• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.147-159
• /
• 2004

Objective : This study was designed to estimate the effects of Rainbow Power therapy on neck pain patients by using Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) and pressure algometer. Methods : Rainbow Power therapy group consisted of 18 patients and acupuncture therapy group consisted of 7 patients. The degree of improvement of neck pain was evaluated by VAS and pain pressure threshold(at the points of Jianjing GB21 and Jianwaishu SI14) before treatment, before 3rd treatment and before 5th treatment. Rainbow Power therapy was performed at the points of Jianjing GB21, Zhongfu LU1, Yangxi LI5, Ganshu BL18, Weishu BL21 and Shenshu, BL23. Each points were stimulated with RP-UM103(Rainbow Power therapy instrument) for 20 seconds. The points of acupuncture therapy were Jeonggeun, Jeongjong, Sangbaekn and Hegu LI4 and acupuncture was maintained for 15 minutes. After above therapy dry cupping was performed at the points of Jianjing GB21, Jianwaishu SI14, Gaohuang BL43, Tianzong, SI11 and Bingfeng SI12 for 5 minutes. Results : There was no significant difference between the two groups in VAS, pain threshold of Jianjing GB21 and Jianwaishu SI14 following treatment. In the two groups VAS was significantly decreased. In Rainbow Power therapy group the pain threshold of the two points was significantly increased. But there was no significant increase in acupuncture therapy groups about the pain threshold of Jianwaishu SI14. Conclusions : The effectiveness of Rainbow Power therapy on neck pain was shown through VAS and pressure algometer. These imply that Rainbow Power therapy may be useful for neck pain. Further study is needed about Rainbow Power therapy.

• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.74-85
• /
• 2007

Objective : In this study we wanted to confirm if proper stimulation and de-Qi of traditional Korean medical acupuncture could increase hot flash relief efficacy. Design : A randomized controlled, single blind study. We used two modalities of acupuncture, one with optimal stimulation [Study group; Korean medical acupuncture (TKMA)] and one with minimal stimulation [Control group; Minimal acupuncture (MA)]. Same acupoints [PC6(內關), HT8(少府), HT7(神門), LI4(合谷), ST36(足三里), SP6(三陰交), Ren4(關元)] were used in both groups. Fifty-two patients were treated twice a week for 8 weeks, and follow up was done after 4 weeks from the last treatment. Patients were checked hot flash VAS (visual analog scale), frequency and duration every time they visited. Results : Hot flash relief efficacy by 100mm hot flash VAS was obvious in both groups. Hot flash VAS scores of study group were smaller than the scores of control group at the early stage (3rd, $4^{th}$ and $8^{th}$ visit), but there wasn't a remarkable difference between study and control group at the end of the trial. Besides, diminution of hot flash VAS was faster and more even in the study group than control group by visualization using 'Box plot'. We compared frequency and duration of hot flash, 100mm sweating, palpitation, sleep disturbance VAS, and Kupperman Index, MENQOL, Patient's global assessment score. Both groups showed definite decrease from the baseline, but the difference was not statistically significant. There wasn't any adverse event. Hot flash relief efficacy was kept in most patients after 4 weeks' follow-up. Conclusion : Acupoint combination by Traditional Korean medical theory is effective on hot flashes and hot flash relief efficacy was faster and more even in optimal stimulation than minimal stimulation.

• 한국임상수의학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.65-68
• /
• 2006

개 추간판 디스크의 2증례를 수침치료를 하였다. 증례 1은 경부 디스크(C3-C4)의 증례이었으며, 1-2차 치료에서는 덱사메타손(1 mg/ml), 3-5차 치료에서는 염산치아민(25mg/ml)을 각각 수침하였다. 사용혈위는 GV-16, GB-20, BL-10, LU-7, LI-4 및 SI-6이었다. 2-5차 치료에는 GV-6, GV-20 및 SP-6의 혈위를 추가하였다. 3-5차 치료에는 2% 염산리도카인(0.2ml)를 이용하여 견갑아래근 및 상완세갈래근의 압통점에 각각 수침하였다. 5차 치료 후 마비증상은 소실되어 치료를 중단하였으며, 5개월 후 증상의 재발은 인정되지 않았다. 증례 2는 요부디스크의 증례(L1-L2)로 1-2차 치료에는 덱사메타손 수침을 3-4차치료에는 염산치아민을 각각 수침하였다. 사용혈위는 GV-6를 주혈로, ST-36, ST-40, GB-34, ST-41 및 BL-40을 부혈로 각각 사용하였다. 또한 허리장골 늑골근 및 대퇴네갈래근의 압통점에 2% 염산리도카인(0.2ml)를 각각 수침하였다. 4차 치료 후 마비증상이 호전되어 치료를 중단하였고, 5개월 후 현재 까지 증상의 재발은 인정되지 않았다. 이상의 증례를 통하여, 덱사메타손과 염산치아민의 수침 및 리도카인을 이용한 압통점치료의 병용은 개의 경부 및 요부디스크의 증상을 효과적으로 콘트롤 할 수 있는 것으로 판단되었다.

