• 제목/요약/키워드: exposure risk assessment

검색결과 821건 처리시간 0.027초

직업상 피폭에 따른 방사선 위험성 평가를 위한 다차원적 모델 (Multidimensional Model for Assessing Risks from Occupational Radiation Exposure of Workers)

  • 배유정;김병수;권다영;김용민
    • 한국방사선학회논문지
    • /
    • 제11권7호
    • /
    • pp.555-564
    • /
    • 2017
  • 직업상 피폭에 대한 현행 방사선 위험성 평가는 종사자의 피폭선량 평가 및 건강진단에 중점을 두고 있다. 이러한 개인 중심의 위험성 평가는 선량계 미착용 및 개개인의 기호로 인한 건강영향 문제 등 정확한 데이터 확보의 어려움으로 인한 오류의 가능성이 있다. 또한 평가의 기준이 되는 선량한도는 법적 최대 상한값으로 방사선 방호에 최적화된 값을 의미하지는 않는다. 이에 선원적, 환경적 및 인적 측면을 복합적으로 고려할 수 있고 방사선방호의 최적화를 이행할 수 있는 국가적 차원의 새로운 위험성 평가 모델이 요구되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 고용노동부의 위험성 평가에 기반하여 개인이 아닌 작업장 중심의 위험성 평가 모델을 연구하였다. 이를 위해 여러 분야의 위험성 추정 방법을 분석하여 방사선 분야에 적용하기 적합한 모델을 도출하고, 모델에 적용하기 위한 데이터 획득 방법 및 절차에 대해 기술하였다. 본 연구에서 도출한 작업장 중심의 다차원적 위험성 평가 모델은 위험성을 점수화하고 Rader Plot을 이용하여 표현함으로서 보다 정확한 방사선 위험성 평가를 가능하게 하며, 결론적으로 효율적인 종사자 관리, 선제적 종사자 보호 및 방사선 방호의 최적화 이행에 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

Non-chemical Risk Assessment for Lifting and Low Back Pain Based on Bayesian Threshold Models

  • Pandalai, Sudha P.;Wheeler, Matthew W.;Lu, Ming-Lun
    • Safety and Health at Work
    • /
    • 제8권2호
    • /
    • pp.206-211
    • /
    • 2017
  • Background: Self-reported low back pain (LBP) has been evaluated in relation to material handling lifting tasks, but little research has focused on relating quantifiable stressors to LBP at the individual level. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Composite Lifting Index (CLI) has been used to quantify stressors for lifting tasks. A chemical exposure can be readily used as an exposure metric or stressor for chemical risk assessment (RA). Defining and quantifying lifting nonchemical stressors and related adverse responses is more difficult. Stressor-response models appropriate for CLI and LBP associations do not easily fit in common chemical RA modeling techniques (e.g., Benchmark Dose methods), so different approaches were tried. Methods: This work used prospective data from 138 manufacturing workers to consider the linkage of the occupational stressor of material lifting to LBP. The final model used a Bayesian random threshold approach to estimate the probability of an increase in LBP as a threshold step function. Results: Using maximal and mean CLI values, a significant increase in the probability of LBP for values above 1.5 was found. Conclusion: A risk of LBP associated with CLI values > 1.5 existed in this worker population. The relevance for other populations requires further study.

Quantitative and Semiquantitative Health Risk Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Styrene in a Petrochemical Industry

  • Moshiran, Vahid Ahmadi;Karimi, Ali;Golbabaei, Farideh;Yarandi, Mohsen Sadeghi;Sajedian, Ali Asghar;Koozekonan, Aysa Ghasemi
    • Safety and Health at Work
    • /
    • 제12권3호
    • /
    • pp.396-402
    • /
    • 2021
  • Background: Styrene is one of the aromatic compounds used in acetonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) producing petrochemicals, which has an impact on health of workers. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the health risks of styrene emitted from the petrochemical industry in Iran. Methods: Air samples were collected based on NIOSH 1501 method. The samples were analyzed by the Varian-cp3800 gas chromatograph. Finally, risk levels of styrene's health effects on employees were assessed by the quantitative method of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and the semiquantitative way by the Singapore Occupational Safety and Health Association. Results: Based on the results, the employees had the highest average exposure to styrene vapors (4.06 × 10-1mg.(kg - day)-1) in the polybutadiene latex (PBL) unit. Therefore, the most top predictors of cancer and non-cancer risk were 2.3×10-4 and 7.26 × 10-1, respectively. Given that the lowest average exposure (1.5 × 10-2mg.(kg - day)-1) was in the dryer unit, the prediction showed a moderate risk of cancer (0.8 × 10-6) and non-cancer (2.3 × 10-3) for the employees. The EPA method also predicted that there would be a definite cancer risk in 16% and a probable risk in 76% of exposures. However, according to the semiquantitative approach, the rate of risk was at the "low" level for all staff. The results showed that there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the units in exposure and health risk of styrene (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Given the high risk of styrene's health effects, appropriate control measures are required to reduce the exposure level.

