• 연구윤리
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2021

The aims of this study were to examine the causes and types of the most common and serious fraudulent authors among research misconduct, and to examine ways to reduce the mass production of unjust authors. In scientific research, it is universal and efficient to have multiple authors participate. This is because each author group consisting of a team has its own expertise, and most of them participate in research in a complementary way to maximize the research effect. However, the competition for achievements between researchers, the quantitative evaluation system of universities, and the social atmosphere of performance-oriented are tempting researchers to abandon research ethics. In this study, in relation to the research ethics of existing researchers, the contents of research ethics by a few countries such as United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia etc. and the situation in Korea was examined as well. In addition, the types and causes of domestic unfair authors in Korea were investigated intensively. In conclusion, in order to no longer produce unfair authors such as compulsory authors, honorary authors, mutually supported authors, and duplicate authors, which researchers unknowingly recognize as co-authors, reinforcement of research ethics education and national organization and system should be supported.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.11-13
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The author wants to specify scope of research, identify without giving burden, prevent unfair identification of the author, admit of production of the outcome, enact rules of identification, and build up foundation of development. Also, this study defines scope of publication of outcome of research to prevent unfair identification of authors and admit of them. Research design, data and methodology: The study described literary research, standard research, phenomenon research, and empirical result without methodologies, statistical analysis and scientific test and investigated operation system of KODISA cases. Results: At publication of findings of the research, researchers shall identify the ones of production of the finding to allocate help of the research. Conclusions: Scientific journals shall be controlled to develop ability and to grow up and have a system. Researchers shall give direction of other scientific journals. The study made efforts to be a model. KODISA Edition Team shall make an effort to keep and develop. So far, no regulation of identification of authors has produced disturbance so terminologies should be uniformed. Researchers shall keep rules of identification of authors to uniform and regulate identification of authors, conditions of authors, and order and correspondent authors. KODISA enacted rules of identification of authors for the first time in Korea to develop science.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 2015

Purpose - This study strives to discern trends in research productivity in the Journal of Consumer Behavior. It will identify prolific authors and institutions in articles over ten years (2004-2013). Research design, data, and methodology - The Journal of Consumer Behavior was chosen and articles over ten years were analyzed. Research productivity was determined by categorizing the data into four themes: number of authors per article, author affiliated institutions, a list of prolific authors over a ten-year period, and author-affiliated countries. Results - Authors have a propensity to collaborate on a research paper, yielding a high frequency of articles with two or three authors in a single publication. In addition, author and institution productivity was highest in North America and Europe. Conclusions - The research productivity of the Journal of Consumer Behavior is unprecedented. The trends and insights from this study will allow academics in the area of consumer behavior to observe leading authors and institutions. Moreover, speculations about the leading countries and institutions, not to mention top prolific authors in consumer behavior, will be elucidated in this study.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.113-120
• /
• 2012

Objective : Academies or societies of Korean Medicine have their journals. Those Journals usually follow guidlines for authors of Journal of KOMS(Korean oriental medical society). However, altough academies or societies of Korean Medicine are branches of KOMS, their guidlines for authors of journal are different form KOMS's. Method : We compared guidlines for authors in academies or societies of Korean Medicine which journals is listed in NRF(National Research Foundation of Korea). Result : They have 78.9% coincidence in guidlines for authors of journal, 68.4% in url adress and 57.9% in both books and chapter. Conclusion : Academies or societies of Korean Medicine might comply with KIOM in guidlines for authors of their journal because they are brabches of KIOM. In addition, these days, scholars try to make journal DB, journal referaence DB, ontology and so on so journals of KIOM and journals of Korean Medicine academies might be agreed especially in guidlines for authors.

• 한국콘텐츠학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘텐츠학회 2014년도 춘계 종합학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.25-26
• /
• 2014

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.62-70
• /
• 2018

One of the characteristics of academic writing is the inclusion of citations and references. As the development of reference styles used for international scholarly communication has mostly been led by Western academic societies, the reference styles developed in Western nations do not reflect the characteristics of Korean names. As a result, it is hard to distinguish Korean authors through citations based on Western reference styles, which in turn decreases the retrieval efficiency of relevant authors and ultimately the efficiency of scholarly communication. This paper intends to analyze author name disambiguation of Korean authors indicated according to Western reference styles. It aims to suggest the necessity for enhancing name disambiguation of Korean authors and revision of reference styles. Its ultimate goal is to increase the efficiency of scholarly communication through the improvement of name disambiguation of Korean authors. For this purpose, this study collected and analyzed name data of Korean researchers and compared name disambiguation of authors by reference style. Based on research results, this study confirmed a necessity for revising reference styles to improve name disambiguation of authors and suggested a necessity for research into the improvement of plans for revision.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.48-61
• /
• 2017

