• Title/Summary/Keyword: comparison evaluation

Search Result 4,885, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

An Analysis on the Two Processes of Social Comparison and Self-Comparison (사회비교와 자기비교의 두 과정에 관한 분석)

  • Kang, Hye-Ja
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.445-452
    • /
    • 2016
  • The purposes of this study were to examine the two processes of social comparison and self-comparison, and to suggest the applications of social comparison theories and self-comparison theories. For these purposes, social comparison theory, self-evaluation maintenance model, control theory, self-discrepancy theory, regulatory focus theory, and temporal comparison theory were reviewed. The processes of social comparison and self-comparison are different, but both comparisons are similar in that they have some effects on self-evaluation, emotion, motivation and behaviors. Suggestions on education, health, economic justice and interpersonal relationships were discussed.

Perceived Importance and Satisfaction of Evaluation Criteria of the Price Comparison Website (가격비교사이트 평가기준의 중요도와 만족도 분석)

  • Cha, Kyung-Wook
    • Journal of Family Resource Management and Policy Review
    • /
    • v.11 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1-20
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study was to identify the criteria of evaluating a price-comparison website, and to investigate the consumers' perceived importance and satisfaction of each criterion. Also, it compared both the importance and satisfaction levels based on consumers' socio-economic and Internet-usage characteristics. Data for this study came from a questionnaire completed by consumers (n=417), who had used the price-comparison website, and were analyzed through factor analysis, t-test, and ANOVA. The findings of the study were as follows: First, the evaluation criteria of the price-comparison website were categorized into five variety of information, accuracy, convenience, credibility, and the website system. Second, convenience of searching information was seen by consumers as both the most important and most satisfactory criterion. Variety of information was also considered important. For most of the evaluation criteria, the level of consumers' satisfaction was significantly lower than the level of consumers' recognized importance. Third, consumers in their 20s, students, and housewives were less likely to be satisfied by the price-comparison website overall. Older people were less likely to be satisfied with the convenience of the website, and the higher-income group was less likely to be satisfied with the variety of information on hand.

  • PDF

Dynamic discrmination of sensory evaluation capability using paired-comparison method (1대비교에 의한 관능평가능력의 동적판별)

  • 김정만;이상도
    • Proceedings of the ESK Conference
    • /
    • 1993.10a
    • /
    • pp.113-123
    • /
    • 1993
  • In a sensory evaluation, the data obtained by a result of evaluation have a wide dispersion and fuzziness because human sense organ is used as a means of measuring sensation instead of measuring instruments. These dispersion and fuzziness are caused by all kinds of time error and have a great influence on a sensory evaluation, but most of previous papers don't deal with these time errors. In this study, a comparative judgement capacity of an evaluator is discriminated by means of the eigen-structure analysis on the premise that evaluation value of sensory evaluators obtained by a paired-comparison become different by the order of sample presentation

  • PDF

Studies on Sensory Evaluation -[Part II] Trio Paired Comparison- (관능검사(官能檢査)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究) -[제2보(第2報)] 3각1대비교법(3角1對比較法)에 대하여-)

  • Hong, Jin
    • Applied Biological Chemistry
    • /
    • v.20 no.3
    • /
    • pp.270-278
    • /
    • 1977
  • In case of sensory evaluation with multi-samples and long-period, in spite of using method with good sensitivity, quality differences among samples could net be detected well because of panel's fatigue and tiredness. So new method to reduce panel's sense of psychological and physiological responsibility, "Trio Paired Comparison", is designed, and New Modified Scheffe's Method 2 as the statistical method for a test of "Trio Paired Comparison" is proposed. And also in this paper problems and countermeasures in applicating "Trio Paired Comparison" are considered.

  • PDF

COMPARISON OF THREE PCM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS IN TAIWAN

  • Wen-der Yu ;Yen-ping Hsu
    • International conference on construction engineering and project management
    • /
    • 2005.10a
    • /
    • pp.719-724
    • /
    • 2005
  • It has been debating on the performance evaluation of professional construction management (PCM) services since its introduction to Taiwan's construction industry more than a decade ago. Several evaluation systems were proposed by previous researchers. However, there has no comparison study been conducted for the feasibility, effectiveness, and appropriateness of these systems to the performance management (PM) of practical PCM services. This paper is intended for this end to compare the existing PCM performance evaluation systems in Taiwan. A real world design/build (D/B) building project was selected for case study. The result of case study concludes and compares the pro's and con's of the three systems. At the end, it recommends strategies for selecting the most appropriate PCM performance evaluation for PCM services.

  • PDF

Dynamic discrmination of sensory evaluation capability using a paired-comparison method (일대비교에 의한 관능평가능력의 동작판별)

  • 김정만;이상도
    • Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.85-91
    • /
    • 1993
  • Data obtained for sensory evaluation have a wide dispersion and fuzziness since human sensory organs are used as a means of measuring sensation instead of measuring instruments. Such dispersion and fuzziness are caused by all kinds of time error and have a great influence on the sensory evaluation, but most of previous papers not consider time errors. In this study, the comparative judgement capability of the evaluator was discriminated by means of the eigen- structure analysis on the premise that evaluation values of sensory evaluators obtained by a paired-comparison become different by the order of sample presentation.

