• 재무관리연구
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.103-138
• /
• 2009

본 논문은 2003년 1월부터 2004년 9월까지 표본기간동안 한국유가증권시장의 전자공시시스템인 KIND를 통해 접속매매시간 동안 장중에 발표되는 비실적 관련 공정공시 표본 자료를 일중 사건연구로 분석하여 실시간 정보에 대한 효율성을 검증하였다. 장중 발표되는 공정공시 정보에 대해 주가는 평균적으로 2분 이내에 유의적으로 강하게 반응하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 공시 발표 시점 2분 이후부터 10분까지는 추가적인 양의 주가 반응이 있었으나, 이후 시간에는 소폭 반전하는 형태를 보였다. 공정공시 종류별로 볼 때 기타사항 공시를 제외한 사업계획 공시나 경영사항 공시에 대해서는 공시 발표 2분 이후부터 20분까지의 시간에는 추가적으로 유의적인 주가의 반응은 발견되지 않았다. 한편 공시 정보에 대한 주가 반응의 크기는 소기업 표본의 공시일수록 강한 것으로 나타났으며, 규모가 큰 종목의 표본에서는 2분 이후에 정보가 지연되는 현상이 발견되었으나 5분 이후로 지속되지는 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이 같은 결과는 기업 특유 정보 내용(firm-specific information)의 공시에 대해서는 대기업보다는 소기업에서 반응하는 속도가 상대적으로 빠르다는 것을 의미한다. 공시 정보를 이용하여 거래비용을 제외하고도 초과수익률을 획득할 수 있는지를 분석한 결과에서는 공시 시점 이후 매입하는 전략은 모두 음의 수익률을 보였다. 반면에 공시 발표 시점 이전과 공시 시점에서 매입하는 전략은 평균적으로 2분이 경과한 다음부터 양의 수익을 시현하는 것으로 분석되었다. 공시 발표 시점에서 소형주를 매입할 경우 2분 이후부터 양의 초과 수익이 발생하지만, 대형주는 10분이 지나도 양의 초과 수익을 획득할 수 없었다. 이상의 결과를 종합하면 투명한 전자 공시 체제를 운영하는 한국유가증권시장은 실시간적으로 준강형 정보 효율성이 높은 시장이라 할 수 있다.

• Asian Journal of Business Environment
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.45-50
• /
• 2020

Purpose: This paper examines the theoretical grounds for the disclosure of the Korea Fair Trade Commission. Three central measures of the disclosure are scrutinized: The interconnected status of affiliate companies, the important matters of private affiliates, and the large internal transactions. Contemplating on three measures, respectively, we review the rationale and derive policy implications. Research design, data, and methodology: Collecting the data of violation rates and remedial measures, we analyze the intensity of the disclosure enforcement. These statistics are critically reviewed by the economic literature of mandatory disclosure. Results: Statistics evince that the Korea Fair Trade Commission has enforced the regulatory disclosure quite successfully. Violation rates of the disclosure has declined from the outset. It demonstrates that the Korea Fair Trade Commission has enforced those measures satisfactorily for about a decade. But we cannot ascertain empirically whether the regulatory disclosures are socially and economically beneficial. To evaluate the effect of the regulatory disclosures precisely, we need a further empirical investigation. Conclusions: Despite the lack of policy evaluation, this study suggests complementary measures for current disclosures. First, disclosure of executive compensation in privately held subsidiaries must be introduced. Second, the controlling shareholder/manager should be responsible for information disclosure on foreign subsidiaries.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.281-288
• /
• 2019

