• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.83-116
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to analyze empirically analyze how the characteristics of participants in educational and social learning forums and the quality of events influence expectations and satisfaction of forums. The study also aims to provide strategic implications for forum organizers and give them suggestions on how to set up target audience, manage forum contents, speakers, and services, improve attendee satisfaction, and ultimately maximize overall outcomes. As exchanges among individuals, enterprises, and organizations, as well as countries are growing rapidly, the convention industry has become a key player in the market. Conventions have also become a venue for people to discuss a specific agenda or topic, exchange information and learn knowledge and insights. Especially, the forum - as part of the convention industry - plays a vital role providing educational and social learning opportunities as scholars and expertise come together to share their knowledge and experience through a variety of discussions. With its role, many of forums are taking place in recent years; however, there have been few empirical studies upon the forum itself. Also, there have been few attempts to research how the quality of forums affect participants' satisfaction along with their characteristics and how much of practical knowledge is provided throughout the events. This study is meaningful in that it is the first practical study that takes a deep understanding of the forum and sees how the quality of the forums influences participants' satisfaction and whether the characteristics of participants have a moderating effect in increasing the level of satisfaction. Forum organizers could also take a strategic approach as their major concerns are to increase the number of participants and raise degree of satisfaction by providing significant information. There are four key elements that determine success or failure of a social learning forum. The four elements are contents, speakers, services, and participants. Content plays an important role in providing rich information and knowledge for participants. Speakers are the main knowledge providers who contribute to the forum's social learning role. Also, the services provided by forum organizers such as simultaneous interpretation services, program brochures, lunch and refreshments, and the overall design of event hall can also influence the level of participants' satisfaction. Lastly, the participants and their characteristics are important since they are the ones who receive knowledge from the providers. The results of this study show that the quality of forum (content, speaker, and services) has a decisive effect on the participants' satisfaction and there are some differences in expectation among the participants in the forum. Also, some groups of participants were more likely to be stimulated by the quality of forum when determining their satisfaction. The study is modeled after MBN Y Forum 2016 and its participants' characteristics. The forum is one of the most representative social learning forums of South Korea and its audiences are mostly young people. It has analyzed how the participants' characteristics influence their satisfaction by grouping them into ${\Delta}participants$ who have invited for free and those who paid for the entrance fee, ${\Delta}first-time$ participants and returning participants, ${\Delta}voluntary$ and involuntary participants, ${\Delta}participants$ who registered through web and those who did through mobile, and ${\Delta}participants$ who registered during pre-sale opens and those who registered during general opens.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.28-36
• /
• 2022

