• 수산해양기술연구
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 1996

In order to obtain the most favourable classification system for fishing gears, the problems in the existing systems were investigated and a new system in which the fishing method was adopted as the criterion of classification and the kinds of fishing gears were obtained by exchanging the word method into gear in the fishing methods classified newly for eliminating the problems was established. The new system to which the actual gears are arranged is as follows ; (1)Harvesting gear \circled1Plucking gears : Clamp, Tong, Wrench, etc. \circled2Sweeping gears : Push net, Coral sweep net, etc. \circled3Dredging gears : Hand dredge net, Boat dredge net, etc. (2)Sticking gears \circled1Shot sticking gears : Spear, Sharp plummet, Harpoon, etc. \circled2Pulled sticking gears : Gaff, Comb, Rake, Hook harrow, Jerking hook, etc. \circled3Left sticking gears : Rip - hook set line. (3)Angling gears \circled1Jerky angling gears (a)Single - jerky angling gears : Hand line, Pole line, etc. (b)Multiple - jerky angling gears : squid hook. \circled2Idly angling gears (a)Set angling gears : Set long line. (b)Drifted angling gears : Drift long line, Drift vertical line, etc. \circled3Dragged angling gears : Troll line. (4)Shelter gears : Eel tube, Webfoot - octopus pot, Octopus pot, etc. (5)Attracting gears : Fishing basket. (6)Cutoff gears : Wall, Screen net, Window net, etc. (7)Guiding gears \circled1Horizontally guiding gears : Triangular set net, Elliptic set net, Rectangular set net, Fish weir, etc. \circled2Vertically guiding gears : Pound net. \circled3Deeply guiding gears : Funnel net. (8)Receiving gears \circled1Jumping - fish receiving gears : Fish - receiving scoop net, Fish - receiving raft, etc. \circled2Drifting - fish receiving gears (a)Set drifting - fish receiving gears : Bamboo screen, Pillar stow net, Long stow net, etc. (b)Movable drifting - fish receiving gears : Stow net. (9)Bagging gears \circled1Drag - bagging gears (a)Bottom - drag bagging gears : Bottom otter trawl, Bottom beam trawl, Bottom pair trawl, etc. (b)Midwater - drag gagging gears : Midwater otter trawl, Midwater pair trawl, etc. (c)Surface - drag gagging gears : Anchovy drag net. \circled2Seine - bagging gears (a)Beach - seine bagging gears : Skimming scoop net, Beach seine, etc. (b)Boat - seine bagging gears : Boat seine, Danish seine, etc. \circled3Drive - bagging gears : Drive - in dustpan net, Inner drive - in net, etc. (10)Surrounding gears \circled1Incomplete surrounding gears : Lampara net, Ring net, etc. \circled2Complete surrounding gears : Purse seine, Round haul net, etc. (11)Covering gears \circled1Drop - type covering gears : Wooden cover, Lantern net, etc. \circled2Spread - type covering gears : Cast net. (12)Lifting gears \circled1Wait - lifting gears : Scoop net, Scrape net, etc. \circled2Gatherable lifting gears : Saury lift net, Anchovy lift net, etc. (13)Adherent gears \circled1Gilling gears (a)Set gilling gears : Bottom gill net, Floating gill net. (b)Drifted gilling gears : Drift gill net. (c)Encircled gilling gears : Encircled gill net. (d)Seine - gilling gears : Seining gill net. (e)Dragged gilling gears : Dragged gill net. \circled2Tangling gears (a)Set tangling gears : Double trammel net, Triple trammel net, etc. (b)Encircled tangling gears : Encircled tangle net. (c)Dragged tangling gears : Dragged tangle net. \circled3Restrainting gears (a)Drifted restrainting gears : Pocket net(Gen - type net). (b)Dragged restrainting gears : Dragged pocket net. (14)Sucking gears : Fish pumps.

• 수산해양기술연구
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.459-468
• /
• 2013

In the application of the ecosystem-based fisheries assessment Jeonnam marine ranching ecosystem, two fisheries, funnel fishery and trap fishery, were selected as target fisheries. Black seabream, Acanthopagru schlegelii, rock bream, Sebastes inermis, gray mullet, Mugil cephalus, were selected as target species for the funnel fishery, and conger eel, Conger myriaster, was target species for the trap fishery. For assessing indicators of four management objectives, that is the maintenance of sustainability, biodiversity, habitat quality and socio-economic benefits, indicators were selected considering the availability of data, which were 5 indicators for sustainability, 3 indicators for biodiversity, 4 indicators for habitat, 2 indicators for socio-economic benefit. The Objective risk indices for sustainability and biodiversity of two fisheries were estimated at yellow zone, medium risk level. The objective risk indices for habitat and socio-economic benefit were estimated at green zone, safe level. The species risk indices (SRI) were estimated at yellow zone. The fishery risk indices (FRIs) were estimated at 1.143 and 1.400 for funnel net fishery and trap fishery, respectively. Finally the ecosystem risk index estimated at 1.184.

