• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.5-31
• /
• 1997

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is an assessment process integrated with policy and planning processes considering environmental impacts, not at the level of individual project, but at higher level of policy and plan. Presently, two systems for the SEA are being implemented in Korea. One is "the consultation of environmental investigation into a change in national land utilization", which is to be pre-discussed with the head of the related central administrative organizations, based on the respective individual code. The other is "the consultation of environmental investigation into an administrative plan and project", which is to be pre-discussed with the minister of the environments for the administrative plan. However, these two systems are not integrated procedures with the planning process. In other words, there is a separate post-environmental assessment after planning. Also concrete proposal is not yet prepared for the method and procedure of environmental investigation about details of the planning. Therefore, they do not playa role in taking precautions for environmentally sustainable development. In this study, for the effective environmental investigation at the level of planning, environmental assessment model to be integrated with urban comprehensive plans was developed. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: First, based on the analysis of systematic problems in environmental investigation of this country, the study compared and analysed the SEA method of foreign countries. derived the potential limitations in its applications to this country. Also, the new method in this study, is integrated into planning process by improving the limitations. Thus, we developed the SEA model for this country, which consists of seven steps ; Phase 1; establishing a work program, Phase 2; defining the scop. of the SEA, Phase 3; analyzing an existing environmental situation, Phase 4; examining the consistency with environmental policy, Phase 5; appraising and synthesizing the plan content, Phase 6; proposing recommendations, Phase 7; monitoring and feedback. Second, the two types of application program of the developed assessment model were proposed. One is to integrate this model into planning process, and the other is for the institute and ministry of environments to implement SEA after planning. An aim of this study was developing an environmental assessment model at the planning level which was not yet established in this country and was to apply the model to urban comprehensive plan for inspection. This research will make the effective operation of environmental investigation system possible at the planning level in this country and contribute to the environmental protection at the global level.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.381-396
• /
• 2010

It is essential to consider strategies, spatial planning, and reflection of sustainability for the creation of sound urban spaces. To this end, there is a need for plans that can secure better sustainability through strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of plans. This study examined the literature and available precedent to develop a SEA model for administrative plans for urban development including metropolitan plans, urban master plans and urban management plans. In the course of development of the model, environmental issues associated with the urban plans were analyzed by classifying them into ten categories, including "spatial planning," "conservation planning," "greenbelt systems," "habitats." and etc. according to their rank. Furthermore, those issues were reflected on the development of environmental evaluation indices for the plans. Overall and detailed environmental indices that can be applied to the administrative plans for urban development including metropolitan plans, urban master plans and urban management plans were devised for five stages: (1) Establishment of development goals and strategy, (2) Analysis of current status and characteristics, (3) Conceptualization of spatial structure, (4) Planning for each department, and (5) Execution and management. Sub plans are more detailed and concrete. Criteria based on the evaluation indices, when performing evaluations on plans based on each environmental assessment index in reference to experts and the literature, were used to forecast their effects, i.e. whether they had a positive, negative, or no effect or relationship, or whether their effects was uncertain. Based on the forecasts, this study then presents means to establish more improvable plans. Furthermore, by synthesis of the effects according to each index and integration of the process, plans were analyzed overall. This study reflects the characteristics of the present time period based on issues in the SEA process and techniques in upper level administrative plans being newly established, and presents them according to the stage of each plan. Furthermore, by forecasting the effect of plans by stage, this study presents proposals for improvement, and in this aspect, can be meaningful in promoting plan improvements through SEA.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.411-424
• /
• 2011

Over the past three decades, Korea has undertaken a series of reforms to improve development policy, plans and programs, including measures to mainstream the environment across all major sectors. Despite of these efforts, there has been still the lack of capacity to fully assess the environmental impacts as well as sustainable implications of development projects and strategies. At the level of regional and sectoral development plans, the development of strategic environmental assessment SEA systems continues to remain at a relatively early stage in the region with fewer examples of fully operational processes or effective practice. This study shows a further information to our understanding of the EIA and SEA systems and their implementation in Korea. It affords a number of insights into strengths and weaknesses of the current action in different countries, and identifies an agenda of needs and options for capacity building for implementing the EIA enactment.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.51-62
• /
• 2016

