• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.291-303
• /
• 2009

According to social constructivism, group interaction is very important when students construct their knowledge. Many researchers have developed methods of teaching on the basis of group interaction because they recognized the importance of group interaction. There are a large variety of issues related to group interaction including group size, the gender and ability composition of groups, seating arrangements, textbook use, gestures, and role assignments. However, research on group interaction in science learning is still insufficient. In this study, we focused upon the emerging role of the primary leader. We investigated the primary leader's diverse role when students are solving mechanics problems. The participants were one group composed of three students in an upper-level mechanics class. To analyze these students' group interactions, their verbal interactions during meetings were videotaped and audiotaped during one-semester period. We also conducted interviews with the three students and analyzed their reports. As a result, we could find a special student who had the role of primary leader. We could also find the leader's three different leadership roles in different problem situations by inductively; explainer, facilitator and evaluator. Group interaction had different aspect according to the different role of leaders. The group interactions were the most active when the leader played the role of facilitator.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.27-47
• /
• 2009

Concepts of mediation and conciliation as alternative dispute resolutions are often confusingly used. As to what is meant by mediation and conciliation, there is no uniform legal definition. However, there has been a distinction between two methods of dispute settlement under the international law (UN Charter, WTO DSU, NAFTA, EU mediation directive, WIPO Mediation Rules) although there is no clear definition on the terms of mediation and conciliation. And also under the domestic law such as U.K, France, Germany, a clear distinction has been made between two terms. Mediation means a facilitated negotiation between two parties through the intervention of a third party. A third and neutral party (mediator) help the parties in dispute to find their solution by managing a certain mediation protocol and facilitating communication between the parties while in conciliation, a third party evaluative the case and can suggest the parties a legally non-binding solution. Once the parties accept it, it becomes binding between them. However, in the U.S,, it seems that there is no practical use of distinguishing mediation and conciliation. The term of mediation is more commonly used than the term of conciliation and it has two kinds of mediation such as facilitative and evaluative mediation. Korea's conciliation system is close to conciliation or evaluative mediation. In conclusion, what is distinct between mediation and conciliation is the role of third party. If a neutral third party takes a role of advisor or facilitator, then he or she may employ a proper protocol to help the parties to find themselves their solution (mediation) while if a neutral person plays a role of evaluator, then he or she listens to the parties and suggest a solution to them (conciliation).

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제65권4호
• /
• pp.268-278
• /
• 2021

이 연구의 목적은 화학교사들의 반응적 교수 유형의 변화를 관찰하기 위하여 선행연구에서 제안한 반응적 교수 유형을 세분화하고, 반응적 교수 유형의 변화에 장애를 주는 요인을 알아보는 것이다. 이를 위하여 교육대학원 과정으로 개설한 화학교육 강좌에 참여한 화학교사들을 대상으로 반응적 교수법에 대한 소개, 반응적 교수법 사례 분석, 촉진자 유형의 교육시나리오에 대한 개별 과제 및 조별 토론 등이 포함된 교육프로그램을 제공하였다. 선행연구를 바탕으로 교사의 교수법은 변별자 유형, 전달자 유형, 안내자 유형, 촉진자 유형으로 분석하였을 때, 분류가 안되는 유형이 관찰되었으므로, 이 연구에서는 탐색자 유형과 해석자 유형 등 2가지 유형을 추가하여 화학교사들의 반응적 교수 유형을 세분화하였다. 또한 개별 과제 및 조별 토론 자료를 통해 교사들의 반응적 교수법 변화에 장애를 주는 요인을 관찰할 수 있었다. 연구에서 찾아낸 장애 요인으로는 교사 요인, 학생 요인, 환경 요인 등이 있었다. 장애 요인 중 교사 요인으로는 교사 주도 수업에 대한 신념, 지식 전달자로서 교사의 역할에 대한 신념, 교육과정에 따라야 한다는 신념, 학생에 대한 교사의 이해 부족, 학생 주도 확장을 이끄는 교사의 역량 부족 등이 나타났다. 학생 요인으로는 학생의 역량에 대한 불신이 있었다. 또한 환경 요인으로는 다인수 학급과 같은 교육 환경이 있었다. 이러한 장애 요인을 제거하기 위한 노력이 함께 이루어질 때 반응적 교수법에 대한 효과적인 교사교육이 이루어질 수 있을 것이다.