• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.785-791
• /
• 2012

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between 3D visual fatigue and physiological measures by canonical correlation analysis enabling to categorical correlation. Background: Few studies have been conducted to investigate the physiological mechanism underlying the visual fatigue caused by processing 3D information which may make the cognitive mechanism overloaded. However, even the previous studies lack validation in terms of the correlation between physiological variables and the visual fatigue. Method: 9 Female and 6 male subjects with a mean age of $22.53{\pm}2.55$ voluntarily participated in this experiment. All participants were asked to report how they felt about their health sate at after viewing 3D. In addition, Low & Hybrid measurement test(Event Related Potential, Steady-state Visual Evoked Potential) and for evaluating cognitive fatigue before and after viewing 3D were performed. The physiological signal were measured with subjective fatigue evaluation before and after in watching the 3D content. For this study suggesting categorical correlation, all measures were categorized into three sets such as included Visual Fatigue set(response time, subjective evaluation), Autonomic Nervous System set(PPG frequency, PPG amplitude, HF/LF ratio), Central Nervous System set(ERP amplitude P4, O1, O2, ERP latency P4, O1, O2, SSVEP S/N ratio P4, O1, O2). Then the correlation of three variables sets, canonical correlation analysis was conducted. Results: The results showed a significant correlation between visual fatigue and physiological measures. However, different variables of visual fatigue were highly correlated to respective HF/LF ratio and to ERP latency(O2). Conclusion: Response time was highly correlated to ERP latency(O2) while the subjective evaluation was to HF/LF ratio. Application: This study may provide the most significant variables for the quantitative evaluation of visual fatigue using HF/LF ratio and ERP latency based human performance and subjective fatigue.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.45-60
• /
• 2010

This study evaluates life annuity plans based on two different types of measures : financial benefit and utility on consumption. The financial benefit is measured by Money's Worth (MW) ratio and return on annuity. For the measure of utility, an optimization problem is formulated with the objective of maximizing utility on consumption. To solve the optimization model, we use Dynamic Programming (DP) technique. The both types of measures are applied to cases of Korean pre-retirees at age 40 with different accumulation years of annuity (i.e. level of annuity asset at the age of retirement) and different timings of annuitization. Our results generally indicate that the utility based optimization model is superior to the financial measures in terms of providing a better evaluation of an annuity plan due to its capability to consider an individual's financial situation during his/her retirement period. Also, they suggest that the level of annuity asset is an important factor when an individual determines the optimal annuitization timing.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.244-248
• /
• 2012

F-Measure is one of the external measures for evaluating the validity of clustering results. Though it has clear advantages over other widely used external measures such as Purity and Entropy, F-Measure has inherently been less sensitive than other validity measures. This insensitivity owes to the definition of F-Measure that counts only most influential portions. In this research, we present $F_n$-Measure, an external cluster evaluation measure based on F-Measure. $F_n$-Measure is so sensitive that it can detect their difference in the cases that F-Measure cannot detect the difference in clustering results. We compare $F_n$-Measure to F-Measure for a few clustering results and show which measure draws better result based upon homogeneity and completeness.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2012년 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.293-300
• /
• 2012

Reliability measures of questionnaire and ${\chi}^2$ contingency tests of categorized responses are most practical tools to analyze the characteristics of subjects of survey study. This research evaluates the Cronbaha's reliability measures by using Repeated Measure Design (RMD) with illustrated MINITAB examples. In addition, ${\chi}^2$ statistics of each cell of categorized tables can be effectively interpreted with the symmetric plot of correspondence analysis. The practical example is also discussed to provide comprehensive understanding of topic.

• 한국방사성폐기물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방사성폐기물학회 2018년도 추계학술논문요약집
• /
• pp.105-106
• /
• 2018

It is important to set up a reasonable failure criterion for cladding, because being able to determine the cladding integrity during transportation is essential for the evaluation of SNF transportation system. There are a few of measures which can be used as a failure criterion for cladding subjected to its specific failure mode. Therefore, to select and to use appropriate failure criterion measures, i.e. strain(UE), $K_{IC}$, and CSED would be a key in evaluating the cladding integrity during transportation with every aspects. In order to justify and quantify that criterion properly, various experiments for the mechanical properties of the claddings with different conditions shall be implemented, which data will enable to justify the failure criteria proposed.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.3-20
• /
• 2018

Independence and impartiality are the operating core of an arbitration disciplinary mechanism. Due to many factors, illegalities and improper acts in arbitration cases are facts of life in our country, and have greatly damaged the credibility of arbitration. It is necessary for us to perfect the operating mechanism of arbitration discipline from the four pluralistic progressive aspects of disciplining the cause externalization, disciplining the subject duality, the quasi-judicature of disciplinary procedures and the disciplining measures so that the populace can experience fairness and justice in every case. We should perfect the supporting measures such as the strict selection conditions and procedures of arbitrators, improving the quality of the arbitrator team, exploring the management mechanisms and strengthening the evaluation dynamic. An examination is a general investigation and evaluation so as to provide encouragement for being continually engaged as arbitrators, but it does not provide an objective basis of arbitration discipline. It is urgent to perfect the arbitration guarantee system on the basis of meeting the material needs of the arbitrators so as to enhance the sense of professional rank and honour of arbitration.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2019

