• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.36-43
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness and the fluoride content of enamel and dentin around fluoride- or non fluoride-containing restorations. Forty extracted human teeth were used and prepared cervical cavities on proximal surface. Experimental teeth were divided into five groups . Group 1 : Prime & Bond NT and Z100, Group 2 Prime & Bond NT and F2000, Group 3 : Scotchbond Multi-purpose and Z100, Group 4 : Scothcbond Multi-purpose and F2000, Group 5 : Fuji II LC. The cavities were filled with dentin adhesives and restorative materials. After each tooth was bisected, one half was tested microharaness and the other half was analyzed the fluoride at the enamel and dentin by an EPMA-WDX device. The results were as follows; 1. There was no statistical difference among the microhardness of enamel surface in all group. 2. The microhardness at dentin of $100{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and $20{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Grocup 4 was lower than that of normal dentin (p>0.05). 3. There was no statistical difference among the fluoride content of enamel surface in all group. 4. The fluoride content at the dentin of $30{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and 5 were higher than those at $100{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}200{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and normal dentin (p<0.05). 5. At the dentin of $30{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point, Group 2 showed higher fluoride content than Group 1 and 3, and Group 5 showed higher fluoride content than other groups.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.13.1-13.9
• /
• 2019

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of dentin pretreatment with silver nanoparticles (SNPs) and chlorhexidine (CHX) on the microshear bond strength (${\mu}SBS$) durability of different adhesives to dentin. Materials and Methods: Occlusal surfaces of 120 human molars were ground to expose flat dentin surfaces. The specimens were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 20). Three groups (A, B, and C) were bonded with Adper Single Bond 2 (SB) and the other groups (D, E, and F) were bonded with Clearfil SE Bond (SEB). Dentin was pretreated with CHX in groups B and E, and with SNPs in groups C and F. The specimens were restored with Z250 composite. Half of the bonded surfaces in each group underwent ${\mu}SBS$ testing after 24 hours and the other half was tested after 6 months of water storage. Results: SNP application was associated with a higher ${\mu}SBS$ than was observed in the CHX and control groups for SEB after 24 hours (p < 0.05). A significantly lower ${\mu}SBS$ was observed when no dentin pretreatment was applied compared to dentin pretreatment with CHX and SNPs for SB after 24 hours (p < 0.05). The ${\mu}SBS$ values of the 6-month specimens were significantly lower than those obtained from the 24-hour specimens for all groups (p < 0.05). This decrease was much more pronounced when both adhesives were used without any dentin pretreatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: SNPs and CHX reduced the degradation of resin-dentin bonds over a 6-month period for both adhesive systems.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.479-484
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of additional acid etching and curing mechanism (light-curing or self-curing) of a composite resin on the dentin bond strength and compatibility of one-step self-etching adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixteen human permanent molars were randomly divided into eight groups according to the adhesives used (All-Bond Universal: ABU, Clearfil S3 Bond: CS3), additional acid etching (additional acid etching performed: EO, no additional acid etching performed: EX), and composite resins (Filtek Z-250: Z250, Clearfil FII New Bond: CFNB). Group 1: ABU-EO-Z250, Group 2: ABU-EO-CFNB, Group 3: ABU-EX-Z250, Group 4: ABU-EX-CFNB, Group 5: CS3-EO-Z250, Group 6: CS3-EO-CFNB, Group 7: CS3-EX-Z250, Group 8: CS3-EX-CFNB. After bonding procedures, composite resins were built up on dentin surfaces. After 24-hour water storage, the teeth were sectioned to make 10 specimens for each group. The microtensile bond strength test was performed using a microtensile testing machine. The failure mode of the fractured specimens was examined by means of an optical microscope at ${\times}20$ magnification. The data was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and