This study examines the relationship between R&D intensity and disclosure. R&D activities are essential in bringing innovation to companies. However, R&D activities are naturally uncertain and increase information asymmetry. Thus, firms with high R&D activities are more likely to have the incentive to communicate the potential of R&D investment to the market through voluntary disclosure and, concurrently, resolve information asymmetry. Meanwhile, incentives to less voluntary disclosure exist because of the proprietary cost and the risk of competitiveness loss. Furthermore, the uncertainties inherent in R&D activities caused the possible decrease in the information accuracy. For the two opposing views, this study investigates the relationship between R&D intensity and disclosure frequency using the Regulation Fair Disclosure data in Korea. Moreover, the relationship between R&D intensity and usefulness of the information disclosed is also examined. Using firm sample listed in the 2011-2016 Korea Stock Market, results show that firms with high R&D intensity make disclosures more frequent. Subsequently, the analysis using forecast sample shows that management forecast error is higher in firms with high R&D intensity. This research contributes to the existing literature by presenting evidence that R&D intensity is a significant factor affecting manager's disclosure behavior and information usefulness.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2020

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions and related caselaw of the Insurance Act 2015 to gain a clearer understanding of the differences between the Act and the preceding legislation. Design/methodology - The authors analyzed caselaw from South Korea and China that involved breaches of the duty of disclosure. Cases highlighting differences between the duties of disclosure and fair presentation were selected. Findings - Changes in the practice of marine insurance laws are expected from the application of the reformed duty of presentation provisions. In particular, the rights of the insured are expected to increase, resulting in the fairer conduct of insurance contracts. Due to the fact that the Insurance Act 2015 has only recently taken effect, the provisions of existing caselaw have not yet been applied. This has limited the authors' scope of analysis. Originality/value - This paper describes the implications of the duty of fair presentation by analyzing caselaw from South Korea and China that involves the duty of disclosure. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper that investigates the reformed duty of fair presentation provisions of the Insurance Act 2015 in the context of the legislation's implications for trade practices.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제71권
• /
• pp.171-194
• /
• 2016

In the UK, the legal principle for the duty of disclosure established in Carter v Boehm case was codified in the Marine Insurance Act 1906("MIA"). The duty of disclosure under the MIA is the pre-contractual duty by the insured and therefore, the insured should disclose the every material circumstance that would influence a prudent insurer's judgement. If the insured violates the duty of disclosure, the insurer is entitled to avoid the insurance contract, regardless of whether there was the deliberate or reckless breach, which is unfavorable to the insured. The Law Commission reviewed the duty of disclosure under the MIA in detail and provided the Insurance Act 2015 for the purpose of enhancing the interests of the insured. The Insurance Act 2015("Act"),while the basic legal structure of the duty of disclosure under the MIA still remains, amends it in respect of non-consumer insurance and furthermore, integrate the duty of disclosure and the duty not to misrepresent into the duty of fair presentation of risk. And according to the Act, the insurer is required to more actively communicate with the insured before entering the contract with the result that, if the insured fails to disclose the material circumstance but provides the sufficient information to put the insurer on notice, the insurer should further inquire for the purpose of the insured's revealing the material circumstance. In addition, the Act details the insured's constructive knowledge of material circumstance by reviewing the current case law and introduces a new system for the insurer's proportionate remedy against the insured's breach of the duty of fair presentation of risk.

• Asian Journal of Business Environment
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.17-21
• /
• 2015

Purpose - This paper compares current requirements for depreciation accounting from the Financial Accounting Standards Board in America for equity securities and all debt securities with determinable fair value, and disclosure requirements related to the fair value of securities below registered cost with the requirements of the international Financial Reporting Standards Board and accounting standards committee. Research design, data, and methodology - Mini-review statements are examined relating to depreciation of investments in America and the Financial Accounting Standards depreciation of investments in Iran that meet the requirements of international reporting standards and the Iranian Accounting Standards Committee. Results - Accounting rules for depreciation of investments in securities requires a good deal of judgment. In particular, devaluation decisions during the recession and market crisis were controversial, although even with no clear guidelines on devaluation, sometimes such decisions were simple. Conclusions -Companies can choose from formal policies applied uniformly and documentations of interest to provide a summary of the principles and conclusions obtained through disclosure, enabling market participants to assess the entity's conclusions reasonably, thereby easing investor and market worries.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제72권
• /
• pp.57-80
• /
• 2016

