• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.255-262
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 Computational Thinking 역량을 효과적으로 평가하기 위한 서술형 수행평가 방법에 관한 내용이다. 제안된 서술형 수행평가도구는 MIT에서 제시한 창의컴퓨팅 평가 문항들을 델파이 기법을 통해 조사한 후 문항을 선별 및 수정하였다. 이 서술형 수행평가 도구는 실험하기 및 반복하기, 테스팅과 디버깅, 재사용과 재구성, 추상화와 모듈화의 4가지 영역으로 구성되어 총 4문항으로 개발하여 예비교사를 대상으로 수업에 적용하였다. 적용결과 평가 도구는 $Cronbach-{\alpha}$값이 0.6 이상으로 신뢰도가 높았으며 전문가 대상의 델파이 검사 결과 타당도도 높게 나타나 제안된 평가 도구가 학생들의 CT 역량을 효과적으로 측정하는 유용한 평가 도구로 확인되었다.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.121-149
• /
• 2022

서술형 평가는 수학과 교육과정에서 강조하는 문제해결 능력 신장, 추론 능력, 의사소통 능력과 관련하여 의미있는 평가 방법이라 할 수 있다. 우리나라에서는 제7차 수학과 교육과정 이후로 수행평가가 강조되면서 중등학교에서 수행평가의 한 방법으로 서술형 평가가 이루어지고 있다. 그렇지만, 대학수학능력시험에서는 여러 가지 이유로 서술형 평가가 도입되지 못하고 있다. 수학교실에서 서술형 평가가 강조되고 교육적으로 충분히 가치가 있다는 것을 감안하면, 대학수학능력시험에서 서술형 평가의 실시에 대한 진지한 논의가 필요할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 대학수학능력시험에 해당하는 러시아의 국가통합시험의 수학 교과에서 실시 중인 서술형 평가를 분석하였다. 문헌 연구를 통해, 국가통합시험에서 수학 시험 문제들이 어떻게 구성되었는지, 시험에서 요구되는 수학적 능력은 무엇인지 고찰하였다. 특히, 국가통합시험의 수학 2021년 출제 문제를 중심으로 문제들의 외적 구조를 분석하였고, 서술형 문제들의 채점 방법을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 우리나라의 대학수학능력시험에서 서술형 문제의 도입 가능성에 대한 다양한 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.125-136
• /
• 2001

This research is about how the adapted learning of descriptive assessment problems influence on the extension of the ability of the students. As a result, adapted learning of descriptive assessment problems totally led to positive effect, and according to the analyses of behavioral objectives divided into knowledge, comprehension and problem solving, they had more effect on the ability of students' problem solving. Learning attitude of the students were changed into self-centered learning attitude and interest on the subject of mathematics were highly increased since the research had started. If we adapt this research to the learning of mathematics after we develop various problems that can develop creativity, I'm sure that it will be a effective way for both extension of the ability and problem solving ability of the students.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.325-354
• /
• 2001

The study aims to develop balanced performance assessment tasks for primary school mathematics which can be implemented in the primary school easily. In order to these purposes, I suggest the types of performance assessment tasks and the framework of assessment standards for the balanced performance assessment with describing the procedures of developing tasks and rubrics. The types of task are journal writing, problem posing, constructed task, and descriptive task. In the framework of assessment standards, I suggest holistic scoring which are classified as four levels according to the degree of excellence which students perform totally concerning about the criterion of implication, reasoning, accuracy, and communication. Also I analyse the responses of children to the task “make a beautiful pattern” and suggest its assessment rubric and anchor papers for each level for illustrating the process of developing a rubric in holistic scoring. In order to reflect the viewpoints of children and their Parents concerning about the tasks, the responses in self assessment and parent assessment are analysed. Finally, methods of implementing the assessment tasks and considerations are discussed.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.63-95
• /
• 2012

수행평가가 시작된 지 10여년이 지난 현재, 서술형 평가 실시에 대한 초등교사들의 인식과 실태가 어떠한지 조사하기 위하여 서울특별시 소재 11개 지역교육지원청에 소속된 공립 초등학교의 초등 교사 212명을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 대부분의 초등 교사들이 수학 교과 서술형 평가가 필요하다고 인식하고 있었으며, 서술형 평가 실시의 목표로는 학습 목표에 근거한 성취도를 정확히 측정하는 것으로 주로 인식하고 있었으며, 교사들이 서술형 평가 문항을 제작할 때 가장 많이 참고하는 자료는 교과서 문제로 나타났다. 문항 제작시 가장 많이 고려하는 사항은 난이도로 나타났다. 서술형 평가의 효과로는 수학적인 사고능력이 뛰어난 학생을 선발할 수 있는 변별력을 들었으며, 서술형 평가 실시에 대하여 교사들이 언급한 문제점으로는 학급당 학생 수가 과다하다는 점과 수학과 서술형 평가 문항개발이 어렵다는 점을 들었다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.149-163
• /
• 2000