Scheffe's post-hoc test (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Additional etching groups showed significantly higher values than the no additional etching group when using All-Bond Universal. The light-cured composite resin groups showed significantly higher values than the self-cured composite resin groups in the Clearfil S3 Bond. CONCLUSION. The additional acid etching is beneficial for the dentin bond strength when using low acidic one-step self-etch adhesives, and low acidic one-step self-etch adhesives are compatible with self-cured composite resin. The acidity of the one-step self-etch adhesives is an influencing factor in terms of the dentin bonding strength and incompatibility with a self-cured composite resin.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.377-387
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 자가산부식 접착시스템과 자가산부식 프라이머 접착시스템의 다층적용이 혼성층 및 adhesive layer의 형성 양상, 그리고 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향 등을 비교 평가하기 위하여 시행되었다. 영구 구치 140개의 치아를 근원심으로 분할하여 협면 혹은 설면의 상아질을 이용하였다. 각 접착시스템을 1회, 2회, 3회 도포, 그리고 1회 도포 후 광중합한 후 1회의 추가 도포한 군으로 분류하였다. 전단결합강도와 혼성층 및 adhesive layer 두께를 측정하여 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 모든 접착제에서 도포횟수가 증가함에 따라 adhesive layer의 두께가 증가하였으며 (p<0.05), Adpor Prompt L-Pop과 Xeno III에서는 자가산부식 프라이머 시스템에서보다 작게 나타났다(p<0.05). 2. Adpor Prompt L-Pop에서 혼성층은 도포횟수에 따라 혼성층의 두께도 증가하였다(p<0.05). 3. Unifill Bond와 Clearfill SE Bond의 전단결합강도는 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus와 Adpor Prompt L-Pop에서보다 높게 나타났으며 (p<0.05), Xeno III와는 유사하였다. 4. Adpor Prompt L-Pop은 접착제의 도포횟수가 증가함에 따라 전단결합강도는 유의하게 증가되었으며(p<0.05), AdheSE에서는 3회 도포한 경우 전단결합강도가 감소하는 경향을 보였다(p>0.05). 5. Adpor Prompt L-Pop과 Xeno III에서 첫 층을 중합한 후 두 번째 층을 추가 도포한 경우 전단결합강도는 감소하였다(p<0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.383-397
• /
• 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of artificial saliva contamination on bonding of several dentin adhesives to dentin. Sixty - three human molar teeth extracted within a month were used. Each tooth was sectioned longitudinally in a buccolingual direction to obtain 126 specimens. These specimens were randomly divided into three groups and were treated by Scotchbond 2, Gluma and All bond. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups; normal group not contaminated with artificial saliva, contaminated with artificial saliva and dried group, and contaminated with artificial saliva and washed and dried group. Enamel/dentin bonding agent(Dental Adhesive of Scotchbond 2) was applied and light cured on the treated dentin surfaces. Thereafter P - 50 were cured on them, and specimens were stored in $37^{\circ}C$ artificial saliva for 24 hours before measuring shear bond strength. Shear bond strengths were determined using an universal testing machine with cross head speed 1mm/min and SEM examinations were conducted to evaluate the resin - dentin interface and degree of penetrating resin string into the dentinal tubules. The following results were obtained. 1. Normal groups not contaminated with artificial saliva showed greater shear bond strength than any other group contaminated with artificial saliva(P<0.01). 2. The shear bond strengths showed no significant difference between washed groups with distilled water and not washed groups after contamination with artificial saliva(P>0.05). 3. In normal groups, the shear bond strength of A group was significantly greater than in any other group(P<0.01). 4. In Sand G groups, fractures after shear bond strength tests occured adhesively on resintooth interface in all specimens. But in A groups, fracture of the normal group occured cohesively in dentin and fracture of the contaminated groups occured adhesively and cohesively. 5. On SEM examination, the number of resin strings penetrated into dentinal tubules were the greatest in normal groups, followed by, in descending order, washed groups and not washed groups after contamination with artificial saliva.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.319-326
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 단일 단계 접착제의 표층과 심층 상아질에 대한 미세인장 결합강도의 차이를 평가하기 위해서 시행되었다. 발거된 상$\cdot$하악 대구치의 교합면측에 있는 표층 상아질과 심층 상아질을 각각 15개씩 노출시킨 후, 사용된 접착제에 따라 AQ군, L-Pop군, Xeno군으로 분류하여 복합레진을 축조하였다. 각 시편은 상아질과 복합레진 계면의 단면적이 $1.0mm^2$이 되도록 절단하였고, 각 군 당 20개의 시편을 사용하였다. 각 군의 미세인장 결합강도의 측정하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 표층과 심층 상아질 모두에서 Xeno III는 다른 접착제보다 가장 높은 결합강도를 나타내었다 (p<0.05). 또한 모든 접착제는 심층 상아질에서 보다 표층 상아질에서 더 높은 결합강도를 나타내었으나 이들 간에 통계학적 인 유의성은 접착제의 종류에 따라 다르게 나타났다.

