• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제47집
• /
• pp.139-172
• /
• 2023

이 논문은 대순사상에서 인심·도심 개념과 그 가치론적 해석의 문제를 살펴보고자 하는 것이다. 인심·도심 개념은 송대에 들어서 정이천·소식·주자 등에 의해 인간 보편의 마음으로 이해되며 수양의 문제 중심으로 해석하였다. 인심·도심에 대한 논의는 주자에 이르러 이론적으로 체계화되며 이후 다양한 논설이 전개되었다. 인심도심론은 가치론적 해석의 문제가 중요한 논제 가운데 하나였는데, 크게 세 가지 유형의 양상을 보였다. 인심·도심을 각각 악과 선(정이천과 주자초설), 가치중립과 선(주자와 퇴계·율곡), 예비 악과 예비 선(다산)이 그것이다. 인심·도심은 인간 보편의 문제로 볼 수 있으므로 유학 전통의 이러한 유형들에 대한 검토는 대순사상의 인심·도심에 대한 이해에도 이론적 기반으로서 의미가 있다고 할 수 있다. 대순사상에서는 인심·도심을 각각 사와 공이라고 규정할 뿐 개념에 대한 설명은 없다. 대순진리회가 지향하는 이념과 가치를 전반적으로 고려하여 추론해 보면, 인심은 의식색(衣食色) 등 인간의 생명 활동과 종족 보존을 위해 필요한 기본적인 생리적 욕구라고 할 수 있다. 도심은 도덕 실천과 더불어 보국안민·광제창생·인류화평 등과 같은 이념을 실현하고자 하는 마음으로 볼 수 있었다. 한편, 인심·도심과 가치론적으로 연관된 양심·사심에 대해서는 이를 각각 선과 악으로 규정하고 그 개념과 발생 근원 등을 논술하며 비교적 체계적인 면모를 보였다. 양심·사심에 대한 논설이 인심·도심보다 체계화된 것은 양심·사심의 문제가 교리적으로 더욱 중요한 의미를 지니고 있기 때문이라고 볼 수 있을 것 같다.

• 한국철학논집
• /
• 제27호
• /
• pp.447-468
• /
• 2009

愚潭丁時翰(1625-1707)是朝鮮朝中期退溪學派的主要代表人物之一, 他一生隱居求志躬行心得為後世儒者所敬仰｡ 作為近畿主理論學者他同李玄逸(1627-1704, 字翼升, 號葛庵)一起, 對退溪的四七理論作了積極維護和系統闡述｡ 本文從比較的角度, 對愚潭的理氣說, 四端七情說, 人心道心說進行了簡要論述｡ 儘管他在理氣關係及四七理論的解釋上有些折衷退溪與栗谷思想之傾向, 但是從四七說以及對理氣關係的主僕, 上下位關係的解釋中我們還是可以看出其基於退溪的尊理貶氣, 理氣互發之義上的為學特色｡ 在人心道心說方面的特點在於, 其對朱子所講的實然之"心"的重視｡

• 대한한의학원전학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.257-283
• /
• 2008

Western Medicine had been taking the occurrence of a disease as a physical matter and had tried to step forward from this angle till the late twentieth. But lately for about 20 years, a lot of researchers have started to understand the disease and human function as those in holistic system They supposed that the human function was the result of the interactions in 'Mind-Brain-Body' system and tried to explain and prove about the theory at the molecular level. The name of this new field of human science is 'Mind-Body Medicine' and in the center stand the 'Psychoneuroendoimmunology. Traditional Korean Medicine of which the core system was formed 2500 years ago, explains the complex interaction between mind and body with the theory of 'Mind-Brain-Body' system. To research on the correlation between mind and body, we tried to explain from the viewpoint of medical classic about the philosophical background, relations among mind, five viscera, and body, interaction between mind and body.