국내에 대규모 거점 공공 체험시설이 건립된 이래로 최근 공공 체험시설 건설사업은 지방자치단체 또는 지방교육청이 단독 발주하거나, 협약하여 공동 발주하는 형태로 변화하고 있다. 특히, 발주 빈도가 적고, 건설사업관리 전문조직을 보유하지 못한 발주기관의 특성상 특화된 발주 프레임워크 개발과 함께 강화된 공공 발주자의 역할이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국내의 공공 체험시설 건설사업 발주현황 및 운영실태를 조사하여 현행 공공 발주자 역할의 문제점과 개선방향을 도출하였다. 또한, 사업특성의 영향요인 및 속성정보를 반영한 추진단계와 기능별로 구성된 공공 체험시설 공공 발주자 역할 개선안을 제안하였다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권32호
• /
• pp.123-159
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this research paper is to re-valuate the factors that affected the Royal Navy's rearmament and preparation for war by conducting analysis on the discussion held in the Britain on the strategic priorities and Navy's coping measures adopted during the interwar period. After the end of the WWI, each of the military arms of the Britain faced significant difficulty in securing budget and increasing their military power all throughout the interwar period, and the Navy was not an exception. The WWII that got started on September 1939 was the turning point in which this difficulty led to full-fledged crisis. Immensely many criticisms followed after the war and problems were identified when it comes to the Royal Navy's performance during the war. This type of effort to identify problem led to the attempt to analyze whether Royal Navy's preparation for war and rearmament policy during interwar period were adequate, and to identify the root causes of failure. Existing studies sought to find the root cause of failed rearmament from external factors such as the deterioration of the Britain itself or pressure from the Treasury Department to cut the budget for national defense, or sought to detect problems from the development of wrong strategies by the Navy. However, Royal Navy's failed preparation for the war during interwar period is not the result of one or two separate factors. Instead, it resulted due to the diverse factors and situations that the Britain was facing at the time, and due to intricate and complex interaction of these factors. Meanwhile, this research paper focused on the context characterized by 'strategic selection and setting up of priorities' among the various factors to conduct analysis on the Navy's rearmament by linking it with the discussion held at the time on setting up strategic priorities, and sought to demonstrate that the Navy Department's inadequate counter-measures developed during this process waned Royal Navy's position. After the end of WWI, each of the military arms continued to compete for the limited resources and budget all throughout the interwar period, and this type of competition amidst the situation in which the economic situation of Britain was still unstable, made prioritization when it comes to the allocation of resources and setting up of the priorities when it comes to the military power build-up, inevitable. Amidst this situation, the RAF was able to secure resources first and foremost, encouraged by the conviction of some politicians who were affected by the 'theory of aerial threat' and who believed that curtailing potential attack with the Air Force would be means to secure national security at comparatively lower cost. In response, Navy successfully defended the need for the existence of Navy despite the advancement of the aerial power, by emphasizing that the Britain's livelihood depends on trade and on the maintenance of maritime traffic. Despite this counter-measuring logic, however, Navy's role was still limited to the defense of overseas territory and to the fleet run-off instead of sea traffic route production when it comes to the specific power build-up plan, and did not understand the situation in which financial and economic factors gained greater importance when it comes to the setting up of strategic priorities. As a result, Navy's plan to build its powers was met with continual resistance of the Treasury Department, and lost the opportunity to re-gain the status of 'senior service' that it had enjoyed in the past during the competition for strategic prioritization. Given that the strategic and economic situation that Korea faces today is not very different from that of the Britain during the interwar period, our Navy too should leverage the lessons learned from the Royal Navy to make the effort to secure viable position when it comes to the setting of priorities in case of national defense strategy by presenting the basis on why maritime coping should be prioritized among the numerous other threats, and by developing the measures for securing the powers needed effectively amidst the limited resources.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1998년도 제13회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.131-163
• /
• 1998

The interest in the evaluation of government-sponsored research institutes (GRIs) has increased markedly in Korea in 1990s; this is mainly because of the increasing needs 1) to improve the quality of R&D at GRIs, and 2) to reorient the GRIs' strategic position in Korean national innovation systems due to the enhancement of R&D capabilities of private companies and universities during last decade. As a first attempt to diagnose the managerial and strategic issues of GRIs, a Multi-Ministerial Evaluation Committee was established as an ad hoc task force under the Prime Minister's Office in 1991. According to the recommendations of the committee, the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) to which most of GRIs were affiliated, made it a rule to evaluate the annual performance of GRIs since 1992. This paper examines the recent experience of MOST's evaluation of Government-sponsored Research Institute in Korea. After several years'efforts of Science & Technology Policy Institute(STEPI) to build prospective evaluation systenL MOST decided to apply two supplementary approaches for the evaluation of GRIs; one is summative annual evaluation and the other is formative 3-year evaluation. The annual evaluation system that is designed as a temporary measure is to monitor and to guide the self-evaluation activities of GRIs. In the process of annual evaluation, MOST tries to minimize its direct involvement, and allows each GRI to develop self-evaluation system that is most appropriate for the unique characteristics of the institute. If there exist urgent issues under scrutiny, however, it can be incorporated and examined by a group of external experts as special issues in the annual evaluation system. The aim of 3-year evaluation is both to examine the past performance of each GRI and to investigate whether the strategic role of each GRI is viable in the future. Its major focus, however, lies not on auditing past performance but on strengthening future strategic position of each GRI. The MOST designates a group of evaluation experts with appropriate knowledge and competence as members of the General Evaluation Committee for one year. With the help of STEPI, a specialized research institute for R&D evaluation, the General Evaluation Committee develops methodology and procedures for the actual evaluation of GRIs. Based on the evaluation reports and recommendations from the General Evaluation Committee, the MOST develops various policy measures for strengthening GRIs.

