Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.3.299

MICROTENSILE BONDING OF ONE-STEP ADHESIVES TO SHEARED AND NON-SHEARED DENTIN  

Song, Yong-Beom (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Jin, Jeong-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Lee, Se-Joon (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.27, no.3, 2002 , pp. 299-309 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step adhesives accord ing to various dentin surface treatments and to observe the interface between resin(Z-100$^{TM}$) and dentin under SEM. In this study forty-five non-caries extracted human molars and three adhesive systems were used ; AlI-Bond 2(AB), One-Up Bond F(OU), AQ-Bond(AQ). ; In Group 1, 2, 3, AB was used and tooth surfaces were treated by smearing(S), ultrasonic cleansing(US), etching(E) respectively. In Group 4. 5, 6, One-Up Bond F was used and tooth surfaces were also treated as the same way above. In Groups 7, 8, 9, AQ Bond was used and tooth surfaces wet$.$e treated as the same way. Each specimen was prepared for microtensile bond testing, and were stored for 24hrs in 37$^{\circ}C$ distilled water. After that, microtensile bond strength for each specimen was measured. Specimens were fabricated to examine the failure patterns of interface between resin and dentin and observed under the SEM. The results were as follows ; 1. The results(mean$\pm$SD) of microtensile test were group 1, 25.69$\pm$4.31MPa; group 2, 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa; group 3, 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa； group 4, 35.98$\pm$9.14MPa； group 5, 39.66$\pm$8.45MPa; group 6, 43.26$\pm$13.01MPa; group 7, 25.07$\pm$4.2MPa；group 8, 30.4$\pm$4.74MPa；group 9, 33.61$\pm$7.88MPa. 2. One-Up Bond F was showed the highest value of 36.98$\pm$9.14MPa in dentin surface treatment with smearing, and there were significant differences to the other groups (p<0.05). 3. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa in dentin surface treatment with ultra-sonic cleansing, but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05) 4. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment with etch ing(10%phosphoric acid), and there were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05). 5. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment according to manufacture's directions. but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05). 6. AQ Bond was skewed the lowest microtensile bond strength with various dentin surface treatment, and the were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chappell R, Schreiner R. Glaros A. Eixk J(1997). Pilot study to determine sample size for micro-tensile testing, J. Dent. Res. 76:38. Abstr. no. 193
2 Sano H, Sonoda H, Shono J, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between suface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Evaluation of a microtensile bond test, Dent. Mater. 1994a :10: 236-240   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin, J. Dent. Res. 1994:73:1205-1211   DOI   PUBMED
4 Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of surface area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 1997:13:290-296   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Gwinnett, A. J. and Matsui, A. A study of enamel adhesives. The Physical relationship between enamel and adhesive, Arch. Oral. Biol., 1967:12:1615-1620   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gwinnet, A. J., and Ripa, L. W. Penetration of pit and fissure sealants into conditioned enamel in vivo, Arch. Oral. Biol., 1973:18:435-439   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Gwinnet A.G., Tay F. R. and Wei S. H. Y. Bridging the gap between overly dry and overwet bonding phenomenon of dentin hybridization and tubular seal. In: Shine. M., Maeda, T., Suda., H., Takayashi, K., eds. Dentin/pulp complex, Tokyo, Quintessence, 1996:359-363
8 Sano, H., Shono, t., Hosoda. H. : Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer, Oper. Dent., 1994: 19:59-64
9 G. Eliades, G. Vougiouklakis, G. Palaghias. Heterogeneous distribution of single-bottle adhesive monomers in th resin-dentin interdiffusion zone, Dent. Mater. 2001:17:277-288   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Sano H, Uno S, Inous S. Clinical considerations of dentin adhesion. In: Sano H, Uno S, Inous S, editors. Modern trends in adhesive dentistry, Osaka: Kuraray. 1998. p 1-13
11 Hume WR. Influence of dentine on the pulpward release of eugenol or acids from restorative materials, J. Oral Rehabilitation 1994:21:469-73   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Effect of smear layer on bonding to ground dentin-relationship between grinding condition and tensile bond strength, Journal of the Japanese Society of Dental Materals and Devices 1994:13:101-8
