• 제목/요약/키워드: US military government

검색결과 59건 처리시간 0.028초

미군정기 기록관리: 혼용의 양상을 중심으로 (Records Management of the United States Military Government Period in Korea: Focusing on Mixed Use)

  • 박종연
    • 한국기록관리학회지
    • /
    • 제21권3호
    • /
    • pp.17-36
    • /
    • 2021
  • 본 연구는 한국 근현대 기록관리 제도사의 결락을 메우기 위하여 USAMGIK와 당시 생산된 기록 등 문헌검토를 진행하였다. 이를 통해 미군정기 행정체계를 확인하였고 행정체계 속에서 나타나는 기록관리 조직과 업무를 검토하였다. 미군정기 기록관리 조직과 업무는 행정체계의 이원화와 인적 구성의 동일성으로 인하여, 조선총독부와 미 육군의 기록관리체계가 혼용된 형태로 나타났다. 그럼에도 불구하고 지방행정조직과 의회 기록관리체계가 정비되기도 하였으며, 군정기구와 민정기구, 중앙행정기구와 지방행정기구, 의회의 경우 개별적 기록을 관리하는 방식이 나타났다. 한편 미군정기에는 미 육군의 기록관리 방식이 도입되어 국한문과 영문을 혼용하여 공문서를 생산하기도 하였다. 이와 더불어 한글 전용화가 요구되면서 공문서 작성방식 변화에 대한 주장이 이어지기도 하였다. 역사기록관리체계 또한 이 시기 시작되어 국사관을 설립하는 등의 노력으로 나타났다.

미군정 초기 미국 연수를 다녀온 한국인 의사 10인의 초기 한국보건행정에서의 역할 (The Role of 10 Medical Doctors Trained in the US under the US Military Government in Korean Public Health Administration)

  • 신영전;서제희
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제23권2호
    • /
    • pp.196-206
    • /
    • 2013
  • On September 24th of 1945, the existing Health Department under the Bureau of Economy and Trade was abolished complying with the Article 1 of the Ordinance of US military occupation "Establishment of Health Bureau". After the establishment of the Health Bureau, one of its first priorities was to select South Korean medical doctors and send them away to the US for training "in order to educate the talents necessary for the Health Bureau to address the public hygiene and health issues of Korea". Under the sponsorship of Rockefeller Foundation, the US Military Government sent 10 Korean medical doctors to three universities. After they came back to Korea from the training in the US, they played significant roles in building and managing the Korean health and medical system under the US Military Government as well as during the post-war of Korea and in the 1960s-1970s. Furthermore, they made a great contribution to expanding and transplanting the 'American-style' health and medical system in heath administration, health research and medical education in Korea. On the one hand, this means the limitation and elimination of an independent, progressive idea in the health and medical field as the influence of the US within the country after the liberation expanded. The lives of 10 doctor represent an important symbol of how the Korean health and medical field has been established under the domestic and overseas political conditions, 'colonization-liberation-military occupation of the Powers', and one part of the concrete history.

미정부의 빅데이터를 위한 보안정책 (The Security Policy for Big data of US Government)

  • 홍진근
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제11권10호
    • /
    • pp.403-409
    • /
    • 2013
  • 본 논문은 미국 정부의 빅데이터 정책과 보안 이슈에 관해 고찰하였다. 빅데이터 R&D 이니셔티브 전략과 계획, NITRD 프로그램, 정부기관의 빅데이터 전략을 소개하였고, 또한 미군에서 빅데이터 운용환경, 군사 작전에 사용되는 빅데이터 정보, 주요 연구기관과 주제, 보안가이드라인 등에 대해 살펴보았다.

