• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.508-522
• /
• 2009

A teacher evaluation system is a hot issue of educational policy these days. Many teachers have opposed teacher evaluation system, but government and many parents have agreed teacher evaluation system. And some people agree teacher evaluation system, but some people disagree teacher evaluation system. The approvers of teacher evaluation system insist that teacher evaluation system can provide the quality of instruction, satisfaction of schooling, and nation's competition capacity. But opponents of teacher evaluation system insist that teacher evaluation system can provide dissatisfaction of teachers' job, excessive competition among teachers, and the failure of educational policy. So, comprehensive studies about teacher evaluation system are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate that elementary and secondary teachers' recognition about teacher evaluation system. The tool of this study was used questionnaire which was made by researcher of this study. This study indicates as follows. Many teachers opposed teacher evaluation system, because of deficit of validity and reliability of teacher evaluation system. Also, many teachers indicated instruction ability as the most important evaluation standard of teacher evaluation system. And many teachers predicted the dissatisfaction of teachers' job and excessive competition among teachers as a result of teacher evaluation system.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.673-683
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity of teacher evaluation policy for professional development and to suggest the ways to improve the policy in school. The teacher evaluation policy for professional development is designed to improve teacher professionalism and quality of school education. For this purpose, A survey was conducted and 361 elementary and middle school teachers participated in Busan. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 12.0. The conclusions of this study are as follows: First, although teachers are highly interested in the teacher evaluation policy, they have negative attitudes for practicing the new policy. Second, assessors must be composed of reliable, competent experts because teacher evaluation has a great influence on teaching activities. The assessors should be composed of those who have the specialization and reliability on the basis. Also the assessors must be trained to enhance the fairness, objectivity and reliability by rigid discipline. Finally, teacher evaluation policy should be closely linked to increasing teacher's expertise such as training opportunities, teacher consultants, and senior teacher systems and should be widely utilized for the evaluation to be effective.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.695-706
• /
• 2019

This study conducted a case study on the process-centered evaluation competency of a middle-school/high-school science teacher using Teacher's Process-centered Evaluation Competency (T-PEC) measurement tool. The case analysis shows that teacher A in a middle school represents high competency of process-centered evaluation planning and cooperative communication while the competency of utilizing process-centered evaluation results is low owing to the characteristics of non-standardized areas. Teacher B in a high school shows high level of cooperative communication competency whereas low level of process-centered evaluation execution competency because the freedom given to students is not enough during the process of evaluation. The teacher also shows very low level of utilizing process-centered evaluation results due to the lack of time and the school culture not giving feedback to the students. According to cross-case analysis, teacher A and B both represent the highest level of collaborative communication competency and the lowest level of utilization process-centered evaluation results competency. And the lack of clear criteria for process-centered evaluation leads to different understanding of process-centered evaluation between the two teachers, and teacher B shows low the level of utilizing process-centered evaluation affects results due to the students not being concerned on feedback, security problem, and the reality focusing on the university entrance examination in high schools. Based on the results, this study suggests providing clear guidelines of process-centered evaluation to teachers, introducing an application in order to solve the time-lack problem pointed out as the biggest problem of process-centered evaluation, ensuring objectivity and security about process-centered evaluation results, and building the school culture such as the expanded application of standardized areas in order to implementing process-centered evaluation.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.421-443
• /
• 2008

우리나라 사서교사 평가제도로서 현행 교원평가제도의 문제점을 분석하고 대안을 제시하였다. 연구결과 현행 교원평가제도는 사서교사의 직무수행성과를 평가하기 위해서 갖추어야 할 타당성이 매우 부족한 것으로 나타났고, 현행 평가기준을 적용하면 사서교사는 낮은 평가를 받을 수밖에 없는 구조적인 문제점이 드러났다. 이 연구에서는 사서교사 직무수행 성과를 적절하게 평가하고, 이를 통해서 사서교사의 책무성과 전문성을 강화하기 위한 대안을 제시하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.207-216
• /
• 2012

