• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.41-62
• /
• 2003

This study investigated the current status and characteristics of strategic alliances attempted by domestic internet businesses. Specifically, this study surveyed competitive environmental characteristics of partner companies involved, alliance period, types of partner companies, motives of alliances, types of alliances, success and failure factors and satisfaction toward the alliances. Major findings were: first, alliances between portal companies and content producers; portal companies and internet services; e-commercial sites and internet services were the most frequent partnerships engaged. Second, the most important motive for and type of the strategic alliance were: 'the commercialization and marketing of new product' and 'joint distribution and marketing agreement' respectively. Third, the most important factor for the successful alliance was 'a close examination of partners' core business value and competence'; and the factor most hindering the successful alliance was 'a discrepancy on capabilities of partners' core personnel. Finally types of internet business were significantly related to perceived satisfaction toward strategic alliance.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제14권
• /
• pp.45-62
• /
• 2001

이 연구는 전략적 제휴의 존속기간을 결정하는 요소들에 대해 분석한다. 일반적으로 성공하는 전략적 제휴는 오랫동안 지속될 가능성이 맡고, 실패하는 전략적 제휴는 오랫동안 지속될 가능성이 낮다. 국가간의 차이, 산업형태 또는 환경, 파트너와의 전략적 제휴 경험, 다른 기업들과의 전략적 제휴 경험 등이 전략적 제휴들의 지속기간에 미치는 효과들을 조사함으로써 간접적으로 전략적 제휴의 성공, 실패요인을 조사한다. 이 효과를 조사하기 위하여 네델란드의 Limburg의 대학교 연구자들에 수집된 CATI (Cooperative Agreements and Technology Indicators)에서 표본을 추출하여 Cox-Regression을 이용한다. 결과들이 보고되어지고, 어떤 전략적 의미들을 가지는지 조사한다.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.247-262
• /
• 2000

본 연구는 기업의 전략적 제휴의 수명에 관한 이론적 고찰을 시도하였다. 광범위한 문헌 조사를 통하여, 이제까지의 기업이나 기업 환경적 차원에서의 경험적 혹은 이론적 연구들을 비판하고, 전략적 제휴의 수명에 관한 연구가 기업이 속해있는 네트웍 차원에서 조망되어져야함을 역설하고 있다. 뿐만 아니라, 기존의 연구들과 네트웍 수준의 새로운 관점을 통합하여 전략적 제휴의 수명 연구에 관한 가설들을 제안한 이론적 틀을 제시한다. 전략적 제휴의 수명에 영향을 주는 요인들로는 기업의 네트웍 구조와 더불어서 기업 환경의 역동성, 기업이 속한 나라의 문화, 그리고, 전략적 제휴에 대한 경험 등이 발견되었다.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.131-141
• /
• 2007

This paper identifies the productivity in the Global Air Transport Industry for the period of 1995-2001 by testing the Total Factor Productivity with tonqvist method. Based on panel data from 20 major international airline corporations which formed global strategic alliances, we find alliances make a considerably significant contribution to productivity increases. We also find that total factor productivity rate changed surprisingly in Air Transport Industry between pre- and post-Asian financial crisis period.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제26권
• /
• pp.115-141
• /
• 2005

This study explores how strategic alliance activities are evolving and the factors that impact on the formation and development of airline alliances. Findings show the initiation of regional and more liberalized bilateral, or open skies, agreements have removed some of the impediments to structural changes in international aviation. Airlines in more liberal markets enter into greater numbers and more integrative forms of alliances. Also, airlines, on average, achieve better results of operation if the market is more liberal. Essentially, there is a positive relationship between the developments of alliances and the liberalization of air transport markets. It has been questioned that the US bilateral open skies agreements provide its carriers more access to the global market and countries that do not enter into such agreements with the US risk a loss of traffic. Consequently, open skies agreements may enable carriers who have the freedom to exercise market power to be dominant in the markets. This suggests that regulatory coordination and liberalization of international aviation reinforce each other and should therefore be pursued simultaneously.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.108-116
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to analyze the technical and cost efficiency of Air Transport Industry on Global strategic alliances. In particular, this study develops Stochastic Frontier Approach for accurate judgement. Based on 20 major international airline corporations related with strategic alliances during the period 1995-2001, we find that alliances make a significant contribution to efficiency. On the other hand, it is found that the level of contribution to efficiency is different according to alliances. These results also changed greatly between pre- and post- Asian financial crisis period.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.71-91
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to identify the major determinants of performance of the R&D alliances, with an aim toward raising the success rate in cooperative relationships. In particular, this study assesses whether the success factors of purchasing relationship identified in the literature apply equally to SMEs in Korea. The results of this study indicate that inter-firm cooperation, experienced cooperation, and efficiency of government support have positive impacts on the purchase rate of new products. On the other hand, R&D intensity and resources of competencies of the firm do not influence it. Additionally, market attractiveness does not moderate the effects of the five independent variables on the purchase. The extracted determinants according to the results of surveys give valuable and practical hints to the SMEs when they make a decision on their R&D alliances with large enterprises.

