• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.19-39
• /
• 2006

This study deals with construction contract bid-rigging by Japanese contractors who monopolized the construction market of the Korean Peninsula during the Japanese colonial rule, and investigates the abuses of the contract bid-rigging. First of all, construction contract bid-rigging in Korea was triggered by Japanese construction contractors and contract brokers, who had savored the benefits of bidrigging in Japan and had repeated the bid-rigging in Korea since 1903. Second, the agency played a significant role to mediate construction contractors, and existed throughout the Japanese colonial rule on the Korean Peninsula with changing their names. Most of them were engaged in major contract bid-rigging scandals. Among them was Construction Association of Korea, which existed for over 13 years. The agencies had took part in governmental services since the mid-1930s when Japan exploited Korean people during wartime, and focused on sweating human resources for the constructions. Third, one of the biggest construction bid-rigging scandals during the Japanese colonial rule was "the 1st and 2nd scandal on Daegu construction contract bid-rigging." Indeed, the second scandal paved the way for the serial scandals: "Kyeongseong construction contract bid-rigging scandal", "Busan construction contract bid-rigging scandal", and other cases throughout the nation. Fourth, along with the contract bid-rigging cases related to the Japanese Government-General of Korea and local authorities, bid-riggings firmly took rooted in local governments' farmland reclamation projects in the 1920s and the poor relief services in the 1930s. The "bid-rigging charges" forced contractors to compensate their losses with exploiting material costs and labor costs, generating serious problems. The construction contract bid-rigging enabled Japan to monopolize the construction industry and to sweat farmers on the Korean Peninsula. Against this backdrop, contract bid-rigging by Japanese construction contractors during the its colonization made Korean contractors ruled out, and helped Japanese monopolize the industry. A large amount of bid-rigging charges drove Japanese contractors to do fraudulent work with cheap materials and to exploit Korean labor force.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2007년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.662-665
• /
• 2007

CM, EPC, PM 등과 같은 현재 국제적으로 많이 통용되고 있는 계약 방식들이 건설산업에 존재한다. 이러한 국제적인 건설계약 방식들을 도모하고자 중국 정부의 건설부는 2004년 새로운 건설계약법을 실행하였다. 이로 인해 중국내에서도 다양한 선진 건설계약 방식이 도입되고 있다. 한국은 중국과 비교하였을 때 실질적인 건설공사에 이러한 선진 계약방식을 도입함으로써 건설산업의 성장의 가속화를 이룩하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 중국과 한국의 건설산업 및 계약방식 등을 비교함으로써 양국 건설산업의 차이점을 분석하고자 한다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제6권5호
• /
• pp.177-185
• /
• 2005

건설공사의 불확실성은 빈번히 클레임에 노출된다. 대부분의 경우 이러한 클레임에 대한 기본적인 해석은 공사계약서를 기준으로 하게 된다. 이러한 계약서 작성시의 문제는 발주자나 시공자가 부담하여야 하는 계약적 위험(risk)이 어떻게 규정되어 있어야 합리적인 수준인가를 판단하는 것인데 이러한 판단을 위해서는 FIDIC 계약조건과 같이 국제적으로 합리성을 인정받는 표준계약조건을 참고하는 것이 합리적이라 하겠다. 이에 본 연구는 FIDIC 계약조건을 기준으로 국내 공공공사에서 일반적으로 사용하는 공사계약일반조건에 내재되어 있는 불공정, 불합리 조항을 분석하여 세계적 수준에 맞는 공사계약조건을 제시하고자 위험관리의 관점에서 공사 계약조건을 분석하고, 여기서 도출되는 위험요인을 검증하며, 이에 대한 대응방안을 모색함으로써 공사계약일반조건의 위험요인 감소방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2001년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2001

건설공사계약은 다양한 이해관계자의 관여, 장기간에 걸친 계약이행, 계약 외적 환경에 의한 상당한 영향 등으로 인해 계약당사자간 분쟁발생가능성이 높다. 이러한 분쟁발생시 당사자의 주장의 정당성은 계약문서나 관계법령 등에서의 규정에 의하여 판단되기 때문에 이에 대한 정확한 이해와 공사관리가 필요하다. 본 연구는 구체적 판례나 중재판정 등을 중심으로 건설공사의 원활한 관리가 가능하도록 계약의 바람직한 해석방향을 제시하고자 한다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 1th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.1112-1117
• /
• 2005

Construction cost index is generally used to estimate the new project cost based on past construction data and to adjust contract cost when the price change of various articles and items of expenditure composing the contract occurs. In Korea, it is mostly used for adjustment of construction contract cost due to fluctuation of prices. However index adjustment rate which is used for adjustment of construction contract cost had some problems in calculating cost index of each expenditure item that could not reflect properly the change of construction cost. For supplementing these problems, the research of developing construction cost index has been executed. Through the precedent research, these problems were partially resolved but still remain. Therefore this research proposes method of making cost index that utilizes representative items of labor, material, and equipment by analyzing bill of quantity of road construction, through analysis and comparison of precedent study. By using this method, it is expected to solve problems which were not reflected in precedent studies.

