• 정보처리학회논문지C
• /
• 제11C권6호
• /
• pp.773-780
• /
• 2004

본 논문에서는 대표적인 스트림형 트래픽인 DV와 MPEG2를 초고속 네트워크 상에서 전송하고 이들 스트림에 대한 최종 사용자의 주관적 평가를 수행하였다. 두 가지 스트림형 데이터에 대해 화질 측정은 ITU-R BT.500-1을 기반으로 하여 측정하였고, 음질 측정은 ITU-R BS.1116-1을 기반으로 측정하였다. 또한 최종 사용자의 주관적 평가를 얻기 위한 실험 방법으로는 DSCQS 5단계 평가 방법을 채택하였다. 유사한 조건하에서 MPEG2 스트림의 경우, 네트워크 트래픽 파라미터가 급증하는 $54\%$의 부하율에서 화질과 음질의 평가 등급이 급격히 하강한다. DV의 경우 화질은 MPEG2와 마찬가지로 $54\%$의 부하율에서 평가 등급이 하락하지만 그 변화의 정도가 MPEG2에 비해 완만하며 점진적인 것을 확인할 수 있다. 반면 DV 음질의 경우는 부하율 $70\%$까지 사용자의 주관적 평가 등급이 우수하여 사용자의 주관적 평가를 고려한 트래픽 제어 및 QoS 제어가 요구된다. 결론적으로 MPEG2의 경우는 네트워크 상의 실측값과 최종 사용자의 주관적 평가가 거의 동일하므로, 네트워크 실측값만으로 트래픽 제어가 가능하고, DV의 경우는 네트워크 상의 실측값과 최종 사용자의 주관적 평가 등급을 동시에 고려한 트래픽 제어가 가능하다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.77-95
• /
• 1995

This paper shows the case study of risk analysis in an weapon system research and development project. For risk analysis, an advanced stochastic networking technique-VERT (Venture Evaluation and Review Technique) is used. Assumptions for activities of network diagram and conversion methods from PERT ( Program Evaluation and Review Technique) to VERT are discussed. Also, simulation result is presented and discussed.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.174-183
• /
• 2023

Educational evaluation involves data collection and the analysis of various education-related factors to make decisions that improve educational quality. Systematic educational evaluation is essential for enhancing the quality of education. This study reports a case of student-conducted process evaluation of a medical school's student support system and the procedure for devising improvement plans. Sixteen Inje University College of Medicine students participated in the Education Evaluation Committee (IUCM-EEC) to understand the educational improvement process as learners and actively achieve improvement. The Quality Improvement Committee of the Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM-QIC) decided to reform its student support system based on a previous educational evaluation in 2019. The evaluation of the student support system was conducted for 10 months in 2021 by the student subcommittee, under the guidance of the IUCM-EEC. The CIPP (context-input-process-product) evaluation model was used for a systematic evaluation. Accordingly, the subcommittee developed evaluation criteria and indicators, and analyzed relevant data collected from surveys and the previous literature. For further recommendations and revision ideas, the student subcommittee members interviewed faculty members from six other medical schools and also conducted a focus group interview with the dean and vice deans of IUCM. Finally, the student subcommittee submitted a report to the IUCM-QIC. Communication with various stakeholders is essential for a successful evaluation process. In this case, students, as key stakeholders in education, evaluated the student support system. Their active participation helped improve their understanding of the evaluation process.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.173-187
• /
• 2009

CASE tools are complex software products offering many different features. Systems professionals have evaluated various CASE products from a feature and attribute basis. Each product has a different mix of strengths and weaknesses as perceived by the end user. Specific CASE tools support different steps of the applications development process as well as varying methodologies. In this paper we develop a method for evaluating CASE tools. The model has an analytic hierarchy process for evaluating CASE tools in terms of functionality, management efficiency, and support ability of provider, and a data envelopment analysis for overall evaluation considering cost and AHP results. We applied the developed model to a real world case study.