Through quantitative video analysis of four algebra classes and statistical analysis of various types of teacher evaluation behavior in the classroom teaching, we get: (1) Teacher evaluation behavior in classroom is close to take 1/5 of the total time of the classroom teaching, and it appears most frequently in class exercises and take the longest time; (2) There are many forms of teacher evaluation behavior in classroom, and most of the behaviors are positive assessment; (3) Recognition evaluation is relatively conservative in a single form without losing fairness; (4) Classroom assessments of teachers' behaviors are primarily concerned about students' knowledge and skills mastery, and it is less involved in student feelings, attitudes and behaviors; (5) The correct teacher evaluation behavior in classroom will inspire students to create internal motivations; and (6) The correct teacher evaluation behavior in classroom can stimulate the potential of students.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.133-154
• /
• 2010

교육과학기술부는 교원능력개발평가를 도입하면서 사서교사를 평가하기 위한 평가지표와 문항을 제시하였다. 이 연구는 교원능력개발평가에 제시된 사서교사의 평가지표와 문항의 타당성을 분석하고, 분석과정에서 제안된 문제점을 종합하여 새로운 평가지표를 개발하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 연구결과 현 평가지표는 사서교사의 교육활동과 서비스 대신에 시설과 장서의 관리에 중점을 두고 사서교사를 평가하는 구조로 되어 있고, 제시된 지표의 대표성과 체계성에 있어서도 많은 문제점이 드러났다. 이 연구에서는 사서교사의 전문성을 타당하게 평가하기 위해 문헌연구, 전문가 검토, 실증연구의 과정을 거쳐서 12개 지표로 구성된 새로운 사서교사 평가지표와 새 지표에 적합한 동료교원, 학생, 학부모의 평가문항을 개발하였다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.83-97
• /
• 2008

본고는 사서교사가 정보이용교육을 실시하는 데 필수적인 수행평가 방법 및 도구를 개발하기 위한 것이다. 사서교사의 정보이용교육에서 중요한 영역이 평가이다. 그런데 지금까지 사서교사의 교육 활동은 평가 방법에 대한 연구가 거의 없는 실정이다. 다만, 초 중등학교 정보와 도서관 교육과정에 평가 영역이 제시되어 있을 뿐이다. 이에, 사서교사가 실시하는 정보이용교육을 위한 수행평가 방법 및 도구의 개발은 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 평가 방법과 도구는 평가이론과 목표준거에 입각하여 개발되어야 한다. 본고의 최종적인 목적은 현장 사서교사들이 수행평가이론과 목표준거를 바탕으로 정보이용교육을 위한 다양한 수행평가 방법, 도구, 사례를 구현할 수 있도록 하는 데 있다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.93-111
• /
• 2009

