• 한국축산식품학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.162-171
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to investigate the quality of duck ham formulated with duck skin through the pre-emulsification process. The experiments to investigate the quality characteristics of duck ham were carried out to measure proximate composition, cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, texture profile analysis, apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics. Duck ham was prepared with various ratios of duck skin in pre-emulsion as follows: Control (duct skin 30%), T1 (duck skin 20% + pre-emulsified duck skin 10%), T2 (duck skin 15% + pre-emulsified duck skin 15%), T3 (duck skin 10% + pre-emulsified duck skin 20%), and T4 (pre-emulsified duck skin 30%). As the ratio of duck skin to pre-emulsified skin changed, the quality of duck ham in terms of moisture content, fat content, cooking loss, emulsion stability, lightness, textural analysis, apparent viscosity, and overall acceptability changed. The moisture content of T2 was the highest (p<0.05) and that of the control and T4 was the lowest (p<0.05). The fat content of control was higher than all treatments (p<0.05). T2 had the lowest values in cooking loss, total expressible fluid, fat separation, hardness, springiness, and gumminess (p<0.05). The score of overall acceptability of all treatments with pre-emulsified skin was higher than control (p<0.05). Therefore, the pre-emulsification process can improve the quality characteristics of duck ham and 1:1 ratio of duck skin and pre-emulsified skin was the proper ratio to improve the quality characteristics of duck ham.

• 한국축산식품학회지
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.360-367
• /
• 2017

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck ham formulations were produced with the following compositions: T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%), T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%), T3 (duck breast 50% + duck skin 50%), T4 (duck breast 40% + duck skin 60%), and T5 (duck breast 30% + duck skin 70%). The cooking loss and fat separation were lower in T1, and the total expressible fluid separations were lower in T1 and T2 than others. The pH ranged from 6.48 to 6.59, with the highest values in T4 and T5. T5 had the highest CIE $L^*$-value, and T1 and T2 had the highest CIE $a^*$-values; however, CIE $b^*$-values did not differ significantly between the duck ham samples. The protein solubility and TPA (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness) were the highest in T1. T1 and T2 had higher scores for color, tenderness, and overall acceptability. T1, T2, and T3 showed significantly higher values, but there were no significant differences for flavor and juiciness. Regarding apparent viscosity properties, T1 and T2 had higher viscosity values than the other formulations. In conclusion, the T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%) and T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%) duck hams show the highest quality characteristics.

• 오리마을
• /
• 통권180호
• /
• pp.26-33
• /
• 2018

• 한국축산식품학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.261-268
• /
• 1998

In beef, the composition of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids(UFA) were 41.1% and 56.7%, respectively. The rates of saturated fatty acid (SFA) was 36.3, 40.9, 39.2 and 48.1% in loin, picnic shoulder, ham and rib, respectively. However, UFA showed 62.3, 58.4, 56.8, 50.9% in loin, picnic shoulder, ham and rib, respectively. The rates of monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) were similar to those of unsaturated fatty acid in four portions. The content of SFA, UFA and polyunsaturated fatty acid(PUFA) were 40, 59 and 9.4%, respectively, in pork. In portional comparison, composition of unsaturated fatty acids in picnic shoulder, ham rib and loin were 64.2, 60.4, 54.6 and 55.3%, respectively. The UFA contents of rib and loin were lower than picnic shoulder and ham, but SFA levels were higher. Total UFA content of chicken was 62.9% showing higher level than other species, but low when compared to that of duck meat. SFA content resulted in lower level than other portions. In the skin of chicken, MUFA content was especially high showing no significant changes in UFA contents. Duck meat showed lower SFA content, but higher content in UFA compared to those of other species. Skin and thigh contained 31.8 and 31.5%, respectively, in SFA, which are lower level than those of breast and thigh meat. The UFA contents of skin and thigh were 67.4 and 67.7%, respectively, which are relatively high compared to those of other portions. Meanwhile, the ratio of UFA was not high in canis meat compared to other meat. PUFA was, however, 24.2% showed significantly different from other meats. The contents of SFA were 35.4% and 35.9%, respectively, in picnic shoulder and ham. They showed lower SFA but higher UFA content than those of rib and loin. In contrast, the ratio of picnic shoulder and ham were 61.6 and 61.4%, respectively. Interestingly, picnic shoulder showed higher UFA content, especially in arachidonic acid level than other portions.

