• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.57-82
• /
• 2002

This study explores the lexical-semantic structure of derived causative verbs in Korean based on Pustejovsky(1995)'s Generative Lexicon Theory (GL). Morphological causative verbs are derived from their root stems by affixing ‘-i, -hi, -li, -gi’ in Korean and the meanings of derived predicates are closely related to the meanings of their root verbs. In particular, the change of the ARGUMENT STRUCTURE by morphological derivation leads to the change of the EVENT STRUCTURE. The ARGUMENT STRUCTURES of derived causative verbs include a causer argument, which is added to the ARGUMENT STRUCTURE of their root verbs by means of the causative derivation. Their EVENT STRUCTURE has a headed process related to a causer and its result is the event which their root verbs denote. This approach can also suggest that the (in)directness of causative is dependent on is the semantics of its root verb.

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 2002년도 Language, Information, and Computation Proceedings of The 16th Pacific Asia Conference
• /
• pp.195-204
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the lexical-semantic structure of morphologically derived passive verbs in Korean based on Pustejovsky (1995)'s Generative Lexicon Theory (GL) and to explain the change of the root verb's lexical-semantic structure by means of passivization. Passivization in this paper is defined as the unaccusaztivization. In Argument Structure of derived passive verbs, the agent argument is deleted and the theme argument is realized as a syntactic subject. As for Event Structure, derived passives express left-headed event (achievement), whereas their roots denote right-headed event (accomplishment). In Qualia Structure, passive verbs and root ones have the same Fomal Role, but in Agentive Role of passive verbs, an act weakens to a process. Both Formal and Agentive Roles have the same theme argument.

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 2001년도 학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.25-58
• /
• 2001

This study explores the lexical-semantic structure of derived causative verbs in Korean based on Pustejovsky(1995)'s Generative Lexicon Theory (GL), Mor-phological causative verbs are derived from their root stems by affixing ‘-i, -hi, -li, -gi’ in Korean and the meanings of derived predicates are closely related to the meanings of their root verbs. In particular, the change of the ARGUMENT STRUCTURE by morphological derivation leads to the change of the EVENT STRUCTURE. In this study, causation is defined as the cause-effect relation having a causer. The ARGUMENT STRUCTURES of derived causative verbs includes a causer argument, which is added to the ARGUMENT STRUCTURE of their root verbs. Their EVENT STRUCTURE has a headed process related to a causer and their result is the event which their root verbs represent. This approach can also suggest that the (in)directness of causative is determined by which verb is its root and explain the difference between the morphological causativization and the syntactic causativization in Korean.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.309-317
• /
• 2015

This study aims to find out the argument structure which appears in the type of argument class (teacher- and student-centered) of the high school. The argument structure was compared and analyzed according to analyzing the study achievement and verified the academic achievement related to climate change. The results are listed below. First, the student-centered class is more effective method through the result that analyzed the class type of the teacher in argument-centered class. This result is to suggest more effective method to revitalize the argument activity of students-centered class which students plan for themselves and find more various materials. Second, teacher-centered class is more effective in contrast with argument analysis in the academic achievement test. While this is why the teacher-centered class utilizes an essential data necessary to curriculum in the argumentation, the elements to form the argument increased because students utilized the materials with their interest and concern in the process of proving in the student-centered class. Through the results of the research, it is necessary to develop the argument-centered programs for the science class and the curriculum-centered materials for argument class activity.

• 한국영어학회지:영어학
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.273-293
• /
• 2001

In this paper, I examine the phenomenon of English depictive and resultative predications with specific attention given to the relation between accentual focus structure and argument structure. The goal is pursued primarily through a production experiment and analyses to establish the interconnection between focus and argument structure. The central claim is that the resultative predicate forms a complex predicate with a main verb, whereas the depictive predicate behaves as an adjunct in English secondary constructions. The result shows that the relationship between focus and accent depends at least in part on their argument structure, confirming that current focus theories about argument-head and adjunct-head structures in primary predication constructions can be extended to secondary predication constructions.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제32권7호
• /
• pp.1099-1108
• /
• 2012

이 연구의 목적은 학생들의 글쓰기에 나타난 논의 구조의 특징을 통해 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동의 효과를 심층적으로 살펴보고자 하는 것이다. 이를 위해 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 전략을 바탕으로 개발된 중학교 2학년 프로그램 7개 주제를 적용한 후 학생들의 글쓰기에 나타난 논의 구조의 특징을 비교해 보았다. 이 연구를 위해 광역시 소재 중학교 2학년 2개 학급을 실험집단으로, 1개 학급을 비교집단으로 선정하여, 실험집단에는 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동을 실시하였고, 비교집단에는 전통적인 강의 및 실험 수업을 실시하였다. 프로그램의 처치 후 두 집단에게 요약 글쓰기를 실시하였고, 요약 글쓰기를 통해 학생들의 글쓰기에 나타나는 논의 구조의 특징을 살펴보았다. 프로그램의 처치 결과 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동을 실시한 실험집단 학생들이 전통적 강의 및 실험 수업을 실시한 비교 집단에 비해 요약 글쓰기에서 논의 구조를 많이 사용하는 것으로 나타났고, 실험집단 학생들의 증거에서 설명과 함께 그림, 그래프, 예시 등의 다양한 표현 제시되어 있었다. 그리고 증거 제시 수준에서도 비교집단은 증거를 제시할 경우 단순한 용어 나열하는 반면 실험집단의 경우 상대방이 이해하기 쉽게 용어에 대한 설명을 하거나 예를 적절히 사용하고 있었다. 이러한 결과로부터 탐구적 과학 글쓰기 활동이 학생들의 글쓰기에서 논의 구조에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 비교집단과 구별되는 특징을 나타냄을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.67-91
• /
• 2013

