• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.37-74
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 학생의 수학적 사고를 수업의 중요한 자원으로 삼는 학생 참여형 수업을 학생 사고기반 수학 수업이라 명하고, 학생 사고기반 수학 수업의 주요 특징을 살펴보았다. 문헌 검토를 통해 확인된 학생 사고기반 수학 수업의 중요한 특징은 풍부한 수학 과제, 학생의 인지적 사회적 참여, 그리고 형성적 조력자 역할이다. 수업 사례 분석 결과에 의하면 학생 사고기반 수학 수업은 풍부한 수학 과제, 학생의 인지적·사회적 참여, 그리고 교사의 형성적 조력자 역할의 교집합 속에서 이루어졌다. 연구 결과는 학생 참여형 수업이 활동 자체에서 학생의 사고에 초점을 두었으며, 수업의 세 구성 요소의 상호작용이 수업 방향과 결과에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.47-67
• /
• 1997

Fourteen Special high schools for developing talents in Science, Foreign Languages, and Arts in Seoul Metropolitan city were analyzed in terms of their educational objectives, Students screening system, curriculum, teaching-learning methods, teachers, and consistency with higher education. Special high schools in talent area were more or less similar to each other in all the above aspects. However, special high schools in different talent areas were quite different in student screening, teaching-learning methods, teachers, and consistency with higher education. Public schools were more affluent than the private ones. Special high schools in Science, arts and Sports were providing individualized, activity oriented, process-oriented teaching-learning methods, while the Foreign languages high schools excercised teacher-centered, grammar oriented, lecture-focused teaching methods more. Special high schools in arts and sports could have consistency with higher education because the university focuses on talents in the specified field rather than academic scores. In conclusion, the schools have a great deal of rooms to improve in teaching-learning methods with which students can maximize their potential development. However, the special high schools were equipped with better learning environments than regular high schools in many aspects.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.99-115
• /
• 2009

2007 개정 수학과 교육과정 중 두드러진 특징 중 하나는 의사소통의 강조이다. 의사소통은 단지 학생들의 의견을 청취하는 것이 아니다. 즉, 의사소통과 발표는 구분되어야 한다. 본 고에서는 의사소통이 원활이 이루어지는 교실문화 형성을 위해 교사에게 요구되는 교수 학습 실제에 대해서 논의하였다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.6-14
• /
• 2018

In recent years, Korean medical schools have shown a growing interest in the longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) as a means of improving clinical education. Some overseas medical schools have tried the LIC since the 1970s. In the 1990s, several universities in the United States, Canada, and Australia introduced LICs. A variety of studies have confirmed positive results of the LIC. Traditional block-rotation is a discipline-based, inpatient-centered practice. Instead, under the LIC system, a medical student responsible for a panel of longitudinal patients observes developments of their diseases, serving several departments simultaneously. Overseas medical schools have different LIC models depending on their affiliate hospitals' sizes and characteristics. The purpose of this study is to introduce LIC practices in Harvard Medical School and University of California San Francisco, which could be applied by Korean medical schools. This paper also aims to find out the strategies that have been able to help the two US medical schools implement the LIC successfully.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.135-158
• /
• 2022

This study aimed to building models to understand the relationships between reasoning resources and content knowledge. We applied Support Vector Machine and linear models to the data including fifth graders' scores in the Cornel Critical Thinking Test and the Iowa Assessments, demographic information, and learning science approach (a student-centered approach to learning called the Science Writing Heuristic [SWH] or traditional). The SWH model showing the relationships between critical thinking domains and academic achievement at grade 5 was developed, and its validity was tested across different learning environments. We also evaluated the stability of the model by applying the SWH models to the data of the grade levels. The findings can help mathematics educators understand how critical thinking and achievement relate to each other. Furthermore, the findings suggested that reasoning in mathematics classrooms can promote performance on standardized tests.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.111-127
• /
• 2024

There is an increasing concern in the United States regarding the workforce's ability to maintain a competitive position in the global economy. This has led to an increased interest in effective science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of STEM project-based learning (PBL) on students' self-regulation and motivation to learn. Secondary students (n = 60) participated in a STEM summer camp in which STEM PBL was utilized. Results showed that students increased their self-regulation skills (t = 2.83, df = 59, p = .004) and motivation (t = 2.25, df = 59, p =.004), with Cohen's d effect sizes of 0.395 and 0.404, respectively. Student-centered learning and peer collaboration while solving real-world problems were likely the greatest contributing factors to the outcomes. Educators should utilize the results to provide opportunities for students to experience STEM PBL.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.43-53
• /
• 1998

The National Health Promotion Law passed in 1995 was a milestone for initiating a national health promotion program in Korea, and government officers and health professionals are working on how to approach health promotion issues. The purpose of this study was to analyse methods and use of constructivist paradigm in health promotion and education. The health promotion area needs community empowerment, building community partnerships, and community capacity. To meet these health promotion requirements health promotion workforce should be trained through professional preparation programs that contains communication skills, group process skills, and management of programs in advanced countries such as the United States and Australia. Skills and responsibilities of those who are in charge of providing health promotion services have not yet been clearly defined in Korea because the area of health promotion is a multi-academic field, and needs a different approach, constructivist approach. Constructivist paradigm requires relativism, reasoning skills, collaborating, and motivation. These components are needed for community empowerment. Constructivism also has been applied to the field of education. Problem-based education, outcome-based education, performance-based education came from the constructivism. These educational methods are student-centered method. As the modernizing society becomes more complicated, traditional or conventional teacher-centered education cannot meet the needs of students. Students need to learn skills necessary to make healthy decisions with individual value system. So these interactive, self-learning methods can serve much more to the learner. Constructivist educational methods can be applied to educational programs in computers, too. To expand and differentiate the area of health education and health promotion from other health related fields, it is crucial to devote efforts in application and development of constructivist methods.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.461-468
• /
• 2010

