• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2000년도 제17회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2000

The Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) model developed by Saaty is a very useful decision-making model designed for selecting and evaluating project alternatives through $\ulcorner$pairwise comparison$\lrcorner$ in the context of hierarchical structure. In this paper, we construct a modified AHP model named Analytic Dicho-Hierarchy Process (ADHP) model necessary for evaluating technology alternatives.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.49-62
• /
• 2016

In this paper, we propose an integrated data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in which the information about the hierarchical structures of input-output data can be reflected in the performance assessment of decision making units (DMUs). Firstly, this can be implemented by extending a traditional DEA model to a three-level DEA model. Secondly, weight bounds, using AHP, can be incorporated in the three-level DEA model. Finally, the effects of incorporating weight bounds can be analyzed by developing a parametric distance model. Increasing the value of a parameter in a domain of efficiency loss, we explore the various systems of weights. This may lead to various ranking positions for each DMU in comparison to the other DMUs. An illustrative example of road safety performance for a set of 19 European countries highlights the usefulness of the proposed approach.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this paper is an application of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) in the priority setting of promising technology in division of senior friendly product based on the previous studies. In this paper, the decision criteria for evaluating promising technologies in division of senior friendly product are identified and the hierarchical structure of decision making process is developed systematically. Subsequently the values of weights for relative importance among decision criteria are derived using AHP methodology, and the score of importance of promising technology in division of senior friendly product with respect to each criterion is evaluated. Finally the score of each promising technology in division of senior friendly product is quantified in order to prioritize them. We discuss implications of our results with a viewpoint of technology policy in division of senior friendly product.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.612-620
• /
• 1999

환경영향평가는 전과정평가(Life Cycle Assessment : LCA)의 인벤토리 분석과정에서 규명된 환경부하의 값으로 표현하고 상대적인 중용도를 측정하는 단계이다. 이러한 가중치를 측정하므로서 개별제품 또는 기술에 대한 환경부하의 영향을 평가하는데 이용될 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 환경영향평가에 대한 분석에서 환경부하의 상대적인 중요도 혹은 가중치를 산출하기 위하여 일반적으로 이용되는 계층적 의사결정모형(Hierarchical decision model)의 한계인 요인들간의 독립성을 극복할 수 있는 즉, 의사결정요인간 상호영향력을 가지는 네트워크 구조(Network decision model)에서도 사용될 수 있는 의사 결정모형( Analytic Network Process : ANP)을 도입한다. ANP로부터 얻어지는 각 의사결정요인의 가중치는 환경부하의 수준을 결정하는데 용이하게 이용할 수 있다.

• 한국지능시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.828-833
• /
• 2009

웹상에서 이용할 수 있는 방대한 문서의 집합인 WWW은 사용자를 위한 다양한 정보의 보고이다. 그러나 불필요한 정보의 필터링이나 사용자가 필요한 정보를 검색하는데 많은 시간이 소요되어 효율적인 의사결정을 하는데 어려움이 있다. 본 논문에서는 의사결정에 관한 요소를 계층화 구조로 나타내는 AHP나 Fuzzy AHP방법들을 데이터의 관점에서 대안, 평가기준, 주관적 속성가중치, 개념과 객체 사이에 퍼지 관계를 기반으로 웹 자원을 효과적으로 관리하고 의사결정을 할 수 있는 EFAM(Extended Fuzzy AHP Method) 모델을 제안하였다. 제안한 EFAM 모델은 웹상의 효율적인 문서검색과 특정 영역의 문제를 의사결정하기 위하여 영역의 코퍼스로부터 추출된 개념들이 가지는 의미론적 내용에 감성 기준을 고려함으로써 효율적으로 문서를 추출할 수 있어서 명확한 의사결정을 할 수가 있음을 실험을 통하여 확인한다.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.303-319
• /
• 2006

