Acknowledgement
The case study data of this research was provided by the Department of Project & Construction Management, Moh and Associates, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan. Sincere appreciations are given from the authors to Moh and Associates, Inc.
International conference on construction engineering and project management (국제학술발표논문집)
- 2005.10a
- /
- Pages.719-724
- /
- 2005
- /
- 2508-9048(eISSN)
COMPARISON OF THREE PCM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS IN TAIWAN
- Wen-der Yu (Institute of Construction Management, Chung Hua University) ;
- Yen-ping Hsu (Department of Project & Construction Management, Moh and Associates, Inc.)
- Published : 2005.10.16
Abstract
It has been debating on the performance evaluation of professional construction management (PCM) services since its introduction to Taiwan's construction industry more than a decade ago. Several evaluation systems were proposed by previous researchers. However, there has no comparison study been conducted for the feasibility, effectiveness, and appropriateness of these systems to the performance management (PM) of practical PCM services. This paper is intended for this end to compare the existing PCM performance evaluation systems in Taiwan. A real world design/build (D/B) building project was selected for case study. The result of case study concludes and compares the pro's and con's of the three systems. At the end, it recommends strategies for selecting the most appropriate PCM performance evaluation for PCM services.