• 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한치과보존학회 2002년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.671-671
• /
• 2002

No Abstract, See Full Text

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.420-429
• /
• 2007

전통적인 3단계 total-etching 시스템인 제 4세대 상아질 접착제로부터 술식의 단순화를 이루며 진화한 제 5, 6세대 및 최근에 소개된 제 7세대 상아질 접착제를 상아질 표면처리방식과 적용단계별로 구분하여 bovine teeth 상아질에 대한 미세인장결합강도를 측정하여 그 효용성을 비교 평가하였다. Bovine incisor의 상아질 표면을 노출시키고, 적절한 표면처리 후 제조사의 지시에 따라 5종의 상아질 접착제; 제 4 세대로 Scotch $Bond^{TM}$ Multipurpose(3M ESPE, USA), $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond 2(3M ESPE, USA), 제 5세대 $Clearfil^{(R)}$ SE Bond(KURARAY, JAPAN), 제 6세대 AQ $Bond^{TM}$(SUN MEDICAL, JAPAN), 제 7세대 $Clearfil^{(R)}$ tri-S Bond(KURARAY, JAPAN)를 각각 적용하여 미세인장결합강도를 측정하고 접착계면의 파절양상을 관찰하였다. 연구결과 미세인장결합강도는 $Clearfil^{(R)}$ SE Bond군에서 가장 높았으며 다음으로 Scotch $Bond^{TM}$ Multipurpose군, $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond 2군, AQ $Bond^{TM}$군, $Clearfil^{(R)}$ tri-S Bond군의 순으로 나타났다. 계면의 파절양상은 상대적으로 미세인장강도가 높게 나타난 Scotch $Bond^{TM}$ Multipurpose, $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond2, $Clearfil^{(R)}$ SE Bond군은 레진의 응집성 파절이 많이 발생하였고 상대적으로 미세인장강도가 낮은 AQ $Bond^{TM}$, $Clearfil^{(R)}$ tri-S Bond 군의 경우에는 대부분 접착성 파절이 관찰되었다. 이상의 결과를 종합하면 상아질 접착제의 미세인장결합강도는 각 접착시스템별로 다소의 차이를 보이며, 특히 제 6, 7세대 상아질 접착제가 이전 세대보다 낮은 것으로 나타났다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.312-318
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 상아질에 대한 3종의 단일 단계 접착제의 미세인장 결합강도를 상호 비교하였다 15개의 발거된 상$\cdot$하악 대구치의 교합면측에 있는 표층 상아질을 노출시킨 후, 사용된 접착제에 따라 3개의 군 (Xeno군-Xeno III, Prompt군-Adper Prompt L-Pop, AQ군-AQ Bond)으로 분류하여 복합레진을 축조하였다. 각 시편을 막대모양으로 제작하였고, 각 군 당 20개의 시편을 이용하여 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1 상아질에 대한 각 군의 미세인장 결합강도는 Xeno군에서 $48.78\pm 9.83MPa$, Prompt군에서 $30.22\pm4.52MPa$, AQ군에서 $26.31\pm7.07MPa$로 나타났다. 2.Xeno 군은 Prompt 군과 AQ 군보다 통계학적으로 높은 미세인장 결합강도를 나타냈다 (p<0.05). 3. Prompt 군과 AQ 군의 미세인장 결합강도 간에는 통계학적으로 유의차가 없었다 (p>0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.162-169
• /
• 2004

This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins：Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3). Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5). The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests. The results of this study were as follows：1. Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 2. Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 3. Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups. In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.