• 한국항해학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.107-119
• /
• 1993

When the breach of contract is at issue between the contracting parties, the decision of the contents of obligation has an important meaning. The contents of obligation is decided by the construction of cont-ract. Therefore, the construction of contract has very important meaning for the decision of the contents of obligation. And the Civil Law of Korea includes provisions to settle disputes related to contract, and most of these provisions have the nature of voluntary law. And when there is no intention of the contracting parties, or it is not clear, the voluntary law comes into application(Civil code art. 105). Ultimately, voluntary law not only becomes the standard of the construction of the contract, but also it is applied as the law to settle dispute. Thus, it needs to clear what is the relation between the construc-tion of contract and the application of law. Therefore, this paper aims to clarify the relationship between the construction of contract and the appli-cation of law.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2005년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.127-131
• /
• 2005

The construction industry has specific characteristics compared with manufacturing industry. This means that each construction project has it's own contract documents due to the difference of environment and time. Now, the construction market is opening according to the Government Procurement Agreement by WTO. Therefore to overcome the associated risks, domestic contract rules and acts should be reformed. FIDIC and domestic construction contract conditions is investigated and analyzed. Based on the research outcomes the direction of reformation is suggested.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2021년도 봄 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.155-156
• /
• 2021

Most of the construction works in domestic are not direct undertaking work, but by a contract method including subcontracting. Therefore, a general contractor for each project jointly carry out construction work with a specialty contractor for each engineering type. However, in terms of contract, this method is not a joint venture contract, but a subcontract. Accordingly, this system can cause various problems between the prime contractor and the subcontractor. Therefore, this study aims to extract and present the actual obstacle factors in terms of specialty contract company performing specialty construction work for construction project. The presented contents are expected to present the standard for the cooperation system that the prime contractor and the subcontractor can win-win.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.155-163
• /
• 2007

건설프로젝트를 수행하는 과정에 있어 계약당사자간에 다양한 계약방식에 기초하여 시설물 건설에 요구되는 업무 또는 서비스를 제공하고 있으나, 건설사업의 주요 성과지표라 할 수 있는 비용, 일정, 안전등의 측면에서 계약방식에 따라 발생할 수 있는 성과의 차이에 대한 실증적 인 비교연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 건설사업이 다수의 건설전문조직과 계약을 기반으로 운영되는 프로젝트라는 특성을 고려할 때 계약방식의 유형에 따라 사업성과에 대한 차이를 비교분석 함으로써 계약방식 선정에 대한 적정 의사결정을 지원하는데 유효한 자료를 제공할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 건설계약방식 중 실비정산방식과 총액계약방식을 대상으로 건설사업의 주요 성과에 대한 비교 분석을 시도하였다. 계약방식별 프로젝트 성과는 미국 Construction Industry Institute(CII)의 Benchmarking and Metrics(BM&M) 프로그램에서 활용하는 성과측정기준을 기초로 비용, 공정, 안전, 변경, 재작업(rework) 등 5개 분야를 대상으로 하였다. 또한 계약방식으로 인한 각종 성과지표의 차이가 통계적 의미를 지니고 있는가를 판단하기 위하여 통계적 기법인 t-test를 이용하여 데이터의 유의성을 분석하였다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 6th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.704-705
• /
• 2015

Recent research has been ongoing for modular buildings in the country, and interest increases. However, in accordance with legal restrictions in the country with regard to Project Delivery system of Modular Building, the activation of modular buildings industry is obstructed. In Korea, in accordance with national contract law, the construction contract is apply to the project delivery system of modular buildings, and in accordance with Framework Act on the Construction Industry, The project delivery system of modular buildings has to be a separate order. The definition of separate order in contract as defined in the law is that the electric work and Communication work and digestion facility work has to be separate each contract in order to be ensured professionalism. In accordance with law, the project delivery system of modular buildings is that the contract for construction is concluded with the Owner and the Construction Contractor and the contract for goods is concluded with the construction Contractor and modular manufacturer. Due to these project delivery system, the domestic factory production rate when making a modular unit is significantly reduced compared to the rate of factory production abroad and the domestic factory production rate is estimated to 10-20%. Due to the factory production rate is also low, despite what can be done at the factory the workload in construction field increases. According to the workload in field increases, the effect of the schedule reduction can be reduced. It resolved to form a consortium with a modular manufacturer and construction companies or the contract is concluded with Owner, modular manufacturer and construction companies in each. In this paper, we propose a specific project delivery system for modular building to solve the problem of the low factory production rate and the problem of schedule reduction. Through this paper, due to the variety of project delivery system on modular buildings is expected to contribute to the activation of modular buildings.