  • PDF

Characteristics Analysis of Evaluation Measures and Submission Requirements of Sustainable Design Awards -Comparison between AIA COTE Top 10 and Korea Green Building Awards- (완공작 친환경 건축물 공모전의 평가기준 및 제출요구자료 특성 분석 - AIA COTE TOP 10 공모전과 녹색건축대전의 비교를 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Jin-Ho;Lee, Do-Gyun
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • v.17 no.3
    • /
    • pp.59-67
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose: As we are facing the global crisis from the climate change and energy depletion, urgent actions are needed to design a integrated sustainable building. This paper suggests that a sustainable design awards can stimulate for architects to bring the cutting-edge ideas into a realized building in comparison to green building certification system. AIA COTE Top 10 design awards, organized and run by AIA(American Institute of Architects) COTE(Committee on the Environment) from 1997, is analyzed as a case study. By researching the core of the AIA COTE Top 10 design awards system in terms of evaluation measures and submission requirements, meaningful suggestions were drawn to supplement Korea Green Building Awards system and to design and realize leading green buildings in Korea. Method: The comparison between AIA COTE Top 10 and Korea Green Building Design Awards was made in terms of evaluation measures, submission requirements, and green building certification systems. Result: This paper finally suggests the following three points in conclusion: 1) Set the standards of evaluation measures reflecting the three aspects(economy, environment, social) of sustainability, 2) Set the qualitative evaluation measures and corresponding submission requirements that can apply in the design awards in comparison to green building certification system, 3) Develop and balance submission requirements in response to evaluation measures to proceed systematic evaluation of the green buildings.

A Comparison of the Consciousness of Middle Age Women′s Body Image between Self-Evaluation and Others′ - in Gwang-Ju - (중년전기 여성의 신체부위에 대한 자기평가와 타인평가의 비교 -광주지역을 중심으로-)

  • 위은하
    • The Research Journal of the Costume Culture
    • /
    • v.12 no.5
    • /
    • pp.707-720
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study focused on the comparison of the consciousness of middle age women's body image between self evaluation and others'. The respondents include 105 middle age women who evaluated themselves and 532 middle age women who evaluated others in there age group in Gwang-Ju. The Questionnaire was comprised of two components; Part One is consciousness of body-shape and Part Two is body cathexis (or a body preference). For data analysis, SPSS 10.0 program was generally used, and T-test, ANOVA, Scheffe-test were being conducted. The results of study were as follow; On consciousness of body shape, the items that exist difference of opinion on the comparison of the consciousness of middle age women's body-shape between self-evaluation and others' evaluation were total body fatness, upper body type, low arm girth, thigh girth in lean group, and crotch of pants length, ankle girth, calf girth, in normal group, and upper body type, lower body type in obese group. On a body-cathexis, the item were neck, buttocks, bust, posture in lean group(p<.05), and neck, upper arm, abdomen in normal group(p<.01), and waist, abdomen, weight distribution in obese group(p<.01).

  • PDF

Study on Comparison of Industrial Static Analysis Tools to Verify the Design Principles for Software Unit Design and Implementation of ISO 26262 (ISO 26262의 소프트웨어 설계원리 적용에 대한 검증 도구의 비교 연구)

  • Heo, Jeho;Lee, Hongseok;Ko, Byeonggak
    • IE interfaces
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.416-421
    • /
    • 2012
  • One of the activities to improve software quality in ISO 26262 is to apply the design principles for software unit design and implementation mentioned in ISO 26262-6, including the evaluation activity. Before evaluation activity, the tool is compared and selected for evaluation. Because the results of the tool a company selected might have an effect on product quality. In this paper, we suggest the method to compare industrial static analysis tools with some of "MISRA C : 2004 Exemplar Suite" and all lessons learned from comparing tools are described. The result on comparison shows that we just couldn't rely on a result of Static Analysis Tool and need to have another appropriate processes and guidelines to evaluate a software.

The Comparison Between The Level of Process Model and The Evaluation Assurance Level (프로세스 평가 모델 등급과 정보보호시스템 공통평가기준 평가보증등급 비교)

  • 김태훈;이태승;조규민;이경구
    • Convergence Security Journal
    • /
    • v.2 no.2
    • /
    • pp.137-142
    • /
    • 2002
  • When the Common Criteria(CC) for security system evaluation was put up, and the coming into the CCRA is promoted, the interest to the Evaluation Assurance Level(EAL) is greatly increasing. In this paper, via the comparison between the evaluation level of the exiting process evaluation criteria and the EAL of CC, the characteristics of the EAL of the CC are noted.

  • PDF