Since 2006, the Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission have been engaged in a major review of insurance contract law, finally leading to the legislation of Insurance Act 2015. According to the enforcement of the Insurance Act 2015 on 12 August 2016, ss 18~20 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906(MIA 1906) were repealed and substituted by the new concept of fair presentation. This article intends to analyze the legal implications through the comparative research between the duty of fair presentation in Insurance Act 2015 and ss 18~20 of MIA 1906. The major changes in Insurance Act 2015 are designed to (1) encourage active engagement by the insurer rather than passive underwriting, asking questions of the insured if the desired information is not provided at the stage of proposal; (2) encourage policyholders to structure and signpost their presentation in an clear and accessible way, and prevent data dumps; (3) give guidance as to how the insured should prepare a fair presentation, by undertaking a reasonable search of available information and giving examples of what circumstances might be material; (4) clarify whose knowledge in the insured's organization is attributed to the insured for the purposes of disclosure; (5) clarify the exceptions to the duty of disclosure, including circumstances "which are known or presumed to be known to the insurer"; and (6) replace the remedy of avoidance in all circumstances with more proportionate remedies. This is a default regime, which may be altered by agreement between the parties.

• 한국프랜차이즈경영연구
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2011

2002년 5월 공정거래위원회는 '가맹사업거래의 공정화에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 정보공개제도를 도입하였으나, 정보공개서의 신뢰성과 투명성을 담보하는데 한계가 드러나게 되어 2008년 2월부터 가맹본부로 하여금 가맹희망자나 가맹점사업자에게 제공할 정보공개서를 공정거래위원회에 등록하도록 하고, 등록된 정보공개서를 가맹희망자나 가맹점사업자에게 제공하도록 하는 정보공개등록 제도를 도입하였다. 이에 가맹본부는 새로이 도입된 정보공개서 등록제도에 대하여 귀찮고 규제일원적인 제도로 생각하고 있으나, 가맹사업이 급속도로 발전되고 있는 요즈음 가맹사업의 경쟁력을 강화하지 않으면 자칫 도태될 위험에 처해있는 현실에 비추어 볼 때, 역발상으로 오히려 가맹사업을 전개함에 있어 가맹본부가 잘 작성된 정보공개서를 홍보자료로 적극 활용하고 예비창업자들에 진실성이 담보된 정보를 제공하여 가맹본부의 신뢰성을 확보한다면, 가맹사업자와 더불어 가맹사업을 성공적으로 이끌 수 있는 토대를 마련하게 될 뿐 아니라 또한 가맹점사업자와의 사이에 발생되는 분쟁을 사전에 미리 차단하여 대리비용을 감소시켜나갈 수 있을 것이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 가맹본부의 입장에서 정보공개서를 잘 작성할 수 있는 방법 및 그 활용방안에 대하여 연구하였다.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.137-154
• /
• 2019

This study analyzes the major provisions of the UK Insurance Act 2015 and Marine Insurance Act 1906 on the duty of disclosure under the doctrine of utmost good faith. Marine insurance contracts are based on "utmost good faith" and one aspect of this is that MIA 1906 imposes a duty on prospective policy holders to disclose all material facts. In the Insurance Act 2015 of the United Kingdom, the contents of the precedent were enacted such that we have borrowed the legal principles of common law until now. The insurer is required to more actively communicate with the insurer rather than passively underwriting and asking questions of the insured. The Act details the insured's constructive knowledge of the material circumstance by reviewing the current case law and introduces a new system for the insurer's proportionate remedy against the insured's breach of the duty of fair presentation of risk. This is a default regime, which may be altered by agreement between the parties.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2006년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.268-270
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this paper was to explore delay avoiding measures and strategies. The paper was based on previous work of authors on finding delay causes. Firstly, the paper has discussed about delay avoidance measures prescribed by the previous work. As the previous study identified five main causes of construction delays, various measures and strategies to overcome those delay problems have been discussed in sequence in the last sections. Major delay prevention strategies are: involving stakeholders in the project decisions, outreach program, realistic time and resource estimation, try to adjust the triple constraints of time, cost and scope, ensure fair and complete disclosure of information at an early stage of the construction project, contractor, itself should inquire about patent design errors prior to submitting its bid, owner should include in its contract with the consultant an indemnity (protection) clause etc.