• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.23-33
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro interfacial relationship of restorations bonded with three self-etching primer adhesives and one self-etching adhesive. Class I cavity preparations were prepared on twenty extracted human molars. Prepared teeth were divided into four groups and restored with four adhesives and composites Clearfil SE $Bond/Clearfil^{TM}$ AP-X (SE), UniFil $Bond/UniFil^{\circledR}$ F (UF), FL $Bond/Filtek^{TM}$ Z 250 (FL) and Prompt $L-Pop/Filtek^{TM}$ Z 250 (LP) After storing in distilled water of room temperature for 24 hours, the specimens were vertically sectioned and decalcified. Morphological patterns between the enamel/dentin and adhesives were observed under SEM. The results of this study were as follows : 1. They showed close adaptation between enamel and SE, UF and FL except for LP. 2. The hybrid layer in dentin was $2{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ thick in SE, $1.5{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ thick in UF, and $0.4{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ in both FL and LP. So, the hybrid layers of SE and UF were slightly thicker than that of FL and LP. 3. The lengths and diameters of resin tags in UF and FL were similar, but those of LP were slightly shorter and slenderer than those of SE. 4. The resin tags were long rod shape in SE, and funnel shape in other groups Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that self-etching primer adhesives showed close adaptation on enamel. In addition, the thickness of hybrid layer ranged from $0.4-1.5{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ between adhesives and dentin. The resin tags were long rod or funnel shape, and dimension of them was similar or different among adhesives.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2002년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.705-705
• /
• 2002

No Abstract, See Full Text

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.222-231
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength and interfacial pattern of composite bond-ed to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Sixty extracted human molars with exposed occlusal dentin were divided into four groups and bonded with four adhesives and composites. Single Bond/Filtek Z 350(SB), Tyrian SPE-One-Step Plus/Aelitefil(TY), Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z 250(LP), and One-Up Bond F/palfique Toughwell(OU). The results of this study were as follows; 1 Shear bond strength for OU was significantly lower than that of other groups(p＜0.05). No significant difference was founded among SB, TY, and LP. 2. Failure modes to dentin showed adhesive and mixed for SB TY and LP, but them for OU showed adhesive in all spceimens. 3. Dentin-resin interface showed close adaptation for SB, TY, and LP, but it showed gap for OU. 4. The hybrid layers for TY, LP OU were thinner than that of SB. Adhesive layers were observed between composite and hybrid layer, which were 5 $\mu\textrm{m}$ thick for TY and 10 $\mu\textrm{m}$ thick for OU.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2003년도 제120회 추계학술대회 제 5차 한ㆍ일 치과보존학회 공동학술대회
• /
• pp.603-603
• /
• 2003

I. Objectives The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of immediate or delayed composite placement on dentinal micro-tensile bond strength. Caries-free human third molars were used in this study. At first, the occlusal enamel was removed so that the middle dentin was exposed. And then the exposed dentin was polished with 1200-grit silicon carbide paper for the formation of smear layer. The polished dentin was etched with 32% phosphoric acid, dried with gentle air and applicated by dentin adhesives. The specimens were divided into 12 groups.(omitted)

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2003년도 제120회 추계학술대회 제 5차 한ㆍ일 치과보존학회 공동학술대회
• /
• pp.609-609
• /
• 2003

I. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive property on microtensile bond strength and to determine the failure mode. II. Materials and Methods Flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared using low-speed diamond saw. The dentin was etched with 37% phosphoric acid. The following adhesives were applied to the etched dentin according to manufacturer's directions；Scotchbond Multi-Purpose in group 1, Primer＆Bond NT in group 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose followed by Tetric-flow in group 3. After adhesive application, a cylinder of resin-based composite was built up the occlusal surface.(omitted)

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제33권6호
• /
• pp.526-536
• /
• 2008