미군정하 한국 복지체제, 1945~8: 좌절된 혁명과 대역전 (Capitalist Welfare Regime in US Military Government, 1945-1948)

  • 윤홍식
    • 한국사회정책
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.181-215
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구는 미군정시기 분배체계에 대한 연구를 통해 현대 한국복지체제의 기원이 미군정시기의 정치와 경제질서와 매우 밀접하게 연관되어 있다는 점을 밝혔다. 1960년대 계급의 이해로부터 자유로운 개발국가의 탄생은 1945년부터 1948년까지의 미군정기를 사상하고는 상상할 수 없다. 미군정은 노동운동과 농민운동을 물리력으로 해체시키고, 좌파 정치세력에게 괴멸적 타격을 가했다. 이러한 과정을 통해 미군정은 1945년 8월 해방 당시 좌파가 지배적인 한국의 정치지형을 우파가 지배적인 정치지형으로 완전히 전환시켰다. 더욱이 조선 민중 대다수가 바라던 사회(민주)주의 대신 미국식 자본주의를 이식시키는데도 미군정의 물리력이 없었다면 불가능했을 것이다. 농지개혁을 통해 전통적 지주계급을 몰락시키고, 혁명적 농민들을 보수적인 농민으로 전환하고, 일본인이 소유했던 공장들의 배분을 통해 국가에 종속되는 새로운 자본가 계급을 탄생시켰다. 복지체제의 관점에서 미군정 시기의 가장 큰 의미는 미군정이 1960년대 계급의 이해로부터 자유로운 개발국가, 즉 노동력의 상품화에 기초한 한 복지체제가 만들어질 수 있는 토대를 만든 것이다.

한국인에서 고엽제 관련 노출과 건강영향 및 보상정책 (Agent Orange-related Chemical Exposure: Health Effects and Compensation Policy in Korea)

  • 이상욱;오희철;임현술
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제39권3호
    • /
    • pp.197-210
    • /
    • 2013
  • Several US veterans stationed in Korea have told the press that around 250 fifty-five gallon drums of herbicides, including Agent Orange, were buried at Camp Carroll in 1978. Joint Korean-US Agent Orange investigation and environmental and health studies were started in July 2011. Korean soldiers and military personnel who served in Vietnam during 1964-1973 or near the demilitarized zone in Korea during 1967-1970 were exposed to dioxincontaminated Agent Orange. The joint Korean-US Agent Orange investigation team found that herbicides, pesticides, solvents and other chemicals -not Agent Orange- were buried at Camp Carroll. However, there remains the possibility that Agent Orange was stored and buried at Camp Carroll or other military camps in Korea. Adverse health effects have not been clearly explained despite a number of health studies among veterans in Korea with potential Agent Orange exposure. Although the Korean government has been compensating veterans and military personnel with 18 presumptive-service-connected-diseases and their offspring with three diseases, there are many veterans, military personnel and civilians who require the government°Øs support. The environmental study on contaminated sites and health studies among veterans and civilians were initiated three or four decades after possible Agent Orange contamination and exposure. Several toxic chemicals, including dioxin-contaminated Agent Orange, could remain in the environment and could have hazardous effects on the health of exposed people for more than several decades. Further environmental investigations and health studies are needed to ensure public safety and health, and government support should be guaranteed for people potentially exposed to these toxic chemicals.

군사학 분야 웹 문서 분류체계의 설계 (A Design of Classification System for Military Information Resources on the Internet)

  • 오동근;황재영;배영활
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제32권2호
    • /
    • pp.323-347
    • /
    • 2001
  • 이 연구는 군사학 분야의 인터넷 학술정보자원을 효율적으로 조직, 활용하기 위한 청문서 분류체계의 모형을 제시하기 위해 시도된 것이다. 이를 위해, 우선 일반문헌분류표 가운데 군사정보에 관한 항목을 상세하게 전개하고 있는 LCC의 Class U(Military Science)와 Class V(Naval Class)를 상세히 분석하고, 웹 문서 분류체계 중 체계적 분류방식을 도입하고 있는 Yahoo!의 분류항목(처음/정부/군사)을 비교 분석하였다. 아울러 웹 문서 분류체계의 새로운 설계를 위해 기존의 Yahoo! Korea와 심마니, Yahoo! US를 종합적으로 비교 분석하였다. 이와 같은 비교 분석의 결과를 바탕으로, 실제적인 분류체계의 모형을 제시하였다.

