• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.859-871
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the usability, quality, and usefulness of the mobile application, CAMBRA-kids, for caries management in preschoolers. Methods: Ninety-one caregivers and preschoolers participated in the user evaluation of CAMBRA-kids. The evaluators assessed the usability, quality, and usefulness of CAMBRA-kids. The collected data were analyzed using R studio 1.2.1335 for Windows (RStudio Inc. 2018, Boston, MA, USA). The evaluations for usability, quality, and usefulness were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: On user evaluation, the quality and usefulness of the application scored >3 points, and majority of the users rated the quality and usefulness of the application as high. The quality of the application's system was the highest at 3.68 points, and the actual usage of the application was the lowest at 3.10 points. The application had the highest technological aspect score of 3.20, whereas the content related to oral health information had the lowest score of 3.10/5. Although the application showed no statistically significant differences in the quality and usefulness according to general characteristics, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the two when compared between the caries risk group. For all items, the protector of the high-risk group evaluated the quality and usefulness of the application highly. The moderate risk group gave the lowest evaluation score for the application's quality and usefulness. The usability score of the application, according to the user version of the mobile application rating scale (uMARS), was 3.25, and the average engagement score was 2.82 (56.31%). The highest subscale score was 3.63. Conclusions: In this study, we found suitable quality, usability, and usefulness of the mobile application, CAMBRA-kids. In future, the use of this application will contribute to the prevention of dental caries among preschoolers.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권9호
• /
• pp.2424-2434
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 공기업을 중심으로 다면평가제도의 선행요인이 평가효용성에 미치는 영향과 평가효용성이 조직성과에 미치는 영향을 파악하고 평가제도의 사전교육정도에 따라 평가효용성에 미치는 영향에 차이가 있는지를 알아보고 궁극적으로 피평가자가 인식하는 평가효용성이 조직성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 4가지 관점에서 연구하였다. 연구 결과 선행요인인 평가자 신뢰성, 최고경영자의 지지는 평가효용성에 유의한 영향을 미치고 있으나 평가준거는 유의적이지 못하였다. 사전교육의 정도에 따라 선행요인과 평가효용성 간에 조절효과가 있는지를 검증한 결과 평가자 신뢰성은 조절효과가 있는 것으로 판명되었다. 그러나 평가준거, 최고경영자의 지지는 조절효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 결과적으로 본 연구의 평가효용성이 선행요인의 영향을 받아서 조직의 성과 즉, 조직몰입도, 직무만족도, 자기계발기회, 조직활성화에 직접 또는 간접적으로 영향을 미치며, 사전교육이 부분적으로 조절효과가 있는 것으로 확인할 수 있었다.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.71-81
• /
• 2015

With the increasing influence of online media, company websites have become important communication channels between companies and customers. Companies use their websites as a marketing tool for a variety of purposes, including enhancing their image and selling products or services. Many researchers have examined the criteria, methods, and tools for website evaluation, but most have focused on usability. Prior content analyses have focused not on text content but on website components, an approach likely to produce subjective evaluations. This study attempts to objectively evaluate company websites by utilizing text mining. We analyze the usefulness of company websites by presenting visualized outputs from a business perspective, allowing practitioners to easily understand the results of the website evaluation and use them in decision making. To demonstrate our method empirically, we selected a company with a number of affiliates in Korea and analyzed the text content of their websites to assess their usefulness using natural language processing and graphics packages in R. Practitioners can easily employ our objective evaluation method, and researchers can use it to gain a new perspective on website evaluation.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.384-404
• /
• 2019

This study investigates the multidimensional structure of apparel design evaluation criteria and the details of each criterion by exploring how female college students majoring in apparel design in their 20s evaluate apparel design based on an exploratory approach. Data were analyzed through a categorization method of qualitative data after collecting from a literature review and three focus group interviews. The results identified the six evaluation criteria of apparel design (functional usefulness, convenience, aesthetics, psychological self suitability, social activity usefulness, and fashion trend). Functional usefulness and convenience assessed the extent to which primary features of apparel are reflected in apparel design, and aesthetics evaluated the aesthetic beauty of apparel design. Psychological self suitability estimated the extent to which apparel design expressed psychological self properly, and social activity usefulness appraised the extent to which apparel design contributed to the social activities of wearers. Last, fashion trend assessed the extent to which apparel design reflected fashion trend. The study results provide meaningful implications towards an apparel industry that wants to develop apparel design that appeals to consumers, educational institutions that aim to cultivate well-trained professionals in the apparel industry, and consumers who want to purchase clothes of satisfactory design.

• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2020

Purpose: This study tests the validity of a standard evaluation tool of ambulance ride practices with new evaluation items and supports its application by 119 preceptors. Methods: We tested the validity of standard evaluation items collected from 19 on-site professionals assessing ambulance ride practices. New evaluation items, 'understanding of emergency rescue equipment' and 'ability to communicate', were added as additional criteria. The modified Delphi technique was used to test the three evaluation areas and ten evaluation items. We used the analytic hierarchy process to analyze the weighting value of the reconstructed evaluation tool model. Results: All three evaluation areas and 10 evaluation items within the standard evaluation tools used for ambulance ride practices corresponded with the consistency index, degree of convergence, and agreement in the modified Delphi panel. Conclusion: These results provide evidence of the consistency and usefulness behind preceptors' use of this standard evaluation tool in ambulance ride practice.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.77-94
• /
• 2006

이 연구의 목적은 대학도서관에서 사용하고 있는 편목시스템의 유용성을 평가하는 것이다. 이러한 목적을 위해 선행연구에 나타난 품질 평가기준을 분석하고 편목시스템의 유용성을 체계적으로 평가하기 위한 기준을 개발하였다. 개발된 4개의 평가기준과 24개의 항목을 기초로 하여 국내 3개 자동화시스템을 대상으로 편목사서들에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 측정결과를 참조하여 편목시스템의 유용성을 종합적으로 검증하였다. 제안한 평가모델의 신뢰성과 타당성이 있는 것으로 검증되었으며 전반적인 만족도를 분석하였다. 이 연구는 향후 편목시스템의 유용성 향상을 위한 기준으로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.221-245
• /
• 2009

이 연구에서는 2008년 전국 공공도서관 평가사업에서 제시되었던 평가지표에 대해 현장사서들이 인식하는 실제 업무에의 유용성을 조사하였다. 자치단체 대, 중, 소그룹 및 교육청 대그룹에 속하는 사서들을 대상으로 설문조사 한 결과, 항목별 유용성에서는 계획부문이나 계량화된 측정이 용이한 항목에서 유용성이 높았고, 인적자원이나 시설과 같은 항목에서는 유용성이 낮았으며, 도서관 그룹별, 혹은 사서의 특성에 따른 유용성 차이는 기각되었다. 이러한 분석을 토대로 향후 공공도서관 평가 사업의 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.71-81
• /
• 2011

This study aims to make evaluation method as a means to evaluate the crime prevention through environmental design of multi-family housing. According to the analysis of correctness and usefulness of evaluation method in multi-family housing, the preliminary evaluation method is selected. The correctness and usefulness of evaluation method is examined by 2 works. One is analyzing the results of experts' advice about evaluation method. The other is analyzing the results of the case studies of 3 housing sites. Those improve evaluation method to measure the crime prevention through environmental design objectively. As a result, the system of classification is divided into evaluation area and evaluation item. Evaluation area is sorted into four types, i.e. public space, semi-public space, semi-private space, and equipment. Evaluation scores according to evaluation area are different. Evaluation scores of public space are 73. Those of semipublic space are 196. Those of semi-private space are 75, Those of equipment are 28. Evaluation item is divided into 20 items. 20 items are; the entrance of complex, apartment building, recreational space and parking space etc. Checklists according to evaluation items are proposed and detail evaluation criteria according to checklist are proposed.

• 한국의상디자인학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.69-80
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of consumers' fashion design evaluation factors on design value and brand loyalty. After confirming a research hypothesis, 247 people were selected as subjects for empirical analysis, and the results of the study are as follows. As a result of the analysis of 'the influence of consumer's fashion design evaluation factors on design value', the fashion design evaluation factors of 'convenience', 'social activity usefulness' and 'fashion ability' had an effect on the emotional design value. 'Convenience', 'functional usefulness', 'social activity usefulness', 'fashionableness' and 'aesthetic' factors affected the rational design value. 'Convenience', 'fashionableness', 'aesthetic' and 'psychological self-conformity' had a positive (+) effect on kinesthetic design values. As a result of the analysis of 'Influence of consumer's fashion design value on brand loyalty', 'emotional design value', 'rational design value' and 'kinesthetic design value' affect attitude brand loyalty, and 'emotional design value' and 'kinesthetic design value' affect brand loyalty. It was found that 'kinesthetic design value' has an effect on behavioral brand loyalty. As a result of the analysis of 'the effect of consumer attitude brand loyalty on behavioral brand loyalty', it was analyzed that attitude brand loyalty had a statistically significant positive (+) effect on behavioral brand loyalty.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.261-278
• /
• 2006

이 연구는 현재 운영되고 있는 KOLIS-NET의 두 가지 핵심 시스템인 KOLIS-NET 클라이언트 통합형 시스템 과 KOLIS-NET 일반이용자 검색용 시스템 의 품질 수준을 유용성과 사용성의 평가기준을 적용하여 평가하고 개선과제를 제시한 것이다. 'KOLIS-NET 클라이언트 통합형' 시스템의 경우 업무 프로세스별 시스템의 유용성 평가로서, 검색성과 사용용이성, 사용자 지원성을 주된 평가항목으로 설정하였으며, 각각의 평가 항목에 대해 연구팀과 실제 업무를 하고 있는 사서들 간의 브레인스토밍 기법과 심층면담 기법을 통해 평가결과를 도출하였다. 한편 '일반이용자 검색용 시스템' 에 대한 평가는 시스템 사용의 편이성 관점에서 진행되었으며, 다양한 사용성 평가 방법 중에서 인지평가 방법을 사용하였다. 마지막으로 도출된 문제점과 개선 과제를 화면 재설계, 용어 표준화, 기능 개선, 신규 기능의 네 가지로 범주화하여 제시하였다.