• 제목/요약/키워드: doctor's duty of care

검색결과 20건 처리시간 0.026초

의사의 불성실한 진료행위로 인한 손해배상책임 (Liability for Damage due to Doctors' Unfaithful Medical Practice)

  • 전병남
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.317-343
    • /
    • 2014
  • In order to account for whether a doctor should indemnify damages resulted from violation of duty of care, the fact that a doctor violated duty of care, that damages were incurred, and the link between violation of duty of care and damages incurred, respectively, should be verified. So even though a doctor violated duty of care to patients, he or she will not bear the responsibility to indemnify damages unless it is not verified. If a doctor's negligence in medical practices is assessed that obviously unfaithful medical practice far exceeds the limit of admission of a patient, it will not go against people's general perception of justice or law and order to constitute a medical malpractice itself as an illegal action that will require liabiliy for damage. However, when the limit of admission is set too low, a patient's benefit and expectation of proper medical treatment can be violated. In contrast, if the limit of admission is set high, it can leave too little room for doctors' discretion for treatments due to a bigger risk of indemnification for damages. Thus, a reasonable balance that can satisfy both benefit and expectation of patients and doctors' right to treatment is needed.

  • PDF

한의사의 의료기기 사용과 주의의무에 있어서 한방의료행위의 새로운 이해 (The New Understanding of Korean Medicine Practice in Korean Medicine Doctor's Medical Devices Using and Duty of Care)

  • 박용신
    • 대한예방한의학회지
    • /
    • 제23권2호
    • /
    • pp.117-127
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objectives : Korean medicine practice is not specifically described in medical law, and then has always been a quarrel. So far The criteria for judgment in Korean Medicine Doctor's Medical Devices Using should clinically prove it only by Korean medicine theory and academic Traditionally descending from old ancestors. Comprehensively review of Korean Medicine Doctor's Medical Devices Using and Duty of Care, and then present a new understandings to determine future Korean Medicine Practice. Method : An existing court cases of Korean Medicine Doctor's Medical Devices Using and Duty of Care were reviewed. After reviewing various papers published for several years, various opinions were reviewed and suggested. Results : The range of Korean Medicine Doctor's Medical Devices Using has changed since the 1951 National Medical Law stipulated Korean medicine as medical professionals. The issue of the recent ruling that distinguishes medical practice from Korean medicine practice were condensed into what emphasis to interpret amongst 1) The basic principles of learning, 2) Curriculum and professionalism, 3) Risks. The Constitutional Court's ruling was important in order of 'Risk', 'curriculum and expertise', and 'basic principles of learning.' A duty of Care means an obligation to pay attention to something. A duty of Care does not mean a "highest level," but requires a "best care" and does "best under given conditions." Even in the duty of Care, Because Korean medicine has a purpose to protect and promote the health of the people, Some standards of western medicine have to be adapted to the current general medical technology. Korean Medicine doctors can recognize the duty of care in the "some basic range" of knowledge belonging to western medicine. Conclusions : The interpretation of Korean Medicine practice are currently in compatible the argument that should clearly divide Korean medicine from Western medicine, and that should be changed in light of the changing medical environment. Therefore If Korean medicine's standard is applied to the extent to which Korean Medicine doctors are educated, it is necessary to define a new definition to actively interpret Korean Medical practice. The academic basis of Korean medicine and the level of Korean medicine practice based on the books that are traditionally available, and then current textbooks of Korean Medicine College, Korean Medicine Clinical Care Guidelines, and classification of Korean standard medical practices should be standardized. Increasingly, Korean Medicine practice should be interpreted according to reality, focusing on protecting and promoting the health of the people rather than academic differences.

