• 대한간호
• /
• 제15권1호통권81호
• /
• pp.58-65
• /
• 1976

Development of systematic evaluation is regarded an important part in planning for student learning. The systematic evaluation is devided into three phases; the diagnostic, the formative and the summative. Nursing education, to provided comptent professio

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.476-482
• /
• 2023

Introduction: There is a growing global interest in the issue of precarious employment. We aimed to analyze the characteristics and socio-demographic distribution of precarious employment using a summative score approach. Methods: To operationalize precarious employment, we utilized data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey and focused on three distinct dimensions: employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and a lack of rights and protections. By constructing a summative scale ranging from -16 to 2, with lower scores indicating higher precariousness, we measured employment precariousness among Korean wage workers. To compare employment precariousness according to survey participant characteristics, we employed the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Results: We analyzed a weighted number of 38,432 workers. The overall sample showed a median (Q1, Q3) summative scale score of -3 (-6, -1). The median summative score was lower for women compared to men (men: -2; women: -5; p < 0.001), as well as for young or older workers compared to middle-aged workers (young: -4; middle-aged: -2; older: -5; p < 0.001). Similarly, workers with lower educational levels (middle school or below: -8; high school: -5; college or above: -2; p < 0.001) and non-white collar workers (blue collar: -5; service/sales worker: -6; white collar: -2; p < 0.001) experienced higher levels of employment precariousness. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that certain vulnerable groups, such as women, young or older adults, workers with low educational attainment, and caregiving or low-skilled elementary workers, are disproportionately exposed to high employment precariousness. Active policy interventions are needed to improve the employment quality of vulnerable groups.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.164-174
• /
• 2010

이 연구의 목적은 중학교 과학 생물영역의 총괄 평가 문항의 평가 목표를 블룸의 신 교육목표분류체계에 따라 분류하여 평가 목표의 특성을 파악하는 것이다. 대구지역 중학교 25개교로부터 총 1,711개의 총괄 평가 문항을 수집하여 블룸의 신 교육목표분류체계에 따라 각 문항의 평가 목표를 분석하였다. 총괄 평가 문항을 지식과정 차원의 목표분류틀로 분석한 결과, 사실적 지식에 대한 평가를 목표로 하는 문항이 대부분(67.6%)을 차지하였다. 인지과정 차원에서 표본 문항의 평가 목표는 기억하는가를 평가하는 것이 가장 우세하였다(76.1%). 문항의 주된 평가 목표들이 블룸의 신교육목표 분류체계 중 특정 영역에 치우쳐 있었고, 동일한 분류체계로 수업 목표를 분류했던 이전의 연구 결과와 비교했을 때, 수업목표와 평가 목표의 분포에 차이가 있었다. 학년별 문항의 평가 목표 수준을 분석한 결과, 학년이 올라감에 따라 변하는 인지 수준을 고려하여, 평가 목표를 선정하여야 함에도 불구하고 문항의 평가 목표에서 학년별 차이는 발견할 수 없었다.

• 한국지능시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.742-746
• /
• 2006

학습자에 대한 학습능력의 평가는 진단평가, 형성평가와 총괄평가 단계로 구분할 수 있다. 이러한 단계적 평가는 학습자의 사전 학습 준비상태부터 학습 과정의 충실성 및 학습 결과까지를 종합적으로 판단할 수 있는 기준이 된다. 본 논문에서는 퍼지추론을 이용하여 각 단계의 평가를 모두 고려한 종합학습평가 방법을 제안하였다. 학습 수행능력에 대한 객관적인 평가를 위하여 각 평가 단계별로 가중치를 부여하였고, 진단, 형성 및 총괄 평가에 대한 퍼지추론에서 획득한 비퍼지화 값을 최종평가의 소속함수 구간으로 적용하였다. 그 결과 객관성을 보장할 수 있는 명확한 추론을 수행할 수 있었으며, 종합적인 학습평가 방법의 타당성을 보였다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.314-328
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to establish a conceptual model of the course evaluations. in University. This paper has examined the course evaluations according to the levels, purposes, objects, and methods of them. And this paper has been classified for a conceptual model of the course evaluation. As the result of this analysis, four dimensions of course evaluation have been found. First, formative and summative evaluation have been found. The purposes of formative evaluation were improving quality of courses and collecting information for improvement of curriculum. The purposes of summative evaluation were offering informations on faculty staffing and improving of learning outcomes. Second, the levels of course evaluation were classified into university-level, professor-level, and student-level. Third, the objects of course evaluation were classified into analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Forth, the methods of course evaluation were classified into questionnaire, observation, interview, and content analysis. As a result of this analysis, 120 types of course evaluations have been found.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.231-245
• /
• 2009

