• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.67-91
• /
• 2009

Nowadays, Alternative Dispute Resolution in terms of reconciliation, arbitration, and mediation is in the spotlight as a try to overcome the limits of a lawsuit as well as the judicial reform. Since many articles have studied ADR in America, Germany, Japan and the like which developed the system in advance, this article compares ADR in major Asian countries including China, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, India, and Vietnam etc. introducing ADR organizations as well. On the matter of vigorous trade and investment between Asian countries currently, it seems inevitable not to have consequential disputes through international exchange. Thus it will be very useful to know the law to resolve the conflict between the countries involved. This article is written to help to resolve the disputes in Asian countries and provide research materials to develop ADR in Korea by comparing the ones in major Asian countries. In addition, the comparative study of ADR in Asian countries should be continued to find the model which best fits in Asia as well as to nurture talent.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.127-138
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 강원지역에 거주하는 베트남과 캄보디아 출신 결혼이주여성의 분쟁해결 대처방식을 연구하였다. 본 연구는 두 번의 세부 연구로 나누어 진행하였다. 첫 번째 연구는 폐쇄형 설문지를 통하여 12명의 베트남과 캄보디아 결혼이주여성을 대상으로 분석하였으며 두 번째 연구는 5명의 베트남과 캄보디아 출신 결혼이주여성들을 대상으로 개방형 설문지에 대한 응답과 면접을 통하여 진행하였다. 연구결과 상당수 결혼이주 여성들은 분쟁이 발생할 때 주로 모국인과 상담을 하는 것으로 나타나고 있으며 주로 부부 자체적으로 분쟁을 해결하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 베트남 캄보디아 결혼이주여성들은 분쟁이 발생할 때 주로 갈등회피 형 전략을 사용하는 것으로 나타나고 있다. 또한 다문화가족지원 센터가 분쟁해결에 도움이 될 가능성을 보여주고 있다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.47-76
• /
• 2021

India is one of the fast growing country in the world. For the acceleration of economic growth of India, it is indispensable for Indian government to construct infrastructure, such as railroad, airport, harbor, power plant, and water management system. For example, Modi, prime minister of federal government of India proclaimed that Indian government plans to construct 100 smart cities in 2015. In recent times, India is expected to be the largest recipient of Public-Private Partnership(PPP) type projects in the world. Owing to PPP, it is possible for India to pursue her objective to transform the whole economy into digital economy beyond agricultural society. One of major problem related with implementation of PPP type projects is the growth of disputes concomitant to the rising phenomena of PPP type projects in order to build infrastructure in India. Because of this, non-negligible number of projects has been cancelled during last two decades. This study investigates seven failure cases of PPP in India. Those include Nabi mumbai airport, Dabhol power plant, Munbai water project, and Kolkata subway project. Main types of dispute resolution are mediation or conciliation, dispute review board, arbitration, expert adjudication in PPP.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권31호
• /
• pp.220-250
• /
• 2013

South Korean national security strategy should be developed to effectively handle and counter increasing maritime threats and challenges. There are three major maritime threats South Korea faces today; maritime disputes on the EEZ boundary and Dokdo islet issues, North Korean threats, and international maritime security. Maritime disputes in the region are getting intensified and turned into a military confrontation after 2010. Now regional countries confront each other with military and police forces and use economic leverage to coerce the others. They are very eager to create advantageous de facto situations to legitimize their territorial claims. North Korean threat is also increasing in the sea as we witnessed in the Cheonan incident and Yeonpyoung shelling in 2010. North Korea resorts to local provocations and nuclear threats to coerce South Korea in which it may enjoy asymmetric advantages. The NLL area of the west sea would be a main hot spot that North Korea may continue to make a local provocation. Also, South Korean national economy is heavily dependent upon foreign trade and national strategic resources such as oil are all imported. Without an assurance on the safety of sea routes, these economic activities cannot be maintained and expanded. This paper argues that South Korea should make national maritime strategy and enhance the strength of naval forces. As a middle power, its national security strategy needs to consider all the threats and challenges not only from North Korea but also to maritime security. This is not a matter of choice but a mandate for national survival and prosperity. This paper discusses the importance of maritime security, changing characteristics of maritime threats and challenges, regional maritime disputes and its threat to South Korea's security, and South Korea's future security strategy and ways to enhance the role of naval forces. Our national maritime strategy needs to show middle and long term policy directions on how we will protect our maritime interests. Especially, it is important to build proper naval might to carry out all the roles and missions required to the military.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.271-321
• /
• 2002

Every year, many million of business transactions take place. Ocassionally, disagreements develop over these business transactions. Many of these disputes are resolved by mediation, arbitration and out-of-court settlement options. The American Arbitration Association(AAA) helps resolve a wide range of disputes through mediation, arbitration, elections and other out-of-court settlement procedures. The AAA offers a broad range of dispute resolution services to business executives, attorneys, individuals, trade associations, unions, management, consumers, families, communities, and all level of governments. The 198,491 cases composed of the 194,303 arbitration cases and the 4,188 mediation cases, were filed with the AAA in 2000. These case filings represent a full range of matters, including commercial finance, construction, labor and employment, environmental, health care, insurance, real state, securities, and technology disputes. The Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) does more than render arbitration services. It helps facilitate settlements and guarantee implementation thereof between trading partners at home and abroad involving disputes related to such areas as the sale of commodities, construction, joint venture agreements, technical assistance, agency agreements, and maritime transport. The 643 cases composed of the the 197 arbitration cases and the 446 mediation cases, were filed with the KCAB in 2001. There are some differences between the AAA and the KCAB regarding the number and the area of mediation and arbitration case filings, the breath of service offerings, the scope of alternative dispute resolution, and the education and training. In order to apply to the proceedings of the commercial mediation and arbitration, the AAA has the Commercial Mediation Rules, the Commercial Arbitration Rules, the Expedited Procedures, the Optional Procedures for Large, Complex Commerical Dispute, and the Optional Rules for Emergency Measures of Protection as amended and effective on September 1, 2000. In order to apply to the proceedings of commercial arbitration, the KCAB has the Arbitration Rules as amended by the Supreme Court on April 27, 2000, which have been changed to incorporate the revisions of the Arbitration Act that went into effect on December 31, 1999. There are some differences between the AAA's commercial Arbitration Rules and the KCAB's Arbitration Rules regarding the clauses of jurisdiction and administrative conference, number of arbitrators, communication with arbitrator, vacancies, preliminary hearing, exchange of information, oaths, evidence by affidavit and posthearing filing of documents or others, interim measures, serving of notice, form of award, scope of award, delivery of award to parties, modification of award, release of liability, administrative fees, neutral arbitrator's compensation, and expedited procedures. In conclusion, for the vitalization of KCAB and its ADR system, the following measures should be taken : the effective case management, the development of on0-line ADR, the establishment of ADR system of electronic commerce disputes, and the variety of dispute resolution rules in each expert field.

• 한국조리학회지
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.264-279
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 외식 프랜차이징의 분쟁 유형과 기업정보 간의 차이를 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 연구목적을 달성 하기위해 공정거래위원회의 심결례를 바탕으로 분쟁의 유형을 분석하고 관련된 기업정보와의 차이가 있는지 SPSS WIN(V.17.0)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과, 분쟁의 유형은 정보공개서 미제공(58.5%)과 가맹금 미예치(15.1%)가 높았고, 분쟁유형과 관련 변수간의 크러스컬웰리스(Kruskal-Wallis) 검증에서 매출액과 설립기간 및 가맹점수는 유의수준 p<.05, 상시종업원수는 유의수준 p<.1에서 유의한 차이를 발견 하였다. 상관계수에서, 설립기간은 상시종업원수와 가맹점수에서 양의 연관성이 있었고, 상시종업원수는 가맹점 수와 브랜드 수에 유의수준 p<.05에서 연관성이 있었다. 분쟁의 해결방안으로는 가맹본부의 신의칙준수와 관련 당국의 모범거래기준 및 법제도 강화 그리고 가맹 희망자는 전문가의 자문이 필요할 것으로 시사되었다.

• 한국프랜차이즈경영연구
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.173-199
• /
• 2011

프랜차이즈 시스템에서 가맹점사업자는 가맹본부가 제공하는 영업노하우나 경영지원 등 포괄적 시스템에 의존할 수밖에 없고, 가맹본부는 판매나 경영방식을 통해서 가맹점사업자를 통제하거나 원조하기 때문에 당사자 간에 '경제력'이나 '정보력' 등에 있어서 대등한 관계에서 출발하지 않는다. 이로 인하여 가맹본부가 필요 이상으로 가맹점사업자의 활동을 구속·제한하는 불공정한 거래관계가 발생할 가능성이 클 뿐만 아니라, 가맹사업거래의 외관을 가장한 사기성 거래를 하려는 자들에 의한 부작용이 초래되어 가맹사업의 발전 및 국민경제의 발전을 저해하는 요인으로 작용하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 분쟁조정협의회에 신청된 분쟁사례를 중심으로 가맹본부와 가맹점사업자간의 분쟁원인과 문제점을 파악하여 가맹사업 분야에서 불공정한 거래관행을 예방하고, 가맹점 모집과정의 투명성과 가맹사업 거래과정의 공정성을 확보하기 위한 방안을 모색해 보고자 한다. 사례분석 결과 첫째, 가맹본부의 정확한 정보공개서 제공과 가맹사업자의 확실한 이해를 통한 가맹계약이 이루어져야 한다. 둘째, 가맹본부의 일정 기간이 경과된 직영점 운영 경험과 상권에 따른 운영 노하우 및 정확한 데이터 분석과 검증을 통한 가맹점사업자의 모집이 필요하다. 셋째, 가맹계약 시 가맹점 영업권역은 거리가 문제가 아니라 상권을 제대로 파악하여 가맹본부와 가맹점주가 함께 실사하여 확실한 영업지역을 표시하여 계약 하여야한다. 넷째, 가맹사업은 계약이 매우 중요하다. 그러므로 가능한 분쟁가능성을 예상하여 계약서에 규정해 놓을 수 있다면 분쟁을 줄일 수 있을 것이다. 다섯째, 정부의 가맹사업 및 분쟁조정에 대한 좀 더 현실적인 대안 마련과 분쟁에 대한 원인을 보다 세밀히 파악하여 가맹본부와 가맹점사업자간의 권익보호와 분쟁방지에 노력을 보다 많은 투자와 관심이 필요하다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제54권
• /
• pp.145-166
• /
• 2012

This article examines the limitations of the choice of law caused by Internationally Mandatory Rules in Entering into the Turn-Key Contracts. In June 2007, Clough Engineering, a corporation based in Western Australia, approached the Federal Court of Australia seeking injunctive relief and leave to commence proceedings against an entity located outside Australia, the Oil & Natural Gas Corp of India (ONGC). Clough had contracted with ONGC to provide a range of services in relation to the construction of gas and oil wells off the coast of India. The contract was governed by Indian law, and included a clause by which the parties agreed to submit their disputes to arbitration. Yet the Federal Court assumed jurisdiction over the dispute, principally because Clough had framed its claim as a plea for relief for contraventions of Australia's Trade Practices Act 1974. The result of this cases that it is possible for an arbitral tribunal to hear a claim made under the Trade Practices Act even if that claim arises "in connection with"a contract the proper law of which is not the law of Australia. However, in Transfield Philippines Inc v Pacific Hydro Ltd, the turnkey contract included a choice of law provision, selecting the law of the Philippines, and a clause providing that all disputes arising out of or in connection with the agreement were to be arbitrated under the ICC Rules, with the seat in Singapore. Hearings were in fact conducted in Melbourne, Australia, although all awards were published in Singapore. The result of this cases that it would not be appropriate for an Australian court to adjudicate claims for misrepresentation under Australian statutes dealing with misleading and deceptive conduct, once the arbitral tribunal had determined, applying appropriate choice of law rules, that such claims are governed by the law of the Philippines. To do so would lead to a multiplicity of proceedings, usurp the jurisdiction of the tribunal and deny the intention of the parties as expressed by them in the arbitration agreement. In short, the Internationally Mandatory Rules as an active part of public order create limitation of party autonomy in choice of law rules in a different way. The court is fully entitled to refuse to use those rules of law applicable on the contract which are in the contradiction to the internationally mandatory rules of law of the forum. And the court may give an effect to those Internationally Mandatory Rules that form a part of a law of foreign country when deciding about applicability of certain rules of applicable law.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.3-22
• /
• 2021

Civil and commercial disputes can be resolved through alternative dispute settlement systems other than court proceedings. Among them, the arbitration procedure is a system that is clearly distinguished from the mediation procedure in which the dispute is terminated by agreement between the parties. The arbitration proceedings shall have the same effect as the result of the final judgment by the decision of a third-party arbitrator, and its essence is a judgment. The Korean Arbitration Association Studies was founded in December 1990 to recognize the importance of arbitration procedures and conduct specialized research on them, with professional research on 'arbitration procedures' continuing until today. Thus, the Korean Arbitration Association Studies is positioned as the only specialized research organization in the field of arbitration. In the case of the Korean Arbitration Association Studies, which is the only society in Korea related to arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, the members are mainly scholars majoring in trade and commerce and ones majoring in law. This situation reflects the distinctive character of the arbitration system because it is a matter of dispute procedures related to trade and commerce and many scholars who research trade and commerce need to prepare for possible disputes. In addition, the arbitration procedure is a dispute settlement procedure that substitutes for litigation because it has research value as a legal system. In particular, the 'Journal of Arbitration Studies' published by the Korean Arbitration Association plays a role in mediation, as well as mediation and presentation of research papers in the ADR field. This study analyzes the trends of mediation and ADR-related papers published in 'Journal of Arbitration Studies', an academic journal of the Korean Arbitration Association Studies, in four dimensions, celebrating the 30th anniversary of the Korean Arbitration Association Studies. First, this study examined which sub-themes are mainly studied among the various viewpoints of mediation through thematic analysis. Second, it looked at what methodology was used to study intervention at the methodological level. Third, it assessed what countries and regions had been mainly studied at the regional level. Fourth, in terms of content, what kind of research had been mainly conducted and what kind of research was relatively insufficient was investigated, analyzing the research results of the last 30 years and presenting a milestone for the research direction of 'Journal of Arbitration Studies' in the future.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.257-281
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 국제무역거래에 있어 빈번하게 사용되는 약관의 계약편입과 관련하여 CISG 자문위원회의 공식 의견인 Black Letter Rule을 중심으로 고찰한다. 그 주요 내용으로 약관의 계약편입 관련 적용규정과 요건을 상세히 고찰하고, 약관의 계약편입을 의도한 청약상 참조표시 및 약관내용의 명확성 요건을 살펴보도록 한다. 이와 더불어 약관의 계약편입 관련 기타 원칙으로서 계약체결 후 약관편입의 배제, 의외조항배제, 개별약정우선, 작성자 불이익 원칙 및 서식분쟁에 대하여 살펴본다. 이와 더불어 본 연구는 약관의 계약편입 관련 기존 판례 및 학설을 검토한 후 이를 CISG 자문위원회의 공식의견과 상호 비교 검토함으로 약관의 계약편입 관련 원칙을 재정립하고 이에 따른 실무적 시사점을 도출하고자 한다.