정신질환자의 자살과 의료과오책임 (Negligence liability of hospitals for suicide of patient)

  • 손흥수
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제7권2호
    • /
    • pp.9-74
    • /
    • 2006
  • Due to the awareness of their rights for medical liability and the advancement of legal principles, it becomes also not hard to find those who seek damages against hospitals, doctors and nurses for the suicide committed under the protection of psychiatric institute in Korea these days. Judgements on these kinds of cases are not enough yet, so that it may be too early to try to find principles used in these cases, however it is hardly wrong to read following things from above cases. That is, to gain the case, plaintiffs should show (1) there exists an obligation of "due care"(there is a special relation between patients and hospitals), (2) the duty is violated on the basis of the applicable standard of care, (3) whatever injures or damages are sustained are proximately caused by the breach of duty and (4) the plaintiff suffers compensable damages. To specific, whether a psychiatric institute was liable for wrong death or not depends upon the patients conditions, circumstances and the extent of the danger the patients poses to himself or herself; in short, the foreseeability of self-inflicted harm(the doctor should have or could reasonably have foreseen the patient's suicide and the doctor's negligence actually caused the suicide). In this context if a patient exhibit strong suicidal tendencies, constant observation should be required. Negligence has been found not exist, however, when a patient abruptly and unexpectedly dashes from an attendant and jumps out a window or otherwise attempts to injure himself or herself. And the standard of conduct that is required to meet the obligation of "due care" is based on what the "reasonable practitioner" would do in like circumstances. The standard is not one of excellence or superior practice; it only re quires that the physician exercise that degree of skill and care that would be expected of the average qualified practitioner practicing under like circumstances. Most of these principles have been established at cases of the U.S.A and Japan. In this article you can also find the legal organizations of medical liability and medical contacts on the suicide of patients who have psychiatric diseases under Korean negligence law.

  • PDF

의사의 전원의무(轉院義務) 위반 여부의 판단기준과 전원시점 판단 - 판례의 동향을 중심으로 - (A Study on the Decision Point and a Standard of Judgment under the Duty of Inter-hospital Transfer for Patients of Doctor - Focused on the Trend of Supreme Court's Decisions -)

  • 최현태
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제20권1호
    • /
    • pp.163-201
    • /
    • 2019
  • 의사에게는 환자와의 법률관계에서 비롯되는 여러 의무들이 존재한다. 그 중 하나가 의사 자신이 속해 있는 의료기관이 치료 및 진료를 위한 인프라나 의료기술이 부족한 것으로 판단하는 경우 환자를 적절한 진단 검사 및 진료가 가능한 의료기관으로 '전원(轉院)'하여야 하는 주의의무인 전원의무(轉院醫務)이다. 의료기관마다 환자의 응급성 정도에 따라 대응할 수 있는 능력이 다르므로 의사의 지시나 권고에 의하여든 환자 본인의 요청에 의하여든 이와 같은 환자의 전원은 불가피한 현상이다. 예를 들어 심각한 뇌손상을 입은 환자가 내원한 경우, 진단, 검사 장비 및 인력을 갖추지 못한 병원의 의사로서는 적절한 시기(이른바 '골든타임')에 진단, 검사 및 진료가 가능한 상급의료기관으로 전원을 고려하여야 한다. 이처럼 전원의무는 의사의 의무 중 하나인 것으로 의사뿐만 아니라 환자들에게도 널리 인식되고 있다. 그러므로 적절한 전원 시점을 놓치게 되어 의료사고가 발생한 상황에서는 전원의무위반 여부와 관련한 의사와 환자 간의 법적 분쟁이 있을 수밖에 없다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 상황과 관련하여 전원의무에 대한 구체적이고도 명확한 판단 기준 정립과 함께 현재 각 의료기관들에 마련되어 있는 가이드라인이 실제 적용에서의 여러 시행착오들을 반영하고 있는지에 대한 검토가 필요하다고 보고, 의사의 전원의무에 대한 판례의 동향 분석을 중심으로 전원의무 관련 판례에서 이미 제시되어 있는 판단 기준 요소들이 적절한지 그리고 현재 실무에서 적용되는 법령 및 가이드라인 등과 부합되는지 여부를 살펴봄으로써 앞으로 응급환자에 대한 의사의 전원의무 관련 분쟁조정 및 소송에서의 해석과 적용에 기여할 수 있도록 하였다.

