• 보건의료산업학회지
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2015

Objectives : The aim of this research was to develop evaluation indicators that ensure safe services and enhance the quality of small-sized dental hospitals within local communities to prepare for the dental hospital accreditation system. Methods : Materials and data from a total of 460 respondents were analyzed after quality improvement indicators were formed by surveying experts and studying documents in Korea and abroad, and by conducting a survey from August 21, 2013 to September 30, 2013 for validation purposes. Results : Based on the results of factor analysis. all measured items appeared to be statistically significant with a factor loading score of at least 0.5, and the correlation between the factors all appeared to be high as well. The goodness-of-fit for the model also appeared to be within the recommended acceptance level. Thus, the proposed evaluation indicators for dental hospital accreditation developed in this study consisted of a total of seven major category factors and a total of 91 detailed items. Conclusions : Furthermore, the results suggest that the evaluation indicators can be used to improve the quality and to ensure the safe services of dental hospitals in local communities.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2014

A dredging on erosion control dam has been enforced without evaluation the factors that affect the dredging. In addition, there is the negative effect much more than positive effect by dredging on erosion control dam. Therefore, this study was carried out to develop evaluation indicators and to suggest fieldbook in order to determine whether sand deposits at erosion control dam should be dredged up or not. The most important six evaluation indicators that can decide to dredge up at erosion control dam were obtained from three round delphi technique and were selected in the following order: the current sand deposit ratio(0.339), existence of cultivated land and house downstream(0.276), the slope of streambed(0.162), the amount of movable soil and gravel(0.118), the history of any disasters(0.063), the basin area(0.043). The weighted score for each evaluation indicator were acquired from AHP analysis with respect to the degree of importance and then the modified weighted score for actual measurements were classified as three categories: large(2.53), medium(1.60) and small(1.01). Based on delphi technique, erosion control dam dredging evaluation fieldbook introduced the four evaluation indicators out of the total six evaluation indicators and two low effected evaluation indicators were excluded. This results showed that the values for reliability analysis and consistency ratio were acceptable.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.37-47
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to introduce the concept of community resilience to rural society and build an index suitable for the reality of rural areas. Furthermore, by calculating the importance of evaluation factors, it was attempted to present priorities and alternatives for each evaluation factor. By stratifying the derived indicators, a survey was conducted targeting 20 researchers, practitioners, and public officials, three groups of experts working in rural areas who were well aware of the realities and problems of rural areas. In the survey, a pairwise comparison was performed to compare factors 1:1 to calculate the importance, and for rational and consistent decision-making, decisions were made in the 9-grade section. Using the collected data, consistency analysis that can evaluate reliability in the decision-making process and the relative weight of evaluation factors were calculated through AHP analysis. As a result of the analysis, as a result of examining the priority of final importance by summarizing the importance of all evaluation factors, 'Income creation using resources' > 'Population Characteristics' > 'Tolerance' > 'External Support' > 'Social Accessibility' > 'Physical Accessibility' > 'Community Competence' > 'Infrastructure' > 'Leader Competence' > 'Natural Environment' was derived in the order. In the study dealing with urban community resilience indicators, social aspects such as citizen participation, public-private cooperation, and governance were presented as the most important requirements, but this study differs in that the 'income creation' factor is derived as the most important factor. This can be seen through the change in the income difference between rural and urban areas. The income structure of rural areas has changed rapidly, and it is now reaching a very poor level, so it is necessary to prepare alternatives to 'income creation' in the case of rural areas. Unlike urban indicators, 'population characteristics' and 'tolerance' were also derived as important indicators of rural society. However, there are currently no alternatives to supplement the vulnerability by strengthening the resilience of rural communities. Based on the priority indicators derived from the study, we tried to suggest alternatives necessary for rural continuity in the future so that they can be supplemented step by step.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.364-382
• /
• 2009

The purposes of this study were to develop the standard indicators to evaluate the food and nutrition systems in hospitals and to test the validity of those items scientifically. The results were as follows: First, the conceptual validity was examined with recognition degrees of importance from the hospital nutrition department managers. All of the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation standards and the indicators' conceptual validity tested were in the range of 3.71~4.93 out of 5.0, and the mean score was 4.36. Therefore, the conceptual validity was verified. Second, to verify the factor validity of the items of the standards and indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation, the standards and indicators were analyzed as key-factors. Key-factor analysis after vertical rotation showed that four factors appeared and were composed of (a) facilities management, (b) sanitation management, (c) operation & foodservice management, and (d) nutrition management. Third, the reliability of the standards and indicators for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation was analyzed and resulted in a score of 0.98, which showed good internal consistency. Fourth, the discriminative power of each item of the standards for the hospital nutrition department's operation evaluation was tested by checking the differences between groups with first quartile and forth quartile of total evaluation scores. The indicators having low distinction power were modified into obligatory items or eliminated for better differentiation.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.41-64
• /
• 2007

