Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.036

INFLUENCE OF MICROHARDNESS AND FLUORIDE CONTENT OF TOOTH STRUCTURE BY FLUORIDE-CONTAINING RESTORATIVE MATERIALS  

Lee, Su-Jong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Jong-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Park, Byung-Cheul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.29, no.1, 2004 , pp. 36-43 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness and the fluoride content of enamel and dentin around fluoride- or non fluoride-containing restorations. Forty extracted human teeth were used and prepared cervical cavities on proximal surface. Experimental teeth were divided into five groups . Group 1 : Prime & Bond NT and Z100, Group 2 Prime & Bond NT and F2000, Group 3 : Scotchbond Multi-purpose and Z100, Group 4 : Scothcbond Multi-purpose and F2000, Group 5 : Fuji II LC. The cavities were filled with dentin adhesives and restorative materials. After each tooth was bisected, one half was tested microharaness and the other half was analyzed the fluoride at the enamel and dentin by an EPMA-WDX device. The results were as follows; 1. There was no statistical difference among the microhardness of enamel surface in all group. 2. The microhardness at dentin of $100{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and $20{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Grocup 4 was lower than that of normal dentin (p>0.05). 3. There was no statistical difference among the fluoride content of enamel surface in all group. 4. The fluoride content at the dentin of $30{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and 5 were higher than those at $100{\;}\mu\textrm{m}{\;}and{\;}200{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point in Group 2 and normal dentin (p<0.05). 5. At the dentin of $30{\;}\mu\textrm{m}$ point, Group 2 showed higher fluoride content than Group 1 and 3, and Group 5 showed higher fluoride content than other groups.
Keywords
Microhardness; Fluoride content; Fluoride-containing restorative materials Cervical cavities; Dentin adhesives; EPMA-WDX;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Maclnnis WA, Ismail A, Brogan H. Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population. J Can Dent Assoc 57:227 231, 1991
2 Norman RD, Mehra RV, Swartz ML, Philips RW. Effects of restorative materials on plaque composition, J Dent Res 51:1596 1601, 1972   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Diaz Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW, Swift EJ. Jr. Short term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 11:96 101, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Eliades G, Kakaboura A. Palaghias G. Acid base reaction and fluoride release profiles in visible light cured polyacid modified composite restoratives. Dent Mater 14:57 63, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HE. Long term F release from glass ionomer cements. J Dental Res 63:158 160, 1984   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Itota T, Okamoto M, Sato K, Nakabo S, Nagamine M, Torii Y, Inoue K. Release and recharge of fluoride by restorative materials. Dent Mater 18:347 353, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Marie HA, Panagiotis K, Yannis P, Hryssostomos K. Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement. J Prosthet 86:156 164, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Yamamoto H, Iwami Y, Unezaki T, Tomii Y, Ebisu S. Fluoride uptake in human teeth from fluoride releasing restorative material in vivo and in vitro: Two dimensional mapping by EPMA WDX. Caries Research35:111 115, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Reintsema H, Arends J, An in vivo study of microhard ness and fluoride uptake in partially demineralized human enamel covered by plaque. J Dent Res 67:471 473, 1988   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr, Cury JA. Insitu anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement Caries Res 27:280 284, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Dijkman GE, de Vries J , Arends. Secondary caries in dentine around composites: a wavelength independent microradiographical study. Caries Res 28:87-93, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Han L, Abu Bakr N, Okamoto A, lwaku M. Study of the fluoridated adhesive resin cement fluoride release, fluoride uptake and acid resistance of tooth structures Dent Mater 20:114 122, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 69:36 39, 1990   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dent Mater 16:166 171, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 19:503 508, 1998   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