• 한국인지과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국인지과학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.2-7
• /
• 2010

Formally, we may define cognitive science as the convergent study between symbolic and connectionist approaches at macro and micro levels. Since what we refer to as the human mind is regarded as a mathematical product of the human brain and the computing machine, we can obtain two mathematical dynamical projections: one from the set of human brains to the set of mind, the other from the set of computing machines to the set of mind. Then, we are having a new projection from the classical models to the quantum mind.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2006

1. Objectives The purpose of study is to find Lee Je-Ma's thoughts about Great Absolute-Mind in his writings. 2. Methods the concept of Lee Je-Ma's Great Absolute-Mind versus preexisted Great Absolute-Mind is compared and analysed in this study. 3. Results and Conclusions (1) Lee Je-Ma composed his Great Absolute-Mind based on its concept of the science of divination, Confucianism and medicine. However his Great Absolute-Mind is rooted in preexisted meaning, it was disputed desides the controversy between the science of divination, Confucianism and medicine. For this reason, Lee Je-Ma's Great Absolute-Mind is such an originative concept unable to be explained with a simple substitution this concept for the preexisted one of the science of divination, Confucianism and medicine. (2) Lee Je-Ma's Great Absolute-Mind is the human being itself and it can include the humanity from human being itself. (3) There are not only physical meaning of heart but also abstract metaphysical concept of heart included in Lee Je-Ma's Great Absolute-Mind. (4) The talent for comprehending principles is organically connected with the ability to attain their will. And the talent and ability is devided into Two Modes(兩儀) like Mind & Body(心身), Perception & Action(知行) and Nature & Emotion(性情). (5) The supervision of Lee Je-Ma’s Great Absolute-Mind affects physical part of body as well as spiritual part and is not devided into two but one. (6) The source of the supervision is rooted on Lungs Spleen liver Kidney(肺脾肝腎), Sasang(四象), even though it exists in the Great Absolute-Mind. So Sasang(四象), which is Lungs Spleen Liver Kidney(肺脾肝腎), is organically related to the Great Absolute-Mind in its effect and origin.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.245-253
• /
• 1997

The methodology of the Oriental philosophy is deductive and that of the of Occidental philosophy is inductive. Therefore study on the Oriental philosophy must start from right comprehension of fundamental premise before detailed analysis. The writer studied the meaning of the cosmology which forms the basis of Sa-sang constitutional philosophy and the propriety of visceral assignment by Sa-sang constitution which forms the theoletiacal basis of Sa-sang constitutional medicine. The results are following ; 1. The cosmology of Lee jae-ma has the existent principle but don't have the side of the formative principie. 2. The cosmology of Lee jae-ma is not that searchs for the objective rule of nature but that centers around a human being by subjective understanding system. 3. The cosmology consists of four elements, that is mind(心), body(身), events(事), and nature(物). Among them mind and body means a human being, nature means the natural environment containing time and space, events means not that of nature but that of human being. 4. The mind and body as Yin-yang(陰陽) means the state which objects and self become one. 5. The mind as the Great-Absolute(太極) has the possibility of two interpretation, Firstly it means the state of the source of life which nature and human being become one, and secondly it means that the mind of a human being becomes the cosmos or the center of the cosmos. 6. In the visceral assignment by Sa-sang constitution the position of heart, the Great-Absolute in center is immanent within four viscera and the function of it is that the undifferentiated unitary organic body, after it is diffrentiated still serves as the unitary organic whole by mutual connection, adjustment, unification and supervision. 7. The Great-Absolute in center is divided into the Great-Absolute of mind and that of body. And the Great-Absolute of body consists of the heart and the system of blood vessel, that of mind means the self-consciousness(自我).

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.32-43
• /
• 2004

1. Objectives This paper was tried to find out Dong-Mu's recognition systemfor Sasang Structure about "Dongyi Suse Bowon" and "Gyukchigo" 2. Methods The study was researched through comparative studying in a structural manner between "Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物) and "Dongyi Suse Bowon" 's Heaven-Human-Nature-Order(天人性命). 3. Results and Conculusions "Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物) should be understood as Dong-Mu's change process of thinking scheme before writing the book of "Dongyi Suse Bowon" and it is somewhat difficult to make a connected attachment in a lump between "Dongyi Suse Bowon" 's Heaven-Human-Nature-Order(天人性命) and "Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物). Just "Dongyi Suse Bowon" 's Heaven-Human-Nature-Order(天人性命) can be understood as a new recognition systemto encompass" Gyukchigo" 's Affairs-Mind-Body-Objects(事心身物).

