• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.53 no.1
• /
• pp.303-323
• /
• 2016

For a canonical threefold X, it is known that $p_n$ does not vanish for a sufficiently large n, where $p_n=h^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(nK_X))$. We have shown that $p_n$ does not vanish for at least one n in {6, 8, 10}. Assuming an additional condition $p_2{\geq}1$ or $p_3{\geq}1$, we have shown that $p_{12}{\geq}2$ and $p_n{\geq}2$ for $n{\geq}14$ with one possible exceptional case. We have also found some inequalities between ${\chi}(\mathcal{O}_X)$ and $K^3_X$.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.37-46
• /
• 2012

It is well known that plurigenus does not vanish for a sufficiently large multiple on a canonical threefold over $\mathbb{C}$. There is Reid Fletcher formula for plurigenus. But, unlike in the case of surface of general type, it is not easy to compute plurigenus. In this paper, we in-duce a different version of Reid-Fletcher formula and show that the constant term in the induced formula has periodic properties. Using these properties we have an application to nonvanishing of plurigenus.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.161-165
• /
• 2010

Even though there is a formula for $h^0$(X, $\cal{O}_X(nK_X)$) for a canonical threefold X, it is not easy to compute $h^0$(X, $\cal{O}_X(nK_X)$) because the formula has a term due to singularities. In this paper, we find a way to control the term due to singularities. We show nonvanishing of plurigenus for the case when the index r in the singularity type $\frac{1}{r}$(1, -1, b) is sufficiently large.