• Journal of East Asia Management
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.29-49
• /
• 2020

In an intensively competitive global market, small-and medium-sized firms are puzzled about how to develop sustainable competitive advantages against global rivalries, thus leading satisfactory economic performance. However, despite the roles and contributions of such small-and medium-sized firms in the local community and national economies in Japan, little guidance has been offered to the practical issues related to their strategic behaviors toward global management. To fill this notable knowledge gap, this study aims to investigate the conditions in which how Japanese small-and medium-sized could dominates global market, which is one of key challenges in the literature of small business and entrepreneurship. To obtain better insights to this research area, this study undertakes an in-depth interview survey with I.S.T (Industrial Summit Technology) Corporation that shows off the highest global market share (40 per cent) with seamless polyimide tube product widely used in office automation equipment (e.g., copiers and printers). This method of survey is designed to deeply understand historical considerations about how I.S.T Corporation could dominate in the global market of such seamless polyimide tube product. Based on findings drawn from an interview, this study identifies five major factors enabling I.S.T Corporation to be a competitive global hidden company: vision sharing through founder's entrepreneurship, core competence, strategic network, risk management, and employee engagement. Specifically, to become a global hidden champion, sharing the vision motivating employees to partake in shaping company's future will be the first step on the road to global success through founder's entrepreneurship. However, in order to achieve such a vision, the importance of company's core competence cannot be overemphasized, which differentiates your customer solution with those of competitors. As such, a group of experts will be naturally formed and demonstrates your expertise in the global market, thereby building sustainable competitiveness. On the other hand, to maintain sustainable competitiveness, it is necessary to make up for the weaknesses small-and medium-sized firms suffer from competitive resources while strengthening their own strengths through strategic networks with external organizations. Here, every company has to understand the critical role of risk management, which is essential in this process of being global company so as not to lose your own strengths. Last but not least, do not forget the significant effects of employee engagement in firm performance. To enhance employees' engagement, a company has to create an ideal organization culture which fits into company's history and personality. In doing so, such organization culture can allow the vision and strategy to be implemented into detailed business tactics while facilitating employees to challenge the status quo by experimenting with creative ideas.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.5-31
• /
• 1997

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is an assessment process integrated with policy and planning processes considering environmental impacts, not at the level of individual project, but at higher level of policy and plan. Presently, two systems for the SEA are being implemented in Korea. One is "the consultation of environmental investigation into a change in national land utilization", which is to be pre-discussed with the head of the related central administrative organizations, based on the respective individual code. The other is "the consultation of environmental investigation into an administrative plan and project", which is to be pre-discussed with the minister of the environments for the administrative plan. However, these two systems are not integrated procedures with the planning process. In other words, there is a separate post-environmental assessment after planning. Also concrete proposal is not yet prepared for the method and procedure of environmental investigation about details of the planning. Therefore, they do not playa role in taking precautions for environmentally sustainable development. In this study, for the effective environmental investigation at the level of planning, environmental assessment model to be integrated with urban comprehensive plans was developed. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: First, based on the analysis of systematic problems in environmental investigation of this country, the study compared and analysed the SEA method of foreign countries. derived the potential limitations in its applications to this country. Also, the new method in this study, is integrated into planning process by improving the limitations. Thus, we developed the SEA model for this country, which consists of seven steps ; Phase 1; establishing a work program, Phase 2; defining the scop. of the SEA, Phase 3; analyzing an existing environmental situation, Phase 4; examining the consistency with environmental policy, Phase 5; appraising and synthesizing the plan content, Phase 6; proposing recommendations, Phase 7; monitoring and feedback. Second, the two types of application program of the developed assessment model were proposed. One is to integrate this model into planning process, and the other is for the institute and ministry of environments to implement SEA after planning. An aim of this study was developing an environmental assessment model at the planning level which was not yet established in this country and was to apply the model to urban comprehensive plan for inspection. This research will make the effective operation of environmental investigation system possible at the planning level in this country and contribute to the environmental protection at the global level.

