• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.8-15
• /
• 2011

연구 목적: 본 연구의 목적은 금속 의치상 재료에 직접법으로 이장을 시행했을 때 표면처리와 시간에 따른 결합강도의 변화를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Co-Cr 시편을 최대직경 9 mm의 육각기둥 형태로 절삭하여 제작하였으며, $110\;{\mu}m$의 $Al_2O_3$로 1분간 sandblasting 하였다. 시편을 18개씩 3군으로 나누어 A군은 화학적 처리 없이, B, C군은 금속표면처리제 (MR $bond^{(R)}$, Alloy $primer^{(R)}$)를 도포한 후 7 mm직경의 자가 중합형 이장용 레진 (Vertex $SC^{(R)}$) 기둥을 부착하였다. 각각의 그룹을 다시3군으로 나누어 수분 하에서 다른 기간 (0주, 1주, 2주)동안 저장한 다음 만능역학 실험기계 (Instron)를 이용하여 시편을 분리하였고, 분리되는 시점의 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 통계처리는 two-way ANOVA와 Tukey 방법을 이용하여 5% 유의수준에서 분석하였다. 결과: 시편을 sandblasting한 실험에서는, 1분 동안 sandblasting 한 시편의 표면 거칠기가 가장 크게 나타났다. 전단결합강도 실험에서 결합강도는 B, C, A군의 순서로 낮아졌으며, 이 세 군 사이에 유의성 있는 차이를 보였다. 기간별로 봤을 때 결합강도는 수분에 저장하지 않은 군에서 가장 높았으며 2주 동안 수분에 저장한 군에서 가장 낮았으나 기간별로 유의성 있는 차이는 보이지 않았다. 기간과 군을 함께 고려했을 때 모든 군에서 침수 시간이 길어짐에 따라 결합강도가 낮아졌으나B군과C군에서 임상적인 유의성은 보이지 않았고, A군에서만 유의성 있게 결합강도가 낮아졌다. 결론:Co-Cr 금속 의치상에 진료실에서 직접법으로 이장을 할 경우 적절한 기계적 처리 (Sandblasting) 후 금속 표면 처리제를 도포하는 것이 유리할 것으로 사료된다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.211-220
• /
• 2000

The use of autopolymerizing-cured resin and light-cured resin for direct relining of complete and partial dentures has been popular. This investigation compared the adhesion of autopolymerizing-cured reline resin(Tokuso Rebase, Mild Rebaron) or light-cured reline resin(Mild Rebaron LC, Lighton-U) to metal base or resin base. Cylindrical samples were made from metal($Biosil^{(R)}$) or heat-cured resin(QC-20) and were prepared to produce a flat bonding surface. Cylindrical metal samples were roughened by scratch or by scratch and sandblast and were treated with primer(MR Bond) after scratch and sandblast. And then, liners were prossesed to the cylindrical metal or resin samples according to the manufacturer's recommendations so as to bond metal base or resin base. The specimens were tested in pure tension by using an Instron Univesal testing machine for the four direct reline resins. The results were as follows ; 1. In comparison with tensile bond strength of material relined on resin base or metal base, the case of resin base produced significantly higher tensile bond strength than the case of metal base. 2. Metal surface pretreatment or primer improved the tensile bond strength between the reline resin and the metal($Biosil^{(R)}$) base. 3. The tensile bond strength of Mild Rebaron LC relined on resin base or metal base were similar to those of the other reline resins.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.161-170
• /
• 2000

The use of autopolymerizing-cured resin and light-cured resin for direct relining of complete and partial dentures has been popular. This investigation compared the adhesion of autopolymerizing-cured reline resin(Tokuso Rebase, Mild Rebaron) or light-cured reline resin(Mild Rebaron LC, Lighton-U) to metal base or resin base. Cylindrical samples were made from metal($Biosil^{(R)}$) or heat-cured resin(QC-20) and were prepared to produce a flat bonding surface. Cylindrical metal samples were roughened by scratch or by scratch and sandblast and were treated with primer(MR Bond) after scratch and sandblast. And then, liners were prossesed to the cylindrical metal or resin samples according to the manufacturer's recomendations so as to bond metal base or resin base. The specimens were tested in pure tension by using an Instron Univasal testing machine for the four direct reline resins. The results were as follows ; 1. In comparison with tensile bond strength of material relined on resin base or metal base, the case of resin base produced significantly higher tensile bond strengths than the case of metal base. 2. Metal surface pretreatment or primer improved the tensile bond strength between the reline resin and the metal($Biosil^{(R)}$) base. 3. The tensile bond strengths of Mild Rebaron LC relined on resin base or metal base were similar to those of the other reline resins.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제41권6호
• /
• pp.732-746
• /
• 2003

Statement of problem. Soft lining materials, also referred to as tissue conditioning materials, tissue heating materials, relining materials, soft liners or tissue conditioners, were first introduced to dentistry by a plastic manufacturer in 1959. Since the introduction of the materials to the dental field, their material properties have been continually improved through the effort of many researchers. Soft lining materials have become widely accepted, particularly by prosthodontists, because of their numerous clinical advantages and ease of manipulation. Unfortunately, few reports have been issued upon the topic of increasing the bond strength between the base metal alloy used in cast denture bases and PMMA soft liner modified with 4-META, nor upon the pattern of debonding and material change in wet environment like a intra oral situation. Purpose. The purposes of this study were comparing the bond strength between base metal alloy used for the cast denture bases and PMMA soft liner modified with 4-META, and describing the pattern of debonding and material property change in wet environment like the intraoral situation. Material and Methods. This study consisted of four experiments: 1. The in vitro measurement of shear bond strength of the adhesive soft liner. 2. The in vitro measurement of shear bond strength of the adhesive soft liner after 2 weeks of aging. 3. A comparison of debonding patterns. 4. An evaluation the Relation time of modified soft liner. The soft liner used in this study was commercially available as Coe-soft (GC America.IL.,USA), which is provided in forms of powder and liquid. This is a PMMA soft liner commonly used in dental clinics. The metal primer used in this study was 4-META containing primer packed in Meta fast denture base resin (Sun Medical Co., Osaka, Japan). The specimens were formed in a single lap joint desist which is useful for evaluating the apparent shear bond strength of adhesively bonded metal plate by tensile loading. Using the $20{\times}20mm$ transparent grid, percent area of adhesive soft liner remaining on the shear area was calculated to classify the debonding patterns. To evaluate the change of the initial flow of the modified adhesive soft liner, the gelation time was measured with an oscillating rheometer (Haake RS150W/ TC50, Haake Co., Germany). It was a stress control and parallel plate type with the diameter of 35mm. Conclusion. Within the conditions and limitations of this study, the following conclusions were drawn as follows. 1. There was significant increase of bond strength in the 5% 4-META, 10% 4-META containing groups and in the primer coated groups versus the control group(P<0.05). 2. After 2 weeks of aging, no significant increase in bond strength was found except for the group containing 10% 4-META (P<0.05). 3. The gelation times of the modified soft liner were 9.3 minutes for the 5% 4-META containing liner and 11.5 minutes for the 10% 4-META liner. 4. The debonding patterns of the 4-META containing group after 2 weeks of aging were similar to those of immediaely after preparation, but the debonding pattern of the primer group showed more adhesive failure after 2 weeks of aging.