Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.2.162

MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE OF SINGLE STEP ADHESIVES  

Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jeong, Jin-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Ki, Young-Jae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Choi, Hee-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jin, Cheul-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Yoo, Sang-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Jong-Uk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Park, Byung-Cheul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.29, no.2, 2004 , pp. 162-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins：Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3). Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5). The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests. The results of this study were as follows：1. Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 2. Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 3. Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups. In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.
Keywords
Marginal microleakage; Single step adhesives; Class V cavity preparation; Dye penetration; Enamel margins; Dentin margins;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Pradelle Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel dentin/com posite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent 14:344 348, 2001
2 Tay FR, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light cured resin composite on bonding of all in one adhesives. J Adhesive Dent 3:207 225, 2001
3 Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Investigation of self etching dentin primers. Dent Mater 5:408 410, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Swift EJ, Bayne SC, Shear bond strength of a new one bottIe dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 4:184 188, 1997
5 Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 14:163 169, 2001
6 Amaral CM, Hara AT, Fimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 14:31 33, 2001
7 Gladys S, Meerbeek BV, Lambrechts P,Vanherle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 14:170 176, 2001
8 Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR, Quantititive evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 27:475 479, 2002
9 Gagliardi RM, Aveelar RP. Evaluation of micrpleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 28:582 586, 2002
10 Hannig M, Fu B. Effect of air abrasion and resin com posite on microleakage of class V restorations bonded with self etching primers. J Adhesive Dent 3:265 272, 2001
11 Frankenberger R, Perdigao J , Rosa BT, Lopes M. 'No bottle' vs multi bottle' dentin adhesive a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373 380, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Inoue S, Meerbeek BV, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self etching adhesives. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray symposium, 131 148, 1999
13 Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems, Dent Mater 18(2):111 119, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Tulunoglu O, Uctash M, Alaoam A, Omurlu H. Microleakage of light cured resin and resin modified glass ionomer detin bonding agents applied with cocure vs pre cure technique. Oper Dent 25:292 298, 2000
15 Santini A, Plasschaert AJM, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self etching dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 14:132 136, 2001
16 Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 31:353 358, 2000
17 Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 4:253 258, 1996
18 Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The compositon between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396 1399, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of flow able resin . Oper Dent 28 :42 46, 2003
20 Mehl A, Hickel R, KunZelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light cured composites with and without: softstart polymerization. J Dent 25:321 330，1997   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ferrari M, Garcia Godoy F. Sealing ability of new generation adhesive restorative materials places on virtal teeth. Am J Dent 15:117128, 2002
22 Hofmann N, Siebrecht C, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 28(2):160 167, 2003
23 Pontes DG, Melo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all in one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 33:136 139, 2002
24 Barnes DM, McDonald NJ, Thompson VP, Blank LW, Shires PJ. Microleakage in facial and lingual class 5 composite restorations: A comparison. Oper Dent 19:133 137, 1994
25 Opdam NJM, Roesters JJM, Feilzer AJ. Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26:555 562, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Tells PDS, Machado MAAM, Nor JE. SEM study of a self etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediat Dent 23:315 320, 2001
27 Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75:1706 1715,1996   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self contamination of deep dentin by dentinal fluid. Am J Dent 13:195 200, 2000
29 Croll TP: Self etching adhesive system for resin bonding. J Dent Child 176 181, 2000
30 Brackett WW, Covey DA, Germain HA. One year clinical performance of a self etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 27:218 222, 2002
31 Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa RT. New trends in dentin/enamal adhesion. Am J Dent 13:25 30, 2000
32 Sonoda H, Sasafuchi Y, Kitasako Y, Arakawa M, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Pulpal response to a fluoride releasing all in one resin bonding system. Oper Dent 27:271 277, 2002
33 Ohno H, Kimura M, Fuchigami S, Oguri M: Dental composition. United states patent number 5,739,177; April 14, 1998
34 Kleter GA, Damen JJM, Everts V, Niehof J, Ten Cate JM. The influence of the organic matrix on demineralization of bovine root dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 73:1523 1529, 1994   DOI
35 Nunes MF, Perdigao J, Rosa BT: The effect of an experimental one application self conditioning adhesives on microleakage. J Dent Res 78:306 (abstract no. 1602), 1999
36 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas P, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dernt 28:215 235, 2003
37 Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 26:167 173, 1995
38 Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Dentin permeability and adhesion. J Dent Res 25:355 372, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Balooch M, Wu Magidi IC, Balazs A, Lundkvist AS, Marshall SJ. Marshall GW, Siekhaus WJ, Kinney JH. Viscoelastic properties of demineralized human dentin measured in water with an atomic force microscope (AFM) based indentation. J Biomed Res 40:539 544, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Walshaw PR, McComb D, Clinical considerations for optimal dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 27:619 625, 1996
41 Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 17:296 308, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE: Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers Am J Dent 10:219 223, 1997
43 Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK: Enamel and deltin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361 366, 2001
44 Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26:120, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petchelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Dent Mater14:329 338, 1999