in problem solving process by gender indicated that both sexes made the most use of analytical reasoning (male 62.0%, female 53.6%) to solve problems.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.415-422
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of scientific program for gifted elementary students using metacognition on learning-flow and lingual interaction. For the purpose, the two classes for elementary science of P Institute for Gifted Education located in Pusan were assigned to experimental and control groups, respectively. The experimental and controls groups received eight sessions applying a program for scientifically gifted students using metacognition and same program without using it, respectively. The learning-flow test and the lingual interaction observed among students and between teacher and students pre and post program were compared and analyzed. The results shows that there was no significant difference between pretest and posttest in experimental group, indicating that learning-flow is not a construct obtained by short-term using of metacognition. For the lingual interactions, however, the amounts of conversation and the ratio of high level conversation in experimental group were 1.6 and 1.5 times higher than those in control group. This suggests that the lingual interaction may be varied among classes even with same experiments, by instruction method. The lingual interaction is not active in control group where the experimental results may be obtained easily only with sincere attitude while, in experimental group, questions using metacognition and providing intellectual stimulation is continuously presented, leading to high level of lingual interaction, therefore it is considered that the development of scientific program for gifted elementary students using these advantages is needed.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.669-695
• /
• 2009

21세기는 과히 로봇 혁명의 시대이다. 불과 몇 해 전만 하더라도 로봇 시장에서의 주류는 산업용 로봇이었다. 그러나 현재는 다양한 유형의 로봇이 여러 가지 목적으로 우리의 일상생활에서 활용되고 있으며, 가까운 미래에는 인간과 유사하게 사고하고 행동하는 로봇이 등장할 전망이다. 결과적으로 로봇 혁명은 인류의 생활양식을 통째로 변화시킬 것으로 예상된다. 따라서 미래 로봇사회에 적응할 창의적 인재 양성을 위해 로봇교육이 이루어져야 하며 특히 로봇의 움직임을 프로그래밍 할 수 있는 기회는 초등정보과학영재에게 논리적 사고력을 함양할 수 있는 효과적인 교육이 될 것이다. 본 논문에서는 로봇교육의 가장 큰 특징인 '다양한 알고리즘을 통한 프로그래밍 교육을 강화하여 일반학생이 아닌 초등정보과학영재를 대상으로 하는 로봇교육과정을 설계하였다. 로봇교육에 대한 연구가 아직은 부족한 실정으로 본 논문의 교육과정을 설계하기 위해 로봇에 대한 흥미를 갖고 있는 학생을 대상으로 한 특기적성 로봇교육과정을 분석하며 그 시사점을 초등정보과학영재를 위한 로봇교육과정 설계 시에 적용하였다. 또한 설계된 교육과정의 타당성을 검증하기 위하여 전문가 집단을 선정한 후에 델파이 조사를 실시하였다.