• Nutrition Research and Practice
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.14-32
• /
• 2022

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma co-activator-1α (PGC-1α) has a central role in regulating muscle differentiation and mitochondrial metabolism. PGC-1α stimulates muscle growth and muscle fiber remodeling, concomitantly regulating lactate and lipid metabolism and promoting oxidative metabolism. Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thumb.) has been widely employed as a traditional herbal medicine and possesses antioxidant, anti-obesity, anti-inflammatory, hypolipemic, hypoglycemic, and anticancer properties. We investigated whether G. pentaphyllum extract (GPE) and its active compound, gypenoside L (GL), affect muscle differentiation and mitochondrial metabolism via activation of the PGC-1α pathway in murine C2C12 myoblast cells. MATERIALS/METHODS: C2C12 cells were treated with GPE and GL, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blot were used to analyze the mRNA and protein expression levels. Myh1 was determined using immunocytochemistry. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation was measured using the 2'7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate assay. RESULTS: GPE and GL promoted the differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes and elevated mRNA and protein expression levels of Myh1 (type IIx). GPE and GL also significantly increased the mRNA expression levels of the PGC-1α gene (Ppargc1a), lactate metabolism-regulatory genes (Esrra and Mct1), adipocyte-browning gene fibronectin type III domain-containing 5 gene (Fndc5), glycogen synthase gene (Gys), and lipid metabolism gene carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1b gene (Cpt1b). Moreover, GPE and GL induced the phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase, p38, sirtuin1, and deacetylated PGC-1α. We also observed that treatment with GPE and GL significantly stimulated the expression of genes associated with the anti-oxidative stress response, such as Ucp2, Ucp3, Nrf2, and Sod2. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that GPE and GL enhance exercise performance by promoting myotube differentiation and mitochondrial metabolism through the upregulation of PGC-1α in C2C12 skeletal muscle.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.199-228
• /
• 2009

SISP는 정보시스템 관리에서 중요한 부문이다. 기업은 성공적인 SISP를 통하여 장기적이며 효과적인 정보시스템 활용방안을 수립할 수 있을 뿐 아니라 기업의 목표 달성을 적극 지원할 수 있다. 이러한 체계적이고 성공적인 SISP은 기업으로 하여금 새로운 응용시스템을 개발하기 위한 우선순위의 결정, 정보시스템의 기능을 관리하고 정보시스템의 서비스를 조직화하기 위한 정책이나 절차의 개발, 나아가서 데이터와 응용프로그램의 통합을 촉진할 수 있는 글로벌화 된, 전사적인 정보 아키텍쳐를 완성할 수 있다. 성공적인 SISP 수립을 위해서 많은 연구들이 진행되어왔으며, 대부분의 연구들이 계획과정에서 가지고 있는 문제점 해결을 위한 연구, 계획수립 역량에 영향을 미치는 핵심적인 요인들을 찾아내는 연구, 계획 과정을 수행하기위한 방법론에 대한 연구, 또는 성공적인 SISP와 기업성과와의 관계에 관한 연구 등이다. 본 연구의 목적은 성공적인 SISP의 기준(criteria)을 두 가지 차원 즉 관리 능력의 향상(improvement of planning capabilities)부문과 계획의 목표 달성(fulfillment of planning objectives) 부문으로 규정하고 성공적인 SISP 수립을 달성하기 위한 경로(path)를 밝히는데 있다. 즉 연구의 범위를 구체적으로 설명하면 다음 과 같다. (1) SISP의 관리능력을 향상시키는 조직적 요인은 무엇이며 얼마나 영향을 미치는가? (2) SISP의 관리능력의 향상은 계획의 목표달성에 얼마나 중요한가? 연구 결과에 의하면 계획의 관리능력향상에 영향을 미치는 조직적 요인은 정보시스템의 현재 및 미래의 역할이며 또한 관리 능력의향상은 계획의 목표달성에 밀접한 영향력을 가지는 것으로 나타났다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제16권9호
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2018