• ETRI Journal
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.638-647
• /
• 2006

This paper investigates two kinds of strategic combinations carried out by the European telecom operators between 1986 and 2001: acquisitions, on the one hand, and strategic alliances, on the other. The aim of the paper is twofold. First, it analyzes the behavior adopted by these companies to adapt to an environment that, after the processes of globalization and privatization presents a clearly different structure. Second, it focuses on the effect that internationalization and diversification could exert over the returns obtained by the European telecom firms involved in acquisitions and alliances, differentiating when such strategic combinations are more profitable for the shareholders of the firms that carry them out.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.145-158
• /
• 2019

Purpose - Alliance members have constantly revised market strategies over time by withdrawing membership from a current alliance, joining another alliance, or constructing a new alliance. From the perspective of the signaling effect, the purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of partner volatility (new member, old member, and new group) on firm value. Design/methodology - To analyze the impact of partner volatility on firm value, companies in strategic alliances are classified into the three groups of new partner, existing partner, and new alliance, and the effects on company value are verified through an event study and the signaling effect analysis. Findings - This study proved that new partners and newly formed strategic alliances have higher expectation effects than old partner company groups, and have a more positive effect on the relevant firms' stock prices. In addition, the result of the study showed the same valid results as the alliance levels, and showed that investors' expectations were higher with new partners and new alliances than with old partners. Research Implications - A new perspective on the signaling effects of strategic alliances among shipping lines was presented in this study by grouping alliance types including new member, old member, and new group. The results provide useful insights for selecting partners and firm values of alliance announcement times. Originality/value - This study analyzed partner volatility on relevant companies' stock prices from the perspective of investors from the global shipping conference reorganization in 2017. Strategic alliances were classified into the three categories of new partner, old partner, and new alliance, and the effects on firm value were verified.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제18권7호
• /
• pp.149-161
• /
• 2017

본 논문은 국내 유가증권시장(KOSPI 및 KOSDAQ)에 상장된 106개의 제약 바이오기업을 대상으로 사건연구방법론(Event study methodology)을 이용하여 제휴 체결이 기업의 시장가치에 미치는 영향을 연구하였다. 연구 결과, 국내 제약 바이오산업에서 모든 제휴가 기업의 시장가치에 유의미한 영향을 주지는 않았지만 제휴 유형에 따른 분석에서 기술력이 제휴 체결의 주요인으로 작용하는 연구개발 제휴는 기업의 시장 가치에 긍정적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 연구개발 제휴 중에서는 기술 이전 제휴, 특히 개발기술 이전 제휴가 기업 가치에 더 긍정적인 영향을 주었다. 이는 제휴 유형별로 차별화된 평가를 받는다는 것으로 해석되었다. 한편, 제휴 체결이 기업가치에 반영되는 시점을 확인한 결과, 내부 정부 유출로 제휴 공시 전 주가 상승 가능성이 높다는 것을 확인하였다. 이는 국내 제약 바이오산업 내 제휴와 관련하여 사전정보유출 가능성이 높다고 해석된다. 본 논문은 국내 제약 바이오 기업의 가치 창출을 위해 제휴의 방향을 모색하는 경영자들과 실무자들에게 제휴의 효과를 실증적으로 입증해 준다. 또한 제휴 체결 전 정보 유출 방지를 위해 정보 관리 및 이와 관련된 제도적 보완이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.