The Ministry of Education have had us practice the performance test as a substitute proposal, however, all the more for the idealistic purport, our education front does not have such a sufficient condition as to practice the performance test for many classes and miscellaneous duties and over-populated class, and that practice has been enforced so abruptly without any drastic preparation and has caused much confusion from the beginning of that enforcement. Thus, these problematic concerns are remained as the tasks of the teachers to be solved by themselves in the front of education, and herein I came to do this research. The followings are the conclusions that I got as the results of the research (1) Performance test style should be applied in consideration of the students' achievement level and the gap of the teachers' recognition; descriptive test, portfolio assignment and formative test styles were proper for the students lacking basic study ability. (2) Descriptive test should have its beginning with the question items to which students can write the problem solving procedure logically rather than those to evaluate the creation ability and thinking ability: and putting down specifically the assessment standard could prevent students' confusion and scheme the impartiality of the assessment. (3) Portfolio assignment evaluation should be given with as interesting and suitable amounts as possible so that the students can do by themselves. (4) Utilizing the performance test table enabled easy management of documentary evidence. And it is needless to say that the success of the performance test should have preceding conditions like the teachers' understanding and their positive participation. Therefore, I'd like to give suggestions herein like the followings; (1) The performance test should not always be made into grades, and there is a need to develop the test gradually in the condition that the education surroundings permit by checking time, frequency, ratio and contents of the test while practicing the multiple choice writing test. (2) As long as the performance test has the aims of improving the studying and learning activities, any performance test only for the sake of making numerals with the thought that assessment is the disposal of the grades should be avoided, and the change of the lecturing styles and development of various assessing types and studying materials should be endeavored to confirm with the aims.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.193-204
• /
• 2002

Performance assessment has been introduced to school education as an alternative measure of the former educational assessment which put much emphasis on the result rather than the process of learning, memorization than pursuit of knowledge, and passive than active study. As for the subject of mathematics, the change of the assessment came to replace multiple choice tests with descriptive- and statement-type tests. This means animprovement on the testing system, focusing on the process of finding out the answer. The main focus, however, is still on the intellectual domain without paying due attention to the emotional domain of mathematics education. The previous studies on the assessment of emotional domain In mathematics have shown that there are stumbling blocks in the application of the assessment, such as the disputes on the reliability, objectivity, and fairness as well as the complicated procedure of applying the results to school records. The lack of the development and supply of the appropriate assessment tools have also been pointed out. Therefore, this study has been carried out with the intention of establishing an applicable standard of assessment on the emotional domain of high school matematics. As a result, detailed standards of performance assessment, which adopt oral examination, discussion, observation, and report have been developed. The problems which are likely to emerge In the course of the application of the newly developed assessment are under study as a continuing research project.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.543-567
• /
• 2008

최근 우리나라 2007 개정 수학교육과정에서는 그동안 강조되어오던 수학적 문제해결력 뿐 아니라 수학적으로 사고하고 의사소통하는 능력을 중요한 요소로 강조하고 있다. 이에 따라 수학과의 평가영역에서는 고등 사고 능력을 평가할 수 있는 대안적인 평가 방법으로 수행평가와 서술형 논술형 평가방법의 구체적인 활용 방안들이 논의되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 초등학교 교과서와 교육과정을 분석하여 <6-나> 단계를 중심으로 서술형 평가 문항과 채점기준을 개발하고 개발된 평가문항을 현장에 적용하여 결과를 분석함으로써 초등학교 수학과 서술형 평가의 현장 적용 가능성을 제시하고자 한다.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.546-558
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study aimed at the effectiveness to investigate the performance of evidence-based pain assessment and management guidelines. Methods: Participants were 140 nurses at the med-surgical units. Data were collected in early July, 2014 using Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) guideline (2007) revised and validated by Hong and Lee (2012) and analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA using SPSS/WIN18.0. Results: The score of performance of pain assessment guideline was higher than the score of pain management. Categories with high score were pain screening, parameter of pain assessment, documentation, assessment of opioids side-effects, and record of pain caused intervention. Categories with low score were comprehensive pain assessment, multidisciplinary communication, establishing a plan for pain management, consultation and education for patients and their families, and education for nurse. Non-pharmacological management was the lowest one. Conclusion: Assessing and managing pain is a complex phenomenon. It might be useful if institutions host training programs to ensure that nurse are better able to understand and implement pain assessment and management. Since non-pharmacological management is less likely to be used by nurses it may be helpful to include these methods in a training program.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제55권2호
• /
• pp.171-192
• /
• 2016

As teachers' competency is evaluated based on their teaching performance. pre-service teachers need to have an opportunity to reflect on themselves by systematically analyzing and evaluating their own lesson planning and teaching performance through self-assessment. In this study, we aimed to examine what evaluation criteria for lesson planning and teaching performance pre-service mathematics teachers consider in the process of self-assessment. This study used a mixed-methods research design. To draw the self-evaluation criteria for lesson planning and teaching performance, pre-service self-reported assessments were analyzed using qualitative analyses. In addition, descriptive statistics were used to investigate the pre-service teachers' distribution across the criteria and check the ratio of pre-service mathematics teachers for each element. As a result, it was disclosed that pre-service mathematics teachers considered eight elements in self evaluating their own lesson planning and teaching performance. In addition, we found that pre-service mathematics teachers tended to consider Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) more than Subject-Matter Knowledge (SMK). Moreover, the results of this study provide educational implications for the curriculum in the pre-service teacher's education program.