• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.191-209
• /
• 2021

이 연구에서는 과정중심평가의 특징이 배포된 과학과 과정중심평가 예시 문항 자료들에서 어떻게 구현되고 있는지를 분석하였다. 선행연구 리뷰를 통해 과정중심평가의 특징에 대한 분석 관점을 6가지로 추출하였다. 그 분석틀을 이용하여 시도 교육청 및 교육과정평가원에서 개발한 과정중심평가 장학자료의 초등 과학과 평가문항이 과정중심평가의 특징을 어떤 방법으로 반영하고 있는지 기술하였다. 연구 결과, 과정중심 평가의 특징은 초등 과학과 평가 문항 예시 자료들에 형식적으로 반영되어 있는 경우가 많았고, 과정중심 평가의 특징이 초등 과학과 평가 문항에 두드러지게 나타나지 않는 경우도 있었다. 개발된 예시문항들은 기존 과학과 수행평가 문항의 형태와 동일한 유형, 서·논술형 유형, 실험관찰과 유사한 유형으로 구분되었다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.15-25
• /
• 2020

In this study, we investigated elementary and preservice elementary school teachers' actual and preferred types of science assessment focusing on the purpose and the method of assessment. Participants were 75 elementary school teachers and 93 preservice elementary school teachers. The questionnaire adopted from previous relevant studies was administerd in order to examine the types of assessment which the teachers have actually implemented and the preferred types of assessment for hypothetical situations known as the prototypical examples of constructivist assessment. The results revealed that most teachers and preservice teachers tend to possess the summative-oriented purpose of assessment. An affective assessment purpose focused on evaluating students' interest, attitude, and curiosity toward science was newly identified in this study. In analyzing teachers' responses from the viewpoint of the method of science assessment, responses of an informal mode such as observation and portfolio were noticeable. However, most of them were found to correspond to the traditional summative-oriented purpose of assessment. For prototypical constuctivist assessment situations, teachers and preservice teachers were found to prefer the performance and the informal modes than the measurement mode of the assessment methods, whereas their purposes of the assessment were not found to be constructivist.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.913-924
• /
• 2016

Re-consultation on Marine Environment Impact Assessment (MEIA) says that business operators are then licensed back from the disposition authorities undergoing a consultation process to change business plans. Marine Environment Management Act has provisions(Article 94) with respect to a case where the scale of business, the period of business, reflects the basic plan, including a plan to change a variety of reasons. But increasingly diverse types of businesses and projects which are the subject of MEIA, As it appears that the vulnerability issues and the problem of the re-consultation. In this study conducted an analysis of the literature review and comment on the re-consultation report four years. In addition, it presents a check to the problem through concrete examples related to the re-consultation and proposes improvement measures.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.143-151
• /
• 2010

본 논문은 서울과학기술대학교(구 서울산업대학교) 기계설계자동화공학부에서 16년간의 캡스톤디자인 운영경험과 개선을 바탕으로 캡스톤디자인 교과목 기반의 프로그램 학습성과의 평가 사례에 대해 서술하였다. 우선, 캡스톤디자인 교과목과 관련된 프로그램 학습성과를 소개하였고, 평가 방법 및 항목에 대해서 설명하였다. 이를 바탕으로 하여 2008년도의 학습성과 평가 결과를 도출하였고, 이를 분석한 후 개선 전략을 수립하였다. 전략으로서 학생들에게 심사 기준과 모범사례를 온라인상에 미리 공개하였고, 그 결과 2009년도에는 전반적으로 약 3.3% 개선된 학습성과 평가 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 마지막으로 코스 임베디드 평가 개념 측면에서 캡스톤디자인 교과목을 이용한 프로그램 학습성과 평가의 타당성, 효율성, 내실성, 그리고 지속가능성에 대해서도 논의하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.725-733
• /
• 2015

이 연구에서는 중등 과학교사들이 실시하는 과학 평가와 교사들이 지향하는 평가의 사례를 목적과 방법의 측면에서 조사하였다. 연구대상은 중등 과학교사 92명으로, 학교에서 교사가 실시했던 평가 사례와 구성주의적 평가를 실시할 수 있는 전형적인 가상 상황에 대하여 교사가 지향하는 평가 사례를 조사하기 위한 검사지를 개발하였다. 교사의 경력, 평가 관련 교육 경험의 유무, 구성주의적 과학 평가관 수준 등 교사의 특성 변인도 조사하였다. 교사들이 실시하는 과학 평가사례를 분석한 결과, 대부분의 교사는 총괄평가와 같은 전통적인 목적의 평가를 실시하는 경향이 있었고, 선다형 평가와 실험, 보고서, 논술형 평가가 가장 많이 사용되는 평가 방법이었다. 전형적인 평가 상황에서 과학교사들은 다양한 유형의 구성주의적 평가 방법을 지향한 반면, 여전히 전통적 평가 목적에서는 벗어나지 못하였다. 이때, 구성주의적 과학 평가관 수준이 높은 교사가 형성평가를 지향하는 비율은 구성주의적 과학 평가관 수준이 낮은 교사들에 비해 유의미하게 높았다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.626-638
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to design a development frame for multicultural science program and develop a corresponding program using the frame. This study organized a development frame to design a multicultural science education program based on the culturally responsive teaching theory. This development frame consisted of the elements of purpose, teaching examples, teaching and learning methods, and assessment. This program consisted of the guideline for class teaching courses, reading materials, student worksheet, and teachers' reference materials. Based on this development frame, a multicultural science education program was developed, which was comprised of seven activities for elementary and middle school students. Each activity of the program included the concept and inquiry related to science education. In particular, by connecting the concept of science with the cultural characteristics of various countries, the activity made students aware of cultural diversity and the commonness of science principles. Compared to other subjects, the science education field has not actively undertaken studies on multicultural education. In term of dealing with universal principles, science education is suitable for making students aware of commonness. Accordingly, this gives rise to the need to draw cultural characteristics based on basic studies such as the analysis of science textbooks in various countries and develop culturally responsive programs utilizing the outcomes.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.22-35
• /
• 2013