송사리(Oryzias latipes)와 지렁이(Eisenia fetida)를 이용한 Alachlor의 생태 위해성평가 (Ecological Risk Assessment of Alachlor using Medaka (Oryzias latipes) and Earthworm (Eisenia fetida))

  • 이철우;김현미;윤준헌;송상환;류지성;김은경;양창용;정영희;최경희;이문순
    • 환경생물
    • /
    • 제25권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-7
    • /
    • 2007
  • 제초제 alachlor에 대한 송사리 및 지렁이 독성시험을 실시하고 국내 잔류실태조사 결과를 바탕으로 생태 위해성평가를 실시하였다. 송사리 독성시험 결과, 96시간 $LC_{50}$$1.8\;mg\;L^{-1}$이었으며, 수정란을 사용한 초기생장단계 독성시험에서는 부화율에 대한 NOEC가 $100\;{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$으로 나타났다. 한편, 지렁이 급성독성시험에서 $LC_{50}$(14일)는 $94.1\;mg\;kg^{-1}$, NOEC는 $55.0\;mg\;kg^{-1}$으로 나타났으며, 체중감소가 유의적으로 나타난 농도는 $71.5\;mg\;kg^{-1}$이었다. Alachlor의 국내 하천 및 토양 중 노출수준은 국립환경과학원에서 실시하고 있는 "내분비계장애물질의 환경 중 잔류실태 조사" 결과를 토대로 하였는데 $1999{\sim}2004$년 동안 조사결과, 하천 및 토양에서 각각 $ND{\sim}0.54\;{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, $ND{\sim}0.9{\mu}g\;kg^{-1}$의 범위로 검출되었다. 위해도 산출을 위한 환경 중 노출수준은 PEC가 아닌 하천 및 토양 중 실제 검출농도로 산출하였다. 독성값은 급성 독성 NOEC를 사용하였으며, 평가계수를 100으로 적용했을 때 PNEC는 송사리 독성시험과 지렁이 독성시험에서 각각 $1.0{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$$0.55\;mg\;kg^{-1}$으로 산출되었다. 본 독성시험을 통한 PNEC에 비해 잔류실태조사에서의 일반 하천과 토양에서의 노출수준은 매우 낮았으며, alachlor의 최대 검출농도를 나타낸 지점(수계 $0.54{\mu}g\;L^{-1}$, 토양 $0.9{\mu}g\;kg^{-1}$)을 적용했을 경우, alachlor물질에 대한 HQ는 1 이하로 낮게 나타남에 따라 국내 일반 하천과 토양에서의 위해도는 낮은 수준이었다. 한편 외국의 경우, 일반 하천에서 뿐만 아니라 제초제 제조 또는 사용지역을 중심으로 한 모니터링도 이루어지고 있으며, 따라서 이러한 오염원 지역에서의 위해도는 높을 가능성이 있다. 국내의 경우 일반 하천과 토양에서는 alachlor에 대한 생태 위해도는 현저히 낮은 수준이지만 향후에는 제초제 사용 빈도가 높은 지역을 중심으로 한 모니터링 실시와 장기노출에 따른 민감 독성자료를 활용한 위해성평가가 필요하다고 판단된다.

토양 위해성평가 지침에서 피부흡수발암계수 및 비산먼지농도 인자 개선 (Improvement of Dermal Absorption Slope Factor and Suspended Particle Concentration for Soil Risk Assessment Guideline)

  • 이보배;조영태;박정훈
    • 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
    • /
    • 제28권6호
    • /
    • pp.33-44
    • /
    • 2023
  • A risk assessment on the heavy metals including arsenic (As), cupper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) was investigated by setting exposure routes in agricultural fields. Moreover, the factors requiring improvement in risk assessment were also discussed through a review of the dermal absorption slope factor (SFabs) and total amount of suspended particles (TSP) in the current risk assessment guidelines. Assessment results show that the total cancer risk (TCR) of As through crop and soil ingestion was 1.51E-03 in adults and 6.37E-4 in children, which indicated a carcinogenic risk (exceeding 1E-05). On the other side, the harzard index (HI) was 3.37 in adults and 1.41 in children, which was evaluated as having a non-carcinogenic risk (>1). The carcinogenic purification targets for As were calculated to be 6.84 mg/kg in adults and 6.86 mg/kg in children, while the non-carcinogenic purification targets were calculated to be 13.43 mg/kg for adults and 22.54 mg/kg for children. When applying SFabs 61 of the current guidelines, it appears that there is a carcinogenic risk even though the As exposure concentration is below the area of concern 1 standard (25 mg/kg), which suggestes that additional research on this factor is required for the risk assessment. In order to apply the measured suspended particle concentration to risk assessment, TSP should be derived from PM10 using an appropriate correlation equation. As a result, it is suggested to improve the risk assessment guidelines so that the mesured PM10 value measured in the field can be used directly.

