• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.141-164
• /
• 2008

This study aims to come up with the elements that have influence on the outcomes of technology transfer in a multi-divisional way by making analysis of the interactive relations among technology transfer factor, technology transfer procedure factors, and technology transfer outcome factors through the Structural Equation Model(SEM). And the sample companies are restricted to the ones that have the records of technology transfer to China for the past five years For research model, technology success factor model of Choi and Lee (2000) and technology receptive capability and technology transfer outcome model of Lin, Tan and Chang(2002) were adopted. The research model was divided into an external variable, technology transfer factors and an internal variables, technology transfer procedure factors and technology transfer outcome factors. Research hypothesis was divided into technology transfer factors and technology transfer procedure factors; and technology transfer outcomes. As a result of analysis, cultural difference associated with technology transfer, technological type, corporate capability, and mutual trust have an effect on the outcomes of technology transfer.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.41-58
• /
• 2023

This study identifies the commercialization success factors that can be an important indicator for the transfer and commercialization of national R&D results in the agricultural sector. Unlike other industries, the agricultural sector has a non-systematically scaled and processed industrial structure, and R&D is led by government rather than the private sector. Although the quantitative performance of national agricultural R&D, especially the number of patents and publications, has increased rapidly with the quantitative expansion of the government R&D budget, the technology commercialization of the results of agricultural R&D has been accompanied by difficulties for SMEs. Therefore, this study summarized the success factors for commercialization of state-owned technologies presented in previous studies, and based on them, analysed the success factors for commercialization specific to the agricultural sector. It also conducted a questionnaire survey using Delphi and focus group interviews (FGI) with experts from academia, research and industry, and a survey of agricultural companies to derive success factors for commercialization in the agricultural sector using logistic regression analysis. As a result, five indicators with positive correlation and three indicators with negative correlation within technology characteristics, suppliers, adopters, policy and market factors were finally derived as key factors for agricultural commercialization. In the future, it is expected that independent factor analysis of the food and seed sectors, which have independent industry characteristics from the agricultural sector, will be needed.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2015

An empirical analysis study applied to evaluate the effect of critical factors for technology transfer. The research aims to suggest ways of political support in order to facilitate technological transfer and commercialization of public research institute'technology. Based on previous researches, it is determined that five critical factors which effect on technology commercialization. These critical factors are used to derive the order of priority, attribute of the success, and failure factors. The result of this research emphasized on both roles of technology introduction motivation and type of technology transfer. In order to collect data for this research, it is carried out that survey and field study toward to technology user such as manufacturing companies which have contracted with institute A. This research has a meaning in aspects of verification of previous hypothesis through scientific approach and new findings of a significant factor that motivation determines the success or failure of technology commercialization.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.490-518
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 전자부품연구원과 반도체 테스트용 프로브카드 회사간 기술이전 사례를 중심으로 기술이전이 사업화 성과까지 연계되기 위해 필요한 요인들을 분석하였다. 이러한 연구를 통해 실제 현장에서 가장 영향력 있는 기술이전의 성공요인을 살펴보고 정부정책과 기업전략 측면에서 기술이전과 기술사업화 성과를 창출하는 것을 주요 목적으로 한다. 국내외 선행연구 분석, 프레임워크 설정, 사례분석의 과정을 거쳐 기술 수요자, 기술 공급자, 이전 기술, 기술이전 과정 특성의 4가지 측면에서 시사점을 도출하였다. 연구결과 기술 수요자 특성은 신기술 이전획득전략 및 추진의지/보완 자산과 흡수 능력, 기술 공급자 특성은 기술이전 및 사업화 경험/기술이전과 연계한 사업화 지원의지/풍부한 이전 대상 기술군, 이전 기술 특성은 연구개발단계 및 기술분야/기존 기술과의 연계성, 기술이전 과정 특성은 기술이전 전담조직의 지원활동/기술 이전과정의 적극적 참여 등이 성공요인으로 도출되었다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.15-34
• /
• 2013