• 한국유기농업학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.35-51
• /
• 1999

• Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• 제24권7호
• /
• pp.891-892
• /
• 2003

• 한국작물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국작물학회 2019년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.204-204
• /
• 2019

• 축산식품과학과 산업
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.34-40
• /
• 2017

• 한국식품과학회지
• /
• 제43권5호
• /
• pp.525-531
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 식육의 중금속 기준규격 설정을 위하여 다소비 식품인 소, 돼지, 닭, 오리, 햄 및 소시지에 대하여 중금속 함량을 조사하였다. 국내 유통 중 식육 및 식육 가공품 총 466건을 2008년 5월부터 11월까지 구입하고 납, 카드뮴, 비소 및 수은의 함량을 분석하였다. 시료의 분해를 위해 관련 전처리 방법을 비교하여 검증된 중금속 분석법을 찾고자 하였으며, 이를 근거로 소, 돼지, 닭, 오리, 햄 및 소시지 6종류의 시료에 대하여 납, 카드뮴, 비소 및 수은을 모니터링하고 안전성 평가를 위해, 수집된 자료와 식이섭취량으로 JECFA의 주간잠정섭취허용량와 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 전처리법으로 비교한 습식 분해법과 마이크로웨이브법은 회수율이 모두 80% 이상이며 재현성(RSD)은 10% 미만으로 나타났으나 전처리 시간과 조작의 편리성에서 마이크로웨이브법이 나은 것으로 판단되었다. 따라서 납, 카드뮴, 비소의 경우 산 혼합액을 사용한 마이크로웨이브법으로 시료를 전처리하여 ICP-MS로 분석하였고, 수은은 수은분석기를 사용하여 직접 분석하였다. 전반적으로 낮게 검출된 원소는 카드뮴과 수은이었으며, 납과 비소는 상대적으로 높게 나타났다. 납의 경우 평균함량이 식육은 0.006-0.010 mg/kg이었고, 식육가공품은 0.005-0.009 mg/kg이었다. 카드뮴의 경우 평균함량이 식육은 0.000-0.001 mg/kg이었고, 식육가공품은 0.001-0.002 mg/kg이었다. 비소의 경우 평균함량이 식육은 0.004-0.021 mg/kg이었고, 식육가공품은 0.014-0.018 mg/kg이었다. 그리고 수은 함량은 식육에서 0.710-0.902 ${\mu}g/kg$이었고, 식육가공품은 1.052-1.141 ${\mu}g/kg$이었다. 안전성 평가를 위해 본 연구에서 측정된 모니터링 자료를 이용하여 JECFA(Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives)의 주간잠정섭취허용량(Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake, PTWI)와 비교하여 노출량을 평가한 결과, 본 사업에서 검출된 중금속 함량은 비교적 안전한 수준으로 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국축산식품학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.387-394
• /
• 2014

This study was conducted to determine the effect of duck feet gelatin concentration on the physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of duck meat jellies. Duck feet gelatin was prepared with acidic swelling and hot water extraction. In this study, four duck meat jellies were formulated with 3, 4, 5, and 6% duck feet gelatin, respectively. In the preliminary experiment, the increase in duck feet gelatin ranged from 5 to 20%, resulting in a significant (p<0.001) increase in the color score, but a decline in the hardness and dispersibility satisfaction scores. An increase in the added amount of duck feet gelatin contributed to decreased lightness and increased protein content in duck meat jellies. Regarding the textural properties, increase in the added amount of duck feet gelatin highly correlated with the hardness in the center (p<0.01, $R^2=0.91$), and edge (p<0.01, $R^2=0.89$), of duck meat jellies. Meanwhile, the increase in duck feet gelatin decreased the score for textural satisfaction; duck meat jellies containing 6% duck feet gelatin had a significantly lower textural satisfaction score, than those containing 3% duck feet gelatin (p<0.05). Furthermore, a significant difference in the overall acceptance of duck meat jellies formulated with 5% duck feet gelatin was observed, as compared to those prepared with 3% duck feet gelatin. Therefore, this study suggested that duck feet gelatin is a useful ingredient for manufacturing cold-cut meat products. In consideration of the sensory acceptance, the optimal level of duck feet gelatin in duck meat jellies was determined to be 5%.