• Honam Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.233-237
• /
• 2009

In this paper, we show that: (1) every strongly ${\omega}$-monolithic space X with countable fan-tightness is Fr$\'{e}$chet-Urysohn; (2) a direct proof of that X is Lindel$\"{o}$f when $C_p$(X) is Fr$\'{e}$chet-Urysohn; and (3) X is Lindel$\"{o}$f when X is paraLindel$\"{o}$f and $C_p$(X) is AP. (3) is a generalization of the result of [8]. And we give two questions related to Fr$\'{e}$chet-Urysohn and AP properties on $C_p$(X).

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.191-201
• /
• 2023

In this paper the control system described by Urysohn type integral equation is studied. It is assumed that control functions are integrally constrained. The trajectory of the system is defined as multivariable continuous function which satisfies the system's equation everywhere. It is shown that the set of trajectories is Lipschitz continuous with respect to the parameter which characterizes the bound of the control resource. An upper estimation for the diameter of the set of trajectories is obtained. The robustness of the trajectories with respect to the fast consumption of the remaining control resource is discussed. It is proved that every trajectory can be approximated by the trajectory obtained by full consumption of the control resource.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.491-503
• /
• 2001

In this paper we show that solution set of certain Volterra inclusions on the half line is a continuum.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.297-303
• /
• 2007

In this paper, we study on C-closed spaces, SC-closed spaces and related spaces. We show that a sequentially compact SC-closed space is sequential and as corollaries obtain that a sequentially compact space with unique sequential limits is sequential if and only if it is C-closed [7, 1.19 Proposition] and every sequentially compact SC-closed space is C-closed. We also show that a countably compact WAP and C-closed space is sequential and obtain that a countably compact (or compact or sequentially compact) WAP-space with unique sequential limits is sequential if and only if it is C-closed as a corollary. Finally we prove that a weakly discretely generated AP-space is C-closed. We then obtain that every countably compact (or compact or sequentially compact) weakly discretely generated AP-space is $Fr\acute{e}chet$-Urysohn with unique sequential limits, for weakly discretely generated AP-spaces, unique sequential limits ${\equiv}KC{\equiv}C-closed{\equiv}SC-closed$, and every continuous surjective function from a countably compact (or compact or sequentially compact) space onto a weakly discretely generated AP-space is closed as corollaries.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.447-452
• /
• 2008

We provide some examples around AP and WAP spaces which are connected with higher convergence properties-radiality, semiradiality and pseudoradiality. We also prove a theorem (Theorem 3.2) that (a) any pseudo-open continuous image of an AP-space is an AP-space and (b) any pseudo-open continuous image of an WAP-space is an WAP-space. This answers the question posed by V. V. Tkachuk and I. V. Yaschenko [10].

• Honam Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.39 no.4
• /
• pp.655-663
• /
• 2017

In this paper we define $AP_c$ and $AP_{cc}$ spaces which are stronger than the property of approximation by points(AP). We investigate operations on their subspaces and study function theorems on $AP_c$ and $AP_{cc}$ spaces. Using those results, we prove that every continuous image of a countably compact Hausdorff space with AP is AP. Finally, we prove a theorem that every compact ${\kappa}$-WAP space is ${\kappa}$-pseudoradial, and prove a theorem that the product of a compact ${\kappa}$-radial space and a compact ${\kappa}$-WAP space is a ${\kappa}$-WAP space.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.423-438
• /
• 1994

We employ the Galerkin method to solve the nonlinear Urysohn integral equation (1.1) x(t) = f(t) ＋ $∫_{D}$ k(t, s, x(s))ds (t $\in$ D), where D is a bounded domain in $R^{d}$ , the function f and k are known and x is the solution to be determined. We assume that D has a locally Lipschitz boundary ([1, p. 67]). We can rewrite (1.1) in operator notation as x = f ＋ Kx. We consider (1.1) as an operator equation on $L_{\infty$}$(D) and assume that K is defined on the closure $\Omega$ of a bounded open set $\Omega$ ⊂ $L_{\infty}$(D). Throughout our analysis we put the following assumptions on (1.1).(omitted)(1.1).(omitted)