동료평가는 학습자 중심의 평가로서, 평가를 통해 학습자간의 상호작용이 활발하게 일어나며, 교사 주도의 일방적인 평가보다 동료 학생들에 의한 평가가 학습자들에게 더 많은 영향을 미치게 된다. 본 연구에서는 초등학교 4학년 사회과를 중심으로 원격응답기를 활용한 수행평가 모형과 수행평가 과제를 개발하고, 실제 수업에 학생참여 수행평가를 적용하여 학생들의 학업성취도 및 학습태도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보았다. 연구를 통해 나타난 결과는 다음과 같다. 원격응답기를 활용한 학생참여 수행평가는 사회과 학업성취도와 학습태도 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 주었으며 통계적으로 유의미한 결과를 나타냈다. 또한 원격응답기를 활용하여 학생참여 수행평가 후 학생들의 반응을 조사한 결과 교수.학습 과정에서 학생들의 학업 수행에도 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.111-125
• /
• 2000

This paper presents cross-national perspectives on challenges in implementing current mathematics education reform ideals. This paper includes detailed qualitative descriptions of mathematics instruction from unevenly successful second-grade classrooms both in Koran and in the U. S with regared to reform recommendations. Despits dramatic differences in mathematics achivement between Korean and the U.S student. problems in both countries with regard to mathematics education are perceived to be very similar. The shared problems have a common origin in teacher-centered instruction. Educational leaders in both countries have persistently attempted to change the teacher-centered pedagogy to a student-centered approach. Many teachers report familiarity with and adherence to reform ideas, but their actual classroom teaching practices do not reflect the full implications of the reform ideals. Given the challenges in implementing reform, this study explored the breakdown that may occur between teachers adoption of reform objectives and their successful incorporation of reform ideals by comparing and contrasting two reform-oriented classrooms in both countries. This comparison and contrast provided a unique opportunity to reflect on possible subtle but crucial issues with regard to reform implementation. Thus, this study departed from past international comparisons in which the common objective has been to compare general social norma of typical mathematics classes across countries. This study was and exploratory, qualitative, comparative case study using grounded theory methodology based on constant comparative analysis for which the primary data sources were classroom video recordings and transcripts. The Korean portion of this study was conducted by the team of four researchers, including the author. The U.S portion of this study and a brief joint analysis were conducted by the author. This study compared and contrasted the classroom general social norms and sociomathematical norms of two Korean and two U.S second-grade teachers who aspired to implement reform. The two classrooms in each country were chosen because of their unequal success in activating the reform recommendation. Four mathematics lessons were videotaped from Korean classes, whereas fourteen lessons were videotaped from the U.S. classes. Intensive interviews were conducted with each teacher. The two classes within each country established similar participation patterns but very different sociomathematical norms. In both classes open-ended questioning, collaborative group work, and students own problem solving constituted the primary modes of classroom participation. However in one class mathematical significance was constituted as using standard algorithm with accuracy, whereas the other established a focus on providing reasonable and convincing arguments. Given these different mathematical foci, the students in the latter class had more opportunities to develop conceptual understanding than their counterparts. The similarities and differences to between the two teaching practices within each country clearly show that students learning opportunities do not arise social norms of a classroom community. Instead, they are closely related to its sociomathematical norms. Thus this study suggests that reform efforts highlight the importance of sociomathematical norms that established in the classroom microculture. This study also provides a more caution for the Korean reform movement than for its U.S. counterpart.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.740-749
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 과학교과서에 대한 중학교 교사와 학생들의 인식을 알아보기 위해 시도되었다. 먼저, 교사 및 학생의 인구학적 변인에 따른 교과서 인식의 차이를 알아보고, 교사 학생의 교수 학습관에 따른 교과서관의 관계를 알아보고, 마지막으로 교사와 학생간의 교과서 인식의 차이를 알아보았다. 연구목적에 따른 연구문제와 연구가설을 설정하고, 설정된 가설을 검증하기 위한 설문지를 개발하였으며, 대구 경북지역의 중학교 과학교사 113명과 중학생 715명을 대상으로 연구를 수행하였다. 통계기법으로는 주로 일원변량분석을 실시하였고, 교사와 학생간의 교과서 인식 차이를 알아보기 위해서는 t검증을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 바탕으로 한 결론은 다음과 같다. 중학교 교사의 인구학적 변인 중 교과서에 대한 인식의 차이를 나타내는 변인은 학교소재와 학급규모이었고, 교사의 연령, 성에 따라서는 별 차이가 없었다. 중학교 학생의 인구학적 변인 중 교과서에 대한 인식의 차이를 나타내는 변인은 학교소재와 남녀공학여부, 학급규모, 학년이었고, 성에 따라서는 차이가 없었다. 상대주의적 교수관을 가진 교사나 상대주의적 학습관을 가진 학생이 교과서의 지식을 상대적으로 보았으며, 학생중심의 교과서를 선호하였다. 교사들은 학생들보다 더 학생 중심으로 서술된 교과서를 선호하였고, 절대주의적인 지식관과 교수 학습관을 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고, 학생들은 교사들보다 더 전자교과서를 선호하였다.