• KSBB Journal
• /
• v.21 no.5
• /
• pp.341-346
• /
• 2006

This study was carried out to establish the optimum condition for cell disruption with a sonificator in the detection of the gram negative bacteria, E. coli for the purpose of developing automatic fluorometer. The efficiency of sonification on the E. coli disruption was greatly dependent on the diameter of sonificator probe tip. The larger sonificator probe diameter showed greater disruption effect. Sonificator probe of 13 mm diameter was the most efficient one for E. coli when sonificated for 20 seconds. The efficiency of the E. coli disruption differed greatly according to the depth of sonificator probe tip sank in the sample solution. The shorter the distance between probe tip end and the bottom of the container, the higher the disruption efficiency. The detection limit of E. coli was $5{\times}10^5CFU/m{\ell}$ when sample was sonificated for 20 seconds with a sonificator probe of 13 mm diameter.

• KSBB Journal
• /
• v.21 no.5
• /
• pp.347-352
• /
• 2006

This study was carried out to establish the optimum condition for cell disruption with a sonificator in the detection of the gram positive bacteria, Bacillus globigii and Streptococcus epidermidis for the purpose of developing automatic fluorometer. The efficiency of sonificator on the Bacillus globigii and Streptococcus epidermidis disruption differed greatly according to the diameter of sonificator probe tip. The larger sonificator probe diameter showed greater disruption. Bacillus globigii was more disruptive than Streptococcus epidermidis. Sonificator probe of the 13 mm diameter was the most efficient one when sample was sonificated for 20 seconds. The detection limits of Bacillus globigii and Streptococcus epidermidis were $10^5CFU/m{\ell}\;and\;5{\times}10^5CFU/m{\ell}$ respectively when samples were sonificated for 20 seconds with a sonificator probe of 13 mm diameter.

• KSBB Journal
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.305-310
• /
• 2011

This study was carried out to establish the optimum condition of cell disruption with a sonicator for the detection of the spore, Bacillus anthracis ${\Delta}$-sterne for the purpose of developing automatic fluorometer. The efficiency of sonication on the ${\Delta}$-sterne spore disruption was very weak. The ${\Delta}$-sterne spore with zirconia bead showed greater disruption than the ${\Delta}$-sterne spore alone when sonificated. The volumn of the zirconia bead added in the spore solution has little effect on the disruption efficiency. The detection limit of the ${\Delta}$-sterne spore with zirconia bead and the ${\Delta}$-sterne spore alone was $10^6$ CFU/mL and $5{\times}10^7$ CFU/mL respectively, when sample was sonicated for 20 seconds with a sonicator probe of 13 mm diameter.

• Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment
• /
• v.39 no.2 s.116
• /
• pp.257-264
• /
• 2006

In order to evaluate the application of Algae Online Analyzer (AOA), an instrument of automatic measurement of chlorophyll a concentration, was tested and compared with the acetone extraction method on the basis of microscopic counting of phytoplankton in field water (Paltang Reservoir). We simultaneously conducted AOA operation and extraction method with the same water sample, to compare both results of chlorophyll a measurement. Phytoplankton were enumerated by inverted microscope with the Sedgwick-Rafter chamber, and classified into the genus or species. According to the AOA measurement, the diatom most (83.6%) strongly contributed to the total chlorophyll a concentration, followed by chlorophyceae> cyanophyceae>cryptophyceae. Overall, the results of both AOA and extraction method showed a similar trend and significant correlation (r=0.87, n=302, p<0.001), however, there were some differences according to the season and species. In particular, the relationship between AOA Chl-a density of the diatom (r=0.73, p=0.010) and cyrptophyceae (.=0.83, p=0.00154) were siginificant, while chlorophyceae (r= -0.13) and cyanophyceae (r= -0.16) showed no clear relationship during the study period. Although we can not fully understand why there was difference between both mothods, AOA application for alarming algal bloom and water quality management during the algal bloom appears to be very relevant. However, the further study or technical upgrade of AOA measurement is required, especially in the case of low density of phytoplankton or species-specific measurement.

• Korean Journal of Remote Sensing
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.323-334
• /
• 2007

We analyzed the ocean environmental data from water sample and automatic measurement instruments with the Incheon-Jeju passenger ship for 18 times during 4 years from 2001 to 2004. The objectives of this study are to monitor the spatial and temporal variations of ocean environmental parameters in coastal waters of the Yellow Sea using water sample analysis, and to compare and analyze the reliability of automatic measurement sensors for chlorophyll and turbidity using in situ measurements. The chlorophyll concentration showed the ranges between 0.1 to $6.0mg/m^3$. High concentrations occurred in the Gyeonggi Bay through all the cruises. The maximum value of chlorophyll concentration was $16.5mg/m^3$ in this area during September 2004. The absorption coefficients of dissolve organic matter at 400 nm showed below $0.5m^{-1}$ except those in August 2001 During 2002-2003, it did not distinctly change the seasonal variations with the ranges 0.1 to $0.4m^{-1}$. In the case of suspended sediment (SS) concentration, most of the area showed below $20g/m^3$ through all seasons except the Gyeonggi Bay and around Mokpo area. In general SS concentration of autumn and winter season was higher than that of summer. The central area of the Yellow Sea appeared to have lower value $10g/m^3$. The YSI fluorometer for chlorophyll concentration had a very low reliability and turbidity sensor had a $R^2$ value of 0.77 through the 4 times measurements comparing with water sampling method. For the automatic measurement using instruments for chlorphlyll and suspended sediment concentration, McVan and Choses sensor was greater than YSI multisensor. The SeaWiFS SS distribution map was well spatially matched with in situ measurement, however, there was a little difference in quantitative concentration.