이 연구의 목적은 수종의 상아질 접착시스템이 즉시 및 지연 상아질 봉쇄에서 미세인장결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이었다. 18개의 발거된 대구치를 사용하여 지연 상아질 봉쇄그룹은 노출된 상아질면을 임시수복하였으며, 1주간 보관 후, 접착제에 따라 3개의 소그룹으로 나누어 도포하였다; SB 그룹 (3 단계 산 부식 접착제), SE 그룹 (2단계 자가 부식 접착제), XE 그룹 (1단계 자가 부식 접착제). 즉시 상아질 봉쇄그룹은 3개의 소그룹으로 나누어 접착제를 도포하고 임시수복 후 1주간 보관하였다. 모든 시편은 간접 복합레진과 레진 시멘트로 합착하고 미세인장결합강도를 측정하여, 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 즉시 상아질 봉쇄그룹은 지연 상아질 봉쇄그룹에 비해 3단계 산 부식과 2단계 자가 부식 접착제에서 높은 미세인장결합강도를 보였다 (p < 0.05). 2. 즉시 및 지연 상아질 봉쇄그룹 모두 미세인장결합강도는 3단계 산 부식, 2단계 자가 부식, 1단계 자가 부식 접착제순으로 감소하였고, 즉시 상아질 봉쇄그룹에서는 1단계 자가 부식 접착제와 다른 소그룹간 유의한 차이가 있었으며 (p< 0.05), 지연 상아질 봉쇄 그룹에서는 모든 소그룹간 유의한 차이가 있었다 (p < 0.05). 3. 파절 양상은 대부분 혼합성 파절을 보였으며, 1단계 자가 부식 접착제에서만 접착성 파절을 보였다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.299-309
• /
• 2002