• 대한한방내과학회지
• /
• 제24권2_4호
• /
• pp.995-1006
• /
• 2003

Objective: The purpose of this study is to see whether pain in cancer patients is decreased by Eriobotryae Folium Fomentation. Methods: We examined the change in pain among six cancer patients, prescribing Eriobotryae Folium Fomentation. As for evaluating methods, we used the case history of pain, the direct evaluation of pain, the indirect evaluation of pain. The direct evaluation of pain is subdivided by the language expression, the non-language expression, and Visual analog scale(VAS). The indirect evaluation of pain is subdivided by the condition of walking, mood and the condition of sleep. Results: After two weeks, any remarkable pain decrease is not observed in both of the direct evaluation and indirect evaluation.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.29-46
• /
• 1996

In the past decade, considerable effort has been devoted unsuccessfully to the development of information technology (IT) evaluation frameworks in the information systems area. Based on the literature review in this area and the decision analysis field, two competing evaluation frameworks are developed in this study: the direct evaluation framework and the indirect evaluation framework. A case study on Firm K shows that the latter is more practically efficient and theoretically appropriate but requires the adequate training for practitioners in order not to get confused the weight of an evaluation variable with the product of this weight and the score of the variable. Another finding is that Weill's conversion effectiveness is neither possible nor necessary to measure in the process of evaluating an IT although it is in theory an important concept.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.201-217
• /
• 2002

Researchers, institutes, and government involved in research & development (R&D) are faced with the problem of performing R&D project evaluations. As a real-word case of evaluation, we elicited and reproduced the evaluation process of the national nuclear R&D projects, using a specific case study of Korea. In the methodology, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is employed to evaluate and rank the selected nuclear R&D projects which have a wide range of evaluation objectives and characteristics. As a result, we obtained relative ranking for research projects and importance of evaluation criteria. The method and implications can be easily understood and applied by practitioners since it follows naturally the standard practice of evaluating and relative comparisons of performance using evaluation procedures. By applying particular R&D project output to the procedures, project evaluators can compare and prioritize evaluation objectives.

• 한국전자거래학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전자거래학회 2003년도 종합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.148-154
• /
• 2003

An Evaluation System of Personal Information Competency was developed to evaluate individual Information competency and maturity levels in the enterprises of the information environment. The Evaluation System measures the requirements of information knowledge, skills, and mindset with the evaluation indices of personal information maturity. The indices are customized to four types of business departments - strategy Planning, development/maintenance, business applications, and administration support. Also, a maturity model of personal information competency is defined for interpretation of the evaluation results. The system was applied to assessment of actual human resources, 124 workers in an enterprise, to testify to its practical value. The case evaluation procedures include a series of questionnaires, written tests and application tests.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.471-478
• /
• 2014

Navy forces of ROK asked for more than 90% operational availability in the requirement document of combat ship. This study proposes the evaluation methodology of operational availability with the evaluation process, calculation formula, analysis of operational test data. As the case study, the developed methodology is proved to apply for 00 batch-I naval ship using the data to be acquired during the operational test period. The operational availability by test data was 90.03%, and it was satisfied with objective value 90%. The paper will contribute not only to establish the evaluation methodology of operational availability for combat ship but also other general weapon system.

• 실천공학교육논문지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2022

파이썬 프로그래밍 언어를 강의하는 과목은, 일반 대학에서 모든 재학생이 필수로 이수하는 교양 과목으로 대부분 운영되고 있다. 이를 통해, 컴퓨팅 사고에 의한 기초 프로그래밍 과정을 학습한 비전공자 학생들이 다양한 전공 분야에서 SW를 적용할 수 있는 융합 역량을 강화하고 있다. 기존 연구결과에서는 컴퓨팅 사고 개념 이해와 코드 작성 역량에 대한 다양한 평가 방법들이 제시되었다. 그러나, 평가 문제 사례는 제시되지 않아, 실제 과목 운영 시 적용하는 데 어려움이 있다. 이에 본 논문에서는 비전공자들을 위한 교양과목으로 적용할 수 있는 파이썬 기초 프로그래밍 커리큘럼을 ADDIE 모형에 따라 제안하였다. 그리고 제안된 상세 커리큘럼에 따른 파이썬 요소별 평가 문제 사례를 1차와 2차로 나누어 제안하였다. 마지막으로 본 평가 문제 사례를 적용한 강좌에서 산출된 비전공자 학생들의 평가 점수 결과를 바탕으로 제안한 평가 문제의 유효성을 분석하였다. 제안된 평가 문제 사례는 실시간 온라인 비대면 평가 방식으로 적용하여, 효과적으로 비전공자 학생들의 프로그래밍 역량을 평가할 수 있음을 확인하였다.