의료과오사건에서 의사의 과실을 인정하기 위한 요건 - 대법원 2006. 10. 26. 선고 2004도486 판결 - (Requirements to accept the doctor's mistake in the medical malpractice case - Sentenced by October 26, 2006, by The Supreme Court, Precedent case no. 2004Do486 -)

  • 범경철
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.215-234
    • /
    • 2007
  • The mission of the doctors is to take care of human life, body and health through the medical behaviors such as diagnosis and treatment. Under this job propensity, the doctors have care duty to take the best actions required to prevent the risk according to the patients' specific disease status. Such care duty of the doctor may be evaluated based on the medical behavior level at the medical institution and clinical medical study field. Such medical level should be understood in the normative level, considering the treatment environment, condition and specialty of the behavior, because it means the medical common sense known and acknowledged to the normal doctors. While the criminal suit requires the evidence for no doubt conviction, the civil suit requires more eased different standard. The results between the criminal and civil sentence may be different, because the confirmed former case may lead to long-term imprisonment and even death penalty, while the latter case puts only monetary penalty on the defeated party.

  • PDF

동일 의료기관 내에서의 분업과 협진에 대한 법적 고찰 (A Legal Study on Division of Labor and Collaboration within the Same Medical Institution)

  • 백경희
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.27-55
    • /
    • 2023
  • 우리나라에서 통상 사용하는 협진의 의미는 동일한 의료기관 내에서 서로 다른 진료과목의 의사가 환자를 함께 치료하는 경우로 이해된다. 그렇기 때문에 협진은 다양한 의료관여자들이 각자의 전문성에 의거하여 역할을 분담하여 환자를 치료하는 의료팀의 양상을 띠게 된다. 또한 의료팀 내 다른 진료과목의 의사는 동등한 지위에서 각각 전문성에 의거하여 수평적 분업을 하게 되므로 협진은 분업의 원칙에 따라 법적 책임이 분배된다. 대법원도 "여러 명의 의사가 분업이나 협업을 통하여 의료행위를 담당하는 경우 먼저 환자를 담당했던 의사는 이후 환자를 담당할 의사에게 환자의 상태를 정확하게 알려 적절한 조치를 할 수 있도록 해야 한다."고 하여 의료팀을 이루어 환자를 함께 치료하는 경우를 인정하고, 의사의 협진의무에 대하여 판단하고 있다. 다수의 진료과목이 있는 의료기관 내에서 서로 다른 진료과목의 의사가 분업이나 협업을 통하여 의료행위를 담당하게 되는 협진의 경우, 환자를 담당했던 의사는 환자의 상태에 따라 협진 여부를 결정하여야 하며, 이후 환자를 담당할 진료과목의 의사에게 환자의 상태를 정확하게 알려 적절한 조치를 취하게 하여야 한다. 협진을 하게 된 후임 의사 또한 환자에 대한 치료 종료 시까지 협진을 요청했던 전임 의사에 대하여 환자의 상태와 관련된 치료사항을 적극적으로 고지하고 서로 소견을 교환하여야 할 것이다. 다만 협진의 필요성에 대한 결정은 당시 환자의 상태에 따라 판단이 이루어져야 하는 것으로, 모든 경우에 협진의무가 강제되는 것이라고 단언할 수는 없다. 그리고 협진의 필요성에 대한 결정에 있어서 과실이 존재하는지 여부는 의사의 주의의무 판단에 대한 법리가 적용될 것이다.

응급환자 전원에 관한 판례의 태도 - 대법원 2005. 6. 24. 선고 2005다16713 판결 - (A Study on the Interhospital Transfer of Emergency Patients)

  • 이재열
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.389-420
    • /
    • 2009
  • Main Issue of Supreme Court Decision 2005Da16713 Delivered on June 24, 2005 is about the duty of medical care in the interhospital transfer of patients. According to the above Supreme Court Decision, in the interhospital transfer of patients, the decision to transfer should make from the aspect of medical treatment. The hospitals and doctors keep the duty of medical care. In addition to the duty for hospitals/doctors to check the capacity and availability of the hospital to which the patient is transferred, there are also duties to inform about emergency medical service and to sufficiently explain the need for the transfer, the medical conditions of the patient to be transferred and the hospital from which the patient is transferred. The hospital to which the patient is transferred must be thoroughly informed about matters such as the patient's conditions, the treatment the patient was given and reasons for transfer. including information upon referral, completeness of medical records, patient monitoring and so on. The interhospital transfer requires the consent of doctor belonging to the hospital to which the patient is transferred after the consideration of capacity and availability of the hospital and the informed consent of patients or legal representatives.