This paper describes Korean Nominal Bank, a project that provides argument structure for instances of the predicative nouns in the Sejong parsed Corpus. We use the language resources of the Sejong project, so that the same set of data is annotated with more and more levels of annotation, since a new type of a language resource building project could bring new information of separate and isolated processing. We have based on the annotation scheme based on the Sejong electronic dictionary, semantically tagged corpus, and syntactically analyzed corpus. Our work also involves the deep linguistic knowledge of syntaxsemantic interface in general. We consider the semantic theories including the Frame Semantics of Fillmore (1976), argument structure of Grimshaw (1990) and argument alternation of Levin (1993), and Levin and Rappaport Hovav (2005). Various syntactic theories should be needed in explaining various sentence types, including empty categories, raising, left (or right dislocation). We also need an explanation on the idiosyncratic lexical feature, such as collocation and etc.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.74-82
• /
• 2022

본 논문은 문장의 통사구조, 의미구조, 형태구조 등을 동시에 그리고 독립적으로 생성되는 모듈로 보는 자율어휘문법을 기반으로 한국어의 이중대격에 대한 다모듈적 분석을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 통사중심주의적 이론들과 달리 본 논문은 이중대격 구문의 기능-논항구조와 더불어 역할구조와 정보구조를 통해 이중대격에 대한 의미론적 특성을 분석한다. 기능-논항구조에서 이중대격의 첫 번째 대격은 관계명사의 논항인 소유격과는 달리 술어의 논항이 되며, 역할구조에서는 수동자의 역할을 취하게 되어 그 결과 수동문의 주어가 될 수 있다. 반면에 이중대격 구문에서 두 번째 대격인 소유대상은 정보구조에서 초점영역이 된다. 즉, 이중대격의 사용 목적은 두 가지로 정리된다. 소유자를 수동자의 역할을 하는 독립된 논항으로 표현하는 동시에 소유대상을 초점으로 표현하고자 하는 화자의 의도를 나타내는 것이다. 이와 같은 이중대격의 의미론적 특성을 자율어휘문법의 기능-논항구조, 역할구조, 정보구조 등 세 개의 다차원적인 구조로 나타내므로 해서 이중대격에 대한 통합적 설명이 가능해진다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.323-336
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to evaluate students' written arguments embedded in scientific inquiry investigations using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. Argument components defined in this study are questions, claims, questions-claims relationship, evidence, claims-evidence relationship, multiple modal representations, and reflection. A set of criteria for evaluating each argument component was developed to evaluate writing samples of students from college freshman general chemistry laboratory classes. Results indicate that students produced, on average, moderate to powerful questions, claims, and evidence. They also constructed reasonable questions-claims relationship and claims-evidence relationship. Compared to other component scores, the average score for reflection was relatively low. Overall, the average Total Argument score was 21.4 out of a possible 36, that is, the quality of the written arguments using the SWH approach during a series of inquiry-based chemistry laboratory investigations was moderate to powerful. The findings of this study suggest that students, on average, developed reasonable scientific arguments generated as part of scientific inquiry. In other words, students are capable of putting together reasonable arguments as they participate in inquiry-based laboratory classrooms.

• 음성과학
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.187-209
• /
• 2003

In this paper, we examine if the lexical information of the verb and its noun object affects the pitch accent patterns of the verb phrase focus. Three types of verb-object combinations with different semantic weights are discussed: when the verbs have optional direct objects, when the objects have the greater semantic weight relative to verbs, and when the verbs and the objects have equal semantic weight. Argument-structure-based works note that the pitch accent location in a focused phrase is closely related to the argument structure and contextual information. For example, it has been argued that contextually new noun objects receive accent while given noun objects don't. Contrary to nouns, verbs can be accented or not in verb phrase focus regardless of whether they are given information or new information (Selkirk 1984, 1992). However, the production experiment in this paper shows that the accenting of verbs is not fully optional, but influenced by the lexical semantic information of the verbs. The accenting of noun objects with given information is possible and the deaccenting of new noun objects also occurs depending on the lexical information of the noun objects. The results demonstrate that in addition to argument structure and information by means of context sentences, the lexical semantic information of words influences the pitch accent location in focused phrase.