1 |
Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039-1065
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627-636
DOI
|
3 |
Horn, E. M., Collier, W. G., Oxford, J. A., Bond, C. F., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). Individual Differences in Dyadic Cooperative Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 153-161
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
|
5 |
Lee, H., Kim, H., & Song, J. (2008). Features of High-school Students' Discourse During Body Physics Activity. SAEMULLI (New Phys.), 57(3), 174-182
|
6 |
Li, Y., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Dong, T., Archodidou, A., Kim, I.-H., et al. (2007) Emergent Leadership in Children's Discussion Groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 75-111
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Lim, H., Park, S., & Noh, T. (1999). The Relation between Verbal Behaviors and Academic Achievement in Cooperative Learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19(3), 367-376
과학기술학회마을
|
8 |
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods
|
9 |
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Yamaguchi, R. (2001). Children's Learning Groups: A Study of Emergent Leadership, Dominance, and Group Effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32(6), 671-697
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Kim, H. N., Chung, W. H., & Jeong, J. W. (1998). National Assessment System Development of Science-Related Affective Domain. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(3), 357-369
과학기술학회마을
|
12 |
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press
|
13 |
Cho, Y. (2001). The understanding of the Korean secondary school classrooms. Seoul: Educational Science Press
|
14 |
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553 - 576
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Hassard, J. (2005). The art of teaching science: inquiry and innovation in Middle School and High School, (p. 173). New York: Oxford University Press
|
16 |
Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2008). Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students' Understanding of Metallic Bonding. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 401-420
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Kim, H. S., Lee, E. K., & Kang, S. J. (2006). Analysis of Approaches to Learning Based on Student-Student Verbal Interactions according to the Type of Inquiry Experiments Using Everyday Materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(1), 16-24
과학기술학회마을
|
18 |
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, New Jersey.: Ablex Pub. Corp
|
19 |
Seong, S. K., & Choi, B. S. (2007). Change and Characteristics of Interactions in a Heterogeneous Group in Scientific Inquiry Experiments. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(9), 870-880
과학기술학회마을
|
20 |
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation: Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York
|
21 |
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
|
22 |
Stamovlasis, D., Dimos, A., & Tsaparlis, G. (2006). A study of group interaction processes in learning lower secondary physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 556-576
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637-644
DOI
|
24 |
Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40
DOI
|
25 |
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
|
26 |
Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1997). Gender differences in small group discussion in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 19(4), 393-406
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Smallgroup discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Mills, G. E. (2003). Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall
|
29 |
Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in smallgroup discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning
|
31 |
Shepardson, D. (1996). Social Interactions and the Mediation of Science Learning in two Small Groups of First-Graders. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 159-178
DOI
|
32 |
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Longman
|
33 |
Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2007). From Everyday Life Experiences to Physics Understanding Occurring in Small Group Work with Context Rich Problems During Introductory Physics Work at University. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 449-467
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66(3), 212-224
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1998). The structure of discussions that promote reasoning. Teachers College Record, 100(2), 315-368
|
36 |
Etkina, E. (2000). Weekly reports: A two-way feedback tool. Science Education, 84(5), 594-605
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science. Studies in Science Education, 13(1), 105-122
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.), (p. 250). Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon
|
39 |
James, M. C. (2006). The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction. American Journal of Physics, 74, 689-691
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Ryu, E. H., Lim, H. Y., Kang, S. J., & Choi, B. S. (2008). A Case Study on Student to Student Verbal Interaction on the Acid-Base Titration Experiment Using MBL. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(1), 67-74
과학기술학회마을
|
41 |
Lee, E. K., & Kang, S. J. (2008). The Effect of SWH Application on Problem-Solving Type Inquiry Modules through Student-Student Verbal Interactions. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(2), 130-138
과학기술학회마을
|