• Title/Summary/Keyword: TERTC-DEQ

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.133 seconds

Use of the Texas Eye Research and Technology Center Dry Eye Questionaire (TERTC-DEQ) as a Screening Survey for Contact Lens Wearers and Nonwearers (콘택트렌즈 착용자와 비착용자의 건성안 설문조사 TERTC-DEQ의 활용)

  • Kim, Jai-Min;Kim, Yong-Hwan;Jung, Ju-Hyun
    • Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.4
    • /
    • pp.127-131
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study was designed to demonstrate the ability of Texas Eye Research and Technology Center Dry Eye Questionaire (TERTC-DEQ) to examine the distribution of self-reported dry eye symptoms and their diurnal intensity in university students and compare it with McMonnies & Ho DEQ. Two dry eye questionnaires were administered to 46 contact lens wearers and 47 nonwearers. Contact lens wearers scored higher on the TERTC-DEQ (52.2%) than McMonnies & Ho DEQ (6.5%). Non-contact lens wearers also scored higher on the TERTC-DEQ (19.1%) than McMonnies & Ho DEQ (2.1%). Ocular symptoms worsened with progression of time of day in both groups of subjects. This study suggests that TERTC-DEQ provides a first-choice diagnosis tool to obtain a comprehensive assessment of patient's symptoms, especially in comparison with McMonnies & Ho DEQ. The TERTC-DEQ is an efficient screening survey and may be use in dry eye diagnosis of contact lens-related dry eye.

  • PDF

Comparative Analysis of Questionnaires for Dry Eye Screening Test (안구건조증 설문지의 일치도 연구)

  • Kim, Da-Young;Lee, Sun-Haeng;Cho, Hyun-Gug;Kim, Kun-Kyu;Kim, Ha-Na;Moon, Byeong-Yeon
    • Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
    • /
    • v.19 no.4
    • /
    • pp.499-504
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: This study is to evaluate the accuracy of dry eye screening test by comparing coincidences between three types of questionnaires and objective tests. Methods: 90 adults were classified into the normal and dry eye groups using evaluations of three types of questionnaires (SPEED, OSDI, TERTC-DEQ) and objective tests (NIBUT, Schirmer test). Coincidences-between the results of objective tests and questionnaires were compared and analyzed for dry eye diagnosis. Results: Coincidences between NIBUT test and each questionnaire were 83.3% by SPEED, 77.8% by OSDI and 72.3% by TERTC-DEQ, respectively. Concordance by SPEED was highest among three types of questionnaire. Coincidences between the Schirmer test and each questionnaire were 57.8% by SPEED, 58.9% by OSDI and 73.3% by TERTC-DEQ, respectively, thus coincidence by TERTC was higher than by others. But coincidences by Schirmer test were generally lower than those by NIBUT test. Conclusions: SPEED questionnaire showed the highest concordance with objective test as compared with others. Therefore, SPEED is expected to be used usefully to diagnose dry eyes.