  • PDF

의료행위와 환자의 자기결정권에 관한 고찰 - 대법원 2014. 6.26. 선고 2009도14407 판결을 중심으로 - (A Study of the Medical Practice and the Right of Patients to Self-determination - Focusing on Supreme Court Decision 2009DO14407 Delivered on June 24, 2014 -)

  • 김영태
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.3-29
    • /
    • 2014
  • The Supreme Court made a decision that the doctor cannot be punished for not taking a blood transfusion to the patient, depending on the patient's will to refuse the blood transfusion on June 24, 2014. The reason is that, in a special situation of conflict between the right of patients to self-determination and the duty of care, and when it was impossible to compare whether which has the superior value, if the doctor made a medical practice to respect either of those two values according to the professional sense, he cannot be punished. In principle, the doctor should make medical practices according to the patient's will. However, if the patient's life was at stake, I think, the doctor is obliged to try his best to save the life of patient. Yet to entrust the patient's life to the doctors professional sense, is to give up the obligation of the country to protect lives. In this regard, I think that the Supreme Court Decision should be reviewed, and that an ongoing research is needed.

  • PDF

저소득층 방문간호 관리를 위한 제안 - 강북구 방문간호 대상자를 중심으로- (A Proposal on a Management Model Applicable to Visiting Nursing Program for a Low-income Group)

  • 고미자
    • 한국보건간호학회지
    • /
    • 제10권1호
    • /
    • pp.118-138
    • /
    • 1996
  • Because of accelerated urbanization public body visiting nursing project that started according as matter of health on urban class in the lower brackets of income was concentrated on Social interests has a unsatisfied points to propel project efficiently from the lack of rating materials. Therefore centering around written contents in documentary literature of citizen health by household in five years from starting year of project to now. visiting frequency by medical manpower was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively in aspect of management hereupon. for the sake of giving a basic materials for public health project of this field. This research presents documentary literature of citizen health which become materials is that as one person's charged region of nurse in duty scale. district is Kang-Buck Gu. the object is resident in the lower brackets of income grounded livelihood protection law and who is admitted by the head of organ~chief of health care). and the number of material centering around the head of a household is 415 copy. The result of research is summarized. as follow. 1. Average visiting frequency examinated by medical manpower show difference according to valuables of supervision characteristics namely average visiting. Frequency of nurse has long term residence in case registration season is early and supervision season is the first year and is high incase a kind of house is unlicdnsed mountain town. Average visiting frequency with doctor is high incase supervision season is the first year and the medical insurance system is admitted by chief of health care. That shows that a man of discomfort behavior left alone are yet many in local society. The meaning of this result shows that the continuity of official relation about class in the lowest brackets of income of long term residence goes well between househole who is a user of visiting nursing service of the object according to midway income under management influences a given duty of nurse s and so causes quantitative decrease. 2. In case behavier and condition of health that nurse diagnoses are bad. as the type matter is a lack of health and the number of patient is large. the average visiting frequency of nurse is high. because average visiting frequency with doctor is high as the condition of health is bad and the number of patient is large. That is similar with that of nurse. CD Average visiting frequency of nurse s seen by matter of disease is very high only in apoplexy by 39.50 and is confined within limits from 7.63 to 11.36 in other disease. But average visiting frequency with doctor is double as many as that of nurse but defined in apoplexy hypertension and articulate. (1) Average visiting frequency of nurse by existence in inoculation of hepatitis is low by 6.73 in unidentified group and very high by 26.89 in group of non-inoculation and the case of the antigenic positive man of B type hepatitis or epileptic who can't be inoculated shows 13.00 and that even family nursing service is needed to them. That result shows that though one person nurse of local charge has a large scale of duty. as visting nursing service is given a class who has a large demand preferentially by respectively accurate nursing diagnosis. the number of diagnosis service is similar with it. 3. During five years. average visiting frequency of nurse is 10.84 and average visiting frequency with doctor is 76.50 seeing from the official scale of nurse. visiting by household is performed two more per year to the average. Seeing this by type of service. average visiting frequency of nurse is higher in indirectly nursing than in directly nursing and that suggests that at the time of visiting household nurse performs education of protection lively save patient but at the time of contrastedly visiting with doctor. directly nursing is more contents of service show no difference by man power and medication dressing by demand is 14.3 and 18.6 the aid of hardship term of doctor and nurse is high by 18.7 and 17.00 in the request of hospitalization when seeing by demands. 4. Action by turns exemplified 1994 is well in sequence of 2/4 turn. 3/4 turn. 1/4 turn. 4/4 turn. When seen by average visiting frequency of nurse but gradually is even. Without difference by turns. average visiting frequency of doctor is much higher in 1/4 turn than other turns. Type of service by turns is all even but directly nursing is inactive in 4/4 and indirectly nursing. Very increases in 4/4 and so. Nurse's quantity of duty is plentiful that shows that by evaluation of last turn and plan of project. Contents of service follows that medication and dressing is the highest by' 5.57 in 1/4turn. goes down gradually by turn. becomes 3.57 in 3/4 turn. and increases again by 4.83 in 4/4 turn. the rest service is higher in 2/4 turn than other turns. 5. Total visiting frequency of nurse is explained to total $37.5\%$ by six valuables of visiting frequency of doctor. nursing demand. demand of diagnosis. condition of behavior. year. Special terms and magnitude of influential power is the same as sequence of enumerated valuables. Namely. the higher the visiting frequency of doctor. the bigger nursing and demand of diagnosis is. the worse the condition of behavior is. the older the object is and the more the household of special terms is. the high total visiting frequency of nurse is.

