1 |
Chin, C. & Teou, L.-Y. (2009). Using concept cartoons in formative assessment: Scaffolding students' argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1307-1332.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Cho, H., Yang, I.-H., Lee, H. & Song, Y.-M. (2008). An analysis on the level of evidence used in gifted elementary students' debate. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(5), 495-505.
과학기술학회마을
|
3 |
Choi, G. Y. (2014). An analysis of elementary sciencegifted students' argumentation during small group science inquiry. Master's Thesis, Chuncheon National University of Education.
|
4 |
Clark, D. B. & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
6 |
Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Jeong, H.-C., Park, Y.-S. & Hwang, D. J. (2008). Analyzing perceptions of small group inquiry activity in the gifted education of Korea. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 29(2), 151-162.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Keogh, B. & Naylor, S. (1993). Learning in science: Another way in. Primary Science Review, 26, 22-23.
|
9 |
Lee, S.-K. (2006). The patterns and the characteristics of students' interactive argumentation in the small-group discussions. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(1), 79-88.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Kim, H. & Song, J. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
|
11 |
Kim, S.-W. & Kim, E.-M. (2001). The effects of discussion learning using 'concept cartoons' on middle school students' learning attitude and achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), 299-315.
|
12 |
Lee, S.-H., Seo, B.-H. & Kim, Y.-G. (2007). A study on the characteristics of the components of argumentation in the process of solving scientific argument tasks among elementary students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 76-86.
|
13 |
Lim, H. & Yeo, S.-I. (2012). Characteristics on elementary students' argumentation in science problem solving process. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 13-24.
과학기술학회마을
|
14 |
Lim, H.-J. & Shin, Y.-J. (2012). Investigation of scientific argumentation in the classes for elementary gifted students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 513-531.
과학기술학회마을
|
15 |
Lim, J., Song, Y.-M., Song, M. & Yang, I.-H. (2010). An analysis on the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation in scientific Inquiry. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 441-450.
과학기술학회마을
|
16 |
Naylor, S., Keogh, B. & Downing, B. (2007). Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37, 17-39.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Naylor, S. & Keogh, B. (2000). Concept cartoon in science education. UK: Millgate house Publishing.
|
18 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Park, J.-E., Yu, E.-J., Lee, S.-K. & Kim, C.-J. (2009). An analysis of science writing by high school students through the argumentation structure instruction: Focus on writing tasks based on genres of science writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(8), 824-847.
과학기술학회마을
|
20 |
Park, Y.-S. (2006). Theoretical study on the opportunity of scientific argumentation for implementing authentic inquiry. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 401-415.
과학기술학회마을
|
21 |
Watson, F. R., Fulian, R. L. & McroRobbie, C. (2004). Students discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 25-45.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Wee, S.-M., Cho, H., Kim, S.-H. & Lee, H. (2009). The analysis of the level of the argumentation of small group according to the students' characteristics. Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 1-11.
DOI
|
23 |
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
24 |
Han, H.-J., Lee, T., Ko, H., Lee, S.-K., Kim, E., Choe, S.-U. & Kim, C.-J. (2012). An analysis of the type of rebuttal in argumentation among science-gifted student. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(4), 717-728.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|