In this study, we analyzed the problems of grade 3~4 science textbooks developed for the 2007 revised national curriculum raised by elementary school teachers. 53 elementary school teachers were selected and asked to complete the open questionnaire to find out the problems they experienced or perceived when they taught the corresponding unit of the science textbooks. The responses were coded and categorized through researchers' cross analysis. The result revealed various problems in using the science textbooks in real classroom context. The problems were divided into three dimensions as inquiry activity aspect, science knowledge aspect, and science learning assessment aspect. Each dimension consisted of several categories. We explained the frequency and representative examples of the problems in each category. These can provide some guidelines and implications for new science textbook developers and science education policy makers.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.298-314
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to develop science research ethics guidelines for elementary school teachers. To develop the guidelines, authors have conducted the following procedures: Development of guidelines through literature reviews; and an application of the developed guidelines to classroom sites. Authors established sections and formats of guidelines for science research ethics through literature reviews and developed contents of major sections and subsections and their explanations and descriptions. After that, authors applied the developed guidelines at elementary science classes and collected data through semi-structured interviews with science class teachers and checklists to reflect on and complement the contents of the guidelines. To secure the validity of guidelines, authors requested a validity assessment to four science education experts and one ethics education specialist. As a result, the CVI for the guidelines was found to be 0.9. Finally, authors developed the final guidelines by adding "Case Examples of Application" by adopting requests of elementary school teachers who used the provisional guidelines.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.119-130
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 과학 교과의 학생 평가에서 생성형 인공지능인 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성을 탐색하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 평가 문항을 개발하여 학생들로부터 문항에 대한 응답 자료를 수집하였고, 응답 결과를 ChatGPT에 입력하여 평가의 과정을 수행하도록 하였다. 또한 교사들에게 ChatGPT로부터 얻은 평가 결과를 공유하고, 교사들의 평가 과정과 비교하여 학생 평가에서의 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성을 탐색해 보았다. 연구 결과, 채점 기준의 설정 측면에서 ChatGPT가 생성해 내는 채점 기준이 전반적으로 타당성을 갖추고 있는 것으로 볼 수 있었다. 그러나 ChatGPT가 수행한 채점 결과는 교사들 채점한 결과와 비교하였을 때 일관성이 다소 낮았고, 특히 문항에 포함된 평가 요소가 많고, 평가 요소별 배점 기준이 복잡할수록 채점 결과의 일치도가 더 낮게 나타났다. 학생 응답에 대한 피드백 측면에서는 학생 응답의 과학적 타당성을 평가하는 과정에서 일부 잘못된 내용을 제공하거나 교육과정을 넘어서는 수준의 피드백이 생성되는 경우도 있었으나, 문항에 대한 올바른 답안을 알려주고, 추가적인 사례들을 제공하는 등의 긍정적인 부분도 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과들을 바탕으로 교사들로부터 ChatGPT의 활용 가능성에 대한 인식을 살펴 보았을 때, 학생 평가에서 중요하게 인식되는 '신뢰성' 측면에서 부족한 면이 있기는 하지만, 교사들의 평가를 지원하는 측면에서 활용 가능성을 발견할 수도 있었다. 마지막으로, 이러한 연구 결과를 종합하여 학생 평가에서의 ChatGPT의 활용에 대한 시사점을 제언하였다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.35-42
• /
• 2008

Purpose : Since PBL was first developed by Howard Barrows at McMaster, it has been adopted as one of the best teaching and learning methods in medical schools throughout the world. However, the educational superiority of PBL relative to traditional approaches is less clear. Given the somewhat extensive resources required for the operation of PBL curriculum, this gives reason for concern. The aim of this study is to review experiences of PBL in other medical schools and learn how to implement PBL in our school. Methods : This study was undertaken in two stages. In the first stage, PBL curricular examples in 7 medical schools (University of Pennsylvania, University of Melbourne, University of Maastricht, McMaster University, Flinders University, Harvard medical school. University of California at L.A.) were collected and summarized. In the second stage, a careful search for articles of journals published since 2000 regarding PBL group assessment, effectiveness of PBL and group facilitation skills was conducted. Results : PBL is generally introduced in a core curriculum in undergraduate medical education. Relating to small group assessment, the perception of students has been well developed. but the current PBL assessment tool needs to be revised, to develop thinking skills of students. The PBL graduates considered themselves as having much better interpersonal skills, better competencies in problem solving and self-directed learning than the non-PBL graduates. Tutors used various techniques to raise awareness, facilitate the group process and direct learning. Conclusions : The following three aspects can be regarded as important in this study. First, to implement PBL in our school more effectively, it might be considered, which curriculum content can be best learned with PBL. Second, to enhance students' thinking skills during PBL, a new assessment tool needs to be developed. Third, tutors' competencies are important to facilitate, group process, so it would be worthwhile including in staff development.