1 |
Khey, D. N., Jennings, W. G., Higgins, G. E., Shoepfer, A., & Langton, L. (2011). Re-ranking the top female academic “Stars” in criminology and criminal justice using an alternative method: A research note. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(1), 118-129.
DOI
|
2 |
Khurshid, Z. (2013). Contribution of Pakistani authors to foreign library and information science journals: An evaluative study. Aslib Proceedings, 65(4), 441-460.
DOI
|
3 |
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
DOI
|
4 |
Long, H., Boggess, L. N., & Jennings, W. G. (2011). Re-Assessing publication productivity among academic "stars" in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(1), 102-117.
DOI
|
5 |
Macri, J., & Sinha, D. (2006). Rankings methodology for international comparisons of institutions and individuals: An application to economics in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(1), 111-156.
DOI
|
6 |
Mahmood, K., & Rehman, S. U. (2009). Contributions of Dr. Anis Khurshid to library literature: A bibliometric study. Pakistan Journal of Library & Information Science, 10, 43-56.
|
7 |
McCallum, M. L. (2010). Characterizing author citation ratings of herpetologists using Harzing’s Publish or Perish. Herpetology Notes, 3, 239-245.
|
8 |
McKercher, B. (2008). A citation analysis of tourism scholars. Tourism Management, 29(6), 1226-1232.
DOI
|
9 |
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 5, 1-21.
|
10 |
Minasny, B., Hartemink, A. E., McBratney, A., & Jang, H.-J. (2013). Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. PeerJ 1:e183; DOI 10.7717/peerj.183.
DOI
|
11 |
Qayyum, M., & Naseer, M. M. (2013). Bio-bibliometric study of Dr. Khalid Mahmood's contributions to LIS field in Pakistan. Library Philosophy and Practice, paper no. 900.
|
12 |
Saad, G. (2006). Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics, 69(1), 117-120.
DOI
|
13 |
Razzaque, M. A., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2007). Research performance of senior level marketing academics in the Australian universities: An Exploratory Study Based on Citation Analysis. Paper Presented at Australia New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (ANZMAC), University of Otago, New Zealand, December 1-3.
|
14 |
Repanovici, A. (2011). Measuring the visibility of the university’s scientific production through scientometric methods: an exploratory study at the Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 12(2), 106-117.
DOI
|
15 |
Rizwan, M. M., & Saadullah, M. (2009). Impactomania. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 59(6), 424.
|
16 |
Sabzwari, G. A. (2015). Intellectual honesty and professional integrity (editorial). Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 46(2), 1-2.
|
17 |
Sandstrom, U., & Sandstrom, E. (2009). Meeting the micro-level challenges: Bibliometrics at the individual level. In 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 845-56). Rio de Janeiro: BIEREME/PAHO/WHO.
|
18 |
Schreiber, M. (2008). The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g index. Scientometrics, 76(1), 187-200.
DOI
|
19 |
Shah, T. A., Gul, S., & Gaur, R. C. (2015). Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(4), 458-468.
DOI
|
20 |
Shadbolt, N., Brody, T., & Carr, L. H. S. (2006). The open research web: A preview of the optimal and the inevitable. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 195-208). Oxford: Chandos.
|
21 |
Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), 253-280.
DOI
|
22 |
Sife, A. S., & Lwoga, E. T. (2014). Publication productivity and scholarly impact of academic librarians in Tanzania: A scientometric analysis. New Library World, 115(11/12), 527-541.
DOI
|
23 |
Singh, N. (2009). Influence of information technology in growth and publication of Indian LIS literature. Libri, 59(1), 55-67.
|
24 |
Swain, D. K. (2011). Library Philosophy and Practice, 2004-2009: A scientometric appraisal. Library Philosophy and Practice, paper no. 556, 1-18.
|
25 |
Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines. Journal of Information Science, 24, 431-435.
|
26 |
Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences. Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.
DOI
|
27 |
White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.
DOI
|
28 |
Yazit, N., & Zainab, A. N. (2007). Publication productivity of Malaysian authors and institutions in LIS. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 12(2), 35-55.
|
29 |
Zhang, C.-T. (2009). The e-Index, complementing the h-Index for excess citations. PLoS One, 5(5), e5429.
|
30 |
Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415, 726-729.
DOI
|
31 |
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro-study of self-citations. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235-246.
DOI
|
32 |
Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2016). Research publishing by library and information science scholars in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Information Science Theory & Practice, 4(1), 6-20.
DOI
|
33 |
Anees, M. A., & Iraj, M. (2015). Impact factor, fad or fallacy? The Nation, July 24, 2015, retrieved from http://nation.com.pk/blog/24-Jul-2015/impact-factor-fad-or-fallacy.
|
34 |
Anwar, M. A., & Saeed, H. (1999). Pakistani librarians as authors; A bibliometric study of citations in LISA-PLUS. Asian Libraries, 8(2), 39-46.
DOI
|
35 |
Bashir, M. (2013). Bibliometric study of Pakistan’s research output and comparison with other selected countries of the world. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(5), 1-7.
|
36 |
Atanassov, V., & Detcheva, E. (2014). Self-citation effect on scientometric indexes. International Journal of Information Models and Analysis, 3(1), 68-83.
|
37 |
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.
DOI
|
38 |
Bartneck, C., & Kokkelmans, S. (2011). Detecting h -index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 87, 85-98.
DOI
|
39 |
Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G., Kinouchi, O, & Martinez, A. S. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68(1), 179-189.
DOI
|
40 |
Bhatti, R. (2008). Information needs of students - Islamic University Library, Bahawalpur. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 39(3), 6-21.
|
41 |
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (pp. 3-72). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
|
42 |
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Citation counts for research evaluation: Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting result. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 93-102.
DOI
|
43 |
Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2005). Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: Some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC. Research Evaluation, 14(2), 110-120.
DOI
|
44 |
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278.
DOI
|
45 |
Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effect of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564-1581.
DOI
|
46 |
Couto, F. M., Pesquita, C., Grego, T., & Verissimo, P. (2009). Handling self-citations using Google Scholar. Cybermetrics, 13(1), 1-7.
|
47 |
Cronin, B. (2005). Warm bodies, cold facts: The embodiment and emplacement of knowledge claims. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2005, Stockholm (pp. 1-12). Karolinska University Press.
|
48 |
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
DOI
|
49 |
Harzing, A.-W. K. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel Prize winners. Scientometrics, 93(3), 1057-1075.
|
50 |
Harzing, A.-W. K. (2007). Publish or Perish. Retrieved from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm.
|
51 |
Harzing, A.-W. K., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.
DOI
|
52 |
Harzing, A.-W. K., & Wal, R. van der (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46.
DOI
|
53 |
Harzing, A.-W. K., & Wal, R. van der (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and environmental Politics, 8, 61-73.
DOI
|
54 |
Jacso, P. (2009). Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google scholar with the Publish or Perish software. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1189-1200.
DOI
|
55 |
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.
DOI
|
56 |
Hussain, A., & Fatima, N. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of the Chinese librarianship: An international electronic journal (2006-2010). Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 31(2), 1-14.
|
57 |
Hyland, K. (2003). Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 251-259.
DOI
|
58 |
Jan, S. U., & Anwar, M. A. (2013). Impact of Pakistani authors in the Google world: A study of library and information science faculty. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Paper no. 980.
|
59 |
Harzing, A.-W. K. (2014). A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013. Scientometrics, 98(1), 565-575.
DOI
|