This paper uses 601 cited papers of Pakistani LIS researchers with the purpose to examine the individual performance of these Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers in terms of their research output and its impact on the LIS (national/international) literature by using various bibliometric indicators. A list of 139 authors was compiled with the help of the Library, Information Science, and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) and some other sources. Data were collected from Google Scholar and SPSS version 20 was utilized in order to identify the relationship between self-citations and various performance indices of the authors. The average citations received per paper vary from 1.80 to 10.08. About half of the papers were single-authored whereas less than one-fifth were by three or more authors. The authors who worked in collaboration produced more papers and received more citations. The h-index, g-index, hI-index, hI-norm, and e-index were used to determine the rank for each author. The intra-group citations grid revealed the volume of self-citations and a small group who cite each other more due to close academic and social relationships. The correlations between self-citations and the impact indices used revealed significant differences. Findings are useful for concerned institutions regarding award, promotions, etc. Further, future research should seriously consider the self-citations and social networking of authors while examining their citations-based research performance.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.53-71
• /
• 2018

이 연구는 KCI 색인 학술논문들을 대상으로 피인용 최상위 수준의 논문들을 추출하여, 그들의 서지적 특성을 파악하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 피인용이나 상위 논문들에 대한 기존의 분석과 달리 논문들의 서지적 요소를 중심으로 그것의 특성을 분석하였다. KCI에서 수집한 사회과학의 17개 분야 3,453편의 논문을 대상으로 하였고, 분석을 위한 서지적 요소는 저자, 소속기관, 발행년, 학술지, 피인용수이다. 분석결과로 나타나는 주요한 서지적 특성은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 단독저자와 공동저자의 비율, 공동저자의 수에서 차이가 났다. 저자들은 주로 단독저자 또는 2인 공동저자였다. 대체로 1건의 논문 저자비율이 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 소속기관 유형의 대부분은 대학이며, 각 분야별 저자들을 보유한 기관의 수에 차이가 났다. 그리고 저자의 소속기관의 등장빈도에서는 불균등 현상이 나타났다. 분야별로 우수한 연구기관과 저자들의 수가 달랐다. 셋째, 2018년을 기준으로 해서 발행 후 피인용 최상위 논문이 되는 경과년수는 평균 11년으로 나타났다. 넷째, 수록 학술지의대부분은 KCI 등재학술지이며, 학술지의 영향력은 피인용 최상위 논문의 영향요인이 되지 않았다. 다섯째, 분야에 따라 피인용수에 차이가 나타났다. 이 연구는 사회과학 분야 피인용 최상위 논문들의 서지적 특성을 파악한 것에 의의가 있다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.209-218
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 특정 기관에 소속된 저자들의 저작경향을 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 H 의과대학 부속병원 소속저자들을 대상으로 이들이 게재한 2000년부터 2008년까지의 SCI 논문을 추출하여 저자별로 색인화하였다. 소속 저자들의 저작경향을 일시성과 지속성 측면에서 분석하였다. 분석결과, 소속저자들은 일시적인 저작경향보다는 비교적 지속적인 저작경향을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로 신규저자들에 의한 출판비율은 평균 39.17%로 높지만 재투입 저자들의 출판비율(16.83%)과 연속저자의 출판비율(44%)로 구성된 기존저자들에 의한 출판비율이 평균 60.83%로 상대적으로 높게 나타났다. 또한 저자들의 일시성을 판단하는 신규소멸저자비율은 평균 28.2%로 비교적 낮았으며 특정연도의 저자들의 고정적 출판확률은 평균 76%로 매우 높게 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 기관 소속저자들의 저작경향은 기관의 연구성과 관리를 위한 기초 데이터로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.99-101
• /
• 2018

Revising manuscripts is often challenging and may be a task that authors do not want to face, but it is a crucial step for significantly improving authors' work before the final publication. Understanding these general rules and the several tips discussed above may be helpful for authors in dealing with comments from editors and reviewers.