• 한국임상수의학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.225-228
• /
• 2007

개 추간판 디스크 2 증례(症例)를 대상으로 봉독약침 및 봉독약침과 한약제로 각각 치료하였다. 증례(症例) 1은 흉-요추부 추간판탈출증(T11-T12, T12-T13, L3-L4 및 L4-L5)으로 진단(診斷)된 증례이었으며. 증례 2는 흉추부 추간판탈출증(T10-T11 및 T12-T13)으로 진단(診斷)된 증례이었다. 이들 증례에 대하여 봉독약침(0.1 ml/혈위, 총$200{\mu}g$)을 실시(實施)하였으며, 운동요법과 수영요법도 병용하였다. 봉독약침에 사용한 혈위는 GV20-Bai Hui, GB30-Huan Tiao, ST36-Zu San Li, GB34-Yang Ling Quan, ST40-Feng Long, ST41-Jie Xi 및 BL40-Wei Zhong, 병변부 및 압통점이었다. 또한 증례 2에 대하여는 봉독약침과 더불어 Zheng Gu Zi Jin Dan(정골자금단(正骨紫金丹) : 1 g), Shiuh Duann(속단(續斷) .0.2 g), Du Zhong(두중(杜仲) : 0.2 g), Mo Yao(몰약(沒藥 : 0.2 g), Ru Xiang(유향(乳香) : 0.2 g) 및 Pyrite(자연동(自然銅) : 0.2 g)를 각각 총 9일간 경구투여(2회/1일)하였다. 증례 1은 총 4주간 11회 치료, 증례(症例) 2는 총 2주간 6회 치료 후 각각 보행이 가능하였다.

• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2017

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of further acupuncture research as an effective alternative and safe treatment for abdominal pain control in patients with pancreatitis. Methods and Results : This study is an open-label, assessment-blind, parallel designed pilot clinical trial. Thirty participants will be assigned to the acupuncture group(n=15) and usual care group(n=15). All patients will receive the conventional standard-of-care(SOC) therapy, but only the experimental group will receive acupuncture therapy six times a week, and the duration of acupuncture therapy will be held up to 12 weeks or until the pains are to be resolved. For the conventional SOC therapy, painkiller will be given. In treatment group, the subjects will receive the identical SOC therapy in combination with electroacupuncture therapy on twelve acupuncture points(LI4, PC6, SP6, GB39, ST36, ST37), and auricular acupuncture therapy on five auricular acupuncture points(Sympathetic, Shen Men, Abdomen, Pancreas gall, and Spleen). The primary outcome will be measured using the visual analogue scale(VAS), and the secondary outcome will be measured using the painkiller demand, quality of life index and severity of pancreatitis by abdominal computed tomography(CT). Assessments will be made at baseline and at week 1, 4, 8 and 12. Results of abdominal CT will be evaluated at baseline and at week 12. Conclusions : The result of this trial will provide a basis for the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture treatment for abdominal pain in patients with pancreatitis.

• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2014

목적 : 본 연구는 전단계 및 1기 고혈압에 해당하는 폐경 후 여성을 대상으로 침 치료의 유효성과 안전성을 평가하고 적정 치료 횟수를 탐색할 목적으로 실시하는 연구이다. 방법 : 네 군, 무작위 배정, 공개 예비연구가 두 임상연구센터에서 진행될 것이다. 총 60명의 대상자가 두 치료군과 두 대조군에 배정되게 된다. 치료군의 대상자는 통상적 관리와 함께 8개 혈위(양측 풍지, 곡지, 족삼리, 삼음교)에 치료군 A는 4주간 10회, 치료군 B는 8주간 20회 침 치료를 받을 것이다. 대조군의 대상자는 침 치료를 받지 않고 대조군 C는 16주간, 대조군 D는 20주간 통상적 관리를 하게 된다. 각 대상자의 생활습관은 교정될 것이며 혈압에 영향을 줄 수 있는 약물은 금지될 것이다. 치료군 A와 대조군 C는 무작위 배정 4, 8, 12, 16주 후에, 치료군 B와 대조군 D는 무작위 배정 4, 8, 12, 16, 20주 후에 평가를 받을 것이다. 주요결과변수는 무작위 배정 4주 후 이완기 혈압 변화량이다. 보조결과변수는 (1) 무작위 배정 8, 16, 20주 후 이완기 혈압 변화량, (2) 수축기 혈압 변화량, (3) 혈압 조절률, (4) 지질대사지표, (5) 고감도 C-반응단백이다. 결론 : 본 연구의 결과는 혈압 조절에 대한 침의 유효성 및 안전성에 관한 근거 구축에 도움이 될 것이다.