석유계총탄화수소의 위해성평가 시 적정 분획 시료수 결정에 대한 고찰 (Study on the Soil Sample Number of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Fractionation for Risk Assessment in Contaminated Site)

  • 전인형;김상현;정현용;정부윤;노회정;김현구;남경필
    • 한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경
    • /
    • 제24권5호
    • /
    • pp.11-16
    • /
    • 2019
  • In this study, a reliable number of soil samples for TPH fractionation was investigated in order to perform risk assessment. TPH was fractionated into volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) with three subgroups and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) with four subgroups. At the study site, concentrations of each fraction were determined at 18 sampling points, and the 95% upper confidence limit (UCL) value was used as an exposure concentration of each fraction. And then, 5 sampling points were randomly selected out of the 18 points, and an exposure concentration was calculated. This process was repeated 30 times, and the results were compared statistically. Exposure concentrations of EPH obtained from 18 points were 99.9, 339.1, 27.3, and 85.9 mg/kg for aliphatic $C_9-C_{18}$, $C_{19}-C_{36}$, $C_{37}-C_{40}$, and aromatic $C_{11}-C_{22}$, respectively. The corresponding exposure concentrations obtained from 5 points were 139.8, 462.8, 35.1 and 119.4 mg/kg, which were significantly higher than those from 18 points results (p <0.05). Our results suggest that limited number of samples for TPH fractionation may bias estimation of exposure concentration of TPH fractions. Also, it is recommended that more than 30 samples need to be analyzed for TPH fractionation in performing risk assessment.

CalTOX 모델을 이용한 벤젠 종합위해성평가의 불확실성 분석과 민감도 분석 (Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of Human Aggregate Risk Assessment of Benzene using the CalTOX Model)

  • 김옥;이민우;송영호;최진하;박상현;박창용;이진헌
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제46권2호
    • /
    • pp.136-149
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study was to perform an aggregate human risk assessment for benzene in an industrial complex using the CalTOX model and to improve the reliability and predictability of the model by analyzing the uncertainty and sensitivity of the predicted assessment results. Methods: The CalTOXTM 4.0 beta model was used to evaluate a selected region, and @Risk 7.6 software was used to analyze uncertainty and sensitivity. Results: As a result of performing the aggregate risk assessment on the assumption that 6.45E+04 g/d of benzene would be emitted into the atmosphere over two decades, 3% of the daily source term to air remained in the selected region, and 97% (6.26E+04 g/d) moved out of the region. As for exposure by breathing, the predicted LADDinhalation was 2.14E-04 mg/kg-d, and that was assessed as making a 99.99% contribution to the LADDtotal. Regarding human Riskcancer assessment, the predicted human cancer risk was 5.19E-06 (95% CI; 4.07E-06-6.81E-06) (in the 95th percentile corresponding to the highest exposure level, a confidence interval of 90%). As a result of analyzing sensitivity, 'source term to air' was identified as the most influential variable, followed by 'exposure time, active indoors (h/day)', and 'exposure duration (years)'. Conclusions: As for the results of the human cancer risk assessment for the selected region, the predicted human cancer risk was 5.19E-06 (95% CI; 4.07E-06-6.81E-06) (in the 95th percentile, corresponding to the highest exposure level, a confidence interval of 90%). As a result of analyzing sensitivity, 'source term to air' was found to be most influential.

군부대 시설 및 지하철 역사 주변 지하상가의 측정농도와 노출시간을 이용한 실내에서의 라돈 위해성 평가 (Indoor Radon Risk Assessment by Applying Measurement Concentrations and Exposure Times for Military Facilities and Underground Shopping Malls near Subway stations)

  • 공진석;김영희
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제42권5호
    • /
    • pp.345-351
    • /
    • 2016
  • Objectives: The objective of this study was to conduct risk assessment using indoor radon concentration and exposure times. Methods: The target facilities were military facilities before and after the application of radon reduction processes and underground commercial facilities in major subway stations in Seoul. Indoor radon concentrations were measured by passive sampler. Results: Radon concentrations in 13 military facilities were initially higher than the guidelines, but the levels were below guidelines after the application of radon reduction processes. Underground shopping mall radon concentrations near subway stations in Seoul satisfied the guidelines. However, indoor radon effective doses after radon reduction processes in some military facilities and those in underground shopping malls belonged to International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) groups needing control management. Conclusion: Indoor radon management requires risk assessment data that takes into account working time (or residence time) in addition to management according to concentration guidelines.

Principles of Risk Assessment: Overview of the Risk Assessment Process

  • Doull John
    • 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한예방의학회 1994년도 교수 연수회(환경)
    • /
    • pp.402-403
    • /
    • 1994
  • There are three different approaches to chemical risk assessment which will be considered in this paper. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Cancer Risk Assessment includes some of the approaches used by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) effort is an evaluated database approach similar to that used in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Criteria Documents and in the documentations prepared by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for the Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) and those of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) for the Threshold Limit Values (TLVs). A third approach is used by the Committee on Toxicology.

  • PDF