Business Information Systems are strategic applications to achieve companies' goals and innovation. This idea make companies invest their time and budget in the Information Systems. However, it is difficult to forecast effects of the investment in Information Systems and it causes hesitation of making decision. Thus, I researched a case so that I could forecast the effect of the information systems using AHP(analytic hierarchical process). In this study, I approached this matter with three views such as intelligence(review of prior literature), design(methodology development), and application. This study is significant in terms of practicality rather than theoretical dimension. Particularly, I suggested a way of quantifying in monetary value the quality aspects through inverting qualitative facts to quantitative facts and calculated the investment feasibility with it.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.82-90
• /
• 2015

Location selection of distribution centers is a crucial task for logistics operators and key decision makers of an organization. This is a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process which includes both quantitative and qualitative criteria. In order to propose an optimized location selection model, this research suggests a hierarchical group of evaluation criteria : 5 major criteria with 15 sub-criteria. The MCDM approach presented in this research, by integrating Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), tends to rectify the overall quality and uncertainty of the values of evaluation criteria. An example of a location selection case in Korea is illustrated in this study to show the effectiveness of this method.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.66-73
• /
• 2013

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a famous method amongst Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), set up by Saaty in 1980. AHP can be determined as a methodology of hierarchical analysis following reasonable decision making with make simpler a difficult crisis. Decision making in systems of Safety management concerned multipart challenges. AHP is process for get better the composite decisions understanding with analyzes of the problem in a structure of hierarchy. The integration all of applicable decision criteria, their pair wise judgment permits the decision maker to establish the trade-offs amongst objectives. In recent years, Malaysian's economy and infrastructure development have significantly and rapidly risen. The construction industry continues to play a major role in this development as many construction activities have been carried out to meet the high demands of the expansive market. However, the construction industry has faced a wide range of challenges, one of which is the frequent occurrences of accidents at the workplace. An effective safety program can substantially reduce accidents because it can help management to build up safer means of operations and create safe working environments for the workers. Furthermore, by having an effective safety programs, good safety culture can be embedded in organization because it can encourage mutual cooperation between management and workers in the operations of the programs and decisions that affect their safety and health. The focus of this research is development methodology of Analytics Hierarchy Process (AHP) in construction safety factors and investigates the levels of some effective elements in SMS in Malaysian construction industries.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 2000년도 춘계공동학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.122-125
• /
• 2000

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision making model, which is more applicable than other methods to R&D project selection, particularly when it is applied to intangibles. The objective of this paper is to develop an extended model of the AHP which Is linked to Cross Impact Analysis to assist in the ranking of a large number of technological alternatives. In this study, we developed a priority setting algorithm which considers the cross-impact of the future technology alternatives and thus developed an integrated cross-impact hierarchical decision-making model, which sets the priority by considering technological forecasting and technology dependency

• 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 엔터테인먼트 산업에 효과적인 고성과작업조직(high performance work system)을 모색, 제시하는 데 있다. 최근에 엔터테인먼트 산업 자체는 급격하게 성장하고 있으나, 엔터테인먼트 기업은 제조업과 달리 안정적 수익구조를 확보하기 어렵다는 특징이 있다. 엔터테인먼트 기업 및 프로젝트의 성과는 인적자원의 역량과 시너지에 의존하는 경향이 농후하기 때문이다. 이를 관리할 수 있는 체계적인 모델을 마련하고자, 본 연구는 ANP(analytic network process)를 활용하여 엔터테인먼트 기업에 경쟁우위를 제공할 수 있는 고성과작업조직을 제시하였다. 고성과작업조직의 성공적 특성을 평정한 쌍대비교 자료는 엔터테인먼트 기업에 종사하는 28명의 팀장급 리더를 대상으로 수집되었다. 연구 결과, '개발적 지원', '관리적 지원'에 비해 '참여기회 부여'가 가장 높은 중요도를 나타냈다. 구체적인 구성요소별 중요도는, '개방적 의사소통', '분산된 의사결정', '성과에 의한 보상'이 높게 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과에 기초하여 엔터테인먼트 기업에서 고성과작업조직을 성취하는 데 실질적 시사점과 실행의 우선순위를 제언하였다.