  • PDF

천안함 폭침 이후 북한의 군사도발 양상과 전망 (Trends and Prospects of N. Korea Military Provocations After the Sinking of ROKS Cheon-an)

  • 김성만
    • Strategy21
    • /
    • 통권34호
    • /
    • pp.58-92
    • /
    • 2014
  • Even after S. Korea took 5.24 Measure(24 May 2014), N. Korea has not stopped raising provocations such as the shelling of Yeonpyeong Island, electronic and cyber attacks. To make matters worse, the communist country lunched long-range missiles(twice) and conducted 3rd nuclear test, escalating tensions which could possibly lead to an all-out war. Korean Government failed to respond properly. However, escalation into an all-out war was deterred by the CFC immediately carrying out its peacetime duty(CODA). The US made a rapid dispatch of its augmentation forces(Aircraft carrier, nuclear-powered submarine, strategic bomber, F-22) to the Korean Peninsula. In recognition of the importance of the Combined Forces Command, since May 2013 the Park Geun-Hye Administration has been pushing ahead with re-postponement of Wartime Operational Control Transfer(which initially meant the disassembling of the CFC as of 1 December 2015) More recently, there has been a series of unusual indicators from the North. Judging from its inventory of 20 nuclear weapons, 1,000 ballistic missiles and biochemical weapons, it is safe to say that N. Korea has gained at least war deterrence against S. Korea. Normally a nation with nuclear weapons shrink its size of conventional forces, but the North is pursuing the opposite, rather increasing them. In addition, there was a change of war plan by N. Korea in 2010, changing 'Conquering the Korean Peninsula' to 'Negotiation after the seizure of the Greater Seoul Metropolitan Area(GSMA)' and establishing detailed plans for wartime projects. The change reflects the chain reaction in which requests from pro-north groups within the South will lead to the proclamation of war. Kim, Jeong-Un, leader of N. Korean regime, sent threatening messages using words such as 'exercising a nuclear preemptive strike right' and 'burning of Seoul'. Nam, Jae-June, Director of National Intelligence Service, stated that Kim, Jung-Un is throwing big talks, saying communization of the entire Korean Peninsula will come within the time frame of 3 years. Kim, Gwan-Jin, Defense Minister, shared an alarming message that there is a high possibility that the North will raise local provocations or a full-fledged war whenever while putting much emphasis on defense posture. As for the response concept of the Korean Government, it has been decided that 'ROK·US Combined Local Provocation Counter-Measure' will be adopted to act against local provocations from the North. Major provocation types include ▲ violation of the Northern Limit Line(NLL) with mobilization of military ships ▲ artillery provocations on Northwestern Islands ▲ low altitude airborne intrusion ▲ rear infiltration of SOF ▲ local conflicts within the Military Demarcation Line(MDL) ▲ attacking friendly ships by submarines. Counter-measures currently established by the US involves the support from USFK and USFJ. In order to keep the sworn promise, the US is reinforcing both USFK and USFJ. An all-out war situation will be met by 'CFC OPLAN5027' and 'Tailored Expansion Deterrence Forces' with the CFC playing a central role. The US augmentation forces stands at 690,000 troops, some 160 ships, 2,000 aircraft and this comprise 50% of US total forces, which is estimated to be ninefold of Korean forces. The CFC needs to be in center in handling both local provocations and an all-out war situation. However, the combat power of S. Korean conventional forces is approximately around 80% of that of N. Korea, which has been confirmed from comments made by Kim, Gwan-Jin, Defense Minister, during an interpellation session at the National Assembly. This means that S. Korean forces are not much growing. In particular, asymmetric capabilities of the North is posing a serious threat to the South including WMD, cyber warfare forces, SOF, forces targeting 5 Northwestern Islands, sub-surface and amphibious assault forces. The presence of such threats urgently requires immediate complementary efforts. For complementary efforts, the Korean Government should consider ① reinforcement of Korean forces; putting a stoppage to shrinking military, acquisition of adequate defense budget, building a missile defense and military leadership structure validity review, ② implementation of military tasks against the North; disciplinary measures on the sinking of ROKS Cheon-an/shelling of Yeonpyeong Islands, arrangement of inter-Korean military agreements, drawing lessons from studies on the correlation between aid for N. Korea, execution of inter-Korean Summit and provocations from the North, and ③ bolstering the ROK·US alliance; disregarding wartime operational control transfer plan(disassembling of CFC) and creation of a combined division.

계층적 분석방법(AHP)을 적용한 전시작전통제권 전환의 주요 결정요인 분석 (Analysis of Key Factors in Operational Control Transition Resolution using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP))

  • 박상중;고찬
    • 디지털융복합연구
    • /
    • 제9권6호
    • /
    • pp.153-163
    • /
    • 2011
  • 본 연구는 참여정부의 '전시작전통제권(이후 전작권) 전환 결정에 영향을 미친 군사 및 정치적 요인을 분석하는데 있다. 전작권 전환의 결정요소들에 관한 조사는 문헌연구를 우선 실시하고 추가적으로 AHP를 이용하여 타당성을 제고하였다. 분석결과로, '한미동맹의 비대칭성' 측면에서는 한국 방위에 부정적인 효과가, '한미동맹의 상호의존성' 측면에서는 한국군의 전구작전 주도능력 구비에 긍정적인 효과가, '참여정부의 진보정권 이익' 측면에서는 한국군의 자위권 제고에 긍정적인 효과가 나타났다. AHP 분석결과로 '참여정부의 진보정권 이익'측면의 "한국의 자위권 행사"가 가장 높게, '한미동맹의 비대칭성’측면의 "북한의 위협 감소" 가 가장 낮은 것으로 조사되었다. 본 연구는 참여정부의 전작권 전환의 결정요인을 AHP를 이용하여 군사 및 정치적 측면에서 분석하였다는데 의의가 있다.

국방 전장관리정보체계 연구개발사업의 애자일 적용 방안 연구 (A Study on the Agile Approach in Battlefield Management Information System R&D Project in Korea Military)

  • 윤성현;임규건
    • 한국IT서비스학회지
    • /
    • 제20권1호
    • /
    • pp.41-54
    • /
    • 2021
  • The SW-centered battlefield management information system R&D project takes a long period of 5-10 years or more by applying a complex and rigid batch acquisition strategy. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to institutionalize a rapid and flexible battlefield management information system R&D project management procedure applying agile development methodology, and a government project management organization and contract management method to support it In this study, we analyzed the case of applying the Agile development method centered on Scrum to the US SW-centered weapon system R&D project and the characteristics and problems of the battlefield management information system R&D project in Korea, and suggested improvement measures as follows. First, the battlefield management information system R&D model applies the hybrid development method, and the system requirements analysis and system structure design use the existing waterfall development procedure, and the agile method is applied from the SW requirements analysis to the system integration stage. Second, flexible adjustment of performance, schedule, and cost by organizing an Agile IPT in which military (requirements) - DAPA (project management) - developer - functional specialized organizations (test and evaluation, quality, government research institutes, etc.) participate. Third, improving the Basic Order Agreement so that it can be applied to agile R&D.

The Role of Operations Research/Systems Analysis in Defence Policy and Programming Decisions

  • Trost C.A.H
    • 한국국방경영분석학회지
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.7-15
    • /
    • 1979
  • The very fact that so many of us are here to participate in this conference on Operations Research is an indicator of the importance we attach to this relatively new and still expanding field. All of us recognize that Operations Research techniques are especially useful tools in problem solving in business, Government and the military. A discussion of the role of Operations Research and the related field of Systems Analysis in national defense policy and programming decision processes seems especially appropriate at the opening session of this conference, As you know, Operations Research as an organized form of research first found application in the review of individual military weapons systems and their effectiveness just over forty years ago. From that relatively narrow beginning has evolved a discipline whose future exploitation and utility you will explore over the next several days. I plan to review very briefly the historical development of Operations Research and Systems Analysis as tools in the defense decision-making process. Then, I will give you an overview of their application to today's military and defense problem solving by discussing the use of these techniques at the headquarters level by the United States Navy, Obviously, in such a brief period, I cannot cover all applications, specific techniques, or all of the groups involved in such a complex process. A review of the historical development of Operations Research/Systems Analysts reveals that the use of the basic concepts of Operations Research is not new; it originated with the first attempts to use the scientific approach to solve problems. We are still seeking, through modern analysis, to answer the three questions posed by John Dewey in his examination of the problem solving process in 1910.'1 - What is the problem? - What are the alternatives? - Which alternative is best? As I noted earlier, Operations Research, as an organized form of research, began in Great Britain in the late 1930s with the review of individual weapons systems.

  • PDF