최근 토양자원에 대한 인식은 작물생산 뿐 아니라 우리가 살아가는 환경의 질을 좌우하는데 중요한 역할을 하고 있는 것으로 변화되고 있다. 최근 연구에서는 정책계획과 개발기본계획에 대해 각 개별계획이 가지는 고유 특성을 감안하여 토양특성에 미치는 영향에 대한 검토의 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 본 연구는 국가환경정책 및 국제협약 등 상위계획에서의 토양 세부평가 항목을 추출하여 댐건설 장기계획에 적용함으로써 향후 전략환경영향평가에 합리적으로 적용할 수 있는 방법을 도출하고자 하였다. 그 결과, 토양침식, 토양영양물질, 토양오염, 토양이동, 토양생물다양성 등에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났으며, 이들 세부 항목들은 기존 환경영향평가서상의 항목과 일정부분 중복되는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서, 향후 전략환경영향평가시 평가항목간의 합리적 연계방안에 대한 추가연구가 필요할 것으로 보인다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.375-385
• /
• 2015

연구는 SEA 사후관리에 대한 국내 외 제도와 해외사례를 조사 분석하여 시사점을 도출함으로 국내 SEA 제도 개선에 밑거름이 되고자 한다. 국내는 SEIA를 시행하고 있으며 현재 대상계획, 구체적인 지표, 실효성 있는 운영방안 등 관련 논의와 연구가 활발히 진행 중이다. 현 상황에서 국내 SEA 사후관리를 위한 구체적인 방안을 제시하기엔 한계가 있으므로 국내 SEA 사후관리를 위한 시사점을 몇 가지 제안하고자 한다. 첫째, SEA 사후관리의 내용은 대상계획에 따라 달라질 수 있으며, 계획의 특성을 고려하여야 한다. 둘째, SEA 사후관리의 주체, 방법, 시기 및 주기, 조치결과 등은 SEA 협의대상에 따라 다르게 적용할 수 있다. 셋째, SEA 사후관리의 지표에는 다양한 환경기준과 더불어 현재 정치 사회 경제적 큰 이슈가 되는 지표들을 함께 고려할 수 있다. 넷째, SEA 사후관리는 해당 대상계획과 환경계획과의 통합과정으로 활용될 수 있다. 다섯째, SEA 모니터링의 결과가 환류될 수 있는 시스템이 마련되어야 한다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.167-176
• /
• 2008

Korea has made the rapid economical development under the condition with the high population density and low available land. In this context, conservation of land environment, connected directly with living quality of human, has mostly ignored. Prior Environment Review System(PERS) is the one to investigate the locational validity, environmental impacts, harmony with surrounding environment, from the early stage of administrative plan or development project. PERS was amended to include SEA(Strategic Environment Assessment) system on June 1, 2006. But, several problems, including the loss of administrative ability, cost, and time, have been appeared, since the system is applied to all administrative plans without any distinction and plans or projects are delayed generally. In this study, the weaknesses of PERS were indicated through the comprehensive analysis including literature survey, study of legal and internet database, and the recently published PERS reports. Based on that, the improvement schemes were suggested to be harmonized with the nature of SEA. This study was mainly focused on a PERS for the designation of conservational area of hot-spring wells, conducted by authors.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.35-59
• /
• 1997

In this study, for the effective environmental investigation at the level of planning, environmental assessment model to be integrated with urban comprehensive plans was developed. This model was applied to the Suwon City urban comprehensive plan and was tested to derive the future application program and the adaptability to the current research issues. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: First, we defined basic items for environmental assessment as to be used in the developed SEA model. We also defined three ranges and twelve items for the environmental assessments, which can be used in the assessment of the urban comprehensive plan through the expert advices. Second, we performed the case study by applying the developed SEA model to the Suwon City urban comprehensive assessment, and investigated the environmental impacts through an expert inquiry at the "phase 5" of the model. The results of the case study showed that Suwon City urban comprehensive plan contained partially discrepancies at the goal of the planning. The spatial strategy for leisure, park and open space, and green belt was analysed not to be effective in energy use. The case study also indicated that the environments of Suwon City are expected to be much worse in each sectional plan, if the City was to implement the present five sectional plans for life boundary and distribution of population, land use plan, transportation plan, industrial development plan, and life environmental plan. Third, according to the result of the case study, an mitigation plan for urban comprehensive plan of Suwon City was proposed as the following four stages; modification of planning goal, modification of site alternatives, modification of planning contents, and proposal of mitigation measures.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.359-367
• /
• 2003