  • PDF

마취 관련 의료사고 시 주의의무 - 법원 판결 사례를 중심으로 - (Duty of Care on Medical Accidents related to Anesthesia - Focused on Court Decisions -)

  • 최규연
    • 의료법학
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.61-99
    • /
    • 2017
  • 마취는 수술 등 의료행위 시 많은 경우 필요불가결하게 동반될 수밖에 없고 마취 자체가 가진 특성 때문에 그로 인한 의료사고가 빈번하게 발생하고 있다. 마취와 관련된 의료사고가 의사의 과실로 인한 것인지를 판단하기 위해서는 마취의 전 단계를 통하여 의사 등 의료진에게 어떠한 주의의무가 요구되는지를 알아야 한다. 이 글에서는 이러한 주의의무의 기준 등을 알아보기 위하여 마취 관련된 의료사고로 판결이 선고된 1990년대부터 현재까지의 대법원 판결들과 최근의 하급심 판결사례들, 프로포폴이 사용된 사례들을 분석해보았다. 분석 결과 과거 흡입마취로 문제가 된 사례가 많았던 반면 최근에는 주로 정맥마취제나 국소마취제의 사용으로 문제가 된 사례가 많은 것을 알 수 있었고, 특히 마취제 중 프로포폴이 관련된 사고가 2007년경 이후부터 상당히 많이 발생하여 법적 분쟁이 이루어졌음을 알 수 있었다. 그런데 대법원 판례들은 대부분 과거 흡입마취로 마취한 사례여서, 흡입마취의 경우 마취 시 의료진의 주의의무의 정도와 내용에 관해 어느 정도 기준이 제시되고 있었으나, 그 외의 경우에는 그러한 기준이 제시되었다고 보기에는 미흡해 보였다. 프로포폴의 사용과 관련한 마취사고가 끊이지 않고 있는 현실 등에 비추어 볼 때 우선 의료현장에서 각각의 마취제의 사용에 관한 임상지침 등을 세우고 이를 지켜나가는 것이 중요하겠지만, 의료현실이나 의료 관행에 하나의 나침반 역할을 할 수 있도록 법원에서도 우리의 현실에 맞는 적절한 주의의무의 기준을 제시하는 것이 필요하다고 하겠다.

  • PDF