In a turbulent environment, it is important for a firm to obtain competitiveness through acquiring new technologies and new knowledge. Many studies has shown that R&D has positive effects on innovation and performance. However, the limitation of resources and research personnel for SMEs leads to the needs of collaboration between government R&D and SMEs. The quantitative results of government R&D comes in the form of patents or publication of papers while the qualitative results comes in the form of commercialization (revenue increase or cost reduction) of the SMEs acquiring the technology through technology transfer. Korean government invested 16.9 Trillion Won in 2013 and achieved remarkable quantitative results but the qualitative results are still yet to be improved. The technology transfer rate in 2011 was 26.0% while the success rate of commercialization of the transferred technology is only 23.6%. Therefore it is meaningful to study the success factors of the technology commercialization in Korea. In this study, a case of technology commercialization between ETRI and Initech is studied. Initech was a venture firm which started in 1997 with 2 employees and after transfer of technology from ETRI in 1999, it has grown to a firm of 238 employees. In this study, Jolly's commercialization model was used to analyze the success factors of the commercialization. It was shown that four main factors that leads to the success are (1) mobilizing interest and endorsement through customer oriented R&D by ETRI, (2) mobilizing resources for demonstration through systematic technology commercialization process by ETRI, (3) mobilizing market constitutents through government standardization that leads to the reliability of the participants, and (4) mobilizing complementary assets for delivery by management strategies of Initech.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.129-145
• /
• 2016

This is a case study to analyze the role of technology licensing or transfer office (TLO) as factors of success for the spin-off from government research lab. The case company is a research lab startup, which is a joint venture through technology investment by a government research lab or university in the designated R&D parks and cash investment by the partner company. The case company listed on the stock market in 2015 reaching a market capitalization of US$ 1.2 billion. We confirm the success factors of startups pointed out in many studies: original technology, good understanding of core technology and production technology, technological competitiveness in the market. However, there is an important factor not well discussed in the previous studies, the role of TLO. TLO guided the company ownership, management, technology, and solved problems that pause business itself. The case became the sample of research lab startup and technology investment in Korea.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2014

Purpose - This Study aims to promote technology transfer commercialization and ultimately make contribution towards enhancement of the success rate of commercialization of technology transfer at national level by deducing the factors that impart influence on the negotiation at the time of technology trading between the seller and buyer of technology of public research institutions subjected to transfer and sales. Research design, data and methodology - This Study deduced 5 research hypotheses through preceding researches related to technology transfer commercialization related technology marketing for technology trading negotiation. This Study was conducted by verifying the hypotheses through multiple regression analysis. Results - As the result of the Study, the research hypothesis H1, 'Promotion of commercialization of technology transfer trading will be affected in accordance with the innate characteristic factors of the technology', and H5, 'Promotion of commercialization of technology transfer trading will be affected in accordance with the mutual factors of the parties of the technology trading', among the 5 research hypotheses were chosen. Conclusions - It was found that the technology seller must be able to demonstrate technological value of the technology being sold in order to successfully conclude technology transfer trading negotiation and mutual understanding and harmonious communication between the parties.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.28-48
• /
• 2015

공공 R&D 연구기관은 기업에게 좋은 기술공급처다. 그러나 낮은 사업화 성공률은 기업에게 고민꺼리다. 어떤 기술을 이전 받을 때 사업화 성공률을 높일 수 있을까? 본 연구에서는 대표적인 한국의 IT기술분야 공공R&D 기관을 대상으로 이전기술의 사업화 성공요인을 로지스틱으로 회귀분석했다. 분석 결과, 이전기술이 기업의 기존보유 제품과 연계성이 높고, 기술적 호환성이 높을수록 사업화 성공률이 높았다. 반면, 예상과는 달리 이전받을 기술의 개발과정에 기업이 공동연구로 참여한 경우보다는 독립적으로 기술이전 받을 때 오히려 상용화 성공률이 높게 나타났으며, 이전기술의 완성도는 유의한 영향을 미치지 않았다.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2017

This study explores how the technology commercialization process leads to either success or failure after transfer from PROs to SMEs by conducting a binomial logistic regression analysis. We found that the more additional development a firm implements on the transferred technology, the more likely the commercialization is to fail. The higher number of alternative technology and bigger market risk are associated with a greater likelihood of failure. On the other hand, the existence of complementary technology, the degree of cooperation with the technology provider, the size of the target market, the willingness of the CEO, and the funding availability are known to have positive effects on the success of technology commercialization. In addition, the case studies we conducted from the sample companies demonstrated that "market uncertainty," "technological issues depending on the technology-specific characteristics," and "a lack of funding capability" are some of the causes for failure of technology commercialization.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2014년도 추계 학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.686-698
• /
• 2014