This study focuses on the evaluation of severity measures used for accidents associated with industrial machines and devices. In particular, duration of medical treatment, duration of work loss, number of deaths in an individual accident associated with industrial machines and devices are evaluated in various ways to assess the severity of the accident. The number of accidents with work loss of longer than 1 year as the severity measure and the number of accidents as the frequency measure appeared to be the most discriminating information and allow risk assessment based on these frequency and severity measures for grouping of industrial machines and devices. Results of such risk assessment further confirmed the re-classification of industrial machines and devices that are currently subject to safety certification (SC) and self-declaration of conformity (SDC) or selection of those machines and devices that are newly subject to SC and SDC.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.17-28
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation items and weight determination of the indoor environmental safety area, which has the most frequent accidents, among the safety certification evaluations of educational facilities by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, which has been conducted since May 2021. As a preceding study, the evaluation items of the school safety evaluation checklist being implemented in the US state of Vermont were compared, and the causes of accidents judged by teachers in the accident experiences written by 200 Korean teachers were compared with the safety certification evaluation items belonged to the Ministry of Education. In addition, research literature using the AHP analysis technique on safety risks of elementary and secondary schools in China and safety evaluation index study cases of 539 elementary school children in Indonesia were analyzed. Through these preceding studies, measures to add and adjust evaluation items were derived and the validity and importance rankings of evaluation items were calculated through AHP questionnaires to teachers and safety experts. In addition, a survey was conducted on 104 ordinary people to verify the results of expert analysis. As a result of expert AHP analysis, 'safety education and disaster response training (.396)' was the highest priority for the relative importance of the first layer, followed by 'safety measures (.387)' and 'building materials'. Safety (.216)' was found to be the highest priority. In the overall importance ranking of the 13 second-tier screening items, safety accident prevention education had the highest priority and disaster preparedness training ranked second, proving that the Ministry of Education's review weight was underestimated. In addition, slip and collision accident countermeasures, which were not in the existing Ministry of Education review items, ranked 4th, laboratory practice room safety measures ranked 6th, and sanitation, cleanliness, hazardous substance management, and cafeteria/cooking room safety measures ranked 9th, indicating a significant level of importance. Referring to the importance ranking, which is the result of this study, it is suggested that it is necessary to review the weight of each review item again.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.71-83
• /
• 2012

최근 행정중심복합도시와 혁신도시, 미군기지 이전사업을 중심으로 건설공사에서의 비용절감 및 품질향상, 기술개발 및 가치구현을 목적으로 기술제안입찰방식 적용이 확대되고 있다. 이로 인하여 기술제안입찰에서 중요 평가항목 중의 하나인 '생애주기비용 개선방안'에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있으며, 특히 건축물 생애주기비용에 대한 신뢰성 확보 및 객관적인 평가를 수행할 수 있는 방안을 마련하기 위해 노력하고 있다. 하지만 기술제안입찰에서의 생애주기비용 개선방안에 대한 적용사례의 부족, 원안에 대한 초기공사비의 왜곡, 불변가와 현재가의 혼재, 입찰업체간 산정기준의 모호성, 용어의 불명확성, 작성양식의 미흡 등의 문제점이 지적되고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기술제안입찰에서의 평가항목 중 생애주기비용 개선방안에 대한 참여업체별 변별력을 확보하고 체계적인 생애주기비용 평가를 수행하기 위하여 작성지침 및 분석기준, 작성양식에 대한 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국공간구조학회논문집
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 학교 건물의 구조적 성능 평가를 통한 내진보강에 대한 연구이다. 본 연구의 목적은 학교 건물의 구조적 성능평가를 통하여 안전성과 사용성을 고려한 구조보강방안을 비교분석하고 합리적 내진 보강안을 제시하여 보다 지진에 안전한 건축물을 유지하는데 도움 이 되고자 한다. 이 목적을 위해 기존의 학교건물을 연구 대상으로 선정하여 내진성능평가를 실시하고 내진 보강안을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 방법은 기존의 철근콘크리트 학교건물을 대상으로 1차 내진 성능평가와 2차 내진 성능평가를 실시하였다. 위와 같은 방법으로 내진성능평가를 하여 그 결과를 분석하고 내진보강방안을 제시(강재댐퍼, 탄소막대보강재)하였다. 제시된 내진 보강방안을 대상 건축물에 적용하여 내진보강 전, 후의 내진성능평가를 통해 종합적인 결과를 도출 하였다.