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step adhesives accord ing to various dentin surface treatments and to observe the interface between resin(Z-100$^{TM}$) and dentin under SEM. In this study forty-five non-caries extracted human molars and three adhesive systems were used ; AlI-Bond 2(AB), One-Up Bond F(OU), AQ-Bond(AQ). ; In Group 1, 2, 3, AB was used and tooth surfaces were treated by smearing(S), ultrasonic cleansing(US), etching(E) respectively. In Group 4. 5, 6, One-Up Bond F was used and tooth surfaces were also treated as the same way above. In Groups 7, 8, 9, AQ Bond was used and tooth surfaces wet$.$e treated as the same way. Each specimen was prepared for microtensile bond testing, and were stored for 24hrs in 37$^{\circ}C$ distilled water. After that, microtensile bond strength for each specimen was measured. Specimens were fabricated to examine the failure patterns of interface between resin and dentin and observed under the SEM. The results were as follows ; 1. The results(mean$\pm$SD) of microtensile test were group 1, 25.69$\pm$4.31MPa; group 2, 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa; group 3, 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa； group 4, 35.98$\pm$9.14MPa； group 5, 39.66$\pm$8.45MPa; group 6, 43.26$\pm$13.01MPa; group 7, 25.07$\pm$4.2MPa；group 8, 30.4$\pm$4.74MPa；group 9, 33.61$\pm$7.88MPa. 2. One-Up Bond F was showed the highest value of 36.98$\pm$9.14MPa in dentin surface treatment with smearing, and there were significant differences to the other groups (p<0.05). 3. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa in dentin surface treatment with ultra-sonic cleansing, but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05) 4. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment with etch ing(10%phosphoric acid), and there were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05). 5. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment according to manufacture's directions. but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05). 6. AQ Bond was skewed the lowest microtensile bond strength with various dentin surface treatment, and the were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제32권5호
• /
• pp.426-436
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 접착레진의 부가적인 도포가 레진 시멘트의 결합강도에 미치는 영향을 연구하였다. One-Step Plus와 Choice, Single Bond와 Rely X ARC, One-Up Bond F와 Bistite II DC를 사용하였고 접착레진으로 D/E Bonding resin과 Pre-Bond Resin을 선택하였다. 적용 및 광중합 유무에 따라 12개의 군을 설정하였다. 제 3대구치의 건전한 상아질 면에 간접 복합레진 수복물을 제작하여 접착을 시행하고$1\;{\times}\;1\;mm^2$의 시편을 만들어 미세인장강도를 측정하였다. 또한 투과전자현미경으로 접착계면을 관찰하였다. 그리하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻을 수 있었다. 1. Single Bond와 Rely X ARC, 그리고 One-Step Plus와 Choice를 조합하고 광중합을 시행한 군에서, 접착 레진을 부가적으로 도포할 경우 미세인장강도가 증가하였다. 2. One-Up Bond F와 Bistite II DC를 조합한 군에서 접착레진의 부가적인 도포에 의한 미세인장강도의 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 3. 광중합을 시행한 군들 중, One-Step Plus와 Choice를 조합한 군이 다른 군보다 높은 미세인장결합강도를 보였다. 4. 자가중합만을 시행한 군간에는 접착레진의 부가적인 도포에 의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 투과전자현미경 관찰을 시행하여 광중합을 시행하고 접착레진을 부가적으로 도포한 실험군에서 미세누출이 감소하고 접착층의 두께가 증가한 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구결과 완전산부식 상아질 접착제와 이중중합 레진 시멘트를 사용할 경우 부가적인 접착레진의 도포가 임상적으로 유용할 수 있다는 사실을 확인할 수 있었다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.435-441
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 친수성 용매가 함유되어 있는 3종의 단일병 접착제의 적용 시간을 증가시켰을 때, 건조 상아질에 대한 재습윤의 효과가 있는지를 미세인장 결합강도의 측정을 통해 알아보고자 시행하였다. 실험대상은 최근에 발거한 상하악의 대구치로, 교합면 1/3부위의 치질을 치아 장축에 수직으로 절단하여 상아질을 노출시킨 후, $32\%$인산 (Unietch, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA)으로 15초간 산부식 하고 수세하였다. 치아는 무작위로 S군 (Single Bond), O군 (One-Step), P군 (Prime & Bond NT)으로 분류하였고, 각 군은 다시 3군 (W: 상아질 표면의 남아있는 과잉의 물을 수분에 적신 거즈를 이용하여 제거한 후, 즉시 단일병 접착제를 적용하고 광중합, D : 30초간 건조 한 후 즉시 단일병 접착제를 적용하고 광중합, 30: 30초간 건조 한 후 단일병 접착제를 30초간 적용하고 광중합)으로 소 분류하였다. 접착제 도포 후, 복합레진을 축조하고 접착계면이 $1mm^2$가 되도록 절단하여 각 군당 20개의 표본을 사용하여 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하였다. 5군,0군의 30초 적용군 (S-30, O-30)은 건조군 (S-D, O-D)보다 높은 미세인장 결합강도를 보였으며, S-30군의 경우 S-D군보다 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 높았다 (P<0.05). 하지만, P군의 30초 적용군 (P-30)은 건조군 (P-D)에 비해 미세인장 결합강도가 통계학적으로 유의성 있게 감소하였다 (P<0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.55.1-55.9
• /
• 2021

Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to collect and discuss the technique of adhesive systems application on dentin substrate under electric current. Materials and Methods: The first search strategy was based on data available at PubMed, LILACS, Scielo, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, using a combination of descriptors such as "dentin bond agents OR adhesive system AND electric current OR electrobond" or "dentin bonding agents OR dentin bonding agent application OR adhesive system AND electric current OR electrobond", with no limit regarding the publication year. The second search strategy was based on the articles' references found previously. An additional search strategy was applied that concerned the proposed theme in the SBU-UNICAMP (Unicamp's Library System Institutional Repository). Results: Twelve studies published between 2006 and 2020 were found. The analyses of the selected studies showed that the use of electric current during adhesive systems application on dentin, whether conventional or self-conditioning, increases resinous monomer infiltration in the dentin substrate, which improves the hybridization processes and the bond strength of the restorative material to dentin. Conclusions: Despite the favorable results related to the use of this technique, there is still no specific protocol for the application of adhesive systems under electric current.