• The Korean Journal of Ecology
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.237-246
• /
• 2003

우리나라 산촌마을의 경관구조를 경관생태학적 패러다임인 토지 모자이크 모형에 의해 해석하였다. 상대적으로 개발의 영향이 적게 작용하여 산림청의 산촌종합개발사업 대상마을로 선정된 전북 김제시 선동리 아직, 산수마을을 연구대상지로 선정하였다. 전형적으로 나타나는 마을유역의 면적(2.8∼2.0㎢), 마을구역 및 농경지의 면적율(27%), 숲의 면적율(73%)이 조사되었다. 패취 경계형태의 깔때기 효과 특성은 3차원적 지형요소와 풍수지리적 형국도를 원용하여 해석할 수 있었다. 패취 경계형태의 깔때기는 동물이동 주요 통로로 보며 하천에 의하여 형성되는 만입부는 물과 대기 흐름의 장소로 동시에 적용될 때 물질흐름이 해석될 수 있었고, 이러한 깔때기 효과의 개념은 풍수지리에서 사용되는 형국도에서 중심축과 지류축으로 나타나고 있었다. 이러한 내용은 산촌생태마을 계획. 설계 시 보전해야 할 숲의 적정 크기와 하천 및 능선의 녹지축 net-working을 하기 위한 기본적 틀로서 적용될 수 있다고 판단된다.

• 한국환경농학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.371-381
• /
• 2023

The effectiveness of plant-based attractants was studied using large traps, which attracted relatively more snails in agricultural water drainage ditches and rice-cultivating environments, although their effectiveness in rice fields and lakes was limited. The rate began to rise after three hours of observation. Watermelon peel exhibited the highest apple snail attraction rate (13.8%), followed by potatoes (10.0%), and apple peel (8.8%). These values significantly differed from the attraction rate attributed to papaya leaves (F=3.84; P=0.0387). After 24 h, watermelon peel and apple peel indicated a higher rate of attraction (23.4% and 21.7%, respectively), which were significantly different compared with those of papaya leaves and potatoes (F=9.94; P=0.00455). Large bait traps outperformed funnel traps in capturing golden apple snails and trapped a significant number of snails measuring over 1 cm in size. Watermelon peel was the most effective attractant for a large bait trap, followed by apple peel, potatoes, and papaya leaves. On average, 110 snails were captured in the lure net. However, potatoes, apple peels, and papaya leaves caught an average of 93, 80, and 79 snails, respectively. Among the attractants, the lure effect of the snails was not significantly different. The efficiency of large bait traps in capturing snails, regardless of the plant attractant employed, followed the order: apple peel > watermelon peel and potatoes > papaya leaves > melon > Korean melon. Watermelon peel is highly recommended for farmer use, as well as apple peel and potatoes. Utilizing these snail attractants may contribute positively to developing a safe and environment-friendly integrated pest management strategy.

• 한국수산과학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.125-130
• /
• 1979

1978년 8월 23일 부터 동년 10월 20일 사이에 우리 나라의 남부와 싱가폴 북부 해상에서 새바다호의 순항, 예망, 표박시의 선박소음에 관하여 실험한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 외부 갑판상의 가장 높은 소음원은 연돌로 돌출하는 배기소음이고, 연돌뒤(No.9)에서 순항, 예망, 표박시 92,90,87dB로 가장 높았으며, 선수(No. 1)에서 65,63,53dB로 가장 낮았다. 2. 학생 거주구역에서는 주기소음보다 통풍기나 에이콘의 가동소음이 주소음원을 이루었는데 통풍기를 가동하면 표박할때와 에이콘을 가동하면서 순항때를 비교하면, 출입구(No. 14)에서 85,69dB로 가장 높았고 학생실(No. 22)에서 45,40dB로 가장 낮았다. 3. 중앙부의 선원거주구역에서는 순항소음압이 예망소음압보다 2dBwjd도로 선원식당(No. 30)까지는 높게 나타났고, 급냉실(No. 31)로 부터는 반대로 낮게 측정 되었다. 또 이 구역에서는 출입문을 닫았을 때 선장실(No, 25)에서 13dB, 선원식당(No, 30)에서 3dB씩 낮아졌다. 4. 순항시 주기소음압은 Pitch $8^{\circ}$와 $12^{\circ}$때 103, 105dB 였는데, Pitch $8^{\circ}$로 예망시는 106dB로서 3dB의 증가를 보였다. 5. 선형과 기관이 같은 오대산호와 소음을 비교 하면 식당, 싸롱, 학생식에서 $4\~6dB$씩 낮았고 작업갑판상에서는 14dB나 높은 음압이였다.