Purpose - The purpose of the study is to analyze the empowerment intermediary role on the relationship between the job distribution and the quality of life. A research on empowerment and social service staffs' job distribution also should be conducted to improve the quality of their lives. Because empowerment, particularly, affects the quality of life, it should be taken a detail discussion for empowerment improvement. Research design, data, and methodology - This paper conducted a questionnaire survey. In total, 722 copies of the structural questionnaire were analyzed. Five parameter subsets were selected to measure the empowerment such as task significance, role performance capability, self-determination, task impact, then, the survey consists of 10 questions. For data analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, discriminant and concentration validity analysis, path coefficient significance, and mediation effectiveness verification were employed. Results - As evidenced from the data analysis, job distribution variables such as job impact, job autonomy, and feedback affect the quality of their lives. Empowerment also affects the quality of their lives. Next, the empowerment functions as meditating role in the relationships with job impact, job autonomy, feedback and the quality of their lives. On the other hand, the empowerment do not function as meditating role in the relationships with social service staffs' function diversity and the quality of their lives. Conclusions - It is necessary to conduct ways for various job performance and outside educational facilities to improve social service staffs' function diversity. The mission, vision, strategic purposes, detailed execution goals need to be set by all their organization members' participation. Empowerment also requires social welfare facilities' drastic delegation on their authority and responsibilities with their active decentralization in the organization.

• 만화애니메이션 연구
• /
• 통권28호
• /
• pp.155-180
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 OSMU를 문화콘텐츠가 창출하는 부가가치를 극대화하기 위한 일련의 마케팅 활동으로 파악하고, 브랜드 이론가들이 주장하는 브랜드 자산관리의 전략적 틀을 적용하여, '브랜드 아이덴티티 기반 문화콘텐츠 OSMU 전략'의 개념적 모델을 제시하였다. 문화콘텐츠와 관련하여 소비자가 떠올리는 강력하고 호의적인 연상은 콘텐츠의 높은 브랜드 자산 가치를 구축하는데, 이를 위해 저작권자는 전달하고자 하는 콘텐츠 브랜드 아이덴티티를 결정하고, 이를 OSMU 전략의 수립과 집행의 근간으로 삼아야 한다. 본 연구에서 제시하는 전략 모델에 따르면, 콘텐츠 브랜드 아이덴티티는, 1)다양한 창구를 통해 콘텐츠를 노출시킴에 있어서 필요한 창구화 의사결정, 2)원천 콘텐츠를 어떤 장르로 전환하는 것이 바람직하며, 장르 전환에 있어서 어떤 요소가 유지, 강화되어야 하는가 등에 관한 장르전환 의사 결정, 3)상품화 대상 선정, 상품화 활용 요소 및 상품화 디자인과 관련한 상품화 의사 결정 등 다양한 OSMU 의사 결정의 기준을 제공한다. 또한, 다양한 경로의 소비자 접촉을 브랜드 아이덴티티를 중심으로 조율하고 통합하며, 브랜드 자산의 지속적인 평가를 통해 콘텐츠의 장기적인 부가가치 극대화에 기여한다. 본 연구는 다음과 같은 점에서 기존의 연구와 차별되는 의의를 갖는다고 할 수 있다. 첫째, OSMU를 일련의 과정으로 파악하여 전체적인 흐름을 조망함으로써 OSMU 논의의 폭을 넓히고 있다. 둘째, 창구화, 장르전환, 상품화 등 다양한 OSMU 활동을 통합하고 조율할 필요성에 주목하였다. 셋째, 전략의 초점을 원천 콘텐츠 (One Source)의 부가가치 극대화에 맞춤으로써, 멀티 유즈 (Multi Use) 결과인 장르 전환된 콘텐츠 또는 관련 상품을 위한 전략과의 혼란을 배제하였다. 넷째, OSMU 실행과정에서 저작권자에게 요구되는 다양한 의사결정을 파악하고, 그 기준을 제시함으로써 OSMU 주체의 역할을 강조하였다. 다섯째, 콘텐츠의 내용 이외에도, 마케팅 커뮤니케이션 요소를 논의의 대상에 포함시킴으로써, 콘텐츠 향유자뿐 아니라 미래의 잠재고객을 콘텐츠의 장기적 부가가치 창출원으로 인식하였다.