• 감성과학
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.241-251
• /
• 2005

유학은 인간의 심성(心性)에 대한 탐구를 2,000여 년에 거쳐 해온 학문분야이다. 따라서 유학에서의 인간의 심성에 대한 관점과 연구방법은 현대의 감성과학에 적용될 가능성이 매우 높다. 유학에서의 인간심성을 유학의 전반적 개념과 퇴계 이황의 개념으로 고찰하여본 결과 현대의 감성과 유사한 정(情)이라는 개념이 있었으며, 본 마음(性)의 발로의 결과인 정의 좋음과 나쁨의 관점은 정이 발현되는 과정에서 좋은 정과 나쁜 정으로 구분된다고 하여 정의 형식이 중요한 것이 아니라 인간의 본성이 왜곡됨 없이 발현된 정이 좋은 정, 즉 감성이라 하고 있어 현대의 감성의 호악과는 다른 기준을 가지고 있었음을 알 수 있었다 또한 심성을 파악하는 구조는 심성작용이 일어나는 형식구조로 파악하고 있는 것이 아니라 심성의 내용과 작용주체를 파악하기 위한 관점으로 파악하고 있음도 알 수 있었다. 또한 현재의 인지, 감성, 생리, 철학 등의 관점이 총체적 ·종합적인 관점으로 인간의 심성을 바라보고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 연구의 종합결론으로서는 유학에서도 인간의 심성을 탐구하기 위한 연구가 매우 오랜 기간 수준 높게 진행되었으며, 현재 감성과학에 부분적인 참고와 도움뿐만이 아니라 감성과학의 지향점을 찾는 데 중요한 관점과 지식을 충분히 제공할 수 있을 것이라는 알 수 있었다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.99-105
• /
• 2017

Plato and Aristotle examined what the true spirit of physical education is and what kind of relationship it is, from the perspective of dividing into two parts of the body and mind. And the relationship between human body and mind, knowledge and behavior. Plato and Aristotle examined the harmonious combination of body and mind and what is the desirable relationship setting. In Plato's soul and body in philosophical centered ideological aspect, human education center emphasizes poetry education, but physical education is recognized as essential education for human education. Plato's body contour emphasizes the harmony of soul and body, not the superiority of the body to the mind. In Plato's education room, physical education should be preceded and then mental education should be done. I thought that there could be no independent souls without bodies. It is not an independent entity but a unified entity. Because there is a body, there is a soul. There is a soul, so a body exists. Aristotle thought that the body was more important than Plato, and that the body should be preceded by the soul.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.31-56
• /
• 2000

A purpose of this study is to study on Rene Descartes's mind-body theory in medical aspect. Though Rene Descartes was not so much a doctor as a philosopher, he had health and medical science at heart. When he came into the world in 1596, he was in poor health. Therefore, he suffered from his bad health. Descartes's ideas absolutely colored Western thought for three hundred years, especially, his mind-body theory, mechanistic life-view, and reductionism had important effect on medical study and science of public health. As a rule, we know that his mind-body theory was applicable to mind-body dualism, and his mind-body dualism was connected with biomedical model of medicine. But by this study, his mind-body theory was not only mind-body dualism but also mind-body monoism. And he asserted mind-body interaction too. In other words, he advocated mind-body dualism in scientific aspect, but he knew mind-body monoism from his experence. He confessed this fact to Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia, he wrote mind-body interaction in $\boxDr$Discours de la methode$\boxUl$, $\boxDr$Meditationes de prima philosophia$\boxUl$, and $\boxDr$Traite des passions de 1'ame$\boxUl$ etc. However, only mind-body dualism of his mind-body theories was written in our medical text book, morever mental realm was excluded from the persuit of learning Descartes advocated a mechanistic world-view and mechanistic life-view, he regarded human body as a machine part. And a paticent corresponds to a troubled machine, a doctor deserves a repairman. But this point of view made holistic understanding of man impossible. Descartes divide the whole into basic building blocks, we named the approach Reductionism. Reductionism led to ontological concept in medical science, bacteriology established 'specific cause-specific disease-specific therapy'. We examined medical influence of Descartes's thought, we need to draw out a philosophic basis of medical science and science of public health by a close study of his records.