16 Pereira PNR. Inokoshi S, Tagami J. In vitro seoondary caries inhibition around fluoride releasing materials. J Dent 26:505 510, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Francci C, Deaton TG, Arnold RR, Swift EJ Jr. Fluoride release from restorative materials and its effects on dentin demineralization. Dent, Res. 78: 1647 1652, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Duckworth RM, Lynch RJM. Fluoride uptake to demineralised enamel: A comparison of sampling techniques. Caries Res. 32 :417 421, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Raven SJ, Schafer F, Duckworth RM, Gilvert RJ, Parr TA. Comparion between evaluation methods for the anti caries efficacy of monofluorophosphate containing dentifrices. Caries Res 25:130 137, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, Hogan MM. Evaluating the effects of fluoride releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. J Am Dent Assoc 130:817 825, 1999   DOI
21 Yap AUJ, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK. Short Term Fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 27:259 265, 2002
22 Verbeeck RM, De Maeyer AP, Marks LA, De Moor JG, De Witte AM, Trimpeneers LM. Fluoride release process of (resin modified) glass ionomer cements versus (polyacid modified) composite resins. Biomaterials 19:509 519, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Corpron RE, More FG, Mount G. Comparison of fluo ride profiles by SIMS with mineral density of subsurface enamel lesions treated intra orally with a fluoride releasing device. J Dent Res 71 :828 831, 1992   PUBMED
24 Jones FH, Hutton BM, Hadley PC, Eccles AJ, Steele TA Billinton RW, Pearson G.J. Fluoride uptake by glass ionomer cements: a surface analysis approach. Biomaterials 24:107 119, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Samuel SM, Rubinstein C. Microhardness of enamel restored with fluoride and non fluoride releasing dental materials. Braz Dent J 12:35 38, 2001   PUBMED
26 Marquis R.E. Antimicrobial actions of fluoride for oral bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41 :955 964, 1995   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
27 Boyde A et al Application of the scanning electron probe X ray microanalyzer to dental tissues. J Ultrastruct Res 5:201 207, 1961   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Preston AJ, Mair LH, Agalamanyi EA, Higham SM. Fluoride release from aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehab 26:123 129, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Dijkman, Arends. Secondary caries in situ around fluoride releasing light curing composites: A quantitative model investigation on four materials with a fluoride content between 0 and 26 vol%. Caries Res 26:351 357, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Takahashi K, Emilson CG, Birkhed D. Fluoride release in vitro from various glass ionomer cements and resin composites after exposure to NaF solutions. Dent Mater 9:350 354, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Torii Y. Itota T, Okamoto M, Nakabo S, Nagaminie M, Inoue K. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 26:36 43, 2001
32 Corpron RE, More FG, Clark JW, Korytnicki D, Kowalski CJ. In vivo remineralization of artificial enamel lesions by a fluoride dentifrice or mouth rinse. Caries Res 20:48 55, 1986
33 Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Resin modified glass lonomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries forrmation in coronal enamel. Quintessence Int 31:570 578, 2000
34 Kawai K, Tantbirojin D, Kamalawat AS, Hasegawa T, Retief DH. In vitro enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from three fluoride containing composites. Caries Res 32 :463 469, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Yap AUJ, Khor E, Foo SH. Fluoride release and antibacterial properties of new generation tooth colored restoratives. Oper Dent 24:297 305, 1999
36 Araujo FB, Godoy FG, Cury JA, Conceicao EN. Fluoride release from fluoride containing materals. Oper Dent 21:185 190, 1996
37 Lisa P, Afrodite K, George E. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass ionomer and resin compos ite restorative materials. Dent Mater 18:561 569, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Pagadogiannis Y Konstantinidis A. Artificial secondary caries around two new F containing restoratives. Oper Dent 23:81 86, 1998
39 Guha Chowdhury N, Clark AG, Sissons CH Inhibitation of purrified enolases oral bacreia by fluoride. Oral Microbiol Immuno120:114 122, 2001
40 Hotta M. Li Y, Sekine I Mineralization in bovine dentin adjacent to glass ionomer restorations. J Dent 29:211 215, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 3: 133 138, 1991   DOI   PUBMED
42 Kotsanos N. An intraoral study of caries induced on enamel in contact with fluoride releasing restorative materials. Caries Res 35:200 204, 2001   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
43 Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, Switzer P. Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 18:250 257, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Dunne SM, Goolinik JS, Millar BJ, Seddon RP. Caries inhibition by a resin modified and a convertional glass ionomer cement in vitro. J Dent 24:91 94, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from light activated glass restorativ cements. Dent Mater 9:151 154, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn