• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제49권5호
• /
• pp.505-514
• /
• 2019

Purpose: This study aimed to introduce and elucidate changes in Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory and discuss its application to the field of nursing in South Korea. Methods: The changes in grounded theory by Strauss and Corbin were examined through a literature review of grounded theory from its inception. Results: Strauss and Corbin acknowledged their philosophical backgrounds of symbolic interactionism and pragmatism; however, their methodology based on positivism overwhelmed their epistemology and ontology. This inconsistency has been represented by the coding paradigm and the premise of "emergent from the data." In the revised version of Basics, Strauss and Corbin modified their theory to weaken the coding paradigm and strengthen the strategies for the development of substantive theory. Conclusion: Strauss and Corbin's revised grounded theory did not fully address the inconsistency of their epistemology and ontology between their acknowledgement and methodology. However, these changes constitute a meaningful step toward resolving inconsistencies and highlight the development of substantive theory. This has implications for Korean nursing researchers who have utilized methodologies in grounded theory with dogmatic approaches; grounded theory, with its evolving nature, is not a finalized method and calls for open approaches for the development of a grounded theory that fits Korean nursing.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.181-199
• /
• 2020

Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the current state of grounded theory methodology in Korea information systems studies and to suggest its application strategies. Design/methodology/approach After reviewing previous studies, this study reviewed 16 papers which adopted grounded theory methodology and analyzed these papers by two ways, research contents and methods adopted from grounded theory methodology: Main characteristics in grounded theory methodology are selected as main criteria in analysis such as data collection method, constant comparison, software use, coding ways, suggested model, proposition suggestion etc., while subject, theory/practice orientation, and role of prior knowledge are included in research contents. Findings Based on the review and analysis, this paper suggested four guidelines for adopting grounded theory methodology to information systems research in Korea: First, division of research methodology into stages. Second, explicit documentation of research process. Third, pursuit of diversity in research topics. Fourth, strengthening scale up and theoretical integration.

• 사회복지연구
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.351-379
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 국내에서 근거이론이 스트라우스의 방법만 소개되어 있고, 따라서 근거이론연구를 비롯한 많은 질적연구들이 스트라우스의 방법에만 의지해 이루어지는 지적 지형에 대한 문제의식에서 출발하였다. 근거이론방법의 창안자인 글레저와 스트라우스의 분기에 주목하여, 이 두 사람의 근거이론 방법상의 차이를 소개함으로써 근거이론 접근의 논쟁점을 제시한다. 글레저와 스트라우스 두 사람의 근거이론 차이는 연구과정의 기본논리, 핵심범주와 기본적 사회적 과정, 코딩절차와 방법의 세 가지 측면에서 고찰하였다. 연구결과 연구과정의 기본논리는 발견과 출현 대 검증과 강제의 논쟁점이, 핵심범주와 기본적 사회적 과정을 도출하는 방법상의 차이, 코딩과정과 축코딩을 중심으로한 코딩방법을 놓고 서로 다른 방법들을 제안하고 있었다.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제3권5호
• /
• pp.444-454
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this paper was to identify and compare the underlying design theory of contemporary European and Japanese fashion designers by using the qualitative research method of grounded theory developed by Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Glaser (1978). In this research, four fashion sites-Paris, Milan, London and Tokyo-were selected. The researcher stayed in each site for a period of two to three weeks for the purpose of data collection. A total of 60 fashion designers, educators, students and journalists were interviewed. 53 open-ended design questionnaires were returned by fashion designers and students. 19 on-site observations of fashion designers and educators were done. Grounded theories of fashion designers were synthesized from in-depth interviews, participant observations and questionnaire surveys of fashion designers, students and educators. The results of theory-building research suggested that there were significant differences between the grounded design theories of European and Japanese fashion designers due to their various cultural contexts.

• Journal of Community Nutrition
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.16-23
• /
• 2006

This paper describes a methodology for conducting Community Nutrition research with rather than on people in a community to generate grounded theory. This collaborative grounded theory methodology incorporates local knowledge and wisdom and builds community leadership capacity through engaging community-based professionals and para-professionals in the research process. In addition to building capacity for participation and leadership in research, education and action, this approach can increase the validity and value of the research and facilitate its application in community led programs. The methodology has five components: background, study design, data gathering, data analysis and interpretation, and application of findings in community programming. Three stages of the data analysis component focus sequentially on each interview independently, comparing across interviews, and systematically testing theory developed in the first two.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.1-20
• /
• 2018

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify the determinants of non-use and the dynamic nature of non-use by the qualitative research methodology, grounded theory methodology, as part of identifying the nature of non-use. Design/methodology/approach We applied the grounded theory methodology to a total of 23 college students, including non-users who are not currently using them, users with low intention to use them, and users with high intention to use. We extracted the codes related to the use and proposed the non-use dynamics conversion process based on the coding results. Findings First, the use of information technology can also promote the frequency of use, but can also lead to the use of negative attitudes which would fall in the state of non-use. Second, the user may have both positive and negative attitudes toward the current information technology. Third, if usage is dominated by habits, it is not so easy to change persistent use into an unused state. Fourth, factors that determine the use of specific information technology can be a factor in determining nonuse. This study has contributed to understand the essence of non - use as well as the nature of use, overcoming limitations of quantitative research approach and confirming possibility of grounded theory method in information system research.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.183-195
• /
• 2019

The objective of this paper is to present how to use Grounded Theory Methodology for conducting a literature review that produces new insights and conceptualizations. In this paper, we have employed Wolfswinkel et al.(2013)'s method, which is called by Grounded Theory Literature-Review Method, for a rigorous literature review. We have utilized this method to capture the concept and insights of individuals' shadow wok in digital environments. By analyzing the relevant literature based on Wolfswinkel et al.'s guide, we have extracted 73 codes in the coding steps and finally showed 12 categories by incorporating similar concepts from those codes. Based on the categories, we end this paper by developing the academic definitions of shadow work in digital environments.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.179-199
• /
• 2017

멀티채널 소비자들의 크로스오버 쇼핑행동이 두드러지는 시점에서 최근 사용자 행동 메커니즘에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 단순한 멀티채널 사용자행동에 대한 이해 차원을 넘어 면밀한 관찰을 통해 기존 연구방식에서 발견할 수 없었던 크로스 오버 쇼핑행동에 대한 연구 축적이 필요한 시점이라 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 근거이론(grounded theory)를 활용하여 멀티채널 사용자들이 왜, 어떻게 크로스오버 쇼핑행동을 하는지를 살펴보는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서는 총 25명의 응답자를 대상으로 인터뷰를 진행하였으며, 근거자료의 분석을 통해 118개의 개념을 추출하였고, 유사 개념간의 통합과정을 통해 28개의 범주를 제시하였다. 본 연구는 근거이론을 적용하여 기존 설문연구에서는 파악하기 어려웠던 사용자들의 동적인 탐색과 구매행동의 메커니즘을 포착함으로써 멀티채널 환경에서 설명 가능한 행동연구 방안을 제안하고 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.91-104
• /
• 2007

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of parenting from the parents of children with ADHD and to develop a grounded theory about their experiences. Method: This study was a qualitative research study that used a grounded theory to understand and discuss the parenting experiences of parents of children with ADHD in a greater depth. Grounded data was collected through an in-depth interview from twelve participants with ADHD children. The data was analyzed using the grounded theory method. Results: 'Approaching the normal' emerged as the core phenomenone. Parenting experiences for parents of children with ADHD referred to a process of bringing the children, back on track of normal growth development, and their functioning in the family at a normal level and establishing a new normalcy. The process of approaching the normal involved a basic social-psychological process, such as 'living a day in hell', 'accepting', 'confronting the conflicts', 'lowering expectations', and 'making a new normalcy'. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study, which observed the parenting process of parents of children with ADHD, could enhance nurses' understanding of ADHD and help nurses become major mental health service providers for the mental health of children with ADHD and their families.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.105-111
• /
• 2012

한국 교육의 양적 성장이 증대된 지금, 교육의 질적 향상을 위하여 현 교육의 실태를 돌아보아야 할 때이다. 현교육에 대한 부정적 인식과 긍정적 인식의 측면을 파악하고자 한다면, 우리 교육의 역사적 맥락을 어떻게 인식하고 있는지를 먼저 알아보아야 한다. 이러한 전통 교육에 대한 인식을 알아보는 것은 앞으로 역사 교육이나 다가올 통일 시대를 대비하여 정립해 나가야 할 인문학 전반의 노력이 되어야 할지도 모른다. 선행연구가 부족한 이러한 인식에 대한 연구 방법으로 근거이론을 통한 질적 연구 방법을 실행하고자 한다. 근거이론의 방법론은 학제 간연계의 가능성을 시사하리라 기대한다.