13 Pashey DH, Samo H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A Review, Dent. Mater. 1995:11:117-125   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V reatorations, Am. J. Dent. 1997: 10: 66-70   PUBMED
15 Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentin permeability and dentine adhesion, J. Dent. 1997:25:355-72   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Simmelink, J. W., Nygaard, V. K. and Scott, D. B. Penetration of resins inOto partially demineralized enamel in vivo, Arch. Oral. Biol., 1974:18:435-439   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Pashley DB, Carvalho RM, Sana B, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F : The microtensile bond test : a review, J. Adhes. Dent. 1999:1(4)299-309
18 Kanca, J. : Wet bond. Effect of drying tome and distance, Am. J. Dent., 1996:9:273-276   PUBMED
19 Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J : Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength, Oper. Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb:26(1):97-104
20 Nakabayashi N., Kojima K. and Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth states, Dent. Mater. 1982:16:265-273
21 Buonocore, M. G., Matsui, A. and Gwinnett, A. J. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding, Arch. Oral. Biol., 1968:13:61-70   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH : Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J. Dent. Res, 1997:76:1298-1307   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Buonocore, M. : A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces, J. Dent. Res., 1995:34:849-853   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Miyasaka K, Nakabayashi N. Combination of EDTA conditioner and Phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin, Dental Materials 1999:15:1537
25 Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G : A critique of bond strength measurements, J. Dent. 1989:17:61-67   DOI   ScienceOn
26 H. Sano, M. Yoshiyama, S. Ebisu, M.F. Burrow, T. Takatsu, B. Ciucchi , R. Carvalho, D.H. Pashley. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nonoleakage within the hybrid layer, Oper. Dent. 1995:20:160-170
27 H. Sano. T. Takatsu, B. Ciucchi, J.A. Horner. W.G. Natthews, D.H. Pashley. Nanoleakage leakage within the hybrid layer, Oper. Dent.1995:20:18-25
28 Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface : its influence on dentinal adhesion III. Quintessence Inter. 1993:24(8):571-574
29 Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PNR, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer in vivo, J. Dent. Res. 1999:78:906-911   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Cardoso PEC, Braga RR, Carrilho MRO : Evaluation of rnicrotensile. shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems, Dent Mater 1999:14:394-398
31 Toida T, Watanabe A, Nakabayashi N. Effect of smear layer on bonding to dentin prepared with bur, Journal of the Japanese Society of Dental Materials and Devices 1995:14:109-16
32 H. Wakabayashi. Y. Kondo, K. Suzuki, H. Yatani, A. Ymashita. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin, Int. J. Prosthodont., 1994:7:302-306
33 Rebeca F. Schreiner, Robert P. Chappell, Alan G. Glaros, J. David Eick : Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives, Dent. Mater. 1998 June:14:194-201   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of resin-infiltrated demineralized human dentin, J. Dent. Res. 1995:74:1093-1102   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998:14:194-202   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Franklin R. Tay, David H. Pashley. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent. Mater. 2001: 17: 296-308   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Samsri S. Van Noort R : Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J. Adhes. Dent.1999:1:57-67   PUBMED
38 Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin, J. Dent. Res. 1996:75:1706-15   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Watanable I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer, J. Dent. Res. 1994:73:1212-20   DOI   PUBMED
40 Suzuki, M., Kato. H., Wakumoto, S. : Vibrational analysis by Raman spectroscopy of the interface between dental adhesive resin and dentin, J. Dent. Res., 1991:70:1092-1097   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
41 H. Sano, T. Shono, T. Takatsu, H Hosoda. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer, Oper. Dent. 1994:19: 59-64