• Title/Summary/Keyword: Water Leisure Safety Act

Search Result 13, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Study on Improving the Facilities of Power-Driven Water Leisure Crafts for the Deaf (청각장애인을 위한 동력수상레저기구 운영 개선방안에 관한 연구)

  • Won-Sam Choi;Bong-Kyu Jung;Cheor-Hong Park;Nam-U Lee
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
    • /
    • v.29 no.7
    • /
    • pp.836-842
    • /
    • 2023
  • Under the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act, the national qualification test allows disabled and non-disabled people to appear for the same test, and the deaf do not fall under the reason for disqualification from obtaining a license for power-driven water leisure crafts; therefore, even the deaf can obtain a license. During a risk of collision at sea, ships and power-driven water leisure crafts notify the other party of dangerous signals such as maneuvering and warning signals through sound signals to prevent accidents that may occur because surrounding ships are not visible. However, a method is required to prevent marine accidents that may occur when the deaf cannot hear danger signals through sounds from nearby ships or power-driven water leisure crafts during leisure activities owing to hearing impairment. A sound reception system is a device installed on a ship where missionary work is completely deposed to display the amplification of external sounds and the direction of sound reception on the screen. Through visual display of sound signals such as dangerous signals that cannot be heard owing to hearing impairment, improvement measures were proposed to prevent marine accidents that can occur owing to the inability of the deaf to check sound signals during leisure activities.

A feasibility study on the stability securement on domestic inflatable boat by comparing foreign rules and regulations with Korea Water-related Leisure Activities Safety Act. (팽창식 보트의 국내외 시험 규정 비교를 통한 안정성 확보의 필요성 연구)

  • Yeong-Min Park;Ming-Su Kang;J ang-Gon Im;Hyen-Woo Kim
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2022.11a
    • /
    • pp.329-331
    • /
    • 2022
  • 국내 '수상레저기구 안전검사 기준(해양경찰청 고시)' 의 고무보트 안전검사 기준을 국제 표준 및 관련 법령(ISO-6185, 미국 ABYC 단체표준, 미국해양경비청 USCG, 뉴질랜드 해양법 NZ Maritime Law)과 비교를 통해 안정성(stability) 확보를 위하여 개선 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 현행 '수상레저기구 안전검사 기준'의 고무보트는 승선정원 13인 이상 및 특정 항해 구역에 대해서만 복원성 조건을 요구하고 있어 13인승 이하의 고무보트는 안정성 조건이 전무한 실정이다. 특히, 국제 표준 및 관련 법령과는 약 38개의 검사항목에 누락 또는 미흡한 차이가 있으며, 이에 국내 기준과 국제 표준과의 비교 분석을 통해 개인의 최소 안전을 담보 할 수 있는 고무보트의 안전성 확보 방안을 마련하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Analysis and Implication on the International Regulations related to Unmanned Aircraft -with emphasis on ICAO, U.S.A., Germany, Australia- (세계 무인항공기 운용 관련 규제 분석과 시사점 - ICAO, 미국, 독일, 호주를 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Dong-Uk;Kim, Ji-Hoon;Kim, Sung-Mi;Kwon, Ky-Beom
    • The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.225-285
    • /
    • 2017
  • In regard to the regulations related to the RPA(Remotely Piloted Aircraft), which is sometimes called in other countries as UA(Unmanned Aircraft), ICAO stipulates the regulations in the 'RPAS manual (2015)' in detail based on the 'Chicago Convention' in 1944, and enacts provisions for the Rules of UAS or RPAS. Other contries stipulates them such as the Federal Airline Rules (14 CFR), Public Law (112-95) in the United States, the Air Transport Act, Air Transport Order, Air Transport Authorization Order (through revision in "Regulations to operating Rules on unmanned aerial System") based on EASA Regulation (EC) No.216/2008 in the case of unmanned aircaft under 150kg in Germany, and Civil Aviation Act (CAA 1998), Civil Aviation Act 101 (CASR Part 101) in Australia. Commonly, these laws exclude the model aircraft for leisure purpose and require pilots on the ground, not onboard aricraft, capable of controlling RPA. The laws also require that all managements necessary to operate RPA and pilots safely and efficiently under the structure of the unmanned aircraft system within the scope of the regulations. Each country classifies the RPA as an aircraft less than 25kg. Australia and Germany further break down the RPA at a lower weight. ICAO stipulates all general aviation operations, including commercial operation, in accordance with Annex 6 of the Chicago Convention, and it also applies to RPAs operations. However, passenger transportation using RPAs is excluded. If the operational scope of the RPAs includes the airspace of another country, the special permission of the relevant country shall be required 7 days before the flight date with detail flight plan submitted. In accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation 107 in the United States, a small non-leisure RPA may be operated within line-of-sight of a responsible navigator or observer during the day in the speed range up to 161 km/hr (87 knots) and to the height up to 122 m (400 ft) from surface or water. RPA must yield flight path to other aircraft, and is prohibited to load dangerous materials or to operate more than two RPAs at the same time. In Germany, the regulations on UAS except for leisure and sports provide duty to avoidance of airborne collisions and other provisions related to ground safety and individual privacy. Although commercial UAS of 5 kg or less can be freely operated without approval by relaxing the existing regulatory requirements, all the UAS regardless of the weight must be operated below an altitude of 100 meters with continuous monitoring and pilot control. Australia was the first country to regulate unmanned aircraft in 2001, and its regulations have impacts on the unmanned aircraft laws of ICAO, FAA, and EASA. In order to improve the utiliity of unmanned aircraft which is considered to be low risk, the regulation conditions were relaxed through the revision in 2016 by adding the concept "Excluded RPA". In the case of excluded RPA, it can be operated without special permission even for commercial purpose. Furthermore, disscussions on a new standard manual is being conducted for further flexibility of the current regulations.

  • PDF