최근 학생주도적인 활동을 유도하기 위하여 수행평가를 도입 적용하는 학교가 늘고 있다. 그러나 교실의 수행평가에도 불구하고 학생들의 수학적 능력은 표준화 시험지에 의하여 결정되고, 또 교육부는 학생들의 연합고사 점수로서 교육 프로그램의 질을 판단하고 그 개선효과를 기대하는 것 같다. 한편 표준화 검사는 학생 시험불안을 유발하고 자칫 그들의 대안적 방어행동을 유발할 수 있다. 본고는 초등학교의 표준화 시험의 문제점과 초등학생들의 시험불안을 완화할 수 있는 시험문제의 구성 및 채점 방안에 대하여 구안하고자 한다.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.47-70
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this paper was to develop evaluation procedures for blended instruction, focusing on the courses that are currently offered in the university. This study analyzed current evaluation procedures and instruments and suggested redesign the evaluation process for blended instruction. The evaluation procedures are designed based on the combination of objective-oriented and consumer-oriented evaluation approaches. It includes three stages: front-end (screening), formative evaluation, and summative evaluation. During the front-end evaluation stage, information regarding students' technology skills and attitudes towards online instruction and classroom instruction are suggested to collect and plan the instructional strategies accordingly. The formative evaluation is conducted during the semester to collect students' opinions about the course and instructors modify their instruction based on the evaluation results. At the end of semester, summative evaluation is to be conducted to collect the data to improve the course. Evaluation questions and components for each stage are developed to collect the data such as students' perceptions of the course, the usefulness of online instructional materials, the effectiveness of blended learning strategies, and students' satisfaction with the course.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to assess third-year medical students' competency for development or revision of the undergraduate curriculum and assessments. One hundred and twenty-seven third-year medical students at the Pusan National University were included in the study. After third- and fourth-year students took a common written examination, clinical performance examination (CPX), and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with common items as a summative assessment, the third-year students' competency was compared with 132 forth-year students' results. The correlation of the written examination and CPX/OSCE was analysed, and the summative results were compared with the grade point average (GPA) through the second year, CPX/ OSCE in the second year, and GPA in the clerkship. On the written examination, the third-year students' mean score was lower than the fourth-year students' by over 11 points, whereas the gap in the CPX/OSCE was 4 points and there was no difference in the OSCE. There was a moderate correlation between the written examination and the CPX/OSCE scores (R=0.371, p<0.01). The written examination was highly correlated with GPA through the second year, which mainly evaluated medical knowledge (R=0.771, p<0.01). A relatively high correlation was observed between CPX/OSCE scores and GPA in the clerkship (R=0.641, p<0.01). The summative CPX/ OSCE scores showed a moderate correlation with formative CPX/OSCE scores in the second year (R=0.464, p< 0.01). The third-year students' score was quite low on the written examination and slightly low on the CPX/OSCE compared to that of the fourth-year students. The written examination and CPX/OSCE cannot replace each other and should be combined with other methods of evaluation to measure competency. Early OSCE and workplacebased assessment should be useful in the early assessment of clinical skills competency.

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제9권9호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 국내의 이공계 대학 유학생들의 전공기초 능력 향상 및 중도탈락 예방을 위한 물리교육 프로그램을 개발하기 위하여 수행되었다. 연구의 대상은 한국의 이공계 대학에 재학 중인 중국 유학생 5명으로, 자연과학대학 또는 공과대학에 소속되어 있다. 연구자는 물리교육 프로그램 개발에 앞서 5차시 분량의 대학 기초 물리 교재와 진단 및 총괄 평가 문항을 개발하였으며, 이를 활용하여 총 7차시의 수업을 실시하였다. 수업 적용 후 학습자의 진단 및 총괄 평가 결과, 교수자의 수업일지, 수업참관자 일지, 수업전사본 등을 활용하여 삼각검증 방법으로 분석하였다. 또한 질적인 분석을 돕기 위하여 수업일지와 수업관찰지의 분석에는 Nvivo12가 활용되었다. 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 이공계 대학의 유학생을 위한 물리교육 프로그램의 순서와 내용을 구체적으로 제시하였고, 대학 기초 물리 교재와 진단 및 총괄 평가 도구를 개발하였다. 둘째, 프로그램의 사전-사후 평가 결과 분석 결과, 개발된 프로그램의 적용에 따라 유학생들의 대학 기초 물리 학업 성취가 평균 40점 향상되었다. 셋째, Nvivo12를 활용한 프로그램의 적용 결과, 의미 있는 노드 생성 및 사례가 추출되었다. 생성된 노드는 총 10종으로, 수업방법, 수업이해도, 수업참여도, 수준차이, 언어문제, 전공과의 관련성, 출신국의 교육과정 및 교육방법, 협력학습, 흥미유발 등이며, 이와 관련된 사례를 토대로 국내 이공계 대학의 유학생들을 위한 물리교육 방법에 관한 시사점을 제공하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.42-49
• /
• 2014

The main purposes of this study was to develop evaluation model, which provides program educational objectives(PEO) evaluation research with guidances on how to evaluate the program educational objectives and procedures in order to enhance the quality of engineering education. Educational objective evaluation is reciprocal processes that depend on and affect one another. Thus, the evaluation component deals with how to identify members' strengths, weakness, and needs, how to assess and improve the effectiveness of curriculum programs, and how to provide data that assist in decision making. After literature reviews about the case studies on the program educational objectives evaluation, this study, to understand the meaning of education evaluation and the engineering accreditation, and then, examined the evaluation model for program educational objectives. This study suggested evaluation components of program educational objectives. In particular, the distinctions between diagnostic, formative, and summative evaluation are discussed. The result of this study is significant in terms of guiding the future evaluation model development for program educational objectives.