이 연구는 2009년에 개발되어 현재 선도학교를 통해 활용되고 있는 교원능력개발평가 사서교사 평가지표 및 문항에 대한 설문조사를 통해 그 개선점을 제안하였다. 연구결과 현행 평가지표 및 문항의 중요도에 대한 사서교사의 인식이 대체로 긍정적인 것으로 나타났고, 각 문항의 중요도와 수행도에 대한 사서교사의 인식에는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 평가지표 및 문항에서 개선해야 할 점으로는 현재의 평가문항에 다양한 독서교육활동 실시여부에 대한 항목 추가, 자료조직 및 관리 관련 평가문항 수정의 필요성, 학생지도 평가영역 명칭에 대한 제고 등이 제기되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 현재 활용되고 있는 사서교사 평가지표와 문항이 대체로 타당하기는 하지만 일부분에서 수정 보완이 필요함을 제시하였다.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.81-93
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of teachers' self-evaluation on their health teaching behaviors, then to furnish the basic data to be able to improve teachers' health teaching activities and the educational issues on the education of teachers. To put above aims into practice, these were required: 1. Are there any differences in the results of self-evaluation on health teaching behaviors factors by teachers? 2. Are there any differences in the results of health teaching self-evaluation whether he/she take P.E as major of study in-serviece training period? 3. Does it have any influence on the results of health teaching self-evaluation whether he or she completed on the job training for the school health? 4. Are there any differences in the results of health teaching self-evaluation by sex and career? To carry out a research for this purpose, the factors of health teaching self-evaluation were divided into the clearness of the procedure, the active interaction, the variety of the ways showing the contents, and the individualization of the procedure. Then a questionnaire form, consisting of 28 specific inquires to evaluate health teaching behaviors, was delivered and conducted by 450 teacher of the elementary school in Kyungki-do. The analysis of data was done by SPSS; producing mean and standard deviation and they were inspected statistically to compare the evaluation levels and find out the differences by teachers' personal variables. The conclusion were as follows: 1. In the self-evaluation level of teachers' health teaching behaviors, teachers showed 68.23 point as are percentile distribution. And it was in order of a school-nurse(71.68), an athletic teacher(67.29), and a class-room teacher (65.66). Score obtained by teacher was statistically significant difference (p〈.001) 2. In the factors affecting to teachers' health instruction, “active interaction” showed the highest score(18.55), “variety of ways showing the contents”(17.38), “clearness of the procedure” (16.70), and “individualization of the procedure” (15.59). In the analysis of the differences by teachers, according to factors, there were significant differences in “active interaction”, “variety of the ways showing contents”, “clearness of the procedure”(p〈.001). 3. Self-evaluation score for graduates from Dept. of P. E in Teachers' collage was not significant difference compared with other majors(p〉.05). 4. Teachers receiving health education was significantly higher self-evaluation score than that of teachers not-receiving health education (P〈.01). 5. Self-evaluation score of female teacher was significant difference compared with that of male teacher (p〈.001). 6. Career (working duration) did not influenced to self-evaluation score on health teaching behaviors (P〉 .05). On the basis of the conclusion of this study, the next are suggested: First, the further studies to make use of the results of health teaching behaviors and to examine the effect are needed. Second, the further studies to examine the relations between academic achievement and teachers' major(a school-nurse, an athletic teacher, and a class-room teacher) are needed. Third, the following studies to improve health teaching by both teachers' self-evaluation on health teaching behaviors and students' evaluation of teachers, and to find out more effective health teaching, are needed. Fourth, Health education for pre-service training course and On-the-Job training program are need the effective factors on the teachers' Health teaching obtained from this study.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.97-121
• /
• 2017

오늘날 교사 양성 질 관리 기제인 교원양성기관평가가 정착되면서 그 본질적 기능에 대한 의구심도 증폭되고 있다. 특히, 교사 공급 과잉이 발생하는 국가의 경우, 평가 자체의 적합성은 물론, 평가 결과의 활용이 예비교사 교육의 질 관리에 기여하지 못한다는 비판도 제기된다. 이러한 문제인식에서 본 연구는 중등교사가 과잉 공급되고 있는 한국과 중국의 사범대학을 대상으로 한 평가의 특징을 평가의 주체, 목적, 주기, 지표, 방법, 결과 활용이라는 여섯 가지 준거에 따라 비교분석할 목적으로 수행되었다. 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 한국과 중국의 사범대학 평가는 교원양성기관 교육 수준의 질 향상을 공식적 목적으로 표방하고 있지만 실제 평가 추진의 내용 및 결과 활용은 본질적 목적에서 벗어나 형식적으로 운영되고 있다는 공통적 문제가 발견되었다. 둘째, 평가 주체나 지표, 결과 활용 등에 있어서는 정부 주도의 관리 감독이나 양성 자원 통제 등에 치우쳐 있고 교사 직전교육의 질을 높이기 위한 사범대학의 질 제고는 뒷전이라는 상황은 교사 과잉 공급과 밀접하게 연관되어 있다는 점을 확인하였다. 이상 연구결과를 토대로 양 국가의 사범대학 평가가 본질을 회복하고 진정한 의미의 질 관리 기제로 개선되기 위해 필요한 정책적 제언을 제시하였다.