Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.4.375

A Study on the international case studies for SEA follow-up  

Cho, Hanna (Korea Environment Institute)
Park, Joo-Yang (Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.24, no.4, 2015 , pp. 375-385 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzed international case studies on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) follow-up and suggested implications based on the study's findings to aid implementation of SEA follow-up in Korea. SEA requires follow-up in order to identify unforseen adverse effects and enable appropriate remedial action to be taken. Tool kits and methodological framework for effective SEA follow-up are only being researched recently. Based on the study's findings, following implications for implementing SEA follow-up in Korea were drawn. First, the system of carrying out SEA follow-up would be different depending on the PPP topic. During the scoping stage, significant impacts should be identified according to the PPP topic, and thus help determine the indicators to be developed in the later stage. Secondly, responsibility, method, time, intervals and actions from SEA follow-up may vary depending on the target SEA consultation. Thirdly, the indicators of SEA follow-up may be considered together with various environmental standards and current political, social and economic indicators which are a big issue in society. Fourthly, SEA follow-up can be used as an integration system of its target planning and environmental planning. Finally, SEA feedback system should be needed. The result of SEA follow-up should be used for target PPP. These would lead to improvements to the target PPP. If SEA follow up is successfully implemented and actively carried out for domestic PPPs, Korea can be a step closer to realization of sustainable development.
Keywords
Strategic Environmental Assessment; SEA Follow-up; Environmental Assessment Monitoring; Post Environmental Management;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 고정희. 2013. 독일 환경평가정책현황과 사후관리제도.(Ko J. 2013. Germany Environmental Assessment Policy and surveillance systems.)
2 고정희. 2014. 독일 사례분석.(Ko J. 2014. German Case Study.)
3 고정희. 독일의 환경정보공개제도와 공공참여제도.(Ko J. Germany's environmental information disclosure system and public participation.)
4 권영한 외. 2014. 정책계획 전략환경영향평가를 위한 지표개발. 한국환경정책.평가연구원.(Kwon Y et al. 2014. Indicator Development for Policy-level Plan Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment. Korea Environment Institute.)
5 정주철. 2014. 영국의 SEA와 SA의 비교.(Jung J. 2014. Comparison SEA with SA in England.)
6 엄정희 외. 2011.도시계획의 전략환경평가를 위한 기후요소 평가기법의 해외사례분석. 한국환경정책.평가연구원.(Um J et al. 2011. Review on Evaluation Methods of Urban Climatic Factors for Strategic Environmental Assessment in Urban Planning. Korea Environment Institute.)
7 유헌석 외. 2013. 전략환경평가제도의 실효적 운용 방안 연구. 한국환경정책.평가연구원.(Yoo H et al. 2013. A study on the effective management of the strategic environmental assessment. Korea Environment Institute.)
8 조공장 외. 2010. 도시기본계획의 전략환경평가 방법론 연구. 한국환경정책.평가연구원.(Cho K et al. 2010. Korea Environment Institute. Korea Environment Institute.)
9 환경영향평가법 시행규칙. 제2조.(Environmental Impact Assessment Act Enforcement Rules. Article II.)
10 환경영향평가법. 제2조.(Environmental Impact Assessment Act. Article II.)
11 Lundberg K et al. 2010. SEA monitoring in Swedish regional transport infrastructure plans - Improvement opportunities identified in practical experience.
12 Gachechiladze M et al. 2012. Benefits of barriers to SEA follow-up.
13 Gachechiladze M. 2010. Strategic Environmental Assessment Follow-up: from promise to practice. Case studies from the UK and Canada.
14 Hanusch M et al. 2008. Much ado about SEA/SA monitoring: The performance of English Regional Spatial Strategies, and some German comparisons.
15 Sadler B, Verheem R. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment-status, challenges and future derection. Hague; Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the environment.