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the evaluation indicators on safety and health education programs provided to Korean industrial workers, by developing further. Methods: To develop the early evaluation indicator, the secondary analysis was made on 'Survey on Industrial safety & health trends', the national wide survey data product by Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, as well as the various examinations on literatures. To validate such developed evaluation indicator, 13 safety and health managers in Focus Group discussion to prove the reliability of the contents were composed. To confirm the face validity, the interview with 6 industrial safety and health education experts was held to study the appropriateness of the content. With the cooperation from Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, the structured survey was performed with the safety and health managers from 588 businesses who participated in the education program for the later half of 2006. In this study, the number of responses was randomly divided into 1:1 two groups, in which one group was for the Exploratory Factor Analysis and the other group was for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results: The results were as follows. First, for the Structure category, 18 evaluation indicators were developed into 4 evaluation categories such as a preliminary examination, education staff and organization, education environment and rules/ regulation. Secondly, the Activity category was comprised of 10 evaluation indicators with respect to 2 areas of curriculum satisfaction and program evaluation. Finally, for the Output category, 9 evaluation indicators were developed into 2 evaluation areas such as documentation and information share and education effects. Conclusions: The evaluation indicators developed through this study will possibly develop and be applied to evaluation tools on safety and health education program, which may further become the standardized indicators to better operate the industrial safety and health education programs.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2009

This paper objected which prevented the accident occurrence of the related farm work, and developed the evaluation indicators for safety supervision on life environment of farmer and farm work to evaluate the health of farm worker and a musculoskeletal disorders. We selected the evaluation item to 82 items for executing the secondary Delphi investigation and the literature research which composed the farm work relationship specialist conference. We applied the index production of the evaluation indicators to decide the detailed element weight from the element which is farm work, the farm machine and the organization, farm workshop, dangerous substance, and life environment through the AHP techniques. Through the result, we can apply other ergonomic evaluation instrument of farm work field, but also the evaluation indicators for safety supervision on farm work.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.329-350
• /
• 2009

본 연구의 목적은 2009년도 공공도서관 평가에 포함시킬 이용자 평가에 활용하기 위한 공공도서관 이용자 만족도 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 이용자 만족도 지표 개발을 통해 도서관 운영중심의 정량적 지표에서 오는 불균형을 보완하고자 하였다. 선행 연구 및 지표 개발 사례를 토대로 이용자 만족도 지표 항목을 개발하였고 사전조사를 통해 지표의 신뢰성, 타당성, 중복성이 분석되었다. 특히, 사전조사는 기존 공공도서관 운영지표를 적용 받는 운영 주체 및 규모별로 분류된 10개 집단의 도서관에서 각각 선정하여 수행함으로써 개발된 지표의 적용 가능성에 초점을 맞추었다. 최종 분석결과 이용자 만족도 지표는 장서, 직원, 시설, 프로그램, 온라인 서비스, 정보 제공 정도의 영역에서 10개 항목이 선정되었다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제57권1호
• /
• pp.309-338
• /
• 2023

사회적·환경적 이슈에 대한 인식이 증가함에 따라 ESG 경영에 대한 관심이 높아지고, ESG 경영평가의 영향력은 점점 더 강해지고 있으며, 도서관도 ESG 경영평가에 참여할 필요가 있다. ESG 경영을 도서관에 적용하기 위해서는 도서관에 적용 가능한 ESG 경영을 정의하고 범주를 확인한 후, 먼저 적용과 지속적인 환류를 전제로 평가지표 개발이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기업을 포함하여 공공기관 ESG 경영평가지표를 포괄적으로 살펴보고 이로부터 도서관에 적용가능한 ESG 경영평가지표를 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 ESG 관련 선행연구 조사·분석, 선행연구 기반 도서관 ESG 예비경영평가지표 도출, 예비경영평가지표에 대한 전문가 FGI 의견 수렴, 전문가 FGI 의견 수렴 기반 1차 도서관 ESG 경영평가지표 개발, 1차 도서관 ESG 경영평가지표의 적합도 조사과정을 거쳤다. 최종적으로 환경 영역은 총 25개 항목, 사회 영역은 총 56개 항목, 지배구조 영역은 총 32개 항목을 선정하였다. 향후 연구에서는 이 지표를 기반으로 도서관을 대상으로 ESG 경영평가를 수행할 필요가 있다고 본다.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2000

Objective : Use of Internet for health related information is rapidly increasing. There is, however, no consensus as to which information is correct and reliable. This study was conducted to develop an evaluation standards for health related information on the Internet for the purpose of delivering correct information to internet users. Methods : A Delphi technique, which involved a panel of 65 experts, was used as the research design for this study. In the first round, the initial evaluation criteria which consisted of 12 items was developed through a literature review by the researcher and the items represented 2 categories, structure and function. In the second round, a semi-structured questionnaire was sent to the experts with the initial evaluation tool and the respondents identified 55 items. In the third round, these 55 items were analyzed for content validity by the experts and a total of 35 items were included in the model; 11 items in the structural area, 24 in the functional area. Conclusions : Development of indicators for the evaluation of internet site for health information is crucial to provide correct and reliable information. For evaluation to be effective further evaluation programs need to be developed so that users can be sure that the information they received is accurate.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.257-265
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 자전거 이용에 필요한 이용환경과 관련된 지표를 도출하고, 자전거 이용환경을 평가할 수 있는 평가지표를 개발 및 적용하였다. 분석결과 평가요소 간 상대적 중요도는 자전거 안전성이 가장 높았으며 전체적으로 자전거 주행에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 항목의 우선순위가 높고 간접적인 영향을 미치는 항목은 중요도가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 평가모형을 토지이용별로 자전거도로에 적용한 결과 비교적 현실적으로 묘사할 수 있는 것으로 확인되었고 향후 이를 활용하여 지자체의 자전거도로 이용환경 개선을 위한 개선방향 도출 등에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.