1 |
Bozeman, B., Fay, D. and Slade, C.P. (2013) Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art, Journal of Technology Transfer 38, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
DOI
|
2 |
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D, Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
DOI
|
3 |
Colyvas, J.A., Snellman, K., Bercovitz, J. and Feldman, M. (2012) Disentangling effort and performance: a renewed look at gender differences in commercializing medical school research, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 478-489. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9235-6
DOI
|
4 |
Coupe, T. (2003) Science is golden: academic R&D and university patents, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 31-46.
DOI
|
5 |
Di Gregorio, D. and Shane, S. (2003) Why do some universities generate more startups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
DOI
|
6 |
Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-121.
DOI
|
7 |
Friedman, J. and Silberman, J. (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
DOI
|
8 |
Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson, M. (2003) Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property, Research Policy, 32(4), 639-658.
DOI
|
9 |
Haeussler, C. and Colyvas, J.A. (2011) Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany, Research Policy, 40(1), 41-54.
DOI
|
10 |
Hagedoorn, J. (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960, Research Policy, 31(4), 477-492.
DOI
|
11 |
Hoang, H. and Rothaermel, F.T. (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance, Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 332-345.
DOI
|
12 |
Jeong, S. and Lee, S. (2015) Strategic timing of academic commercialism: evidence from technology transfer, The Journal of Technology Transfer, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9424-9
DOI
|
13 |
Kim, Y.J. and Shin, S.W. (2016) A Study on Patented Technology and New Firm Formation from Korean Universities, The Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(1), in press (in Korean).
|
14 |
Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M. and Clarysse, B. (2011) The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: the case of science‐based entrepreneurial firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 777-803.
DOI
|
15 |
Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M.A. and Ireland, R.D. (2008) Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances, Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 315-334.
DOI
|
16 |
Link, A.N. and Link, J.R. (2009) Government as entrepreneur, Oxford University Press New York.
|
17 |
Link, A.N., Siegel, D.S. and Bozeman, B. (2007) An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655.
DOI
|
18 |
Lungeanu, R., Stern, I. and Zajac, E.J. (2015) When do firms change technologysourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack, Strategic Management Journal.
|
19 |
Mahoney, J.T., McGahan, A.M. and Pitelis, C.N. (2009) Perspective-the interdependence of private and public interests, Organization Science, 20(6), 1034-1052.
DOI
|
20 |
Mitchell, W. and Singh, K. (1996) Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods, Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 169-195.
DOI
|
21 |
Mok, K.H. (2005) Fostering entrepreneurship: changing role of government and higher education governance in Hong Kong, Research Policy, 34(4), 537-554.
DOI
|
22 |
Nerkar, A. and Shane, S. (2007) Determinants of invention commercialization: an empirical examination of academically sourced inventions, Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1155-1166.
DOI
|
23 |
Mowery, D.C., Sampat, B.N. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2002) Learning to patent: institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992, Management Science, 48(1), 73-89.
DOI
|
24 |
Mowery, D.C. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2002) Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the BayhaE Dole act in the United States, Research Policy, 31(3), 399-418.
DOI
|
25 |
Murray, F. and Graham, L. (2007) Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 657-689.
DOI
|
26 |
Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W.W. (2001) To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 99-114.
DOI
|
27 |
Roessner, D., Bond, J., Okubo, S. and Planting, M. (2013) The economic impact of licensed commercialized inventions originating in university research, Research Policy, 42(1), 23-34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.015
DOI
|
28 |
Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D. and Jiang, L. (2007) University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
DOI
|
29 |
Rothaermel, F.T. and Deeds, D.L. (2006) Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 429-460.
DOI
|
30 |
Rothaermel, F.T. and Thursby, M. (2005) University-incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance, Research Policy, 34(3), 305-320.
DOI
|
31 |
Thursby, J.G. and Kemp, S. (2002) Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing, Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124.
DOI
|
32 |
Shane, S. (2004) Encouraging university entrepreneurship? the effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States, Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 127-151.
DOI
|
33 |
Siegel, D.S. and Wessner, C. (2012) Universities and the success of entrepreneurial ventures: evidence from the small business innovation research program, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 404-415. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9186-3
DOI
|
34 |
Somaya, D., Kim, Y. and Vonortas, N.S. (2011) Exclusivity in licensing alliances: using hostages to support technology commercialization, Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 159-186.
DOI
|
35 |
Thursby, J.G. and Thursby, M.C. (2002) Who is selling the ivory tower? sources of growth in university licensing, Management Science, 48(1), 90-104.
DOI
|
36 |
Van de Vrande, V. (2013) Balancing your technology‐sourcing portfolio: how sourcing mode diversity enhances innovative performance, Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 610-621.
DOI
|
37 |
Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N. and S'Jegers, R. (2006) Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: an examination of team heterogeneity, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 249-271.
DOI
|
38 |
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E. and Sapienza, H.J. (2001) Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 587-613.
DOI
|
39 |
Zahra, S.A. and Nielsen, A.P. (2002) Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization, Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377-398.
DOI
|
40 |
Aldridge, T. and Audretsch, D.B. (2010) Does policy influence the commercialization route? evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists, Research Policy, 39(5), 583-588.
DOI
|
41 |
Arora, A. and Fosfuri, A. (2003) Licensing the market for technology, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), 277-295.
DOI
|
42 |
Bercovitz, J. and Feldman, M. (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level, Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.
DOI
|
43 |
Bercovitz, J. and Feldman, M. (2011) The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: composition, social networks, and geography, Research Policy, 40(1), 81-93.
DOI
|
44 |
Bozeman, B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy, 29(4), 627-655.
DOI
|