The total pollution load management system of watershed has been implemented upon Special Law pertaining to the Han River Watershed Water Quality Improvement and Residents Support, Special Law pertaining to the Nakdong River Watershed Water Management and Residents Support, Special Law pertaining to the Youngsan River Watershed Water Management and Residents Support, and Special Law pertaining to the Seomjin River Watershed Water Management and Residents Support in Korea since 2002. But many other similar systems with total pollution load management system of watershed are being operated separately or independently, even though its purpose is nearly same with those of the total maximum pollutants load management in Law on Water Quality Environmental Protection, environmental impact assessment(EIA) in Law of Impact Assessment on Environment, Transportation and Disaster and Pre-environmental assessment of Environmental Policy Act. Therefore the contents of total pollution load management system of watershed and many other related systems could be overlapped and at some times have inconsistency among them. This study suggests first the integrated operation of total pollution load management system of watershed, EIA, pre-environmental assessment, urban planning, and sewage planning and secondly EIA system development by integration of EIA and pre-environmental assessment and strategic environmental assessment(SEA).

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.63-76
• /
• 2016

2015년 9월에 세계 각국의 정상이 UN 총회에 모여 지속가능한 발전을 위한 2030 Agenda를 구축하기로 합의하였다. 2030 Agenda에는 사회적 안전성, 경제적 효율성 및 환경적 건전성이라는 3대축을 달성하기 위한 17개의 지속가능한 발전목표(SDG)가 채택되었다. UN 지속가능 발전 구축연합(UN SDSN)에서는 SDG 실행 정도를 측정하기 위한 지속가능 발전지표(SDI)를 개발하여 빈곤퇴치, 사회적 통합, 환경관리 같은 총체적 접근을 통하여 지속가능성의 달성 정도를 확인할 수 있는 지속가능성평가(SA)에 적용할 수 있도록 하였다. 우리나라에서는 전략환경영향평가(SEIA)를 PPP(정책, 계획, 프로그램)에 환경부가 시행하는 반면에, 전략환경평가(SEA)의 일종인 국토계획평가(NLPA)는 국토교통부 자체의 계획에 적용되고 있다. SEIA와 NLPA가 고위 정책당국자를 포함한 이해당사자들에게 의사결정 지원도구로 활용되어 왔지만, 이들 SEA 제도의 핵심원리인 최적 대안 선정의 평가기준은 구체성이 미흡한 실정이다. 우리나라 실정에 적합하게 고안된 SDI를 SEIA에 반영하면 지속가능성을 비교적 간략하게 평가하여 SDG 실행의 실효성을 향상시키는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국해양환경ㆍ에너지학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.179-188
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 연안 육역 및 해역에서 일어나고 있는 해양 신재생에너지 개발계획 및 추진사업을 분석하고, 해양환경 및 생태계와 관련된 중점평가사항을 진단하여 효율적인 스코핑(Scoping) 방안과 정책제언을 제시하였다. 주요한 사업유형으로는 공유수면에는 조력, 해상풍력 및 파력발전이 많았으며, 연안 육역에는 태양광발전사업이 주로 계획되었다. 조력발전 등 대규모 개발사업 추진 시, 상위계획에 따른 전략환경영향평가(SEA)와 공유수면매립기본계획 등 사전평가단계에서는 입지의 타당성과 계획의 적정성 측면에서 연안관리지역계획에 따른 용도구역 등 다른 계획과의 조화, 실질적인 대안분석, 그리고 해양수산 규제지역 분포와 어장이용 등 기 해양공간계획과의 상호 연관성 진단 등이 중요하다. 또한, 해역이용협의나 환경영향평가 등 실시단계에서의 구체적인 평가에서는 사업유형별로 중점평가사항에 대한 철저한 진단, 실효적인 사후모니터링 및 저감방안의 제시가 핵심으로 고려되어야 할 것이다. 특히, 순수하게 해양공간에서 일어나는 에너지발전사업일 경우에는 해양공간계획 방향과 연계되는 사전평가방안 도입 및 통합 "해양환경영향평가" 체제로의 전환 등 해양수산부가 주도하는 평가제도의 개선방안이 필요할 것으로 판단된다.